The Leader In Sports Handicapping
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HAWAII - |
|
|
Last 20 Games for the 2001-2002 Season |
Last 20 Games |
All Games YTD
|
March 2002 |
3-15-02 |
vs XAVIER |
+2.5 |
133.5 |
58-70 |
L |
L |
Un |
35.9% |
33.3% |
66.7% |
35 |
42.6% |
20.0% |
87.5% |
40 |
3-9-02 |
at TULSA |
+5.5 |
145.5 |
73-59 |
W |
W |
Un |
38.5% |
16.7% |
71.4% |
44 |
33.9% |
29.2% |
90.9% |
39 |
3-8-02 |
vs NEVADA |
-5.5 |
140 |
90-68 |
W |
W |
Ov |
58.3% |
57.1% |
78.6% |
28 |
41.4% |
35.7% |
75.0% |
34 |
3-7-02 |
vs SAN JOSE ST |
-11 |
127.5 |
71-56 |
W |
W |
Un |
45.5% |
41.2% |
73.7% |
39 |
32.3% |
31.6% |
71.4% |
39 |
3-2-02 |
at FRESNO ST |
+6 |
NL |
82-79 |
W |
W |
- |
52.7% |
43.8% |
66.7% |
27 |
50.9% |
42.9% |
58.3% |
35 |
February 2002 |
2-28-02 |
at NEVADA |
+1.5 |
NL |
69-79 |
L |
L |
- |
38.1% |
26.1% |
65.2% |
38 |
44.8% |
42.9% |
65.6% |
45 |
2-23-02 |
vs RICE |
-14.5 |
NL |
79-50 |
W |
W |
- |
36.5% |
39.1% |
80.0% |
41 |
38.5% |
20.0% |
50.0% |
36 |
2-21-02 |
vs TULSA |
-2.5 |
NL |
86-85 |
W |
L |
- |
47.4% |
50.0% |
74.1% |
32 |
57.9% |
56.3% |
71.4% |
28 |
2-16-02 |
vs SAN JOSE ST |
-15 |
NL |
71-46 |
W |
W |
- |
52.0% |
42.9% |
62.5% |
31 |
36.2% |
23.1% |
60.0% |
26 |
2-9-02 |
at LOUISIANA TECH |
+4.5 |
NL |
57-61 |
L |
W |
- |
37.5% |
31.8% |
72.7% |
31 |
41.2% |
11.1% |
75.0% |
40 |
2-7-02 |
at SMU |
+3.5 |
NL |
85-76 |
W |
W |
- |
48.2% |
48.0% |
79.2% |
32 |
39.7% |
29.0% |
59.1% |
47 |
2-2-02 |
vs UTEP |
-11 |
NL |
75-60 |
W |
W |
- |
50.9% |
45.0% |
70.6% |
25 |
45.6% |
27.3% |
50.0% |
31 |
January 2002 |
1-31-02 |
vs BOISE ST |
-14 |
NL |
67-56 |
W |
L |
- |
37.7% |
38.1% |
76.0% |
31 |
48.8% |
33.3% |
61.1% |
28 |
1-26-02 |
at TULSA |
+10.5 |
NL |
90-82 |
W |
W |
- |
52.5% |
45.0% |
65.4% |
40 |
45.8% |
32.0% |
69.0% |
32 |
1-24-02 |
at RICE |
-4 |
NL |
88-79 |
W |
W |
- |
46.6% |
55.6% |
75.0% |
34 |
37.7% |
30.0% |
84.4% |
41 |
1-19-02 |
at SAN JOSE ST |
-4.5 |
NL |
53-57 |
L |
L |
- |
34.0% |
15.0% |
73.7% |
29 |
45.5% |
33.3% |
50.0% |
35 |
1-12-02 |
vs SMU |
-6.5 |
NL |
83-74 |
W |
W |
- |
49.2% |
51.9% |
63.6% |
29 |
50.0% |
33.3% |
83.3% |
31 |
1-10-02 |
vs LOUISIANA TECH |
-7 |
NL |
81-61 |
W |
W |
- |
49.1% |
38.1% |
65.5% |
32 |
39.7% |
23.5% |
50.0% |
36 |
1-5-02 |
at BOISE ST |
-1 |
NL |
64-62 |
W |
W |
- |
51.1% |
38.9% |
56.3% |
25 |
44.7% |
35.7% |
62.5% |
27 |
1-3-02 |
at UTEP |
+2.5 |
NL |
70-68 |
W |
W |
- |
50.0% |
38.1% |
75.0% |
29 |
39.0% |
44.4% |
82.4% |
35 |
|
Game Situation Report for the 2001-2002 Season Season |
33 |
27-6 (81.8%) |
20-8-2 (71.4%) |
1-3-0 |
25.0% |
75.0% |
71.7 |
63.1 |
+8.7 |
19 |
17-2 (89.5%) |
10-5-1 (66.7%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
69.9 |
58.6 |
+11.3 |
10 |
7-3 (70.0%) |
8-2-0 (80.0%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
73.1 |
70.2 |
+2.9 |
4 |
3-1 (75.0%) |
2-1-1 (66.7%) |
1-2-0 |
33.3% |
66.7% |
77.0 |
66.5 |
+10.5 |
11 |
10-1 (90.9%) |
6-2-2 (75.0%) |
1-2-0 |
33.3% |
66.7% |
71.6 |
59.6 |
+12.0 |
1 |
0-1 (0.0%) |
0-1-0 (0.0%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
58.0 |
70.0 |
-12.0 |
33 |
27-6 (81.8%) |
20-8-2 (71.4%) |
1-3-0 |
25.0% |
75.0% |
71.7 |
63.1 |
+8.7 |
21 |
18-3 (85.7%) |
13-6-2 (68.4%) |
1-1-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
72.9 |
62.1 |
+10.8 |
9 |
6-3 (66.7%) |
7-2-0 (77.8%) |
0-2-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
70.9 |
68.7 |
+2.2 |
15 |
13-2 (86.7%) |
9-5-1 (64.3%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
71.7 |
60.7 |
+11.0 |
1 |
1-0 (100.0%) |
1-0-0 (100.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
54.0 |
44.0 |
+10.0 |
3 |
2-1 (66.7%) |
2-1-0 (66.7%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
68.3 |
66.0 |
+2.3 |
7 |
5-2 (71.4%) |
6-1-0 (85.7%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
75.1 |
72.0 |
+3.1 |
5 |
4-1 (80.0%) |
4-1-0 (80.0%) |
1-1-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
67.2 |
57.8 |
+9.4 |
11 |
10-1 (90.9%) |
9-0-1 (100.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
71.7 |
62.3 |
+9.5 |
17 |
13-4 (76.5%) |
7-7-1 (50.0%) |
0-2-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
73.1 |
65.1 |
+7.9 |
2 |
2-0 (100.0%) |
2-0-0 (100.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
57.0 |
50.5 |
+6.5 |
27 |
21-6 (77.8%) |
16-7-2 (69.6%) |
1-3-0 |
25.0% |
75.0% |
70.9 |
63.0 |
+8.0 |
5 |
5-0 (100.0%) |
4-1-0 (80.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
75.2 |
65.8 |
+9.4 |
20 |
16-4 (80.0%) |
13-5-1 (72.2%) |
1-3-0 |
25.0% |
75.0% |
72.9 |
65.2 |
+7.8 |
7 |
7-0 (100.0%) |
5-1-1 (83.3%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
75.1 |
64.1 |
+11.0 |
|
|
|
| |
|