The Leader In Sports Handicapping
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C CONN ST - |
|
|
All Games YTD for the 2001-2002 Season |
Last 20 Games |
All Games YTD
|
March 2002 |
3-15-02 |
vs PITTSBURGH |
+14.5 |
128 |
54-71 |
L |
L |
Un |
44.2% |
46.2% |
76.9% |
29 |
52.6% |
31.3% |
54.5% |
26 |
3-6-02 |
vs QUINNIPIAC |
NL |
NL |
78-71 |
W |
- |
- |
47.5% |
30.0% |
82.6% |
36 |
56.6% |
36.4% |
41.2% |
28 |
3-2-02 |
vs ST FRANCIS-NY |
NL |
NL |
58-54 |
W |
- |
- |
37.0% |
30.8% |
76.9% |
40 |
36.5% |
36.8% |
60.0% |
35 |
3-1-02 |
vs SACRED HEART |
NL |
NL |
65-54 |
W |
- |
- |
40.4% |
40.0% |
89.5% |
34 |
41.2% |
26.3% |
63.6% |
35 |
February 2002 |
2-24-02 |
vs ROBERT MORRIS |
NL |
NL |
67-63 |
W |
- |
- |
44.2% |
25.0% |
85.0% |
32 |
42.9% |
36.0% |
100.0% |
29 |
2-22-02 |
vs ST FRANCIS-PA |
NL |
NL |
80-59 |
W |
- |
- |
50.0% |
44.4% |
73.7% |
33 |
44.0% |
12.5% |
82.4% |
30 |
2-20-02 |
at FARLEIGH DICKINSON |
NL |
NL |
83-65 |
W |
- |
- |
49.1% |
12.5% |
81.3% |
39 |
46.9% |
47.6% |
52.9% |
22 |
2-17-02 |
vs LIU-BROOKLYN |
NL |
NL |
100-65 |
W |
- |
- |
58.6% |
46.2% |
70.6% |
54 |
34.9% |
28.6% |
71.4% |
24 |
2-15-02 |
at WAGNER |
NL |
NL |
83-69 |
W |
- |
- |
53.4% |
28.6% |
79.2% |
44 |
43.3% |
17.6% |
66.7% |
26 |
2-9-02 |
at MONMOUTH |
NL |
NL |
63-62 |
W |
- |
- |
41.3% |
43.5% |
71.4% |
32 |
44.7% |
44.4% |
80.0% |
27 |
2-7-02 |
vs FAIRLEIGH DICKINSON |
NL |
NL |
90-62 |
W |
- |
- |
57.6% |
50.0% |
85.7% |
36 |
37.5% |
35.3% |
40.0% |
39 |
2-4-02 |
at ROBERT MORRIS |
NL |
NL |
64-55 |
W |
- |
- |
46.7% |
42.9% |
100.0% |
32 |
47.1% |
26.7% |
37.5% |
22 |
2-2-02 |
at ST FRANCIS-PA |
NL |
NL |
66-49 |
W |
- |
- |
48.1% |
55.6% |
81.8% |
40 |
38.8% |
18.8% |
66.7% |
24 |
January 2002 |
1-30-02 |
vs QUINNIPIAC |
NL |
NL |
76-66 |
W |
- |
- |
48.0% |
44.4% |
75.0% |
45 |
39.7% |
18.2% |
57.1% |
30 |
1-26-02 |
at QUINNIPIAC |
NL |
NL |
78-69 |
W |
- |
- |
34.3% |
35.3% |
72.7% |
50 |
42.4% |
37.5% |
61.9% |
39 |
1-23-02 |
vs MONMOUTH |
NL |
NL |
50-42 |
W |
- |
- |
27.9% |
15.0% |
61.9% |
44 |
34.6% |
5.0% |
83.3% |
40 |
1-19-02 |
vs MD-BALT COUNTY |
NL |
NL |
76-58 |
W |
- |
- |
48.4% |
27.3% |
61.1% |
44 |
41.1% |
26.7% |
66.7% |
27 |
1-16-02 |
at QUINNIPIAC |
NL |
NL |
84-74 |
W |
- |
- |
54.2% |
44.4% |
84.2% |
47 |
43.2% |
20.0% |
42.9% |
31 |
1-12-02 |
vs SACRED HEART |
NL |
NL |
76-47 |
W |
- |
- |
47.1% |
11.1% |
55.0% |
44 |
30.6% |
15.4% |
58.3% |
44 |
1-10-02 |
vs WAGNER |
NL |
NL |
77-71 |
W |
- |
- |
43.8% |
31.3% |
61.5% |
37 |
45.6% |
48.1% |
66.7% |
38 |
December 2001 |
12-30-01 |
at PROVIDENCE |
NL |
NL |
63-94 |
L |
- |
- |
40.7% |
21.4% |
60.0% |
34 |
55.0% |
47.4% |
67.9% |
38 |
12-22-01 |
vs LOYOLA-MD |
NL |
NL |
67-50 |
W |
- |
- |
46.4% |
41.7% |
47.6% |
43 |
35.2% |
27.8% |
50.0% |
33 |
12-15-01 |
vs MASSACHUSETTS |
NL |
NL |
49-64 |
L |
- |
- |
33.3% |
22.2% |
56.3% |
26 |
51.9% |
21.4% |
62.5% |
41 |
12-12-01 |
at LIU-BROOKLYN |
NL |
NL |
107-76 |
W |
- |
- |
65.0% |
61.5% |
84.0% |
40 |
39.5% |
23.5% |
88.9% |
30 |
12-8-01 |
at MD-BALT COUNTY |
NL |
NL |
66-62 |
W |
- |
- |
44.6% |
15.4% |
70.0% |
44 |
36.8% |
45.5% |
53.8% |
37 |
12-6-01 |
at MOUNT ST MARYS |
NL |
NL |
80-69 |
W |
- |
- |
56.0% |
30.8% |
74.1% |
31 |
39.3% |
26.1% |
65.2% |
35 |
12-3-01 |
vs ST FRANCIS-NY |
NL |
NL |
69-82 |
L |
- |
- |
46.7% |
44.4% |
81.8% |
36 |
51.7% |
56.0% |
54.5% |
31 |
November 2001 |
11-30-01 |
vs NIAGARA |
NL |
NL |
60-55 |
W |
- |
- |
37.3% |
33.3% |
75.0% |
42 |
31.8% |
23.8% |
80.0% |
38 |
11-29-01 |
vs HARTFORD |
NL |
NL |
73-59 |
W |
- |
- |
53.1% |
47.4% |
57.1% |
41 |
39.3% |
34.8% |
38.9% |
29 |
11-26-01 |
at SACRED HEART |
NL |
NL |
78-69 |
W |
- |
- |
34.3% |
35.3% |
72.7% |
50 |
42.4% |
37.5% |
61.9% |
39 |
11-17-01 |
vs BROWN |
NL |
NL |
66-60 |
W |
- |
- |
35.6% |
33.3% |
76.9% |
48 |
37.9% |
25.0% |
57.9% |
38 |
11-16-01 |
vs BUCKNELL |
NL |
NL |
68-55 |
W |
- |
- |
37.0% |
40.0% |
83.3% |
44 |
28.8% |
22.7% |
71.4% |
31 |
11-12-01 |
at OKLAHOMA |
+20 |
NL |
44-66 |
L |
L |
- |
41.0% |
33.3% |
57.9% |
31 |
38.7% |
40.7% |
100.0% |
33 |
|
Game Situation Report for the 2001-2002 Season Season |
33 |
28-5 (84.8%) |
0-2-0 (0.0%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
71.5 |
63.2 |
+8.2 |
15 |
13-2 (86.7%) |
0-0-0 ( ) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
71.4 |
59.9 |
+11.5 |
13 |
11-2 (84.6%) |
0-1-0 (0.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
73.8 |
67.6 |
+6.2 |
5 |
4-1 (80.0%) |
0-1-0 (0.0%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
65.6 |
61.8 |
+3.8 |
5 |
4-1 (80.0%) |
0-1-0 (0.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
63.6 |
60.8 |
+2.8 |
1 |
0-1 (0.0%) |
0-1-0 (0.0%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
54.0 |
71.0 |
-17.0 |
32 |
27-5 (84.4%) |
0-2-0 (0.0%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
70.9 |
63.3 |
+7.6 |
2 |
0-2 (0.0%) |
0-2-0 (0.0%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
49.0 |
68.5 |
-19.5 |
1 |
0-1 (0.0%) |
0-1-0 (0.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
44.0 |
66.0 |
-22.0 |
3 |
3-0 (100.0%) |
0-0-0 ( ) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
61.3 |
56.3 |
+5.0 |
7 |
7-0 (100.0%) |
0-0-0 ( ) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
73.7 |
59.0 |
+14.7 |
9 |
7-2 (77.8%) |
0-0-0 ( ) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
73.8 |
64.1 |
+9.7 |
14 |
11-3 (78.6%) |
0-2-0 (0.0%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
71.0 |
66.3 |
+4.7 |
1 |
1-0 (100.0%) |
0-0-0 ( ) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
66.0 |
60.0 |
+6.0 |
28 |
24-4 (85.7%) |
0-1-0 (0.0%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
72.2 |
63.4 |
+8.8 |
4 |
4-0 (100.0%) |
0-0-0 ( ) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
73.0 |
61.3 |
+11.8 |
1 |
1-0 (100.0%) |
0-0-0 ( ) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
68.0 |
55.0 |
+13.0 |
|
|
|
| |
|