The Leader In Sports Handicapping
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BOWLING GREEN - |
|
|
All Games YTD for the 2001-2002 Season |
Last 20 Games |
All Games YTD
|
March 2002 |
3-14-02 |
at BUTLER |
+8 |
126.5 |
69-81 |
L |
L |
Ov |
55.3% |
41.7% |
66.7% |
29 |
51.9% |
37.5% |
60.0% |
24 |
3-9-02 |
vs KENT ST |
+5.5 |
135 |
59-70 |
L |
L |
Un |
38.8% |
12.5% |
79.2% |
32 |
47.1% |
26.7% |
75.0% |
32 |
3-8-02 |
vs BALL ST |
+1 |
141 |
69-57 |
W |
W |
Un |
52.3% |
45.5% |
75.0% |
28 |
36.2% |
12.5% |
75.0% |
33 |
3-7-02 |
vs AKRON |
-12 |
144 |
60-58 |
W |
L |
Un |
47.7% |
22.2% |
70.0% |
35 |
37.8% |
26.7% |
80.0% |
21 |
3-2-02 |
at OHIO U |
+1.5 |
NL |
78-85 |
L |
L |
- |
47.1% |
36.4% |
78.6% |
28 |
50.0% |
28.6% |
76.1% |
32 |
February 2002 |
2-27-02 |
vs BUFFALO |
-14 |
NL |
73-58 |
W |
W |
- |
52.3% |
26.3% |
71.0% |
32 |
32.1% |
9.1% |
84.0% |
31 |
2-23-02 |
vs AKRON |
-15.5 |
NL |
76-46 |
W |
W |
- |
55.3% |
52.4% |
68.4% |
28 |
33.3% |
11.1% |
77.3% |
27 |
2-20-02 |
at MIAMI OHIO |
+2.5 |
NL |
65-50 |
W |
W |
- |
47.4% |
55.6% |
82.8% |
32 |
35.4% |
50.0% |
75.0% |
22 |
2-18-02 |
at TOLEDO |
-3 |
NL |
62-66 |
L |
L |
- |
41.5% |
25.0% |
72.2% |
28 |
44.7% |
30.0% |
65.6% |
36 |
2-13-02 |
vs E MICHIGAN |
-23 |
NL |
82-61 |
W |
L |
- |
47.6% |
41.7% |
77.3% |
34 |
39.6% |
33.3% |
69.0% |
34 |
2-9-02 |
vs MARSHALL |
-9 |
NL |
83-60 |
W |
W |
- |
61.2% |
38.5% |
90.0% |
36 |
35.6% |
30.0% |
66.7% |
24 |
2-6-02 |
vs OHIO U |
-7 |
NL |
80-64 |
W |
W |
- |
59.6% |
62.5% |
86.4% |
28 |
43.9% |
31.8% |
43.8% |
31 |
2-4-02 |
at KENT ST |
+8 |
NL |
64-76 |
L |
L |
- |
40.7% |
43.8% |
81.3% |
29 |
54.7% |
42.9% |
62.5% |
39 |
2-2-02 |
vs MIAMI OHIO |
-8 |
NL |
64-61 |
W |
L |
- |
46.5% |
35.3% |
72.0% |
26 |
42.1% |
18.2% |
84.6% |
34 |
January 2002 |
1-30-02 |
at W MICHIGAN |
-1 |
NL |
78-66 |
W |
W |
- |
49.1% |
53.3% |
72.0% |
42 |
41.3% |
42.9% |
63.3% |
24 |
1-26-02 |
vs KENT ST |
-1.5 |
NL |
67-70 |
L |
L |
- |
42.4% |
22.2% |
72.2% |
34 |
42.0% |
38.1% |
66.7% |
39 |
1-23-02 |
at AKRON |
-7.5 |
NL |
86-87 |
L |
L |
- |
49.3% |
30.8% |
63.2% |
39 |
46.6% |
52.2% |
77.8% |
32 |
1-19-02 |
vs TOLEDO |
-9 |
NL |
76-57 |
W |
W |
- |
44.8% |
40.0% |
78.3% |
36 |
38.6% |
40.0% |
73.9% |
30 |
1-16-02 |
at BALL ST |
+7.5 |
NL |
79-92 |
L |
L |
- |
38.0% |
24.0% |
70.4% |
38 |
52.4% |
40.0% |
84.4% |
37 |
1-12-02 |
at BUFFALO |
-4 |
NL |
85-73 |
W |
W |
- |
50.0% |
37.5% |
71.4% |
36 |
42.6% |
28.6% |
72.4% |
31 |
1-8-02 |
vs N ILLINOIS |
-13.5 |
NL |
91-61 |
W |
W |
- |
58.3% |
47.4% |
66.7% |
36 |
39.6% |
33.3% |
60.0% |
30 |
1-3-02 |
at C MICHIGAN |
-1 |
NL |
82-81 |
W |
P |
- |
53.7% |
61.1% |
65.0% |
33 |
47.0% |
27.3% |
68.4% |
35 |
December 2001 |
12-29-01 |
at INDIANA ST |
-2.5 |
NL |
65-55 |
W |
W |
- |
47.1% |
38.9% |
62.5% |
32 |
37.0% |
23.5% |
47.2% |
38 |
12-22-01 |
vs DETROIT |
-2.5 |
NL |
77-60 |
W |
W |
- |
47.1% |
42.9% |
74.3% |
35 |
40.0% |
26.7% |
59.3% |
31 |
12-15-01 |
at EVANSVILLE |
-2.5 |
NL |
84-72 |
W |
W |
- |
49.0% |
45.5% |
91.2% |
30 |
46.2% |
33.3% |
74.4% |
24 |
12-10-01 |
vs UNC-WILMINGTON |
-5 |
NL |
84-83 |
W |
L |
- |
44.6% |
34.8% |
83.9% |
37 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
80.0% |
30 |
12-5-01 |
at DUQUESNE |
-4.5 |
NL |
64-62 |
W |
L |
- |
43.8% |
36.8% |
88.2% |
30 |
37.3% |
28.6% |
78.6% |
31 |
12-1-01 |
vs MARIST |
-9.5 |
NL |
61-58 |
W |
L |
- |
37.7% |
38.5% |
76.2% |
42 |
35.0% |
28.6% |
92.3% |
36 |
November 2001 |
11-28-01 |
vs MICHIGAN |
-3 |
NL |
65-59 |
W |
W |
- |
51.1% |
27.3% |
70.0% |
28 |
46.5% |
33.3% |
69.6% |
27 |
11-18-01 |
vs DELAWARE |
-3.5 |
NL |
73-70 |
W |
L |
- |
52.1% |
28.6% |
77.8% |
23 |
44.2% |
47.4% |
76.7% |
31 |
11-17-01 |
vs WASHINGTON |
-5.5 |
NL |
74-81 |
L |
L |
- |
44.6% |
46.7% |
85.0% |
29 |
46.6% |
43.8% |
71.4% |
36 |
11-15-01 |
vs MISSISSIPPI |
+6 |
NL |
82-78 |
W |
W |
- |
61.0% |
57.1% |
66.7% |
24 |
50.0% |
40.0% |
82.8% |
23 |
|
Game Situation Report for the 2001-2002 Season Season |
32 |
23-9 (71.9%) |
15-16-1 (48.4%) |
1-3-0 |
25.0% |
75.0% |
73.7 |
67.4 |
+6.2 |
13 |
12-1 (92.3%) |
8-5-0 (61.5%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
75.3 |
61.4 |
+13.9 |
13 |
7-6 (53.8%) |
5-7-1 (41.7%) |
1-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
73.9 |
72.8 |
+1.2 |
6 |
4-2 (66.7%) |
2-4-0 (33.3%) |
0-3-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
69.5 |
69.0 |
+0.5 |
6 |
4-2 (66.7%) |
2-4-0 (33.3%) |
0-3-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
69.5 |
69.0 |
+0.5 |
1 |
0-1 (0.0%) |
0-1-0 (0.0%) |
1-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
69.0 |
81.0 |
-12.0 |
32 |
23-9 (71.9%) |
15-16-1 (48.4%) |
1-3-0 |
25.0% |
75.0% |
73.7 |
67.4 |
+6.2 |
24 |
20-4 (83.3%) |
12-11-1 (52.2%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
74.7 |
65.4 |
+9.3 |
8 |
3-5 (37.5%) |
3-5-0 (37.5%) |
1-2-0 |
33.3% |
66.7% |
70.6 |
73.6 |
-3.0 |
13 |
12-1 (92.3%) |
8-5-0 (61.5%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
75.3 |
61.4 |
+13.9 |
8 |
6-2 (75.0%) |
4-3-1 (57.1%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
75.8 |
70.3 |
+5.5 |
5 |
1-4 (20.0%) |
1-4-0 (20.0%) |
1-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
71.0 |
76.8 |
-5.8 |
3 |
2-1 (66.7%) |
1-2-0 (33.3%) |
0-2-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
67.0 |
65.7 |
+1.3 |
4 |
2-2 (50.0%) |
2-2-0 (50.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
70.8 |
67.8 |
+3.0 |
7 |
5-2 (71.4%) |
3-4-0 (42.9%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
72.1 |
62.4 |
+9.7 |
18 |
14-4 (77.8%) |
9-8-1 (52.9%) |
1-1-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
76.0 |
69.6 |
+6.4 |
23 |
16-7 (69.6%) |
10-12-1 (45.5%) |
0-2-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
74.2 |
68.0 |
+6.2 |
8 |
6-2 (75.0%) |
4-4-0 (50.0%) |
1-1-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
71.0 |
64.5 |
+6.5 |
15 |
10-5 (66.7%) |
6-8-1 (42.9%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
74.9 |
68.5 |
+6.4 |
15 |
11-4 (73.3%) |
7-8-0 (46.7%) |
1-2-0 |
33.3% |
66.7% |
70.7 |
66.1 |
+4.6 |
|
|
|
| |
|