The Leader In Sports Handicapping
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ELON - |
|
|
All Games YTD for the 2001-2002 Season |
Last 20 Games |
All Games YTD
|
March 2002 |
3-1-02 |
vs WINTHROP |
NL |
NL |
66-77 |
L |
- |
- |
30.4% |
26.3% |
67.9% |
42 |
42.0% |
23.1% |
80.0% |
44 |
February 2002 |
2-28-02 |
vs CHARLESTON SO |
NL |
NL |
83-64 |
W |
- |
- |
53.3% |
44.4% |
60.0% |
37 |
44.2% |
36.8% |
73.3% |
29 |
2-21-02 |
vs HIGH POINT |
NL |
NL |
74-66 |
W |
- |
- |
46.4% |
35.7% |
54.8% |
35 |
40.0% |
26.3% |
91.3% |
33 |
2-16-02 |
at RADFORD |
NL |
NL |
60-81 |
L |
- |
- |
33.9% |
41.2% |
55.6% |
30 |
46.6% |
12.5% |
69.4% |
50 |
2-11-02 |
vs UNC-ASHEVILLE |
NL |
NL |
58-72 |
L |
- |
- |
35.6% |
18.8% |
76.5% |
37 |
42.9% |
46.2% |
78.3% |
40 |
2-9-02 |
at CHARLESTON SO |
NL |
NL |
52-61 |
L |
- |
- |
29.8% |
0.0% |
75.0% |
31 |
42.9% |
0.0% |
75.8% |
42 |
2-7-02 |
at COASTAL CAROLINA |
NL |
NL |
75-80 |
L |
- |
- |
44.3% |
0.0% |
68.4% |
42 |
44.0% |
41.7% |
83.9% |
31 |
2-4-02 |
vs WINTHROP |
NL |
NL |
71-64 |
W |
- |
- |
50.0% |
57.1% |
75.0% |
25 |
46.5% |
50.0% |
68.2% |
30 |
2-2-02 |
vs BIRMINGHAM SO |
NL |
NL |
67-60 |
W |
- |
- |
52.3% |
60.0% |
60.0% |
38 |
35.1% |
32.0% |
75.0% |
28 |
January 2002 |
1-29-02 |
at LIBERTY |
NL |
NL |
63-56 |
W |
- |
- |
43.1% |
40.0% |
51.7% |
34 |
37.5% |
22.2% |
41.4% |
47 |
1-26-02 |
at HIGH POINT |
NL |
NL |
63-73 |
L |
- |
- |
35.6% |
19.0% |
70.0% |
45 |
40.7% |
33.3% |
73.1% |
41 |
1-21-02 |
vs LIBERTY |
NL |
NL |
75-53 |
W |
- |
- |
45.2% |
20.0% |
69.6% |
35 |
38.0% |
23.1% |
80.0% |
35 |
1-19-02 |
at UNC-ASHEVILLE |
NL |
NL |
64-76 |
L |
- |
- |
38.7% |
33.3% |
58.8% |
35 |
50.0% |
57.1% |
60.0% |
36 |
1-12-02 |
at WINTHROP |
NL |
NL |
64-76 |
L |
- |
- |
36.2% |
22.2% |
72.0% |
32 |
51.0% |
38.1% |
57.1% |
41 |
1-7-02 |
vs COASTAL CAROLINA |
NL |
NL |
91-80 |
W |
- |
- |
50.8% |
25.0% |
78.6% |
38 |
46.4% |
37.5% |
78.6% |
29 |
1-5-02 |
vs CHARLESTON SO |
NL |
NL |
75-69 |
W |
- |
- |
41.2% |
33.3% |
70.7% |
37 |
44.2% |
31.3% |
78.3% |
33 |
1-2-02 |
vs RADFORD |
NL |
NL |
61-58 |
W |
- |
- |
39.7% |
25.0% |
81.8% |
31 |
33.3% |
25.0% |
70.0% |
45 |
December 2001 |
12-29-01 |
at ARKANSAS |
NL |
NL |
52-96 |
L |
- |
- |
27.9% |
26.7% |
62.5% |
51 |
49.3% |
32.0% |
62.5% |
37 |
12-18-01 |
at BIRMINGHAM SO |
NL |
NL |
58-65 |
L |
- |
- |
39.0% |
38.5% |
58.3% |
28 |
46.3% |
31.3% |
71.0% |
36 |
12-15-01 |
at CLEMSON |
NL |
NL |
78-88 |
L |
- |
- |
40.3% |
38.1% |
75.0% |
34 |
52.6% |
43.5% |
69.2% |
44 |
12-6-01 |
vs BLUEFIELD COLL |
NL |
NL |
97-81 |
W |
- |
- |
49.4% |
37.5% |
76.5% |
42 |
46.8% |
40.0% |
68.0% |
37 |
12-4-01 |
at DAVIDSON |
NL |
NL |
59-66 |
L |
- |
- |
42.3% |
46.7% |
66.7% |
32 |
37.3% |
26.1% |
73.3% |
37 |
12-1-01 |
at BINGHAMTON |
NL |
NL |
77-70 |
W |
- |
- |
43.6% |
33.3% |
67.6% |
43 |
37.0% |
33.3% |
76.7% |
31 |
November 2001 |
11-30-01 |
at BALL ST |
NL |
NL |
65-106 |
L |
- |
- |
40.6% |
30.8% |
69.2% |
35 |
53.1% |
56.0% |
80.0% |
39 |
11-27-01 |
vs UNC-GREENSBORO |
NL |
NL |
55-70 |
L |
- |
- |
31.0% |
31.3% |
66.7% |
28 |
57.4% |
50.0% |
62.5% |
48 |
11-23-01 |
at FLORIDA ST |
NL |
NL |
59-89 |
L |
- |
- |
42.6% |
27.3% |
50.0% |
30 |
50.0% |
25.0% |
61.1% |
50 |
11-20-01 |
vs LYNCHBURG |
NL |
NL |
93-51 |
W |
- |
- |
61.5% |
50.0% |
71.4% |
40 |
35.7% |
31.6% |
71.4% |
23 |
11-18-01 |
at WAKE FOREST |
NL |
NL |
67-87 |
L |
- |
- |
36.4% |
23.1% |
72.7% |
35 |
51.5% |
28.6% |
73.3% |
45 |
11-16-01 |
vs N CAROLINA A&T |
NL |
NL |
94-82 |
W |
- |
- |
42.2% |
33.3% |
74.0% |
44 |
45.9% |
18.8% |
62.2% |
40 |
|
Game Situation Report for the 2001-2002 Season Season |
29 |
13-16 (44.8%) |
0-0-0 ( ) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
69.5 |
73.0 |
-3.5 |
12 |
10-2 (83.3%) |
0-0-0 ( ) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
75.9 |
67.2 |
+8.8 |
15 |
2-13 (13.3%) |
0-0-0 ( ) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
63.7 |
78.0 |
-14.3 |
2 |
1-1 (50.0%) |
0-0-0 ( ) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
74.5 |
70.5 |
+4.0 |
2 |
1-1 (50.0%) |
0-0-0 ( ) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
74.5 |
70.5 |
+4.0 |
29 |
13-16 (44.8%) |
0-0-0 ( ) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
69.5 |
73.0 |
-3.5 |
2 |
1-1 (50.0%) |
0-0-0 ( ) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
71.5 |
73.5 |
-2.0 |
8 |
5-3 (62.5%) |
0-0-0 ( ) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
75.5 |
68.6 |
+6.9 |
7 |
2-5 (28.6%) |
0-0-0 ( ) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
64.9 |
75.9 |
-11.0 |
12 |
5-7 (41.7%) |
0-0-0 ( ) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
67.9 |
74.2 |
-6.3 |
1 |
1-0 (100.0%) |
0-0-0 ( ) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
77.0 |
70.0 |
+7.0 |
13 |
5-8 (38.5%) |
0-0-0 ( ) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
70.6 |
74.8 |
-4.2 |
15 |
7-8 (46.7%) |
0-0-0 ( ) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
66.9 |
70.8 |
-3.9 |
|
|
|
| |
|