The Leader In Sports Handicapping
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LOYOLA-IL - |
|
|
All Games YTD for the 2000-2001 Season |
Last 20 Games |
All Games YTD
|
March 2001 |
3-3-01 |
vs BUTLER |
+14 |
NL |
52-78 |
L |
L |
- |
41.7% |
33.3% |
63.6% |
32 |
48.4% |
43.8% |
50.0% |
32 |
February 2001 |
2-24-01 |
vs WRIGHT ST |
+2.5 |
NL |
60-62 |
L |
W |
- |
41.1% |
35.0% |
53.8% |
39 |
38.7% |
30.4% |
58.3% |
41 |
2-22-01 |
vs BUTLER |
+11 |
NL |
62-66 |
L |
W |
- |
43.3% |
40.0% |
60.0% |
41 |
39.6% |
45.5% |
58.1% |
31 |
2-17-01 |
vs IL-CHICAGO |
PK |
NL |
56-66 |
L |
L |
- |
41.2% |
35.7% |
47.4% |
33 |
35.7% |
15.4% |
70.6% |
40 |
2-13-01 |
at WI-GREEN BAY |
+8.5 |
NL |
56-60 |
L |
W |
- |
41.3% |
11.1% |
77.3% |
30 |
40.0% |
42.9% |
81.5% |
27 |
2-8-01 |
at WI-MILWAUKEE |
+13.5 |
NL |
65-67 |
L |
W |
- |
40.8% |
35.7% |
87.0% |
25 |
35.1% |
26.9% |
76.9% |
31 |
2-3-01 |
vs CLEVELAND ST |
+3 |
NL |
77-80 |
L |
P |
- |
41.4% |
31.6% |
76.5% |
37 |
47.3% |
42.9% |
76.0% |
38 |
2-1-01 |
vs DETROIT MERCY |
+9.5 |
NL |
66-54 |
W |
W |
- |
38.8% |
19.0% |
66.7% |
55 |
37.0% |
37.0% |
33.3% |
31 |
January 2001 |
1-27-01 |
at BUTLER |
+20 |
NL |
57-71 |
L |
W |
- |
42.3% |
57.1% |
69.2% |
35 |
40.7% |
33.3% |
79.2% |
32 |
1-25-01 |
at WRIGHT ST |
+12 |
NL |
76-93 |
L |
L |
- |
50.0% |
13.3% |
50.0% |
31 |
60.8% |
66.7% |
92.0% |
29 |
1-20-01 |
at IL-CHICAGO |
+8.5 |
NL |
63-83 |
L |
L |
- |
35.0% |
11.1% |
71.4% |
42 |
57.9% |
33.3% |
42.9% |
36 |
1-18-01 |
vs BELMONT |
NL |
NL |
91-82 |
W |
- |
- |
49.2% |
46.7% |
78.8% |
31 |
44.6% |
53.3% |
80.0% |
37 |
1-14-01 |
vs WI-MILWAUKEE |
+5 |
NL |
93-94 |
L |
W |
- |
50.8% |
47.4% |
75.9% |
42 |
44.7% |
38.7% |
60.9% |
40 |
1-10-01 |
vs WI-GREEN BAY |
+1.5 |
NL |
57-55 |
W |
W |
- |
47.1% |
25.0% |
37.5% |
35 |
42.9% |
35.3% |
53.8% |
31 |
1-6-01 |
at DETROIT MERCY |
+18 |
NL |
61-81 |
L |
L |
- |
40.3% |
20.0% |
61.5% |
28 |
55.2% |
48.3% |
37.5% |
34 |
1-4-01 |
at CLEVELAND ST |
+11.5 |
NL |
70-73 |
L |
W |
- |
48.3% |
18.2% |
66.7% |
40 |
38.8% |
28.6% |
65.2% |
39 |
December 2000 |
12-28-00 |
vs ST MARYS-CA |
-10 |
NL |
84-79 |
W |
L |
- |
48.5% |
33.3% |
61.9% |
40 |
48.4% |
30.4% |
52.2% |
38 |
12-23-00 |
vs E KENTUCKY |
NL |
NL |
79-72 |
W |
- |
- |
44.4% |
26.7% |
68.8% |
51 |
45.8% |
42.1% |
43.5% |
34 |
12-21-00 |
vs LOYOLA-MARYMOUNT |
-8.5 |
NL |
53-63 |
L |
L |
- |
30.6% |
0.0% |
56.3% |
51 |
36.7% |
20.0% |
71.4% |
42 |
12-18-00 |
at LOUISVILLE |
+15 |
NL |
70-86 |
L |
L |
- |
41.5% |
7.7% |
68.2% |
43 |
44.6% |
50.0% |
75.0% |
38 |
12-16-00 |
vs E ILLINOIS |
NL |
NL |
80-86 |
L |
- |
- |
42.9% |
29.4% |
71.4% |
34 |
52.6% |
45.8% |
75.0% |
39 |
12-9-00 |
vs MICHIGAN ST |
+25 |
NL |
71-103 |
L |
L |
- |
46.6% |
44.4% |
45.0% |
24 |
65.2% |
41.7% |
80.0% |
41 |
12-6-00 |
vs C MICHIGAN |
+4.5 |
NL |
75-70 |
W |
W |
- |
48.3% |
35.7% |
63.6% |
42 |
36.5% |
35.0% |
77.3% |
34 |
12-2-00 |
at CANISIUS |
NL |
NL |
78-99 |
L |
- |
- |
39.0% |
19.0% |
73.7% |
42 |
54.5% |
55.0% |
80.0% |
40 |
November 2000 |
11-29-00 |
at CHICAGO ST |
NL |
NL |
76-78 |
L |
- |
- |
45.6% |
42.9% |
75.0% |
33 |
56.7% |
40.0% |
54.5% |
30 |
11-27-00 |
vs TENNESSEE TECH |
NL |
NL |
76-73 |
W |
- |
- |
46.6% |
41.7% |
70.6% |
36 |
42.4% |
30.0% |
65.4% |
36 |
11-22-00 |
at NOTRE DAME |
+22 |
NL |
68-107 |
L |
L |
- |
37.0% |
26.1% |
28.6% |
44 |
64.3% |
72.7% |
76.0% |
33 |
11-19-00 |
at SF AUSTIN ST |
NL |
NL |
60-64 |
L |
- |
- |
47.4% |
33.3% |
33.3% |
26 |
51.1% |
47.4% |
64.3% |
33 |
|
Game Situation Report for the 2000-2001 Season Season |
28 |
7-21 (25.0%) |
10-10-1 (50.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
69.0 |
76.6 |
-7.6 |
15 |
7-8 (46.7%) |
6-4-1 (60.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
72.0 |
73.7 |
-1.7 |
12 |
0-12 (0.0%) |
4-5-0 (44.4%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
66.7 |
80.2 |
-13.5 |
1 |
0-1 (0.0%) |
0-1-0 (0.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
52.0 |
78.0 |
-26.0 |
1 |
0-1 (0.0%) |
0-1-0 (0.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
52.0 |
78.0 |
-26.0 |
28 |
7-21 (25.0%) |
10-10-1 (50.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
69.0 |
76.6 |
-7.6 |
2 |
1-1 (50.0%) |
0-2-0 (0.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
68.5 |
71.0 |
-2.5 |
18 |
3-15 (16.7%) |
10-7-1 (58.8%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
66.6 |
76.8 |
-10.2 |
2 |
1-1 (50.0%) |
0-2-0 (0.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
68.5 |
71.0 |
-2.5 |
8 |
3-5 (37.5%) |
6-1-1 (85.7%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
70.1 |
73.0 |
-2.9 |
9 |
0-9 (0.0%) |
4-5-0 (44.4%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
65.1 |
80.1 |
-15.0 |
8 |
1-7 (12.5%) |
2-3-1 (40.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
67.9 |
76.6 |
-8.8 |
4 |
0-4 (0.0%) |
0-3-0 (0.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
67.5 |
93.0 |
-25.5 |
16 |
6-10 (37.5%) |
8-4-0 (66.7%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
69.9 |
72.5 |
-2.6 |
7 |
1-6 (14.3%) |
2-3-1 (40.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
76.3 |
84.3 |
-8.0 |
20 |
6-14 (30.0%) |
8-7-0 (53.3%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
66.9 |
74.6 |
-7.6 |
10 |
2-8 (20.0%) |
4-4-1 (50.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
68.3 |
76.0 |
-7.7 |
9 |
3-6 (33.3%) |
4-2-0 (66.7%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
67.8 |
72.4 |
-4.7 |
|
|
|
| |
|