The Leader In Sports Handicapping
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UTAH VALLEY ST Wolverines20-13 |
|
|
Last 20 Games for the 2011-2012 Season |
Last 20 Games |
All Games YTD
|
March 2012 |
3-13-12 |
at WEBER ST |
+11 |
146 |
69-72 |
L |
W |
Un |
48.1% |
40.0% |
84.6% |
33 |
48.3% |
39.1% |
83.3% |
26 |
3-9-12 |
vs NEW JERSEY TECH |
NL |
NL |
78-88 |
L |
- |
- |
34.3% |
26.7% |
75.9% |
42 |
51.8% |
52.4% |
76.0% |
39 |
3-3-12 |
at N DAKOTA |
NL |
NL |
56-57 |
L |
- |
- |
35.6% |
8.3% |
81.3% |
41 |
38.3% |
23.5% |
70.0% |
37 |
February 2012 |
2-25-12 |
vs TX-PAN AM |
NL |
NL |
74-64 |
W |
- |
- |
43.6% |
38.5% |
65.6% |
46 |
45.3% |
33.3% |
64.3% |
21 |
2-23-12 |
vs HOUSTN BAPTIST |
NL |
NL |
75-56 |
W |
- |
- |
45.8% |
44.4% |
81.0% |
47 |
32.1% |
25.0% |
64.3% |
32 |
2-13-12 |
vs MONTANA TECH |
NL |
NL |
70-60 |
W |
- |
- |
43.1% |
30.4% |
81.3% |
30 |
42.4% |
30.0% |
66.7% |
37 |
2-11-12 |
at CHICAGO ST |
NL |
NL |
66-61 |
W |
- |
- |
38.9% |
31.8% |
81.0% |
37 |
45.8% |
23.5% |
42.9% |
33 |
2-9-12 |
at NEW JERSEY TECH |
NL |
NL |
99-97 |
W |
- |
- |
54.3% |
40.9% |
63.6% |
40 |
50.0% |
34.5% |
73.9% |
32 |
2-4-12 |
at HOUSTN BAPTIST |
NL |
NL |
68-66 |
W |
- |
- |
47.4% |
35.7% |
56.3% |
33 |
46.3% |
20.0% |
68.4% |
33 |
2-2-12 |
at TX-PAN AM |
NL |
NL |
77-69 |
W |
- |
- |
45.8% |
35.7% |
82.4% |
38 |
38.1% |
31.6% |
83.3% |
29 |
January 2012 |
1-28-12 |
vs NEW JERSEY TECH |
NL |
NL |
81-58 |
W |
- |
- |
41.4% |
45.8% |
71.0% |
55 |
37.5% |
20.0% |
42.9% |
27 |
1-26-12 |
vs CHICAGO ST |
NL |
NL |
65-56 |
W |
- |
- |
38.1% |
25.0% |
61.9% |
42 |
33.3% |
45.0% |
81.8% |
38 |
1-21-12 |
vs N DAKOTA |
NL |
NL |
72-64 |
W |
- |
- |
43.4% |
62.5% |
75.0% |
38 |
41.4% |
33.3% |
56.3% |
34 |
1-16-12 |
vs ST MARYS-KS |
NL |
NL |
98-72 |
W |
- |
- |
59.3% |
38.1% |
64.5% |
43 |
37.9% |
28.0% |
57.7% |
34 |
1-13-12 |
at SEATTLE |
NL |
NL |
84-74 |
W |
- |
- |
44.1% |
38.9% |
65.4% |
48 |
35.9% |
30.3% |
80.0% |
45 |
1-7-12 |
vs SEATTLE |
NL |
NL |
77-72 |
W |
- |
- |
46.9% |
33.3% |
69.2% |
36 |
42.0% |
33.3% |
77.8% |
41 |
1-3-12 |
vs WYOMING |
NL |
NL |
70-76 |
L |
- |
- |
46.9% |
43.8% |
94.4% |
32 |
50.0% |
45.8% |
85.0% |
21 |
December 2011 |
12-30-11 |
at UT-CHATTANOOGA |
NL |
NL |
59-74 |
L |
- |
- |
31.7% |
26.5% |
66.7% |
34 |
49.1% |
39.1% |
86.7% |
40 |
12-29-11 |
vs HAMPTON |
NL |
NL |
42-40 |
W |
- |
- |
24.6% |
18.2% |
53.3% |
52 |
29.4% |
5.3% |
47.4% |
41 |
12-22-11 |
at MONTANA |
NL |
NL |
52-65 |
L |
- |
- |
41.7% |
33.3% |
53.3% |
27 |
45.3% |
29.2% |
71.4% |
33 |
|
Game Situation Report for the 2011-2012 Season Season |
33 |
20-13 (60.6%) |
1-0-0 (100.0%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
69.8 |
66.4 |
+3.5 |
17 |
15-2 (88.2%) |
0-0-0 ( ) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
72.3 |
59.6 |
+12.7 |
15 |
5-10 (33.3%) |
1-0-0 (100.0%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
66.5 |
72.6 |
-6.1 |
1 |
0-1 (0.0%) |
0-0-0 ( ) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
78.0 |
88.0 |
-10.0 |
2 |
0-2 (0.0%) |
0-0-0 ( ) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
68.5 |
81.0 |
-12.5 |
1 |
0-1 (0.0%) |
1-0-0 (100.0%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
69.0 |
72.0 |
-3.0 |
11 |
9-2 (81.8%) |
0-0-0 ( ) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
73.7 |
66.9 |
+6.8 |
22 |
11-11 (50.0%) |
1-0-0 (100.0%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
67.9 |
66.1 |
+1.8 |
1 |
0-1 (0.0%) |
1-0-0 (100.0%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
69.0 |
72.0 |
-3.0 |
1 |
0-1 (0.0%) |
1-0-0 (100.0%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
69.0 |
72.0 |
-3.0 |
1 |
0-1 (0.0%) |
0-0-0 ( ) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
59.0 |
74.0 |
-15.0 |
9 |
7-2 (77.8%) |
0-0-0 ( ) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
67.6 |
60.3 |
+7.2 |
7 |
3-4 (42.9%) |
0-0-0 ( ) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
68.4 |
68.3 |
+0.1 |
16 |
10-6 (62.5%) |
1-0-0 (100.0%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
72.4 |
68.4 |
+4.0 |
1 |
0-1 (0.0%) |
0-0-0 ( ) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
59.0 |
74.0 |
-15.0 |
20 |
13-7 (65.0%) |
0-0-0 ( ) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
69.8 |
67.1 |
+2.7 |
12 |
6-6 (50.0%) |
1-0-0 (100.0%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
69.2 |
66.3 |
+2.8 |
|
|
|
| |
|