The Leader In Sports Handicapping
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CONNECTICUT Huskies31-5 |
|
|
Upcoming Games for the 2008-2009 Season |
|
|
Big East Standings for the 2008-2009 Season |
|
All |
ATS |
Scoring |
Home/Away |
CONNECTICUT |
31 |
5 |
0.861 |
17 |
15 |
0 |
53.1% |
78.3 |
64.3 |
14-2 |
17-3 |
PITTSBURGH |
31 |
5 |
0.861 |
17 |
13 |
0 |
56.7% |
77.4 |
64.4 |
19-0 |
12-5 |
LOUISVILLE |
31 |
6 |
0.838 |
22 |
15 |
0 |
59.5% |
74.3 |
61.8 |
16-2 |
15-4 |
VILLANOVA |
30 |
8 |
0.789 |
19 |
15 |
0 |
55.9% |
76.8 |
67.4 |
15-2 |
15-6 |
SYRACUSE |
28 |
10 |
0.737 |
19 |
15 |
0 |
55.9% |
80.2 |
71.7 |
17-3 |
11-7 |
MARQUETTE |
25 |
10 |
0.714 |
14 |
15 |
1 |
48.3% |
78.3 |
69.5 |
16-2 |
9-8 |
W VIRGINIA |
23 |
12 |
0.657 |
15 |
17 |
0 |
46.9% |
72.0 |
61.8 |
12-3 |
11-9 |
NOTRE DAME |
21 |
15 |
0.583 |
12 |
19 |
0 |
38.7% |
75.8 |
70.7 |
15-3 |
6-12 |
PROVIDENCE |
19 |
14 |
0.576 |
11 |
18 |
0 |
37.9% |
78.1 |
76.7 |
13-5 |
6-9 |
CINCINNATI |
18 |
14 |
0.563 |
11 |
15 |
0 |
42.3% |
68.3 |
66.3 |
14-5 |
4-9 |
SETON HALL |
17 |
15 |
0.531 |
17 |
10 |
0 |
63.0% |
74.3 |
72.8 |
10-6 |
7-9 |
GEORGETOWN |
16 |
15 |
0.516 |
9 |
17 |
1 |
34.6% |
69.3 |
63.9 |
11-6 |
5-9 |
ST JOHNS |
16 |
18 |
0.471 |
13 |
15 |
1 |
46.4% |
65.9 |
67.6 |
13-7 |
3-11 |
RUTGERS |
11 |
21 |
0.344 |
13 |
13 |
0 |
50.0% |
63.2 |
66.6 |
8-10 |
3-11 |
S FLORIDA |
9 |
22 |
0.290 |
16 |
14 |
0 |
53.3% |
59.0 |
64.6 |
7-7 |
2-15 |
DEPAUL |
9 |
24 |
0.273 |
10 |
18 |
0 |
35.7% |
64.3 |
72.4 |
6-10 |
3-14 |
|
Current Injuries |
No significant injuries. |
|
|
All Games YTD for the 2008-2009 Season |
Last 20 Games |
All Games YTD
|
April 2009 |
4-4-09 |
vs MICHIGAN ST |
-4.5 |
134 |
73-82 |
L |
L |
Ov |
42.4% |
33.3% |
63.6% |
42 |
43.1% |
31.6% |
70.0% |
42 |
March 2009 |
3-28-09 |
vs MISSOURI |
-5.5 |
150.5 |
82-75 |
W |
W |
Ov |
50.9% |
16.7% |
81.3% |
47 |
42.1% |
27.8% |
50.0% |
32 |
3-26-09 |
vs PURDUE |
-6.5 |
132.5 |
72-60 |
W |
W |
Un |
44.6% |
37.5% |
63.3% |
48 |
36.4% |
26.1% |
54.5% |
33 |
3-21-09 |
vs TEXAS A&M |
-10 |
136 |
92-66 |
W |
W |
Ov |
57.9% |
50.0% |
77.8% |
39 |
41.3% |
20.0% |
64.7% |
28 |
3-19-09 |
vs UT-CHATTANOOGA |
-20.5 |
148 |
103-47 |
W |
W |
Ov |
52.1% |
25.0% |
59.0% |
58 |
25.8% |
20.0% |
80.0% |
34 |
3-12-09 |
vs SYRACUSE |
-5.5 |
145 |
117-127 |
L |
L |
Ov |
40.6% |
20.0% |
57.1% |
76 |
37.9% |
39.1% |
78.4% |
67 |
3-7-09 |
at PITTSBURGH |
+4 |
140.5 |
60-70 |
L |
L |
Un |
37.7% |
28.6% |
52.6% |
40 |
44.1% |
20.0% |
66.7% |
41 |
February 2009 |
2-28-09 |
vs NOTRE DAME |
-11.5 |
151 |
72-65 |
W |
L |
Un |
53.7% |
25.0% |
52.2% |
39 |
38.9% |
29.6% |
20.0% |
37 |
2-25-09 |
at MARQUETTE |
+2 |
144.5 |
93-82 |
W |
W |
Ov |
48.5% |
50.0% |
81.8% |
46 |
42.2% |
52.4% |
85.0% |
26 |
2-21-09 |
vs S FLORIDA |
-20 |
126.5 |
64-50 |
W |
L |
Un |
41.3% |
14.3% |
61.1% |
44 |
32.3% |
20.8% |
100.0% |
40 |
2-16-09 |
vs PITTSBURGH |
-2.5 |
135 |
68-76 |
L |
L |
Ov |
43.3% |
29.4% |
64.7% |
31 |
40.0% |
42.1% |
80.0% |
48 |
2-14-09 |
at SETON HALL |
-9.5 |
145 |
62-54 |
W |
L |
Un |
38.6% |
37.5% |
55.6% |
55 |
31.2% |
13.3% |
66.7% |
43 |
2-11-09 |
vs SYRACUSE |
-12 |
150 |
63-49 |
W |
W |
Un |
43.8% |
33.3% |
68.2% |
42 |
31.7% |
27.8% |
50.0% |
34 |
2-7-09 |
vs MICHIGAN |
-16.5 |
137 |
69-61 |
W |
L |
Un |
42.3% |
42.9% |
76.0% |
47 |
38.6% |
31.0% |
66.7% |
24 |
2-2-09 |
at LOUISVILLE |
+2.5 |
138 |
68-51 |
W |
W |
Un |
47.1% |
0.0% |
83.3% |
38 |
34.4% |
29.4% |
100.0% |
34 |
January 2009 |
1-31-09 |
vs PROVIDENCE |
-13 |
153.5 |
94-61 |
W |
W |
Ov |
47.3% |
35.7% |
79.2% |
52 |
33.3% |
26.3% |
35.3% |
46 |
1-28-09 |
at DEPAUL |
-13.5 |
141.5 |
71-49 |
W |
W |
Un |
47.4% |
33.3% |
72.2% |
41 |
38.2% |
13.3% |
55.6% |
29 |
1-24-09 |
at NOTRE DAME |
-2 |
156 |
69-61 |
W |
W |
Un |
40.7% |
33.3% |
50.0% |
54 |
32.9% |
29.6% |
75.0% |
44 |
1-21-09 |
vs VILLANOVA |
-9.5 |
137.5 |
89-83 |
W |
L |
Ov |
47.4% |
33.3% |
79.5% |
37 |
45.3% |
38.9% |
81.8% |
32 |
1-18-09 |
vs SETON HALL |
-18.5 |
151 |
76-61 |
W |
L |
Un |
50.8% |
42.9% |
44.4% |
40 |
40.3% |
29.2% |
50.0% |
33 |
1-15-09 |
at ST JOHNS |
-12.5 |
140 |
67-55 |
W |
L |
Un |
48.1% |
38.5% |
63.2% |
38 |
41.8% |
21.4% |
60.0% |
25 |
1-10-09 |
at CINCINNATI |
-8 |
139.5 |
81-72 |
W |
W |
Ov |
58.0% |
53.3% |
60.0% |
31 |
47.5% |
46.7% |
87.5% |
28 |
1-6-09 |
at W VIRGINIA |
+3.5 |
138 |
61-55 |
W |
W |
Un |
39.6% |
12.5% |
66.7% |
52 |
30.3% |
23.1% |
75.0% |
33 |
1-3-09 |
vs RUTGERS |
-21 |
142 |
80-49 |
W |
W |
Un |
51.9% |
57.1% |
69.0% |
37 |
28.8% |
18.2% |
94.4% |
29 |
December 2008 |
12-29-08 |
vs GEORGETOWN |
-6.5 |
139 |
63-74 |
L |
L |
Un |
44.9% |
30.0% |
72.7% |
31 |
47.2% |
46.2% |
85.7% |
28 |
12-26-08 |
vs FAIRFIELD |
-23 |
141.5 |
75-55 |
W |
L |
Un |
50.0% |
20.0% |
66.7% |
44 |
31.9% |
33.3% |
40.0% |
39 |
12-20-08 |
vs GONZAGA |
+3.5 |
145.5 |
88-83 |
W |
W |
Ov |
42.6% |
50.0% |
76.3% |
41 |
50.0% |
29.4% |
70.0% |
31 |
12-15-08 |
vs STONY BROOK |
NL |
NL |
91-57 |
W |
- |
- |
62.7% |
61.5% |
70.4% |
47 |
32.4% |
31.8% |
66.7% |
24 |
12-4-08 |
at BUFFALO |
-15 |
145.5 |
68-64 |
W |
L |
Un |
46.2% |
40.0% |
61.5% |
37 |
39.4% |
33.3% |
90.0% |
37 |
12-1-08 |
vs DELAWARE ST |
NL |
NL |
79-49 |
W |
- |
- |
49.1% |
42.9% |
84.0% |
40 |
31.3% |
24.1% |
40.0% |
34 |
November 2008 |
11-29-08 |
vs BRYANT |
NL |
NL |
88-58 |
W |
- |
- |
50.0% |
36.4% |
61.5% |
48 |
39.0% |
44.0% |
33.3% |
27 |
11-24-08 |
vs WISCONSIN |
-6 |
133 |
76-57 |
W |
W |
P |
52.1% |
55.6% |
70.0% |
32 |
37.3% |
47.1% |
64.7% |
28 |
11-23-08 |
vs MIAMI |
-4 |
149 |
76-63 |
W |
W |
Un |
47.5% |
30.0% |
68.2% |
42 |
35.3% |
38.9% |
57.1% |
37 |
11-21-08 |
vs LASALLE |
-18 |
147.5 |
89-81 |
W |
L |
Ov |
54.7% |
20.0% |
72.5% |
34 |
50.0% |
30.8% |
90.0% |
29 |
11-17-08 |
vs HARTFORD |
NL |
NL |
99-56 |
W |
- |
- |
48.4% |
30.0% |
71.7% |
47 |
34.5% |
24.0% |
70.6% |
32 |
11-14-08 |
vs W CAROLINA |
-24.5 |
140 |
81-55 |
W |
W |
Un |
50.9% |
30.8% |
70.0% |
42 |
34.4% |
36.4% |
55.6% |
31 |
|
Game Situation Report for the 2008-2009 Season Season |
36 |
31-5 (86.1%) |
17-15-0 (53.1%) |
12-19-1 |
38.7% |
61.3% |
78.3 |
64.3 |
+14.1 |
16 |
14-2 (87.5%) |
4-8-0 (33.3%) |
3-9-0 |
25.0% |
75.0% |
78.2 |
59.9 |
+18.3 |
10 |
9-1 (90.0%) |
6-4-0 (60.0%) |
2-8-0 |
20.0% |
80.0% |
70.0 |
61.3 |
+8.7 |
10 |
8-2 (80.0%) |
7-3-0 (70.0%) |
7-2-1 |
77.8% |
22.2% |
86.8 |
74.1 |
+12.7 |
4 |
3-1 (75.0%) |
2-2-0 (50.0%) |
2-1-1 |
66.7% |
33.3% |
89.5 |
82.0 |
+7.5 |
5 |
4-1 (80.0%) |
4-1-0 (80.0%) |
4-1-0 |
80.0% |
20.0% |
84.4 |
66.0 |
+18.4 |
19 |
15-4 (78.9%) |
9-10-0 (47.4%) |
6-13-0 |
31.6% |
68.4% |
74.6 |
65.5 |
+9.2 |
17 |
16-1 (94.1%) |
8-5-0 (61.5%) |
6-6-1 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
82.4 |
62.9 |
+19.5 |
27 |
23-4 (85.2%) |
13-14-0 (48.1%) |
10-16-1 |
38.5% |
61.5% |
77.5 |
64.9 |
+12.6 |
5 |
4-1 (80.0%) |
4-1-0 (80.0%) |
2-3-0 |
40.0% |
60.0% |
74.0 |
68.2 |
+5.8 |
12 |
10-2 (83.3%) |
4-8-0 (33.3%) |
3-9-0 |
25.0% |
75.0% |
74.5 |
61.6 |
+12.9 |
6 |
6-0 (100.0%) |
3-3-0 (50.0%) |
1-5-0 |
16.7% |
83.3% |
69.7 |
59.2 |
+10.5 |
4 |
3-1 (75.0%) |
3-1-0 (75.0%) |
1-3-0 |
25.0% |
75.0% |
70.5 |
64.5 |
+6.0 |
1 |
1-0 (100.0%) |
1-0-0 (100.0%) |
0-0-1 |
|
|
76.0 |
57.0 |
+19.0 |
6 |
5-1 (83.3%) |
4-1-0 (80.0%) |
3-2-0 |
60.0% |
40.0% |
77.5 |
63.3 |
+14.2 |
10 |
9-1 (90.0%) |
3-6-0 (33.3%) |
2-7-0 |
22.2% |
77.8% |
75.3 |
63.4 |
+11.9 |
19 |
16-3 (84.2%) |
9-8-0 (52.9%) |
7-10-0 |
41.2% |
58.8% |
80.3 |
65.4 |
+14.9 |
31 |
27-4 (87.1%) |
14-13-0 (51.9%) |
10-16-1 |
38.5% |
61.5% |
76.6 |
64.0 |
+12.5 |
4 |
3-1 (75.0%) |
2-2-0 (50.0%) |
2-2-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
91.0 |
68.3 |
+22.8 |
17 |
16-1 (94.1%) |
9-6-0 (60.0%) |
5-9-1 |
35.7% |
64.3% |
76.6 |
60.7 |
+15.9 |
14 |
10-4 (71.4%) |
6-7-0 (46.2%) |
5-8-0 |
38.5% |
61.5% |
79.4 |
67.8 |
+11.6 |
|
|
|
| |
|