The Leader In Sports Handicapping
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MIAMI - |
|
|
All Games YTD for the 2000-2001 Season |
Last 20 Games |
All Games YTD
|
March 2001 |
3-14-01 |
at AUBURN |
+6 |
139 |
58-60 |
L |
W |
Un |
35.5% |
23.8% |
64.3% |
40 |
40.4% |
26.3% |
75.0% |
37 |
3-7-01 |
vs PITTSBURGH |
-3 |
127 |
69-78 |
L |
L |
Ov |
46.3% |
22.7% |
56.0% |
27 |
49.0% |
31.6% |
73.3% |
40 |
3-3-01 |
vs VILLANOVA |
-3 |
140 |
65-53 |
W |
W |
Un |
37.5% |
20.0% |
86.4% |
40 |
36.8% |
20.8% |
66.7% |
34 |
February 2001 |
2-28-01 |
vs W VIRGINIA |
-6 |
NL |
73-66 |
W |
W |
- |
36.5% |
20.7% |
65.6% |
38 |
40.4% |
16.7% |
88.0% |
42 |
2-24-01 |
at CONNECTICUT |
+8 |
137 |
53-60 |
L |
W |
Un |
38.8% |
21.1% |
78.6% |
30 |
42.0% |
45.5% |
81.3% |
30 |
2-17-01 |
at VILLANOVA |
+7 |
139 |
80-62 |
W |
W |
Ov |
48.2% |
52.0% |
86.7% |
24 |
45.5% |
43.8% |
83.3% |
32 |
2-13-01 |
at SYRACUSE |
+10.5 |
135 |
68-57 |
W |
W |
Un |
39.6% |
41.2% |
82.6% |
40 |
30.0% |
20.0% |
88.9% |
37 |
2-10-01 |
vs ST JOHNS |
-1.5 |
137.5 |
79-85 |
L |
L |
Ov |
42.0% |
50.0% |
70.7% |
39 |
40.3% |
27.8% |
69.8% |
42 |
2-6-01 |
vs VIRGINIA TECH |
-11.5 |
NL |
86-61 |
W |
W |
- |
48.3% |
36.8% |
67.6% |
39 |
33.3% |
28.0% |
78.3% |
34 |
2-1-01 |
vs SETON HALL |
PK |
143 |
72-66 |
W |
W |
Un |
46.8% |
50.0% |
50.0% |
40 |
40.3% |
34.5% |
25.0% |
36 |
January 2001 |
1-28-01 |
vs PROVIDENCE |
+1 |
NL |
70-80 |
L |
L |
- |
37.9% |
44.4% |
81.8% |
32 |
44.8% |
33.3% |
71.0% |
43 |
1-22-01 |
at ST JOHNS |
+10 |
145.5 |
63-67 |
L |
W |
Un |
36.1% |
50.0% |
66.7% |
36 |
47.4% |
25.0% |
66.7% |
38 |
1-20-01 |
vs CONNECTICUT |
+2.5 |
NL |
77-74 |
W |
W |
- |
45.5% |
42.9% |
75.0% |
27 |
56.6% |
33.3% |
84.6% |
32 |
1-16-01 |
at PROVIDENCE |
+12 |
NL |
78-64 |
W |
W |
- |
50.0% |
44.4% |
80.0% |
36 |
35.6% |
42.9% |
65.7% |
29 |
1-13-01 |
at BOSTON COLLEGE |
+13 |
NL |
73-82 |
L |
W |
- |
40.9% |
37.5% |
58.8% |
36 |
53.1% |
40.0% |
92.3% |
32 |
1-10-01 |
at VIRGINIA TECH |
-1.5 |
NL |
74-85 |
L |
L |
- |
40.6% |
32.1% |
76.5% |
27 |
55.6% |
41.7% |
69.8% |
37 |
1-7-01 |
vs BOSTON COLLEGE |
+3.5 |
NL |
72-73 |
L |
W |
- |
41.2% |
46.7% |
69.7% |
34 |
45.3% |
50.0% |
57.1% |
36 |
1-3-01 |
at PITTSBURGH |
+6.5 |
NL |
51-62 |
L |
L |
- |
33.9% |
35.0% |
60.0% |
33 |
45.5% |
44.4% |
73.7% |
32 |
December 2000 |
12-29-00 |
vs TENN-MARTIN |
NL |
NL |
70-54 |
W |
- |
- |
47.5% |
35.0% |
58.3% |
33 |
37.0% |
40.0% |
72.7% |
37 |
12-27-00 |
vs LOUISIANA TECH |
NL |
NL |
71-52 |
W |
- |
- |
51.7% |
27.3% |
100.0% |
25 |
45.8% |
21.1% |
80.0% |
29 |
12-21-00 |
vs MEMPHIS |
-1 |
NL |
66-57 |
W |
W |
- |
38.2% |
42.9% |
66.7% |
48 |
28.0% |
26.9% |
50.0% |
50 |
12-18-00 |
vs E ILLINOIS |
NL |
NL |
83-73 |
W |
- |
- |
46.7% |
47.1% |
65.5% |
37 |
38.8% |
36.4% |
76.5% |
44 |
12-16-00 |
vs NEBRASKA |
-3.5 |
NL |
64-72 |
L |
L |
- |
51.0% |
35.0% |
77.8% |
28 |
52.1% |
50.0% |
57.7% |
36 |
12-9-00 |
vs C FLORIDA |
NL |
NL |
83-72 |
W |
- |
- |
45.5% |
41.2% |
76.2% |
42 |
47.4% |
34.6% |
75.0% |
30 |
12-4-00 |
at N CAROLINA |
+16.5 |
NL |
45-67 |
L |
L |
- |
23.4% |
13.0% |
85.7% |
37 |
48.0% |
33.3% |
56.0% |
54 |
November 2000 |
11-28-00 |
at UNC-CHARLOTTE |
+12 |
NL |
63-95 |
L |
L |
- |
33.8% |
25.9% |
90.9% |
29 |
58.3% |
50.0% |
56.3% |
45 |
11-25-00 |
vs NORTHEASTERN |
NL |
NL |
92-86 |
W |
- |
- |
48.6% |
29.4% |
76.0% |
38 |
55.0% |
64.3% |
73.3% |
33 |
11-21-00 |
vs COLUMBIA |
-22 |
NL |
65-41 |
W |
W |
- |
36.9% |
19.0% |
68.4% |
44 |
33.3% |
41.7% |
50.0% |
34 |
11-18-00 |
at FLA ATLANTIC |
NL |
NL |
76-59 |
W |
- |
- |
43.5% |
38.9% |
68.2% |
43 |
31.3% |
13.0% |
77.8% |
45 |
|
Game Situation Report for the 2000-2001 Season Season |
29 |
16-13 (55.2%) |
15-8-0 (65.2%) |
3-6-0 |
33.3% |
66.7% |
70.3 |
67.7 |
+2.6 |
16 |
12-4 (75.0%) |
8-3-0 (72.7%) |
1-2-0 |
33.3% |
66.7% |
74.3 |
66.6 |
+7.7 |
12 |
4-8 (33.3%) |
7-4-0 (63.6%) |
1-4-0 |
20.0% |
80.0% |
65.2 |
68.3 |
-3.2 |
1 |
0-1 (0.0%) |
0-1-0 (0.0%) |
1-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
69.0 |
78.0 |
-9.0 |
1 |
0-1 (0.0%) |
0-1-0 (0.0%) |
1-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
69.0 |
78.0 |
-9.0 |
1 |
0-1 (0.0%) |
1-0-0 (100.0%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
58.0 |
60.0 |
-2.0 |
29 |
16-13 (55.2%) |
15-8-0 (65.2%) |
3-6-0 |
33.3% |
66.7% |
70.3 |
67.7 |
+2.6 |
9 |
5-4 (55.6%) |
5-4-0 (55.6%) |
2-1-0 |
66.7% |
33.3% |
71.2 |
66.4 |
+4.8 |
13 |
4-9 (30.8%) |
9-4-0 (69.2%) |
1-4-0 |
20.0% |
80.0% |
65.5 |
69.5 |
-4.0 |
7 |
5-2 (71.4%) |
5-2-0 (71.4%) |
1-1-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
71.1 |
62.1 |
+9.0 |
3 |
1-2 (33.3%) |
2-1-0 (66.7%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
73.0 |
75.7 |
-2.7 |
1 |
0-1 (0.0%) |
0-1-0 (0.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
74.0 |
85.0 |
-11.0 |
10 |
3-7 (30.0%) |
7-3-0 (70.0%) |
1-4-0 |
20.0% |
80.0% |
63.2 |
67.6 |
-4.4 |
3 |
2-1 (66.7%) |
1-0-0 (100.0%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
72.0 |
64.7 |
+7.3 |
8 |
5-3 (62.5%) |
6-2-0 (75.0%) |
0-2-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
69.0 |
66.8 |
+2.3 |
18 |
9-9 (50.0%) |
8-6-0 (57.1%) |
3-3-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
70.6 |
68.6 |
+2.0 |
16 |
9-7 (56.3%) |
8-5-0 (61.5%) |
3-3-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
69.6 |
66.2 |
+3.4 |
12 |
6-6 (50.0%) |
7-3-0 (70.0%) |
0-3-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
70.8 |
70.4 |
+0.3 |
14 |
8-6 (57.1%) |
8-4-0 (66.7%) |
3-3-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
73.6 |
69.5 |
+4.1 |
8 |
4-4 (50.0%) |
5-1-0 (83.3%) |
0-3-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
69.3 |
68.8 |
+0.5 |
|
|
|
| |
|