The Leader In Sports Handicapping
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CHICAGO ST Cougars9-23 |
|
|
Last 20 Games for the 2009-2010 Season |
Last 20 Games |
All Games YTD
|
March 2010 |
3-10-10 |
at HOUSTN BAPTIST |
NL |
NL |
77-80 |
L |
- |
- |
40.5% |
33.3% |
68.4% |
34 |
56.3% |
33.3% |
70.0% |
40 |
3-6-10 |
vs NEW JERSEY TECH |
NL |
NL |
81-75 |
W |
- |
- |
46.3% |
36.8% |
77.4% |
38 |
42.6% |
43.3% |
55.6% |
36 |
3-3-10 |
at NORTHWESTERN |
NL |
NL |
49-72 |
L |
- |
- |
28.3% |
25.0% |
72.7% |
34 |
49.1% |
41.9% |
50.0% |
39 |
February 2010 |
2-27-10 |
vs S DAKOTA |
NL |
NL |
73-77 |
L |
- |
- |
40.9% |
25.0% |
66.7% |
41 |
49.2% |
23.8% |
51.9% |
42 |
2-25-10 |
vs N DAKOTA |
NL |
NL |
71-61 |
W |
- |
- |
39.2% |
25.0% |
84.4% |
40 |
38.8% |
34.6% |
73.7% |
26 |
2-13-10 |
at N DAKOTA |
NL |
NL |
60-74 |
L |
- |
- |
41.2% |
29.6% |
71.4% |
23 |
50.0% |
46.7% |
87.5% |
34 |
2-11-10 |
at S DAKOTA |
NL |
NL |
74-79 |
L |
- |
- |
36.1% |
41.7% |
63.2% |
43 |
51.1% |
36.4% |
74.2% |
32 |
2-8-10 |
at DETROIT |
NL |
NL |
72-92 |
L |
- |
- |
44.3% |
41.2% |
61.1% |
30 |
57.9% |
43.8% |
65.5% |
39 |
2-6-10 |
vs TX-PAN AM |
NL |
NL |
76-69 |
W |
- |
- |
36.5% |
31.6% |
58.5% |
43 |
44.9% |
35.0% |
51.4% |
43 |
2-4-10 |
vs HOUSTN BAPTIST |
NL |
NL |
83-85 |
L |
- |
- |
39.5% |
14.3% |
69.0% |
35 |
44.2% |
33.3% |
69.4% |
47 |
January 2010 |
1-28-10 |
vs UTAH VALLEY ST |
NL |
NL |
43-41 |
W |
- |
- |
28.6% |
5.6% |
66.7% |
37 |
35.1% |
17.6% |
85.7% |
26 |
1-23-10 |
at NEW JERSEY TECH |
NL |
NL |
37-66 |
L |
- |
- |
26.9% |
25.0% |
33.3% |
38 |
40.0% |
37.0% |
75.0% |
38 |
1-19-10 |
at E KENTUCKY |
NL |
NL |
50-74 |
L |
- |
- |
42.9% |
50.0% |
87.5% |
28 |
45.8% |
41.7% |
83.3% |
29 |
1-16-10 |
at TX-PAN AM |
NL |
NL |
42-63 |
L |
- |
- |
27.5% |
6.7% |
56.5% |
39 |
54.1% |
33.3% |
78.3% |
24 |
1-14-10 |
at HOUSTN BAPTIST |
NL |
NL |
56-66 |
L |
- |
- |
40.7% |
33.3% |
28.6% |
31 |
40.7% |
50.0% |
72.7% |
43 |
1-9-10 |
at UTAH VALLEY ST |
NL |
NL |
43-48 |
L |
- |
- |
34.0% |
29.2% |
44.4% |
37 |
32.6% |
11.8% |
59.3% |
33 |
1-6-10 |
vs N ILLINOIS |
NL |
NL |
93-99 |
L |
- |
- |
47.2% |
40.9% |
72.7% |
33 |
57.4% |
57.1% |
67.6% |
43 |
1-3-10 |
at E MICHIGAN |
NL |
NL |
47-59 |
L |
- |
- |
34.7% |
0.0% |
76.5% |
36 |
37.7% |
28.6% |
59.1% |
37 |
December 2009 |
12-30-09 |
at SOUTHERN U |
NL |
NL |
60-67 |
L |
- |
- |
31.7% |
37.5% |
51.9% |
44 |
38.3% |
37.5% |
55.6% |
50 |
12-28-09 |
at SAMFORD |
NL |
NL |
46-63 |
L |
- |
- |
29.6% |
28.6% |
88.9% |
25 |
52.3% |
35.7% |
100.0% |
33 |
|
Game Situation Report for the 2009-2010 Season Season |
32 |
9-23 (28.1%) |
0-0-0 ( ) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
62.8 |
71.5 |
-8.7 |
12 |
7-5 (58.3%) |
0-0-0 ( ) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
76.8 |
72.9 |
+3.8 |
19 |
1-18 (5.3%) |
0-0-0 ( ) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
54.1 |
71.5 |
-17.5 |
1 |
1-0 (100.0%) |
0-0-0 ( ) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
62.0 |
53.0 |
+9.0 |
1 |
1-0 (100.0%) |
0-0-0 ( ) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
62.0 |
53.0 |
+9.0 |
13 |
4-9 (30.8%) |
0-0-0 ( ) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
62.8 |
68.0 |
-5.2 |
19 |
5-14 (26.3%) |
0-0-0 ( ) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
62.8 |
73.8 |
-11.0 |
1 |
1-0 (100.0%) |
0-0-0 ( ) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
78.0 |
63.0 |
+15.0 |
9 |
1-8 (11.1%) |
0-0-0 ( ) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
60.0 |
75.9 |
-15.9 |
9 |
4-5 (44.4%) |
0-0-0 ( ) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
72.8 |
73.3 |
-0.6 |
13 |
3-10 (23.1%) |
0-0-0 ( ) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
56.7 |
67.8 |
-11.1 |
9 |
2-7 (22.2%) |
0-0-0 ( ) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
69.9 |
75.6 |
-5.7 |
22 |
6-16 (27.3%) |
0-0-0 ( ) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
59.1 |
70.3 |
-11.2 |
|
|
|
| |
|