The Leader In Sports Handicapping
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AUSTIN PEAY - |
|
|
All Games YTD for the 2000-2001 Season |
Last 20 Games |
All Games YTD
|
March 2001 |
3-3-01 |
at E ILLINOIS |
NL |
NL |
83-84 |
L |
- |
- |
52.5% |
50.0% |
77.3% |
38 |
50.8% |
37.5% |
82.4% |
26 |
3-2-01 |
at TENNESSEE TECH |
NL |
NL |
83-63 |
W |
- |
- |
57.1% |
47.1% |
78.6% |
38 |
38.6% |
31.3% |
66.7% |
27 |
February 2001 |
2-27-01 |
vs SE MISSOURI ST |
NL |
NL |
72-70 |
W |
- |
- |
38.5% |
27.3% |
70.4% |
38 |
55.8% |
66.7% |
80.0% |
29 |
2-24-01 |
at TENNESSEE ST |
NL |
NL |
60-83 |
L |
- |
- |
41.4% |
5.6% |
64.7% |
29 |
60.0% |
35.7% |
75.0% |
32 |
2-22-01 |
vs TENN-MARTIN |
NL |
NL |
90-74 |
W |
- |
- |
57.6% |
47.1% |
93.3% |
34 |
51.6% |
18.2% |
72.7% |
22 |
2-17-01 |
at BELMONT |
NL |
NL |
78-74 |
W |
- |
- |
46.2% |
31.3% |
65.8% |
43 |
38.5% |
36.1% |
68.8% |
36 |
2-15-01 |
at TENNESSEE TECH |
NL |
NL |
62-64 |
L |
- |
- |
50.9% |
27.3% |
33.3% |
30 |
38.7% |
36.8% |
75.0% |
41 |
2-10-01 |
vs E KENTUCKY |
NL |
NL |
87-62 |
W |
- |
- |
55.6% |
58.8% |
50.0% |
44 |
41.3% |
33.3% |
57.1% |
28 |
2-8-01 |
vs MOREHEAD ST |
NL |
NL |
80-66 |
W |
- |
- |
55.6% |
33.3% |
82.4% |
32 |
44.2% |
50.0% |
68.4% |
26 |
2-6-01 |
vs MURRAY ST |
NL |
NL |
84-79 |
W |
- |
- |
55.1% |
60.0% |
64.9% |
34 |
51.5% |
44.4% |
30.0% |
34 |
2-3-01 |
at E ILLINOIS |
NL |
NL |
78-80 |
L |
- |
- |
55.2% |
29.4% |
50.0% |
36 |
50.0% |
41.7% |
80.0% |
28 |
2-1-01 |
at SE MISSOURI ST |
NL |
NL |
77-72 |
W |
- |
- |
58.0% |
14.3% |
72.0% |
30 |
42.1% |
26.3% |
95.0% |
26 |
January 2001 |
1-27-01 |
vs TENNESSEE ST |
NL |
NL |
77-73 |
W |
- |
- |
59.1% |
22.2% |
82.1% |
34 |
46.7% |
32.0% |
75.0% |
20 |
1-23-01 |
at MURRAY ST |
NL |
NL |
74-76 |
L |
- |
- |
47.3% |
38.5% |
85.0% |
39 |
45.3% |
43.5% |
57.1% |
30 |
1-18-01 |
vs TENNESSEE TECH |
NL |
NL |
74-86 |
L |
- |
- |
43.8% |
30.8% |
58.8% |
37 |
46.7% |
37.9% |
90.5% |
38 |
1-15-01 |
at TENN-MARTIN |
NL |
NL |
74-76 |
L |
- |
- |
55.6% |
41.2% |
77.8% |
26 |
51.6% |
28.6% |
66.7% |
32 |
1-13-01 |
at E KENTUCKY |
NL |
NL |
81-73 |
W |
- |
- |
46.5% |
33.3% |
53.3% |
37 |
43.3% |
23.1% |
60.0% |
49 |
1-11-01 |
at MOREHEAD ST |
NL |
NL |
90-75 |
W |
- |
- |
66.7% |
43.8% |
84.6% |
30 |
50.8% |
35.0% |
100.0% |
18 |
1-6-01 |
vs SE MISSOURI ST |
NL |
NL |
88-60 |
W |
- |
- |
52.2% |
31.6% |
80.0% |
38 |
43.9% |
28.6% |
60.0% |
30 |
1-4-01 |
vs E ILLINOIS |
NL |
NL |
90-89 |
W |
- |
- |
49.2% |
46.7% |
73.1% |
37 |
46.8% |
45.5% |
71.4% |
44 |
December 2000 |
12-30-00 |
at UT-CHATTANOOGA |
NL |
NL |
62-77 |
L |
- |
- |
50.0% |
25.0% |
43.8% |
27 |
58.3% |
53.8% |
66.7% |
29 |
12-29-00 |
at JACKSONVILLE ST |
NL |
NL |
78-73 |
W |
- |
- |
44.4% |
28.6% |
60.0% |
36 |
50.8% |
31.3% |
72.7% |
36 |
12-20-00 |
at COLORADO ST |
NL |
NL |
74-72 |
W |
- |
- |
49.2% |
31.3% |
57.9% |
31 |
46.3% |
36.4% |
70.0% |
38 |
12-16-00 |
at IUPUI |
NL |
NL |
77-74 |
W |
- |
- |
47.5% |
36.8% |
70.0% |
31 |
52.4% |
50.0% |
74.3% |
27 |
12-9-00 |
vs LEE COLLEGE |
NL |
NL |
85-83 |
W |
- |
- |
50.8% |
26.7% |
73.9% |
36 |
50.7% |
31.3% |
71.4% |
34 |
12-4-00 |
vs OAKLAND CITY |
NL |
NL |
82-64 |
W |
- |
- |
59.3% |
54.2% |
62.5% |
32 |
49.0% |
46.2% |
33.3% |
21 |
12-2-00 |
at INDIANA ST |
NL |
NL |
70-76 |
L |
- |
- |
45.8% |
50.0% |
76.9% |
30 |
53.7% |
38.5% |
72.2% |
31 |
November 2000 |
11-27-00 |
at TENNESSEE |
NL |
NL |
65-98 |
L |
- |
- |
44.1% |
31.6% |
70.0% |
31 |
58.8% |
55.6% |
53.3% |
34 |
11-25-00 |
vs IUPUI |
NL |
NL |
79-76 |
W |
- |
- |
43.6% |
30.0% |
83.3% |
41 |
47.1% |
40.0% |
54.5% |
33 |
11-19-00 |
vs UTAH ST |
+3 |
NL |
80-76 |
W |
W |
- |
50.9% |
45.0% |
68.0% |
29 |
55.3% |
58.3% |
68.0% |
27 |
11-18-00 |
vs COLORADO |
+3 |
NL |
91-86 |
W |
W |
- |
52.6% |
47.6% |
87.5% |
32 |
51.7% |
41.2% |
73.9% |
31 |
11-16-00 |
vs JACKSON ST |
NL |
NL |
85-63 |
W |
- |
- |
47.5% |
41.2% |
74.1% |
45 |
43.1% |
37.5% |
53.8% |
26 |
|
Game Situation Report for the 2000-2001 Season Season |
32 |
22-10 (68.8%) |
2-0-0 (100.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
78.4 |
74.9 |
+3.5 |
12 |
11-1 (91.7%) |
0-0-0 ( ) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
82.3 |
73.5 |
+8.8 |
17 |
8-9 (47.1%) |
0-0-0 ( ) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
74.5 |
75.9 |
-1.4 |
3 |
3-0 (100.0%) |
2-0-0 (100.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
85.3 |
75.0 |
+10.3 |
32 |
22-10 (68.8%) |
2-0-0 (100.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
78.4 |
74.9 |
+3.5 |
2 |
2-0 (100.0%) |
2-0-0 (100.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
85.5 |
81.0 |
+4.5 |
3 |
1-2 (33.3%) |
1-0-0 (100.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
75.0 |
79.0 |
-4.0 |
11 |
7-4 (63.6%) |
1-0-0 (100.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
78.5 |
74.7 |
+3.8 |
4 |
3-1 (75.0%) |
0-0-0 ( ) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
78.3 |
74.5 |
+3.8 |
14 |
11-3 (78.6%) |
0-0-0 ( ) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
79.1 |
74.3 |
+4.9 |
2 |
0-2 (0.0%) |
0-0-0 ( ) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
72.5 |
80.5 |
-8.0 |
22 |
15-7 (68.2%) |
2-0-0 (100.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
78.4 |
74.9 |
+3.5 |
9 |
6-3 (66.7%) |
0-0-0 ( ) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
77.9 |
76.3 |
+1.6 |
2 |
2-0 (100.0%) |
1-0-0 (100.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
79.5 |
76.0 |
+3.5 |
|
|
|
| |
|