The Leader In Sports Handicapping
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FRESNO ST - |
|
|
All Games YTD for the 2001-2002 Season |
Last 20 Games |
All Games YTD
|
March 2002 |
3-13-02 |
vs TEMPLE |
-3 |
140.5 |
75-81 |
L |
L |
Ov |
49.1% |
46.7% |
52.9% |
35 |
42.2% |
37.8% |
76.5% |
37 |
3-8-02 |
at TULSA |
+7 |
149 |
65-81 |
L |
L |
Un |
39.4% |
30.0% |
87.5% |
37 |
41.4% |
34.8% |
75.0% |
48 |
3-7-02 |
vs LOUISIANA TECH |
+1 |
140.5 |
72-69 |
W |
W |
Ov |
50.0% |
44.0% |
65.0% |
26 |
40.3% |
11.1% |
73.9% |
44 |
3-2-02 |
vs HAWAII |
-6 |
NL |
79-82 |
L |
L |
- |
50.9% |
42.9% |
58.3% |
35 |
52.7% |
43.8% |
66.7% |
27 |
February 2002 |
2-28-02 |
vs SAN JOSE ST |
-15.5 |
NL |
72-60 |
W |
L |
- |
48.1% |
43.8% |
72.2% |
41 |
34.4% |
28.0% |
60.0% |
37 |
2-23-02 |
at SMU |
+4.5 |
NL |
86-78 |
W |
W |
- |
45.3% |
39.3% |
81.0% |
44 |
42.9% |
34.8% |
80.0% |
34 |
2-21-02 |
at LOUISIANA TECH |
+6 |
NL |
63-66 |
L |
W |
- |
40.7% |
26.7% |
78.6% |
36 |
37.9% |
29.4% |
70.8% |
41 |
2-16-02 |
vs BOISE ST |
-12 |
NL |
58-61 |
L |
L |
- |
44.9% |
38.9% |
46.7% |
35 |
38.7% |
41.7% |
60.0% |
36 |
2-14-02 |
vs UTEP |
-11.5 |
NL |
72-64 |
W |
L |
- |
46.3% |
23.5% |
60.0% |
28 |
45.1% |
31.3% |
65.0% |
37 |
2-10-02 |
vs OKLAHOMA ST |
-1 |
138.5 |
58-52 |
W |
W |
Un |
34.5% |
43.5% |
71.4% |
33 |
35.0% |
20.0% |
71.4% |
45 |
2-7-02 |
vs NEVADA |
-11.5 |
NL |
57-66 |
L |
L |
- |
37.3% |
17.4% |
60.0% |
37 |
37.7% |
25.0% |
63.6% |
44 |
2-2-02 |
at RICE |
-7 |
NL |
63-76 |
L |
L |
- |
35.0% |
39.1% |
70.6% |
39 |
44.8% |
35.0% |
69.2% |
43 |
January 2002 |
1-31-02 |
at TULSA |
+7 |
NL |
63-78 |
L |
L |
- |
40.0% |
29.4% |
52.6% |
39 |
51.6% |
36.0% |
45.5% |
37 |
1-26-02 |
vs LOUISIANA TECH |
-9 |
NL |
64-71 |
L |
L |
- |
30.4% |
13.6% |
75.0% |
38 |
38.7% |
21.1% |
73.1% |
49 |
1-24-02 |
vs SMU |
-10 |
NL |
78-70 |
W |
L |
- |
43.1% |
25.8% |
63.6% |
44 |
45.5% |
26.7% |
59.3% |
35 |
1-19-02 |
at UTEP |
-3.5 |
NL |
80-77 |
W |
L |
- |
38.9% |
28.6% |
78.3% |
53 |
41.2% |
5.9% |
58.8% |
48 |
1-17-02 |
at BOISE ST |
-5.5 |
NL |
72-56 |
W |
W |
- |
42.3% |
15.8% |
89.3% |
39 |
33.9% |
38.5% |
80.0% |
32 |
1-12-02 |
at NEVADA |
-4 |
NL |
85-88 |
L |
L |
- |
46.2% |
35.7% |
64.5% |
41 |
46.2% |
38.9% |
75.0% |
43 |
1-5-02 |
vs TULSA |
-5 |
154.5 |
86-85 |
W |
L |
Ov |
50.0% |
41.2% |
65.7% |
44 |
38.7% |
33.3% |
80.8% |
39 |
1-3-02 |
vs RICE |
-17 |
NL |
87-61 |
W |
W |
- |
45.5% |
26.7% |
85.2% |
44 |
35.4% |
33.3% |
69.2% |
38 |
December 2001 |
12-29-01 |
at SAN JOSE ST |
-9.5 |
NL |
80-68 |
W |
W |
- |
58.5% |
57.1% |
62.5% |
33 |
36.9% |
42.1% |
57.1% |
36 |
12-27-01 |
at HAWAII |
+1.5 |
NL |
73-83 |
L |
L |
- |
46.4% |
31.6% |
60.0% |
37 |
46.0% |
42.9% |
69.6% |
32 |
12-20-01 |
vs SAVANNAH ST |
NL |
NL |
91-52 |
W |
- |
- |
47.2% |
34.5% |
56.5% |
55 |
31.7% |
33.3% |
42.9% |
36 |
12-11-01 |
at CALIFORNIA |
+8.5 |
NL |
75-97 |
L |
L |
- |
43.1% |
21.1% |
67.7% |
41 |
52.1% |
50.0% |
56.3% |
33 |
12-8-01 |
at SAN DIEGO ST |
PK |
NL |
78-93 |
L |
L |
- |
40.6% |
29.0% |
61.9% |
38 |
49.3% |
46.7% |
60.6% |
42 |
12-6-01 |
vs GONZAGA |
PK |
NL |
77-87 |
L |
L |
- |
50.8% |
35.3% |
43.8% |
32 |
44.9% |
62.5% |
65.2% |
49 |
12-4-01 |
vs SAN FRANCISCO |
-17 |
141.5 |
75-65 |
W |
L |
Un |
49.1% |
23.1% |
62.1% |
35 |
41.3% |
36.8% |
85.7% |
38 |
12-1-01 |
vs AIR FORCE |
-17 |
NL |
68-52 |
W |
L |
- |
52.1% |
21.4% |
57.7% |
39 |
37.5% |
35.5% |
71.4% |
22 |
November 2001 |
11-30-01 |
vs UC-RIVERSIDE |
-23 |
NL |
75-58 |
W |
L |
- |
46.7% |
38.9% |
92.3% |
49 |
27.5% |
10.7% |
45.8% |
51 |
11-28-01 |
at PACIFIC |
-4 |
NL |
73-65 |
W |
W |
- |
41.0% |
36.0% |
66.7% |
46 |
29.7% |
22.6% |
76.9% |
43 |
11-23-01 |
vs MICHIGAN ST |
+2.5 |
NL |
63-58 |
W |
W |
- |
43.4% |
33.3% |
60.0% |
36 |
32.8% |
26.1% |
57.1% |
49 |
11-21-01 |
vs WAKE FOREST |
+3 |
150 |
61-62 |
L |
W |
Un |
41.9% |
14.3% |
40.0% |
44 |
38.2% |
36.8% |
37.5% |
39 |
11-15-01 |
vs USC |
-2.5 |
NL |
65-58 |
W |
W |
- |
28.1% |
32.1% |
75.0% |
46 |
34.7% |
11.1% |
36.4% |
53 |
11-13-01 |
vs MONTANA ST |
-15.5 |
NL |
92-70 |
W |
W |
- |
58.7% |
45.5% |
80.0% |
33 |
42.2% |
24.0% |
76.9% |
32 |
|
Game Situation Report for the 2001-2002 Season Season |
34 |
19-15 (55.9%) |
12-21-0 (36.4%) |
3-4-0 |
42.9% |
57.1% |
73.0 |
70.3 |
+2.7 |
17 |
12-5 (70.6%) |
4-12-0 (25.0%) |
2-2-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
73.6 |
65.2 |
+8.5 |
13 |
5-8 (38.5%) |
5-8-0 (38.5%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
73.5 |
77.4 |
-3.8 |
4 |
2-2 (50.0%) |
3-1-0 (75.0%) |
1-1-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
68.3 |
69.0 |
-0.8 |
8 |
6-2 (75.0%) |
5-3-0 (62.5%) |
1-2-0 |
33.3% |
66.7% |
70.1 |
63.5 |
+6.6 |
1 |
0-1 (0.0%) |
0-1-0 (0.0%) |
1-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
75.0 |
81.0 |
-6.0 |
34 |
19-15 (55.9%) |
12-21-0 (36.4%) |
3-4-0 |
42.9% |
57.1% |
73.0 |
70.3 |
+2.7 |
22 |
15-7 (68.2%) |
7-15-0 (31.8%) |
2-2-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
73.4 |
67.5 |
+5.8 |
9 |
3-6 (33.3%) |
5-4-0 (55.6%) |
1-2-0 |
33.3% |
66.7% |
69.0 |
74.7 |
-5.7 |
16 |
11-5 (68.8%) |
4-12-0 (25.0%) |
2-2-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
72.6 |
66.0 |
+6.6 |
6 |
4-2 (66.7%) |
3-3-0 (50.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
75.5 |
71.7 |
+3.8 |
6 |
1-5 (16.7%) |
2-4-0 (33.3%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
70.8 |
80.5 |
-9.7 |
2 |
1-1 (50.0%) |
0-2-0 (0.0%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
66.5 |
66.5 |
0.0 |
13 |
7-6 (53.8%) |
4-9-0 (30.8%) |
1-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
73.4 |
73.2 |
+0.2 |
3 |
2-1 (66.7%) |
1-2-0 (33.3%) |
0-2-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
69.3 |
71.3 |
-2.0 |
16 |
9-7 (56.3%) |
7-8-0 (46.7%) |
2-1-0 |
66.7% |
33.3% |
74.1 |
68.2 |
+5.9 |
1 |
1-0 (100.0%) |
0-1-0 (0.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
68.0 |
52.0 |
+16.0 |
19 |
11-8 (57.9%) |
4-15-0 (21.1%) |
1-3-0 |
25.0% |
75.0% |
73.3 |
70.0 |
+3.3 |
14 |
7-7 (50.0%) |
7-6-0 (53.8%) |
2-1-0 |
66.7% |
33.3% |
71.1 |
70.7 |
+0.4 |
12 |
10-2 (83.3%) |
6-6-0 (50.0%) |
1-2-0 |
33.3% |
66.7% |
73.8 |
67.3 |
+6.5 |
20 |
8-12 (40.0%) |
5-14-0 (26.3%) |
2-2-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
71.6 |
71.5 |
+0.0 |
|
|
|
| |
|