The Leader In Sports Handicapping
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALL ST - |
|
|
All Games YTD for the 2001-2002 Season |
Last 20 Games |
All Games YTD
|
March 2002 |
3-21-02 |
at S CAROLINA |
+7 |
135 |
47-82 |
L |
L |
Un |
29.6% |
15.0% |
85.7% |
25 |
50.0% |
29.4% |
94.4% |
41 |
3-19-02 |
at LSU |
+3.5 |
135 |
75-65 |
W |
W |
Ov |
43.9% |
53.8% |
78.6% |
30 |
41.1% |
23.5% |
65.2% |
42 |
3-15-02 |
at ST JOSEPHS |
+5.5 |
154 |
76-54 |
W |
W |
Un |
45.6% |
47.8% |
72.2% |
39 |
31.3% |
33.3% |
69.2% |
39 |
3-12-02 |
vs S FLORIDA |
-5 |
152.5 |
98-92 |
W |
W |
Ov |
47.2% |
46.4% |
83.3% |
36 |
55.9% |
45.8% |
38.5% |
32 |
3-8-02 |
vs BOWLING GREEN |
-1 |
141 |
57-69 |
L |
L |
Un |
36.2% |
12.5% |
75.0% |
33 |
52.3% |
45.5% |
75.0% |
28 |
3-7-02 |
vs MIAMI OHIO |
-5 |
134 |
62-50 |
W |
W |
Un |
43.4% |
17.6% |
72.2% |
30 |
38.8% |
16.7% |
83.3% |
34 |
3-2-02 |
at C MICHIGAN |
-4.5 |
NL |
81-77 |
W |
L |
- |
39.7% |
25.9% |
77.4% |
41 |
50.0% |
35.7% |
69.6% |
34 |
February 2002 |
2-27-02 |
vs N ILLINOIS |
-15.5 |
NL |
68-69 |
L |
L |
- |
35.1% |
28.0% |
65.6% |
40 |
40.6% |
35.3% |
68.8% |
46 |
2-23-02 |
vs MIAMI OHIO |
-8.5 |
NL |
74-58 |
W |
W |
- |
47.2% |
45.8% |
86.7% |
31 |
50.0% |
33.3% |
66.7% |
25 |
2-20-02 |
at W MICHIGAN |
-3.5 |
NL |
65-80 |
L |
L |
- |
43.9% |
22.7% |
55.6% |
32 |
52.7% |
55.6% |
60.0% |
35 |
2-16-02 |
vs TOLEDO |
-12 |
NL |
81-63 |
W |
W |
- |
47.1% |
45.5% |
88.5% |
27 |
46.9% |
50.0% |
50.0% |
31 |
2-13-02 |
vs BUFFALO |
-14 |
NL |
87-63 |
W |
W |
- |
52.5% |
52.6% |
61.9% |
35 |
37.9% |
44.4% |
53.6% |
42 |
2-9-02 |
at OHIO U |
PK |
NL |
71-85 |
L |
L |
- |
35.5% |
23.3% |
95.2% |
33 |
49.1% |
33.3% |
82.8% |
38 |
2-5-02 |
at N ILLINOIS |
-6 |
NL |
86-81 |
W |
L |
- |
43.3% |
31.6% |
93.3% |
33 |
48.4% |
23.5% |
70.8% |
37 |
2-2-02 |
vs E MICHIGAN |
-23 |
NL |
90-56 |
W |
W |
- |
54.8% |
55.6% |
70.0% |
38 |
34.6% |
25.0% |
75.0% |
29 |
January 2002 |
1-29-02 |
at MARSHALL |
-1 |
NL |
95-98 |
L |
L |
- |
39.2% |
42.9% |
75.0% |
52 |
42.1% |
37.0% |
82.8% |
46 |
1-26-02 |
at MIAMI OHIO |
-2.5 |
NL |
77-80 |
L |
L |
- |
54.4% |
45.8% |
44.4% |
27 |
52.8% |
55.6% |
79.2% |
31 |
1-23-02 |
vs W MICHIGAN |
-12.5 |
NL |
74-61 |
W |
W |
- |
51.9% |
30.4% |
68.4% |
39 |
37.9% |
27.8% |
60.0% |
35 |
1-19-02 |
vs AKRON |
-19 |
NL |
78-66 |
W |
L |
- |
45.3% |
29.2% |
76.7% |
36 |
48.1% |
33.3% |
76.9% |
29 |
1-16-02 |
vs BOWLING GREEN |
-7.5 |
NL |
92-79 |
W |
W |
- |
52.4% |
40.0% |
84.4% |
37 |
38.0% |
24.0% |
70.4% |
38 |
1-12-02 |
at TOLEDO |
-3 |
NL |
68-59 |
W |
W |
- |
41.7% |
39.1% |
73.1% |
31 |
40.4% |
21.4% |
75.0% |
31 |
1-9-02 |
vs C MICHIGAN |
-12 |
NL |
89-77 |
W |
P |
- |
48.3% |
37.5% |
84.6% |
39 |
40.0% |
21.1% |
80.8% |
36 |
1-5-02 |
at E MICHIGAN |
-16 |
NL |
63-45 |
W |
W |
- |
38.3% |
29.6% |
75.0% |
44 |
30.2% |
8.3% |
75.0% |
35 |
1-2-02 |
at KENT ST |
+2 |
NL |
54-81 |
L |
L |
- |
37.5% |
13.0% |
75.0% |
29 |
46.3% |
45.5% |
86.7% |
38 |
December 2001 |
12-29-01 |
at OKLAHOMA ST |
+8 |
NL |
70-82 |
L |
L |
- |
42.9% |
33.3% |
56.3% |
35 |
50.0% |
42.9% |
59.3% |
42 |
12-22-01 |
at INDIANA ST |
-7.5 |
NL |
68-54 |
W |
W |
- |
47.9% |
40.0% |
76.2% |
35 |
38.0% |
26.3% |
57.9% |
30 |
12-19-01 |
vs BUTLER |
-1.5 |
NL |
66-75 |
L |
L |
- |
44.6% |
38.5% |
64.7% |
35 |
46.6% |
46.2% |
81.8% |
32 |
12-15-01 |
at IUPUI |
NL |
NL |
103-81 |
W |
- |
- |
55.7% |
61.5% |
82.6% |
37 |
43.2% |
36.8% |
50.0% |
37 |
12-8-01 |
at INDIANA |
+7 |
NL |
61-74 |
L |
L |
- |
41.4% |
47.6% |
30.0% |
34 |
45.2% |
30.0% |
63.2% |
43 |
12-1-01 |
vs AUSTIN PEAY |
NL |
NL |
81-60 |
W |
- |
- |
49.2% |
40.0% |
78.6% |
39 |
45.8% |
26.3% |
14.3% |
30 |
November 2001 |
11-30-01 |
vs ELON |
NL |
NL |
106-65 |
W |
- |
- |
53.1% |
56.0% |
80.0% |
39 |
40.6% |
30.8% |
69.2% |
35 |
11-21-01 |
vs DUKE |
+16 |
162 |
71-83 |
L |
W |
Un |
43.1% |
45.0% |
54.5% |
41 |
43.3% |
28.6% |
79.2% |
40 |
11-20-01 |
vs UCLA |
+9 |
NL |
91-73 |
W |
W |
- |
45.7% |
35.3% |
50.0% |
36 |
42.6% |
33.3% |
84.0% |
45 |
11-19-01 |
vs KANSAS |
+15 |
NL |
93-91 |
W |
W |
- |
47.1% |
43.3% |
63.6% |
35 |
52.2% |
33.3% |
66.7% |
43 |
|
Game Situation Report for the 2001-2002 Season Season |
34 |
22-12 (64.7%) |
16-14-1 (53.3%) |
2-5-0 |
28.6% |
71.4% |
77.0 |
71.4 |
+5.6 |
13 |
11-2 (84.6%) |
7-3-1 (70.0%) |
1-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
83.4 |
68.0 |
+15.4 |
16 |
8-8 (50.0%) |
5-10-0 (33.3%) |
1-2-0 |
33.3% |
66.7% |
72.5 |
73.6 |
-1.1 |
5 |
3-2 (60.0%) |
4-1-0 (80.0%) |
0-3-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
74.8 |
73.2 |
+1.6 |
6 |
3-3 (50.0%) |
4-2-0 (66.7%) |
0-4-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
70.2 |
74.7 |
-4.5 |
3 |
3-0 (100.0%) |
3-0-0 (100.0%) |
2-1-0 |
66.7% |
33.3% |
83.0 |
70.3 |
+12.7 |
34 |
22-12 (64.7%) |
16-14-1 (53.3%) |
2-5-0 |
28.6% |
71.4% |
77.0 |
71.4 |
+5.6 |
21 |
15-6 (71.4%) |
11-9-1 (55.0%) |
1-2-0 |
33.3% |
66.7% |
77.1 |
69.1 |
+8.0 |
9 |
4-5 (44.4%) |
5-4-0 (55.6%) |
1-3-0 |
25.0% |
75.0% |
70.9 |
76.1 |
-5.2 |
11 |
9-2 (81.8%) |
7-3-1 (70.0%) |
1-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
81.5 |
69.0 |
+12.5 |
8 |
5-3 (62.5%) |
3-5-0 (37.5%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
75.4 |
71.8 |
+3.6 |
6 |
2-4 (33.3%) |
2-4-0 (33.3%) |
1-2-0 |
33.3% |
66.7% |
63.8 |
73.0 |
-9.2 |
4 |
2-2 (50.0%) |
2-1-0 (66.7%) |
0-2-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
75.0 |
71.3 |
+3.8 |
1 |
0-1 (0.0%) |
0-1-0 (0.0%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
47.0 |
82.0 |
-35.0 |
11 |
9-2 (81.8%) |
6-5-0 (54.5%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
77.0 |
66.8 |
+10.2 |
18 |
11-7 (61.1%) |
8-7-1 (53.3%) |
2-1-0 |
66.7% |
33.3% |
79.1 |
73.7 |
+5.4 |
1 |
1-0 (100.0%) |
0-0-0 ( ) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
81.0 |
60.0 |
+21.0 |
22 |
12-10 (54.5%) |
9-11-1 (45.0%) |
1-5-0 |
16.7% |
83.3% |
73.0 |
71.2 |
+1.8 |
11 |
9-2 (81.8%) |
6-3-0 (66.7%) |
1-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
83.5 |
70.0 |
+13.5 |
16 |
9-7 (56.3%) |
6-8-1 (42.9%) |
1-4-0 |
20.0% |
80.0% |
76.8 |
73.0 |
+3.8 |
13 |
10-3 (76.9%) |
8-4-0 (66.7%) |
1-1-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
78.5 |
69.3 |
+9.2 |
|
|
|
| |
|