The Leader In Sports Handicapping
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FLORIDA ST - |
|
|
Last 20 Games for the 2000-2001 Season |
Last 20 Games |
All Games YTD
|
March 2001 |
3-8-01 |
vs CLEMSON |
-1.5 |
144 |
64-66 |
L |
L |
Un |
43.6% |
31.6% |
62.5% |
30 |
42.6% |
35.7% |
75.0% |
41 |
3-3-01 |
at CLEMSON |
+5 |
NL |
75-63 |
W |
W |
- |
48.1% |
36.8% |
84.2% |
36 |
37.5% |
36.0% |
60.0% |
32 |
February 2001 |
2-28-01 |
vs GEORGIA TECH |
+4 |
NL |
69-59 |
W |
W |
- |
51.0% |
36.4% |
59.1% |
45 |
25.4% |
30.0% |
73.7% |
40 |
2-25-01 |
at NC STATE |
+12.5 |
NL |
46-71 |
L |
L |
- |
31.6% |
6.7% |
45.0% |
42 |
47.3% |
45.0% |
76.9% |
34 |
2-22-01 |
at N CAROLINA |
+20.5 |
NL |
67-95 |
L |
L |
- |
38.8% |
64.3% |
42.9% |
32 |
56.9% |
50.0% |
69.7% |
40 |
2-17-01 |
vs VIRGINIA |
+8 |
NL |
66-69 |
L |
W |
- |
45.5% |
60.0% |
83.3% |
25 |
44.6% |
50.0% |
85.7% |
35 |
2-14-01 |
at MARYLAND |
+21.5 |
NL |
74-71 |
W |
W |
- |
45.3% |
25.0% |
65.7% |
38 |
45.8% |
26.7% |
65.0% |
34 |
2-10-01 |
vs WAKE FOREST |
+11.5 |
NL |
65-71 |
L |
W |
- |
43.1% |
27.8% |
66.7% |
29 |
48.1% |
38.5% |
88.9% |
31 |
2-4-01 |
at DUKE |
+31 |
NL |
58-100 |
L |
L |
- |
44.2% |
16.7% |
62.5% |
25 |
46.6% |
38.9% |
78.1% |
46 |
January 2001 |
1-31-01 |
vs CLEMSON |
-3 |
NL |
88-84 |
W |
W |
- |
41.2% |
36.0% |
69.7% |
42 |
44.1% |
36.7% |
72.2% |
43 |
1-27-01 |
at GEORGIA TECH |
+13.5 |
NL |
68-77 |
L |
W |
- |
41.4% |
33.3% |
66.7% |
34 |
48.0% |
21.1% |
69.4% |
35 |
1-25-01 |
vs NC STATE |
+4.5 |
140.5 |
81-84 |
L |
W |
Ov |
41.7% |
50.0% |
54.8% |
41 |
50.0% |
18.2% |
74.3% |
39 |
1-20-01 |
vs N CAROLINA |
+13 |
NL |
70-80 |
L |
W |
- |
43.1% |
33.3% |
90.0% |
35 |
48.2% |
44.4% |
66.7% |
37 |
1-16-01 |
at VIRGINIA |
+19 |
NL |
71-89 |
L |
W |
- |
54.0% |
35.7% |
75.0% |
26 |
55.7% |
47.8% |
62.5% |
26 |
1-14-01 |
vs MARYLAND |
+14 |
NL |
55-76 |
L |
L |
- |
31.3% |
21.4% |
52.6% |
37 |
46.0% |
66.7% |
56.0% |
54 |
1-9-01 |
at WAKE FOREST |
+25 |
NL |
53-76 |
L |
W |
- |
35.6% |
14.3% |
69.2% |
41 |
44.6% |
41.2% |
86.4% |
32 |
1-6-01 |
vs UNC-ASHEVILLE |
NL |
NL |
76-68 |
W |
- |
- |
41.1% |
33.3% |
70.6% |
40 |
46.9% |
41.7% |
68.0% |
23 |
1-4-01 |
vs DUKE |
+22 |
162 |
72-99 |
L |
L |
Ov |
47.3% |
70.0% |
54.2% |
29 |
49.3% |
46.9% |
82.4% |
43 |
December 2000 |
12-30-00 |
vs MORGAN ST |
NL |
NL |
74-64 |
W |
- |
- |
43.6% |
40.0% |
58.1% |
49 |
45.1% |
53.3% |
58.8% |
30 |
12-21-00 |
vs BINGHAMTON |
NL |
NL |
79-57 |
W |
- |
- |
49.2% |
41.2% |
80.0% |
37 |
33.9% |
33.3% |
69.2% |
34 |
|
Game Situation Report for the 2000-2001 Season Season |
30 |
9-21 (30.0%) |
14-11-0 (56.0%) |
2-1-0 |
66.7% |
33.3% |
69.5 |
76.3 |
-6.8 |
16 |
6-10 (37.5%) |
6-5-0 (54.5%) |
2-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
71.2 |
73.8 |
-2.6 |
11 |
2-9 (18.2%) |
7-4-0 (63.6%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
66.5 |
80.1 |
-13.6 |
3 |
1-2 (33.3%) |
1-2-0 (33.3%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
71.7 |
75.7 |
-4.0 |
1 |
0-1 (0.0%) |
0-1-0 (0.0%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
64.0 |
66.0 |
-2.0 |
30 |
9-21 (30.0%) |
14-11-0 (56.0%) |
2-1-0 |
66.7% |
33.3% |
69.5 |
76.3 |
-6.8 |
4 |
2-2 (50.0%) |
2-2-0 (50.0%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
77.3 |
74.3 |
+3.0 |
21 |
3-18 (14.3%) |
12-9-0 (57.1%) |
2-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
66.6 |
79.2 |
-12.6 |
2 |
1-1 (50.0%) |
1-1-0 (50.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
79.5 |
80.0 |
-0.5 |
9 |
1-8 (11.1%) |
5-4-0 (55.6%) |
2-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
66.9 |
76.9 |
-10.0 |
11 |
2-9 (18.2%) |
7-4-0 (63.6%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
66.5 |
80.1 |
-13.6 |
2 |
1-1 (50.0%) |
2-0-0 (100.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
80.0 |
75.5 |
+4.5 |
6 |
2-4 (33.3%) |
3-1-0 (75.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
73.2 |
75.0 |
-1.8 |
6 |
2-4 (33.3%) |
4-2-0 (66.7%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
60.5 |
67.8 |
-7.3 |
16 |
4-12 (25.0%) |
5-8-0 (38.5%) |
2-1-0 |
66.7% |
33.3% |
70.2 |
80.1 |
-9.9 |
9 |
2-7 (22.2%) |
4-4-0 (50.0%) |
1-1-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
68.7 |
77.8 |
-9.1 |
20 |
7-13 (35.0%) |
10-6-0 (62.5%) |
1-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
69.9 |
75.2 |
-5.4 |
14 |
5-9 (35.7%) |
8-5-0 (61.5%) |
1-1-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
71.6 |
76.4 |
-4.8 |
10 |
3-7 (30.0%) |
4-3-0 (57.1%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
67.5 |
74.0 |
-6.5 |
|
|
|
| |
|