The Leader In Sports Handicapping
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
KENT ST - |
|
|
All Games YTD for the 2001-2002 Season |
Last 20 Games |
All Games YTD
|
March 2002 |
3-23-02 |
vs INDIANA |
+3.5 |
130 |
69-81 |
L |
L |
Ov |
40.6% |
14.3% |
75.0% |
28 |
64.3% |
78.9% |
57.1% |
25 |
3-21-02 |
vs PITTSBURGH |
+2 |
129 |
78-73 |
W |
W |
Ov |
44.8% |
29.4% |
84.0% |
26 |
46.0% |
27.3% |
60.0% |
39 |
3-16-02 |
vs ALABAMA |
+2 |
139 |
71-58 |
W |
W |
Un |
46.0% |
41.7% |
53.3% |
34 |
38.0% |
23.1% |
77.3% |
38 |
3-14-02 |
vs OKLAHOMA ST |
-1 |
130.5 |
69-61 |
W |
W |
Un |
42.3% |
38.9% |
78.3% |
30 |
39.6% |
25.0% |
83.3% |
37 |
3-9-02 |
vs BOWLING GREEN |
-5.5 |
135 |
70-59 |
W |
W |
Un |
47.1% |
26.7% |
75.0% |
32 |
38.8% |
12.5% |
79.2% |
32 |
3-8-02 |
vs TOLEDO |
-11.5 |
129 |
86-61 |
W |
W |
Ov |
54.2% |
61.1% |
64.7% |
34 |
45.7% |
29.4% |
66.7% |
25 |
3-7-02 |
vs MARSHALL |
-12 |
151.5 |
82-70 |
W |
P |
Ov |
53.7% |
35.7% |
65.5% |
35 |
42.6% |
25.0% |
65.0% |
35 |
3-2-02 |
at MIAMI OHIO |
-4 |
NL |
70-67 |
W |
L |
- |
55.3% |
57.1% |
76.9% |
26 |
57.8% |
56.3% |
75.0% |
17 |
February 2002 |
2-25-02 |
vs AKRON |
-21 |
NL |
67-57 |
W |
L |
- |
45.3% |
28.6% |
68.4% |
42 |
36.5% |
37.5% |
68.4% |
28 |
2-23-02 |
at OHIO U |
-3.5 |
NL |
70-67 |
W |
L |
- |
43.3% |
46.7% |
78.6% |
37 |
38.2% |
45.8% |
63.6% |
37 |
2-19-02 |
vs MARSHALL |
-14 |
NL |
116-76 |
W |
W |
- |
55.1% |
57.1% |
77.4% |
38 |
50.0% |
52.9% |
76.5% |
26 |
2-16-02 |
vs MIAMI OHIO |
-12 |
NL |
73-57 |
W |
W |
- |
57.1% |
23.5% |
81.3% |
33 |
36.7% |
33.3% |
50.0% |
31 |
2-13-02 |
at N ILLINOIS |
-9.5 |
NL |
73-61 |
W |
W |
- |
38.8% |
26.7% |
70.8% |
46 |
35.7% |
33.3% |
66.7% |
40 |
2-9-02 |
at C MICHIGAN |
-5 |
NL |
96-66 |
W |
W |
- |
63.3% |
64.3% |
84.6% |
32 |
50.0% |
16.7% |
66.7% |
21 |
2-4-02 |
vs BOWLING GREEN |
-8 |
NL |
76-64 |
W |
W |
- |
54.7% |
42.9% |
62.5% |
39 |
40.7% |
43.8% |
81.3% |
29 |
2-2-02 |
vs TOLEDO |
-13.5 |
NL |
79-52 |
W |
W |
- |
47.5% |
25.0% |
82.6% |
42 |
38.3% |
10.0% |
65.2% |
25 |
January 2002 |
1-29-02 |
at E MICHIGAN |
-16.5 |
NL |
82-62 |
W |
W |
- |
51.5% |
38.5% |
69.2% |
39 |
40.0% |
35.7% |
75.0% |
28 |
1-26-02 |
at BOWLING GREEN |
+1.5 |
NL |
70-67 |
W |
W |
- |
42.0% |
38.1% |
66.7% |
39 |
42.4% |
22.2% |
72.2% |
34 |
1-22-02 |
vs BUFFALO |
-15 |
NL |
91-53 |
W |
W |
- |
55.2% |
76.5% |
53.8% |
49 |
27.1% |
12.0% |
54.5% |
42 |
1-19-02 |
vs W MICHIGAN |
-13 |
NL |
75-72 |
W |
L |
- |
50.0% |
36.8% |
63.2% |
35 |
47.5% |
63.2% |
66.7% |
30 |
1-16-02 |
at AKRON |
-10 |
NL |
78-54 |
W |
W |
- |
53.6% |
40.0% |
76.9% |
34 |
37.7% |
21.4% |
73.3% |
24 |
1-12-02 |
vs OHIO U |
-8.5 |
NL |
71-56 |
W |
W |
- |
41.2% |
50.0% |
83.3% |
35 |
32.1% |
22.2% |
61.5% |
35 |
1-9-02 |
at BUFFALO |
-7.5 |
NL |
65-66 |
L |
L |
- |
39.4% |
23.1% |
76.9% |
38 |
38.9% |
22.2% |
76.9% |
39 |
1-5-02 |
at MARSHALL |
-1.5 |
NL |
73-70 |
W |
W |
- |
47.5% |
40.0% |
64.7% |
42 |
49.1% |
52.4% |
45.5% |
24 |
1-2-02 |
vs BALL ST |
-2 |
NL |
81-54 |
W |
W |
- |
46.3% |
45.5% |
86.7% |
38 |
37.5% |
13.0% |
75.0% |
29 |
December 2001 |
12-31-01 |
vs ST BONAVENTURE |
-3 |
NL |
93-82 |
W |
W |
- |
52.2% |
23.5% |
82.6% |
40 |
48.1% |
42.3% |
77.8% |
25 |
12-29-01 |
at CLEVELAND ST |
-4.5 |
NL |
66-62 |
W |
L |
- |
43.1% |
5.6% |
67.7% |
38 |
38.5% |
22.7% |
46.7% |
41 |
12-22-01 |
at ILLINOIS ST |
+1.5 |
NL |
61-48 |
W |
W |
- |
41.1% |
30.0% |
81.8% |
35 |
37.5% |
41.2% |
64.7% |
30 |
12-20-01 |
at XAVIER |
+11.5 |
NL |
56-62 |
L |
W |
- |
26.1% |
33.3% |
84.6% |
46 |
35.1% |
21.7% |
68.0% |
43 |
12-15-01 |
at YOUNGSTOWN ST |
-12.5 |
NL |
70-75 |
L |
L |
- |
41.0% |
31.6% |
66.7% |
39 |
49.1% |
16.7% |
78.3% |
33 |
12-1-01 |
vs UT-CHATTANOOGA |
-13.5 |
NL |
75-56 |
W |
W |
- |
49.2% |
23.5% |
55.0% |
41 |
33.3% |
25.0% |
62.5% |
37 |
November 2001 |
11-28-01 |
vs KENTUCKY |
+9 |
NL |
68-82 |
L |
L |
- |
42.3% |
26.7% |
83.3% |
26 |
46.9% |
30.0% |
72.7% |
43 |
11-25-01 |
vs UC-IRVINE |
-8.5 |
NL |
75-64 |
W |
W |
- |
46.0% |
30.8% |
78.1% |
33 |
42.9% |
50.0% |
55.0% |
35 |
11-24-01 |
vs ROBERT MORRIS |
-17 |
NL |
83-55 |
W |
W |
- |
47.5% |
50.0% |
80.0% |
46 |
31.8% |
16.7% |
92.6% |
19 |
11-23-01 |
vs HOFSTRA |
-11 |
NL |
64-67 |
L |
L |
- |
37.1% |
15.8% |
60.0% |
32 |
54.0% |
71.4% |
61.5% |
39 |
11-19-01 |
vs MERCYHURST |
NL |
NL |
90-68 |
W |
- |
- |
52.9% |
34.5% |
54.5% |
43 |
44.8% |
37.5% |
90.9% |
27 |
|
Game Situation Report for the 2001-2002 Season Season |
36 |
30-6 (83.3%) |
24-10-1 (70.6%) |
4-3-0 |
57.1% |
42.9% |
75.9 |
64.0 |
+11.9 |
12 |
12-0 (100.0%) |
9-2-0 (81.8%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
82.3 |
62.3 |
+20.0 |
13 |
10-3 (76.9%) |
8-5-0 (61.5%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
71.5 |
63.6 |
+7.9 |
11 |
8-3 (72.7%) |
7-3-1 (70.0%) |
4-3-0 |
57.1% |
42.9% |
74.1 |
66.5 |
+7.6 |
6 |
5-1 (83.3%) |
4-1-1 (80.0%) |
2-1-0 |
66.7% |
33.3% |
76.7 |
62.7 |
+14.0 |
4 |
3-1 (75.0%) |
3-1-0 (75.0%) |
2-2-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
71.8 |
68.3 |
+3.5 |
36 |
30-6 (83.3%) |
24-10-1 (70.6%) |
4-3-0 |
57.1% |
42.9% |
75.9 |
64.0 |
+11.9 |
28 |
25-3 (89.3%) |
19-8-1 (70.4%) |
2-2-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
77.5 |
63.1 |
+14.4 |
7 |
4-3 (57.1%) |
5-2-0 (71.4%) |
2-1-0 |
66.7% |
33.3% |
67.6 |
67.3 |
+0.3 |
11 |
11-0 (100.0%) |
9-2-0 (81.8%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
81.5 |
61.7 |
+19.8 |
10 |
8-2 (80.0%) |
5-5-0 (50.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
74.3 |
65.0 |
+9.3 |
3 |
2-1 (66.7%) |
3-0-0 (100.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
62.3 |
59.0 |
+3.3 |
4 |
4-0 (100.0%) |
4-0-0 (100.0%) |
1-1-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
78.5 |
59.8 |
+18.8 |
7 |
6-1 (85.7%) |
5-2-0 (71.4%) |
1-1-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
74.0 |
63.4 |
+10.6 |
9 |
8-1 (88.9%) |
7-2-0 (77.8%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
80.4 |
64.9 |
+15.6 |
16 |
12-4 (75.0%) |
8-6-1 (57.1%) |
2-1-0 |
66.7% |
33.3% |
73.5 |
64.9 |
+8.6 |
30 |
25-5 (83.3%) |
19-10-1 (65.5%) |
4-3-0 |
57.1% |
42.9% |
76.5 |
65.3 |
+11.2 |
5 |
4-1 (80.0%) |
5-0-0 (100.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
69.2 |
55.4 |
+13.8 |
24 |
20-4 (83.3%) |
17-7-0 (70.8%) |
2-3-0 |
40.0% |
60.0% |
75.2 |
64.6 |
+10.5 |
9 |
8-1 (88.9%) |
6-2-1 (75.0%) |
1-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
76.4 |
62.0 |
+14.4 |
|
|
|
| |
|