The Leader In Sports Handicapping
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARIZONA - |
|
|
All Games YTD for the 2001-2002 Season |
Last 20 Games |
All Games YTD
|
March 2002 |
3-21-02 |
vs OKLAHOMA |
+3.5 |
147.5 |
67-88 |
L |
L |
Ov |
40.4% |
22.7% |
72.7% |
37 |
44.3% |
40.0% |
88.9% |
42 |
3-16-02 |
vs WYOMING |
-8 |
153 |
68-60 |
W |
P |
Un |
40.7% |
30.8% |
71.4% |
38 |
41.3% |
26.7% |
57.1% |
34 |
3-14-02 |
vs UC-SANTA BARBARA |
-12 |
144 |
86-81 |
W |
L |
Ov |
146.7% |
45.5% |
76.2% |
42 |
43.5% |
59.3% |
73.3% |
28 |
3-9-02 |
vs USC |
+3 |
158 |
81-71 |
W |
W |
Un |
46.4% |
45.5% |
86.4% |
37 |
43.3% |
30.4% |
66.7% |
37 |
3-8-02 |
vs CALIFORNIA |
-3 |
146 |
90-78 |
W |
W |
Ov |
56.9% |
41.7% |
70.4% |
27 |
50.8% |
21.1% |
77.8% |
39 |
3-7-02 |
vs ARIZONA ST |
-5.5 |
159.5 |
73-56 |
W |
W |
Un |
47.1% |
28.6% |
67.7% |
47 |
34.8% |
26.1% |
16.7% |
39 |
3-2-02 |
vs CALIFORNIA |
-4 |
151.5 |
99-50 |
W |
W |
Un |
48.5% |
43.8% |
80.8% |
48 |
32.7% |
17.6% |
73.3% |
21 |
February 2002 |
2-28-02 |
vs STANFORD |
-3 |
163.5 |
71-76 |
L |
L |
Un |
37.7% |
38.9% |
72.7% |
34 |
41.4% |
37.5% |
79.2% |
38 |
2-20-02 |
vs ARIZONA ST |
-7 |
162 |
83-75 |
W |
W |
Un |
42.4% |
33.3% |
77.8% |
42 |
43.3% |
42.1% |
48.4% |
37 |
2-16-02 |
at USC |
+6.5 |
157 |
89-94 |
L |
W |
Ov |
51.9% |
55.2% |
81.0% |
33 |
45.2% |
33.3% |
81.8% |
36 |
2-14-02 |
at UCLA |
+3.5 |
159 |
76-77 |
L |
W |
Un |
45.0% |
50.0% |
73.3% |
28 |
45.7% |
34.8% |
62.5% |
45 |
2-9-02 |
vs WASHINGTON ST |
-19 |
NL |
85-68 |
W |
L |
- |
41.4% |
33.3% |
82.6% |
43 |
39.3% |
28.6% |
84.2% |
35 |
2-7-02 |
vs WASHINGTON |
-15 |
NL |
91-82 |
W |
L |
- |
54.1% |
37.5% |
55.9% |
33 |
50.0% |
31.6% |
38.1% |
37 |
2-2-02 |
at STANFORD |
+8.5 |
160 |
88-82 |
W |
W |
Ov |
48.6% |
23.1% |
65.0% |
36 |
42.3% |
29.2% |
78.9% |
47 |
January 2002 |
1-31-02 |
at CALIFORNIA |
+5 |
NL |
68-58 |
W |
W |
- |
54.8% |
37.5% |
51.6% |
37 |
38.6% |
25.0% |
75.0% |
29 |
1-26-02 |
vs CONNECTICUT |
-7 |
154.5 |
98-100 |
L |
L |
Ov |
48.6% |
52.2% |
76.2% |
41 |
51.9% |
58.8% |
80.0% |
36 |
1-23-02 |
at ARIZONA ST |
PK |
NL |
72-88 |
L |
L |
- |
46.2% |
12.5% |
71.0% |
29 |
53.8% |
41.7% |
68.4% |
39 |
1-19-02 |
vs UCLA |
-5 |
164 |
96-86 |
W |
W |
Ov |
48.4% |
40.0% |
78.6% |
35 |
46.2% |
51.5% |
69.2% |
37 |
1-17-02 |
vs USC |
-3 |
154 |
97-80 |
W |
W |
Ov |
54.4% |
40.0% |
71.1% |
44 |
32.9% |
23.3% |
70.8% |
47 |
1-12-02 |
at WASHINGTON |
-5 |
NL |
74-69 |
W |
P |
- |
45.3% |
46.2% |
66.7% |
35 |
43.5% |
27.3% |
64.3% |
37 |
1-10-02 |
at WASHINGTON ST |
-7 |
NL |
92-85 |
W |
P |
- |
55.7% |
31.3% |
86.4% |
31 |
46.0% |
25.0% |
65.7% |
40 |
1-6-02 |
vs OREGON ST |
-13.5 |
NL |
93-87 |
W |
L |
- |
50.8% |
44.4% |
78.1% |
31 |
60.8% |
66.7% |
65.0% |
21 |
1-4-02 |
vs OREGON |
-5.5 |
NL |
80-90 |
L |
L |
- |
42.9% |
31.0% |
64.7% |
34 |
48.5% |
58.8% |
76.2% |
39 |
December 2001 |
12-30-01 |
vs VALPARAISO |
-12 |
NL |
74-70 |
W |
L |
- |
44.6% |
36.4% |
84.2% |
38 |
42.6% |
33.3% |
80.0% |
30 |
12-28-01 |
vs PEPPERDINE |
-14 |
NL |
94-71 |
W |
W |
- |
54.0% |
47.4% |
73.9% |
44 |
35.6% |
15.4% |
71.4% |
39 |
12-22-01 |
at OREGON |
+3 |
NL |
75-105 |
L |
L |
- |
40.6% |
23.5% |
75.0% |
33 |
54.0% |
59.1% |
88.9% |
38 |
12-20-01 |
at OREGON ST |
-7 |
NL |
76-73 |
W |
L |
- |
42.0% |
26.3% |
85.3% |
29 |
46.4% |
31.6% |
78.9% |
34 |
12-15-01 |
at MICHIGAN ST |
+2 |
147 |
60-74 |
L |
L |
Un |
30.2% |
25.0% |
75.9% |
36 |
37.9% |
33.3% |
79.4% |
46 |
12-8-01 |
vs PURDUE |
-6.5 |
157 |
79-66 |
W |
W |
Un |
53.8% |
21.4% |
40.0% |
49 |
36.5% |
25.0% |
66.7% |
28 |
12-4-01 |
vs ILLINOIS |
+2.5 |
149 |
87-82 |
W |
W |
Ov |
37.3% |
36.4% |
76.3% |
47 |
41.7% |
20.0% |
84.8% |
44 |
12-1-01 |
vs KANSAS |
-2.5 |
157 |
97-105 |
L |
L |
Ov |
35.3% |
36.8% |
71.9% |
44 |
55.7% |
36.8% |
80.0% |
45 |
November 2001 |
11-17-01 |
at TEXAS |
+2.5 |
NL |
88-74 |
W |
W |
- |
41.5% |
57.1% |
83.9% |
48 |
37.5% |
38.5% |
47.6% |
43 |
11-9-01 |
vs FLORIDA |
+6.5 |
148 |
75-71 |
W |
W |
Un |
48.0% |
47.4% |
62.1% |
37 |
43.9% |
24.0% |
63.6% |
35 |
11-8-01 |
vs MARYLAND |
+11 |
154 |
71-67 |
W |
W |
Un |
43.9% |
33.3% |
70.0% |
46 |
39.4% |
25.9% |
33.3% |
40 |
|
Game Situation Report for the 2001-2002 Season Season |
34 |
24-10 (70.6%) |
17-14-3 (54.8%) |
10-11-0 |
47.6% |
52.4% |
82.1 |
77.6 |
+4.5 |
14 |
10-4 (71.4%) |
6-8-0 (42.9%) |
5-3-0 |
62.5% |
37.5% |
88.9 |
80.1 |
+8.8 |
11 |
6-5 (54.5%) |
5-4-2 (55.6%) |
2-2-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
78.0 |
79.9 |
-1.9 |
9 |
8-1 (88.9%) |
6-2-1 (75.0%) |
3-6-0 |
33.3% |
66.7% |
76.7 |
70.9 |
+5.8 |
7 |
7-0 (100.0%) |
6-1-0 (85.7%) |
1-4-0 |
20.0% |
80.0% |
79.7 |
69.1 |
+10.6 |
3 |
2-1 (66.7%) |
0-2-1 (0.0%) |
2-1-0 |
66.7% |
33.3% |
73.7 |
76.3 |
-2.7 |
34 |
24-10 (70.6%) |
17-14-3 (54.8%) |
10-11-0 |
47.6% |
52.4% |
82.1 |
77.6 |
+4.5 |
21 |
17-4 (81.0%) |
8-10-3 (44.4%) |
6-6-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
85.5 |
76.6 |
+9.0 |
12 |
7-5 (58.3%) |
9-3-0 (75.0%) |
4-5-0 |
44.4% |
55.6% |
77.1 |
78.6 |
-1.5 |
13 |
9-4 (69.2%) |
5-8-0 (38.5%) |
4-3-0 |
57.1% |
42.9% |
89.1 |
80.0 |
+9.1 |
1 |
1-0 (100.0%) |
1-0-0 (100.0%) |
1-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
87.0 |
82.0 |
+5.0 |
3 |
3-0 (100.0%) |
0-1-2 (0.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
80.7 |
75.7 |
+5.0 |
7 |
3-4 (42.9%) |
5-2-0 (71.4%) |
2-2-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
77.7 |
80.6 |
-2.9 |
3 |
3-0 (100.0%) |
3-0-0 (100.0%) |
1-2-0 |
33.3% |
66.7% |
82.0 |
73.3 |
+8.7 |
10 |
8-2 (80.0%) |
4-4-2 (50.0%) |
3-2-0 |
60.0% |
40.0% |
84.1 |
77.1 |
+7.0 |
2 |
1-1 (50.0%) |
1-1-0 (50.0%) |
2-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
92.5 |
91.0 |
+1.5 |
19 |
12-7 (63.2%) |
9-9-1 (50.0%) |
4-7-0 |
36.4% |
63.6% |
80.1 |
77.2 |
+2.9 |
24 |
16-8 (66.7%) |
10-11-3 (47.6%) |
7-8-0 |
46.7% |
53.3% |
80.6 |
78.4 |
+2.2 |
9 |
7-2 (77.8%) |
6-3-0 (66.7%) |
3-2-0 |
60.0% |
40.0% |
87.4 |
76.7 |
+10.8 |
17 |
12-5 (70.6%) |
10-7-0 (58.8%) |
6-7-0 |
46.2% |
53.8% |
81.9 |
78.2 |
+3.8 |
13 |
9-4 (69.2%) |
5-6-2 (45.5%) |
2-3-0 |
40.0% |
60.0% |
83.9 |
77.4 |
+6.5 |
|
|
|
| |
|