The Leader In Sports Handicapping
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MIAMI OHIO - |
|
|
All Games YTD for the 2001-2002 Season |
Last 20 Games |
All Games YTD
|
March 2002 |
3-7-02 |
vs BALL ST |
+5 |
134 |
50-62 |
L |
L |
Un |
38.8% |
16.7% |
83.3% |
34 |
43.4% |
17.6% |
72.2% |
30 |
3-4-02 |
vs BUFFALO |
-9.5 |
NL |
70-60 |
W |
W |
- |
55.8% |
36.4% |
78.3% |
26 |
50.0% |
53.3% |
62.5% |
20 |
3-2-02 |
vs KENT ST |
+4 |
NL |
67-70 |
L |
W |
- |
57.8% |
56.3% |
75.0% |
17 |
55.3% |
57.1% |
76.9% |
26 |
February 2002 |
2-25-02 |
vs BUFFALO |
-9 |
NL |
78-68 |
W |
W |
- |
50.0% |
27.3% |
75.0% |
26 |
54.5% |
31.3% |
62.5% |
31 |
2-23-02 |
at BALL ST |
+8.5 |
NL |
58-74 |
L |
L |
- |
50.0% |
33.3% |
66.7% |
25 |
47.2% |
45.8% |
86.7% |
31 |
2-20-02 |
vs BOWLING GREEN |
-2.5 |
NL |
50-65 |
L |
L |
- |
35.4% |
50.0% |
75.0% |
22 |
47.4% |
55.6% |
82.8% |
32 |
2-16-02 |
at KENT ST |
+12 |
NL |
57-73 |
L |
L |
- |
36.7% |
33.3% |
50.0% |
31 |
57.1% |
23.5% |
81.3% |
33 |
2-14-02 |
at MARSHALL |
+2.5 |
NL |
74-82 |
L |
L |
- |
43.8% |
35.0% |
73.3% |
41 |
51.9% |
66.7% |
64.0% |
26 |
2-11-02 |
vs OHIO U |
-3 |
NL |
79-55 |
W |
W |
- |
50.0% |
42.9% |
87.5% |
32 |
46.5% |
43.8% |
61.5% |
25 |
2-9-02 |
vs TOLEDO |
-6.5 |
NL |
64-54 |
W |
W |
- |
46.9% |
23.1% |
71.4% |
32 |
40.0% |
42.1% |
85.7% |
27 |
2-6-02 |
at BUFFALO |
+1 |
NL |
66-52 |
W |
W |
- |
43.8% |
35.7% |
86.4% |
39 |
31.0% |
21.1% |
80.0% |
33 |
2-2-02 |
at BOWLING GREEN |
+8 |
NL |
61-64 |
L |
W |
- |
42.1% |
18.2% |
84.6% |
34 |
46.5% |
35.3% |
72.0% |
26 |
January 2002 |
1-26-02 |
vs BALL ST |
+2.5 |
NL |
80-77 |
W |
W |
- |
52.8% |
55.6% |
79.2% |
31 |
54.4% |
45.8% |
44.4% |
27 |
1-22-02 |
at N ILLINOIS |
-2.5 |
NL |
70-78 |
L |
L |
- |
40.4% |
22.2% |
74.3% |
39 |
39.7% |
50.0% |
63.2% |
40 |
1-19-02 |
at OHIO U |
+5 |
NL |
61-85 |
L |
L |
- |
29.8% |
37.5% |
75.0% |
34 |
57.7% |
43.8% |
72.0% |
34 |
1-16-02 |
vs E MICHIGAN |
-19.5 |
NL |
72-56 |
W |
L |
- |
42.9% |
37.5% |
75.0% |
39 |
38.0% |
40.0% |
73.7% |
33 |
1-12-02 |
vs AKRON |
-13 |
NL |
50-48 |
W |
L |
- |
31.6% |
28.6% |
66.7% |
36 |
36.7% |
57.1% |
61.5% |
39 |
1-9-02 |
vs MARSHALL |
-3 |
NL |
80-65 |
W |
W |
- |
51.7% |
55.0% |
77.8% |
32 |
42.6% |
40.0% |
95.0% |
26 |
1-5-02 |
at C MICHIGAN |
+4 |
NL |
100-94 |
W |
W |
- |
45.9% |
36.4% |
61.5% |
53 |
44.1% |
34.8% |
77.3% |
35 |
1-2-02 |
at W MICHIGAN |
+2 |
NL |
63-69 |
L |
L |
- |
43.3% |
25.0% |
66.7% |
36 |
42.9% |
25.0% |
84.2% |
36 |
December 2001 |
12-29-01 |
at DAYTON |
+9 |
NL |
23-60 |
L |
L |
- |
13.3% |
23.1% |
66.7% |
33 |
37.5% |
47.1% |
80.0% |
52 |
12-22-01 |
vs IONA |
-6 |
NL |
51-57 |
L |
L |
- |
40.9% |
11.1% |
73.7% |
28 |
46.5% |
38.5% |
66.7% |
23 |
12-21-01 |
vs GEORGIA |
+4.5 |
NL |
59-64 |
L |
L |
- |
37.0% |
27.8% |
77.8% |
32 |
47.9% |
40.0% |
66.7% |
29 |
12-20-01 |
vs BOSTON COLLEGE |
+7.5 |
NL |
73-67 |
W |
W |
- |
44.6% |
46.7% |
69.6% |
37 |
34.4% |
28.6% |
65.4% |
37 |
12-16-01 |
at USC |
+15 |
NL |
55-59 |
L |
W |
- |
40.0% |
27.8% |
85.7% |
36 |
51.1% |
29.4% |
44.4% |
23 |
12-8-01 |
vs NOTRE DAME |
+6.5 |
NL |
69-70 |
L |
W |
- |
48.1% |
26.7% |
86.7% |
34 |
49.0% |
61.5% |
92.3% |
22 |
12-3-01 |
at EVANSVILLE |
+1 |
NL |
63-67 |
L |
L |
- |
42.6% |
33.3% |
81.8% |
30 |
50.0% |
28.6% |
59.1% |
34 |
12-1-01 |
vs WRIGHT ST |
-7.5 |
NL |
67-61 |
W |
L |
- |
51.1% |
62.5% |
76.2% |
30 |
34.6% |
44.0% |
93.3% |
31 |
November 2001 |
11-28-01 |
vs XAVIER |
+2 |
NL |
58-87 |
L |
L |
- |
37.3% |
38.5% |
75.0% |
23 |
60.0% |
55.6% |
76.7% |
38 |
11-19-01 |
vs GEORGE MASON |
-7 |
NL |
70-65 |
W |
L |
- |
51.0% |
33.3% |
78.3% |
28 |
52.2% |
52.6% |
53.8% |
26 |
11-17-01 |
at UNC-WILMINGTON |
+7 |
NL |
42-50 |
L |
L |
- |
27.0% |
28.6% |
44.4% |
50 |
34.1% |
18.8% |
68.0% |
34 |
|
Game Situation Report for the 2001-2002 Season Season |
31 |
13-18 (41.9%) |
13-18-0 (41.9%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
63.9 |
66.4 |
-2.5 |
14 |
10-4 (71.4%) |
8-6-0 (57.1%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
68.1 |
64.4 |
+3.8 |
13 |
2-11 (15.4%) |
4-9-0 (30.8%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
61.0 |
69.8 |
-8.8 |
4 |
1-3 (25.0%) |
1-3-0 (25.0%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
58.3 |
62.5 |
-4.3 |
5 |
2-3 (40.0%) |
2-3-0 (40.0%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
60.6 |
62.0 |
-1.4 |
31 |
13-18 (41.9%) |
13-18-0 (41.9%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
63.9 |
66.4 |
-2.5 |
12 |
9-3 (75.0%) |
5-7-0 (41.7%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
66.8 |
61.0 |
+5.8 |
19 |
4-15 (21.1%) |
8-11-0 (42.1%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
62.1 |
69.8 |
-7.7 |
10 |
9-1 (90.0%) |
5-5-0 (50.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
68.0 |
59.7 |
+8.3 |
4 |
1-3 (25.0%) |
3-1-0 (75.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
68.5 |
76.0 |
-7.5 |
1 |
0-1 (0.0%) |
0-1-0 (0.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
70.0 |
78.0 |
-8.0 |
12 |
2-10 (16.7%) |
4-8-0 (33.3%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
60.3 |
69.1 |
-8.8 |
2 |
0-2 (0.0%) |
0-2-0 (0.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
55.0 |
60.5 |
-5.5 |
6 |
4-2 (66.7%) |
3-3-0 (50.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
69.5 |
64.7 |
+4.8 |
9 |
4-5 (44.4%) |
2-7-0 (22.2%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
66.0 |
70.9 |
-4.9 |
14 |
5-9 (35.7%) |
8-6-0 (57.1%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
61.4 |
65.1 |
-3.7 |
13 |
5-8 (38.5%) |
5-8-0 (38.5%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
64.5 |
66.1 |
-1.6 |
17 |
8-9 (47.1%) |
8-9-0 (47.1%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
64.7 |
67.6 |
-2.9 |
13 |
7-6 (53.8%) |
9-4-0 (69.2%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
65.2 |
61.7 |
+3.5 |
17 |
6-11 (35.3%) |
4-13-0 (23.5%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
64.1 |
70.9 |
-6.8 |
|
|
|
| |
|