The Leader In Sports Handicapping
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BOSTON COLLEGE Eagles22-12 |
|
|
Upcoming Games for the 2008-2009 Season |
|
|
ACC Standings for the 2008-2009 Season |
|
All |
ATS |
Scoring |
Home/Away |
N CAROLINA |
34 |
4 |
0.895 |
18 |
19 |
0 |
48.6% |
89.8 |
72.0 |
14-1 |
20-3 |
DUKE |
30 |
7 |
0.811 |
16 |
18 |
2 |
47.1% |
77.5 |
65.9 |
16-1 |
14-6 |
WAKE FOREST |
24 |
7 |
0.774 |
15 |
12 |
0 |
55.6% |
81.0 |
70.7 |
14-1 |
10-6 |
CLEMSON |
23 |
9 |
0.719 |
12 |
14 |
1 |
46.2% |
78.3 |
68.0 |
13-3 |
10-6 |
FLORIDA ST |
25 |
10 |
0.714 |
18 |
10 |
1 |
64.3% |
68.3 |
64.9 |
13-3 |
12-7 |
BOSTON COLLEGE |
22 |
12 |
0.647 |
15 |
13 |
1 |
53.6% |
74.4 |
70.5 |
15-4 |
7-8 |
MARYLAND |
21 |
14 |
0.600 |
16 |
12 |
1 |
57.1% |
71.8 |
69.1 |
14-4 |
7-10 |
MIAMI |
19 |
13 |
0.594 |
13 |
13 |
1 |
50.0% |
72.7 |
66.3 |
12-4 |
7-9 |
VIRGINIA TECH |
19 |
15 |
0.559 |
13 |
16 |
0 |
44.8% |
72.6 |
70.7 |
10-6 |
9-9 |
NC STATE |
16 |
14 |
0.533 |
15 |
9 |
1 |
62.5% |
73.0 |
69.6 |
14-4 |
2-10 |
GEORGIA TECH |
12 |
19 |
0.387 |
11 |
16 |
0 |
40.7% |
71.2 |
71.5 |
9-8 |
3-11 |
VIRGINIA |
10 |
18 |
0.357 |
10 |
13 |
0 |
43.5% |
70.0 |
72.5 |
9-8 |
1-10 |
|
Current Injuries |
No significant injuries. |
|
|
Last 20 Games for the 2008-2009 Season |
Last 20 Games |
All Games YTD
|
March 2009 |
3-20-09 |
vs USC |
+2 |
138 |
55-72 |
L |
L |
Un |
32.7% |
26.1% |
92.9% |
28 |
52.9% |
44.4% |
73.7% |
33 |
3-13-09 |
vs DUKE |
+11 |
146 |
65-66 |
L |
W |
Un |
38.3% |
35.0% |
75.0% |
35 |
46.8% |
45.0% |
59.1% |
33 |
3-12-09 |
vs VIRGINIA |
-5 |
140.5 |
76-63 |
W |
W |
Un |
42.3% |
12.5% |
86.1% |
36 |
37.5% |
44.4% |
65.0% |
35 |
3-7-09 |
vs GEORGIA TECH |
-8.5 |
147 |
67-66 |
W |
L |
Un |
41.5% |
16.7% |
87.0% |
39 |
39.0% |
23.8% |
65.2% |
29 |
3-4-09 |
at NC STATE |
+2.5 |
146.5 |
69-74 |
L |
L |
Un |
48.1% |
33.3% |
78.6% |
26 |
52.9% |
47.1% |
60.0% |
30 |
February 2009 |
2-24-09 |
vs FLORIDA ST |
-2 |
140 |
72-67 |
W |
W |
Un |
40.0% |
38.1% |
75.0% |
36 |
38.6% |
50.0% |
93.8% |
38 |
2-21-09 |
at MIAMI |
+6.5 |
146 |
58-69 |
L |
L |
Un |
36.2% |
33.3% |
60.0% |
38 |
52.1% |
55.0% |
50.0% |
28 |
2-15-09 |
vs DUKE |
+7.5 |
146 |
80-74 |
W |
W |
Ov |
58.8% |
44.4% |
70.6% |
28 |
42.6% |
18.8% |
81.3% |
32 |
2-10-09 |
vs CLEMSON |
+4 |
148.5 |
77-87 |
L |
L |
Ov |
48.2% |
35.7% |
72.0% |
35 |
44.8% |
44.0% |
69.6% |
38 |
2-8-09 |
at WAKE FOREST |
+11 |
152 |
76-93 |
L |
L |
Ov |
43.6% |
28.6% |
75.9% |
31 |
57.4% |
54.5% |
83.3% |
31 |
2-4-09 |
at VIRGINIA |
-1.5 |
147.5 |
80-70 |
W |
W |
Ov |
51.1% |
35.3% |
83.9% |
41 |
33.3% |
7.1% |
79.3% |
32 |
January 2009 |
1-31-09 |
vs VIRGINIA TECH |
-3 |
143 |
67-66 |
W |
L |
Un |
42.9% |
21.1% |
78.9% |
35 |
40.0% |
31.3% |
70.8% |
32 |
1-27-09 |
at MARYLAND |
+4.5 |
143 |
76-67 |
W |
W |
P |
48.1% |
50.0% |
75.0% |
34 |
40.8% |
17.6% |
60.0% |
37 |
1-24-09 |
vs NC STATE |
-5.5 |
139.5 |
79-68 |
W |
W |
Ov |
43.8% |
36.8% |
84.2% |
46 |
44.6% |
28.6% |
70.0% |
25 |
1-20-09 |
at GEORGIA TECH |
+2.5 |
146 |
80-76 |
W |
W |
Ov |
44.1% |
36.8% |
81.3% |
35 |
43.1% |
25.0% |
73.7% |
41 |
1-17-09 |
at VIRGINIA TECH |
+4 |
139 |
71-79 |
L |
L |
Ov |
40.7% |
29.2% |
88.9% |
29 |
49.1% |
41.2% |
60.6% |
38 |
1-14-09 |
vs WAKE FOREST |
+3 |
155.5 |
63-83 |
L |
L |
Un |
36.7% |
39.1% |
62.5% |
29 |
55.4% |
33.3% |
63.3% |
40 |
1-10-09 |
vs MIAMI |
-2.5 |
146 |
71-77 |
L |
L |
Ov |
36.4% |
33.3% |
81.5% |
35 |
40.7% |
40.0% |
81.8% |
35 |
1-7-09 |
vs HARVARD |
-17 |
143.5 |
70-82 |
L |
L |
Ov |
43.9% |
15.4% |
62.5% |
38 |
50.0% |
28.6% |
87.0% |
28 |
1-4-09 |
at N CAROLINA |
+22.5 |
164.5 |
85-78 |
W |
W |
Un |
45.7% |
37.5% |
75.0% |
38 |
38.4% |
31.8% |
55.6% |
45 |
|
Game Situation Report for the 2008-2009 Season Season |
34 |
22-12 (64.7%) |
15-13-1 (53.6%) |
14-14-1 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
74.4 |
70.5 |
+3.9 |
19 |
15-4 (78.9%) |
7-7-0 (50.0%) |
8-6-0 |
57.1% |
42.9% |
76.6 |
68.8 |
+7.7 |
10 |
5-5 (50.0%) |
4-5-1 (44.4%) |
5-4-1 |
55.6% |
44.4% |
73.0 |
74.0 |
-1.0 |
5 |
2-3 (40.0%) |
4-1-0 (80.0%) |
1-4-0 |
20.0% |
80.0% |
68.6 |
69.8 |
-1.2 |
6 |
4-2 (66.7%) |
6-0-0 (100.0%) |
3-3-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
76.7 |
67.3 |
+9.3 |
1 |
0-1 (0.0%) |
0-1-0 (0.0%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
55.0 |
72.0 |
-17.0 |
18 |
10-8 (55.6%) |
9-9-0 (50.0%) |
8-9-1 |
47.1% |
52.9% |
72.9 |
73.5 |
-0.6 |
16 |
12-4 (75.0%) |
6-4-1 (60.0%) |
6-5-0 |
54.5% |
45.5% |
76.0 |
67.1 |
+8.9 |
15 |
12-3 (80.0%) |
8-6-1 (57.1%) |
8-7-0 |
53.3% |
46.7% |
74.1 |
67.5 |
+6.5 |
14 |
5-9 (35.7%) |
7-7-0 (50.0%) |
6-7-1 |
46.2% |
53.8% |
71.6 |
76.1 |
-4.6 |
11 |
9-2 (81.8%) |
6-5-0 (54.5%) |
6-5-0 |
54.5% |
45.5% |
74.5 |
67.8 |
+6.7 |
3 |
1-2 (33.3%) |
1-2-0 (33.3%) |
2-1-0 |
66.7% |
33.3% |
73.3 |
81.3 |
-8.0 |
3 |
2-1 (66.7%) |
1-1-1 (50.0%) |
2-1-0 |
66.7% |
33.3% |
71.7 |
68.0 |
+3.7 |
7 |
3-4 (42.9%) |
3-4-0 (42.9%) |
3-3-1 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
73.6 |
76.6 |
-3.0 |
2 |
1-1 (50.0%) |
2-0-0 (100.0%) |
1-1-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
73.5 |
68.0 |
+5.5 |
3 |
2-1 (66.7%) |
1-1-0 (50.0%) |
2-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
83.0 |
80.0 |
+3.0 |
9 |
6-3 (66.7%) |
4-4-0 (50.0%) |
5-2-1 |
71.4% |
28.6% |
77.3 |
70.2 |
+7.1 |
20 |
13-7 (65.0%) |
8-8-1 (50.0%) |
6-11-0 |
35.3% |
64.7% |
71.8 |
69.5 |
+2.3 |
1 |
1-0 (100.0%) |
1-0-0 (100.0%) |
1-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
82.0 |
70.0 |
+12.0 |
22 |
16-6 (72.7%) |
10-7-1 (58.8%) |
8-9-1 |
47.1% |
52.9% |
75.7 |
68.3 |
+7.4 |
11 |
5-6 (45.5%) |
5-6-0 (45.5%) |
6-5-0 |
54.5% |
45.5% |
71.2 |
75.4 |
-4.2 |
15 |
8-7 (53.3%) |
5-8-0 (38.5%) |
5-7-1 |
41.7% |
58.3% |
71.7 |
69.9 |
+1.7 |
12 |
7-5 (58.3%) |
6-5-1 (54.5%) |
7-5-0 |
58.3% |
41.7% |
73.8 |
74.5 |
-0.7 |
|
|
|
| |
|