The Leader In Sports Handicapping
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AKRON - |
|
|
Last 20 Games for the 2001-2002 Season |
Last 20 Games |
All Games YTD
|
March 2002 |
3-7-02 |
vs BOWLING GREEN |
+12 |
144 |
58-60 |
L |
W |
Un |
37.8% |
26.7% |
80.0% |
21 |
47.7% |
22.2% |
70.0% |
35 |
3-4-02 |
at W MICHIGAN |
+10 |
NL |
90-83 |
W |
W |
- |
61.9% |
62.5% |
82.5% |
28 |
45.2% |
20.0% |
78.6% |
29 |
3-2-02 |
vs MARSHALL |
-1 |
NL |
87-104 |
L |
L |
- |
62.2% |
57.1% |
69.7% |
20 |
58.0% |
55.2% |
80.0% |
28 |
February 2002 |
2-25-02 |
at KENT ST |
+21 |
NL |
57-67 |
L |
W |
- |
36.5% |
37.5% |
68.4% |
28 |
45.3% |
28.6% |
68.4% |
42 |
2-23-02 |
at BOWLING GREEN |
+15.5 |
NL |
46-76 |
L |
L |
- |
33.3% |
11.1% |
77.3% |
27 |
55.3% |
52.4% |
68.4% |
28 |
2-20-02 |
vs N ILLINOIS |
-3 |
NL |
88-80 |
W |
W |
- |
51.9% |
36.4% |
90.9% |
36 |
44.3% |
52.2% |
82.4% |
26 |
2-16-02 |
at E MICHIGAN |
-3 |
NL |
76-83 |
L |
L |
- |
48.1% |
23.1% |
70.0% |
28 |
60.9% |
46.2% |
75.0% |
28 |
2-13-02 |
at TOLEDO |
+9 |
NL |
72-77 |
L |
W |
- |
43.1% |
26.7% |
81.8% |
27 |
55.1% |
53.3% |
75.0% |
32 |
2-11-02 |
vs W MICHIGAN |
+1 |
NL |
89-94 |
L |
L |
- |
57.1% |
53.3% |
70.8% |
37 |
48.5% |
48.0% |
69.2% |
32 |
2-5-02 |
at MARSHALL |
+9.5 |
NL |
63-78 |
L |
L |
- |
38.1% |
30.0% |
66.7% |
31 |
49.2% |
35.0% |
50.0% |
44 |
2-2-02 |
vs BUFFALO |
-2 |
NL |
89-81 |
W |
W |
- |
52.0% |
50.0% |
82.4% |
24 |
50.0% |
38.9% |
85.7% |
29 |
January 2002 |
1-30-02 |
at OHIO U |
+12 |
NL |
74-73 |
W |
W |
- |
51.0% |
33.3% |
88.9% |
33 |
46.4% |
29.4% |
66.7% |
28 |
1-26-02 |
vs C MICHIGAN |
+3 |
NL |
83-73 |
W |
W |
- |
54.8% |
50.0% |
74.4% |
19 |
50.0% |
18.8% |
55.6% |
35 |
1-23-02 |
vs BOWLING GREEN |
+7.5 |
NL |
87-86 |
W |
W |
- |
46.6% |
52.2% |
77.8% |
32 |
49.3% |
30.8% |
63.2% |
39 |
1-19-02 |
at BALL ST |
+19 |
NL |
66-78 |
L |
W |
- |
48.1% |
33.3% |
76.9% |
29 |
45.3% |
29.2% |
76.7% |
36 |
1-16-02 |
vs KENT ST |
+10 |
NL |
54-78 |
L |
L |
- |
37.7% |
21.4% |
73.3% |
24 |
53.6% |
40.0% |
76.9% |
34 |
1-12-02 |
at MIAMI OHIO |
+13 |
NL |
48-50 |
L |
W |
- |
36.7% |
57.1% |
61.5% |
39 |
31.6% |
28.6% |
66.7% |
36 |
1-7-02 |
vs E MICHIGAN |
-10.5 |
NL |
60-61 |
L |
L |
- |
42.0% |
17.6% |
75.0% |
35 |
36.8% |
36.8% |
60.0% |
33 |
1-5-02 |
vs OHIO U |
+4 |
NL |
57-68 |
L |
L |
- |
30.8% |
29.2% |
85.7% |
32 |
42.4% |
46.7% |
64.7% |
38 |
1-2-02 |
vs NIAGARA |
-2.5 |
NL |
80-79 |
W |
L |
- |
52.4% |
70.0% |
78.4% |
17 |
44.6% |
37.5% |
82.1% |
36 |
|
Game Situation Report for the 2001-2002 Season Season |
30 |
9-21 (30.0%) |
13-14-0 (48.1%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
69.3 |
74.5 |
-5.2 |
14 |
5-9 (35.7%) |
5-7-0 (41.7%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
72.9 |
78.3 |
-5.4 |
13 |
4-9 (30.8%) |
7-5-0 (58.3%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
67.3 |
72.5 |
-5.2 |
3 |
0-3 (0.0%) |
1-2-0 (33.3%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
61.0 |
65.0 |
-4.0 |
4 |
1-3 (25.0%) |
2-2-0 (50.0%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
68.3 |
69.5 |
-1.3 |
30 |
9-21 (30.0%) |
13-14-0 (48.1%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
69.3 |
74.5 |
-5.2 |
7 |
3-4 (42.9%) |
2-5-0 (28.6%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
77.3 |
78.9 |
-1.6 |
20 |
5-15 (25.0%) |
11-9-0 (55.0%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
66.3 |
74.3 |
-8.0 |
5 |
3-2 (60.0%) |
2-3-0 (40.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
80.8 |
81.0 |
-0.2 |
7 |
2-5 (28.6%) |
3-4-0 (42.9%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
70.7 |
78.6 |
-7.9 |
1 |
0-1 (0.0%) |
0-1-0 (0.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
76.0 |
83.0 |
-7.0 |
11 |
3-8 (27.3%) |
7-4-0 (63.6%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
64.5 |
73.1 |
-8.6 |
2 |
1-1 (50.0%) |
0-0-0 ( ) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
74.5 |
61.5 |
+13.0 |
5 |
1-4 (20.0%) |
3-1-0 (75.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
68.2 |
72.4 |
-4.2 |
10 |
2-8 (20.0%) |
4-6-0 (40.0%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
66.6 |
75.4 |
-8.8 |
13 |
5-8 (38.5%) |
6-7-0 (46.2%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
70.9 |
76.5 |
-5.6 |
1 |
1-0 (100.0%) |
0-0-0 ( ) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
90.0 |
56.0 |
+34.0 |
9 |
3-6 (33.3%) |
4-5-0 (44.4%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
66.1 |
71.6 |
-5.4 |
20 |
5-15 (25.0%) |
8-9-0 (47.1%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
70.8 |
76.3 |
-5.5 |
12 |
5-7 (41.7%) |
5-7-0 (41.7%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
71.5 |
77.9 |
-6.4 |
14 |
2-12 (14.3%) |
7-5-0 (58.3%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
66.5 |
73.6 |
-7.1 |
|
|
|
| |
|