The Leader In Sports Handicapping
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ALABAMA - |
|
|
All Games YTD for the 2001-2002 Season |
Last 20 Games |
All Games YTD
|
March 2002 |
3-16-02 |
vs KENT ST |
-2 |
139 |
58-71 |
L |
L |
Un |
38.0% |
23.1% |
77.3% |
38 |
46.0% |
41.7% |
53.3% |
34 |
3-14-02 |
vs FLA ATLANTIC |
-18.5 |
140.5 |
86-78 |
W |
L |
Ov |
50.0% |
35.7% |
90.0% |
38 |
44.1% |
29.4% |
92.9% |
30 |
3-10-02 |
vs MISSISSIPPI ST |
-2.5 |
138 |
58-61 |
L |
L |
Un |
38.5% |
28.6% |
75.0% |
33 |
41.1% |
31.3% |
58.8% |
35 |
3-9-02 |
vs S CAROLINA |
-3 |
132 |
65-57 |
W |
W |
Un |
39.2% |
35.7% |
76.9% |
36 |
43.9% |
36.4% |
37.5% |
32 |
3-8-02 |
vs TENNESSEE |
-5.5 |
138.5 |
91-72 |
W |
W |
Ov |
42.9% |
37.9% |
93.3% |
45 |
45.6% |
28.6% |
55.2% |
33 |
3-3-02 |
at MISSISSIPPI |
+2 |
133.5 |
56-84 |
L |
L |
Ov |
40.9% |
29.4% |
68.2% |
32 |
54.7% |
52.6% |
76.2% |
24 |
February 2002 |
2-27-02 |
vs AUBURN |
-13 |
NL |
73-68 |
W |
L |
- |
39.3% |
19.0% |
84.0% |
34 |
39.3% |
18.8% |
68.0% |
47 |
2-23-02 |
vs FLORIDA |
+1.5 |
152.5 |
65-64 |
W |
W |
Un |
47.2% |
37.5% |
64.3% |
26 |
50.0% |
33.3% |
69.6% |
31 |
2-20-02 |
at ARKANSAS |
PK |
NL |
59-67 |
L |
L |
- |
25.0% |
25.0% |
76.9% |
43 |
38.5% |
40.0% |
63.6% |
39 |
2-16-02 |
vs TENNESSEE |
-10 |
140 |
95-82 |
W |
W |
Ov |
46.3% |
37.5% |
80.0% |
41 |
45.9% |
44.4% |
64.3% |
38 |
2-13-02 |
at S CAROLINA |
+3.5 |
NL |
52-51 |
W |
W |
- |
41.7% |
0.0% |
66.7% |
37 |
31.5% |
20.0% |
87.5% |
33 |
2-9-02 |
at MISSISSIPPI ST |
-1.5 |
NL |
62-76 |
L |
L |
- |
34.8% |
12.5% |
76.5% |
36 |
56.1% |
63.2% |
66.7% |
29 |
2-6-02 |
vs MISSISSIPPI |
-8.5 |
NL |
79-59 |
W |
W |
- |
52.6% |
40.0% |
83.3% |
31 |
41.4% |
28.6% |
63.6% |
34 |
2-2-02 |
at LSU |
-2 |
NL |
57-48 |
W |
W |
- |
36.0% |
11.8% |
82.6% |
47 |
34.0% |
18.8% |
45.0% |
29 |
January 2002 |
1-30-02 |
vs ARKANSAS |
-7 |
NL |
109-94 |
W |
W |
- |
52.2% |
44.8% |
68.4% |
39 |
46.3% |
36.7% |
72.4% |
39 |
1-26-02 |
at KENTUCKY |
+10 |
149 |
64-61 |
W |
W |
Un |
41.7% |
27.3% |
72.4% |
34 |
38.7% |
23.3% |
75.0% |
34 |
1-19-02 |
vs MISSISSIPPI ST |
-9 |
NL |
85-73 |
W |
W |
- |
49.1% |
27.3% |
82.4% |
36 |
44.6% |
29.2% |
88.9% |
29 |
1-16-02 |
at GEORGIA |
-1 |
NL |
77-72 |
W |
W |
- |
46.8% |
34.8% |
57.9% |
48 |
34.9% |
28.6% |
66.7% |
38 |
1-12-02 |
at AUBURN |
-2 |
NL |
56-59 |
L |
L |
- |
30.0% |
22.2% |
80.0% |
38 |
35.0% |
19.0% |
56.5% |
49 |
1-9-02 |
vs VANDERBILT |
-14.5 |
NL |
92-79 |
W |
L |
- |
46.3% |
31.3% |
86.0% |
34 |
52.8% |
42.9% |
84.6% |
23 |
1-5-02 |
vs LSU |
-9 |
NL |
76-74 |
W |
L |
- |
47.2% |
30.0% |
69.0% |
32 |
52.9% |
50.0% |
73.3% |
28 |
1-2-02 |
vs BETHUNE-COOKMAN |
NL |
NL |
93-46 |
W |
- |
- |
48.6% |
28.6% |
76.0% |
45 |
30.8% |
22.2% |
70.6% |
34 |
December 2001 |
12-31-01 |
vs FLORIDA A&M |
NL |
NL |
76-52 |
W |
- |
- |
45.0% |
27.8% |
70.8% |
48 |
31.7% |
21.7% |
53.8% |
34 |
12-27-01 |
vs NOTRE DAME |
-1.5 |
149.5 |
79-76 |
W |
W |
Ov |
50.8% |
40.0% |
76.5% |
38 |
40.3% |
38.1% |
69.2% |
35 |
12-21-01 |
vs ALABAMA A&M |
NL |
NL |
90-54 |
W |
- |
- |
49.2% |
37.0% |
68.8% |
49 |
26.8% |
25.8% |
66.7% |
42 |
12-18-01 |
vs TEMPLE |
PK |
138.5 |
70-67 |
W |
W |
Un |
45.6% |
35.0% |
68.8% |
49 |
35.4% |
32.4% |
50.0% |
32 |
12-14-01 |
vs JACKSONVILLE ST |
NL |
NL |
99-57 |
W |
- |
- |
50.8% |
34.8% |
73.0% |
33 |
37.3% |
18.2% |
94.4% |
38 |
12-8-01 |
at UCLA |
+1 |
151 |
57-79 |
L |
L |
Un |
29.7% |
21.2% |
60.0% |
44 |
45.2% |
40.0% |
85.0% |
38 |
12-3-01 |
vs UT-CHATTANOOGA |
-19.5 |
NL |
74-68 |
W |
L |
- |
32.3% |
37.1% |
90.5% |
40 |
46.6% |
42.1% |
75.0% |
37 |
November 2001 |
11-29-01 |
vs MCNEESE ST |
NL |
NL |
90-61 |
W |
- |
- |
51.5% |
44.0% |
55.0% |
42 |
29.9% |
14.3% |
90.5% |
45 |
11-26-01 |
vs UTAH |
-11 |
141 |
76-61 |
W |
W |
Un |
53.1% |
42.9% |
62.1% |
30 |
38.8% |
28.6% |
77.3% |
34 |
11-21-01 |
vs MEMPHIS |
+2 |
NL |
81-70 |
W |
W |
- |
50.8% |
18.8% |
72.0% |
35 |
40.9% |
0.0% |
64.0% |
42 |
11-20-01 |
vs MISSOURI |
+1 |
NL |
68-75 |
L |
L |
- |
41.3% |
15.8% |
54.2% |
39 |
41.9% |
26.1% |
63.0% |
45 |
11-14-01 |
vs SAMFORD |
-22 |
NL |
83-51 |
W |
W |
- |
51.6% |
33.3% |
75.0% |
40 |
38.6% |
39.1% |
72.7% |
23 |
11-13-01 |
vs MISS VALLEY ST |
NL |
NL |
107-67 |
W |
- |
- |
50.0% |
40.5% |
50.0% |
60 |
39.4% |
30.4% |
36.4% |
33 |
|
Game Situation Report for the 2001-2002 Season Season |
35 |
27-8 (77.1%) |
16-13-0 (55.2%) |
5-8-0 |
38.5% |
61.5% |
75.9 |
66.7 |
+9.3 |
17 |
17-0 (100.0%) |
7-4-0 (63.6%) |
1-2-0 |
33.3% |
66.7% |
86.0 |
65.3 |
+20.7 |
9 |
4-5 (44.4%) |
4-5-0 (44.4%) |
1-2-0 |
33.3% |
66.7% |
60.0 |
66.3 |
-6.3 |
9 |
6-3 (66.7%) |
5-4-0 (55.6%) |
3-4-0 |
42.9% |
57.1% |
72.9 |
69.7 |
+3.2 |
7 |
5-2 (71.4%) |
4-2-0 (66.7%) |
1-2-0 |
33.3% |
66.7% |
79.0 |
64.7 |
+14.3 |
2 |
1-1 (50.0%) |
0-2-0 (0.0%) |
1-1-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
72.0 |
74.5 |
-2.5 |
35 |
27-8 (77.1%) |
16-13-0 (55.2%) |
5-8-0 |
38.5% |
61.5% |
75.9 |
66.7 |
+9.3 |
20 |
16-4 (80.0%) |
11-9-0 (55.0%) |
4-4-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
76.6 |
69.0 |
+7.6 |
7 |
4-3 (57.1%) |
4-3-0 (57.1%) |
1-3-0 |
25.0% |
75.0% |
63.3 |
69.1 |
-5.9 |
10 |
10-0 (100.0%) |
6-4-0 (60.0%) |
1-1-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
84.2 |
70.9 |
+13.3 |
1 |
1-0 (100.0%) |
1-0-0 (100.0%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
65.0 |
64.0 |
+1.0 |
4 |
2-2 (50.0%) |
2-2-0 (50.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
63.0 |
63.8 |
-0.8 |
4 |
2-2 (50.0%) |
2-2-0 (50.0%) |
1-2-0 |
33.3% |
66.7% |
57.3 |
68.8 |
-11.5 |
4 |
3-1 (75.0%) |
3-1-0 (75.0%) |
0-2-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
71.8 |
59.8 |
+12.0 |
2 |
1-1 (50.0%) |
0-1-0 (0.0%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
75.5 |
58.5 |
+17.0 |
9 |
7-2 (77.8%) |
4-3-0 (57.1%) |
1-1-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
75.1 |
65.7 |
+9.4 |
20 |
16-4 (80.0%) |
9-8-0 (52.9%) |
4-4-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
77.2 |
69.4 |
+7.9 |
1 |
1-0 (100.0%) |
1-0-0 (100.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
83.0 |
51.0 |
+32.0 |
27 |
19-8 (70.4%) |
11-12-0 (47.8%) |
3-7-0 |
30.0% |
70.0% |
74.1 |
66.8 |
+7.3 |
7 |
7-0 (100.0%) |
5-1-0 (83.3%) |
2-1-0 |
66.7% |
33.3% |
78.7 |
66.3 |
+12.4 |
16 |
12-4 (75.0%) |
8-5-0 (61.5%) |
1-4-0 |
20.0% |
80.0% |
75.4 |
65.6 |
+9.8 |
12 |
8-4 (66.7%) |
5-6-0 (45.5%) |
3-3-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
72.5 |
69.7 |
+2.8 |
|
|
|
| |
|