The Leader In Sports Handicapping
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MICHIGAN - |
|
|
All Games YTD for the 2001-2002 Season |
Last 20 Games |
All Games YTD
|
March 2002 |
3-8-02 |
vs OHIO ST |
+11 |
134.5 |
68-75 |
L |
W |
Ov |
40.4% |
29.4% |
85.0% |
32 |
48.1% |
46.2% |
77.3% |
28 |
3-7-02 |
vs NORTHWESTERN |
+3 |
117.5 |
72-51 |
W |
W |
Ov |
46.2% |
61.5% |
80.0% |
36 |
33.3% |
26.7% |
64.3% |
30 |
3-2-02 |
vs OHIO ST |
+6 |
NL |
75-84 |
L |
L |
- |
50.0% |
31.3% |
100.0% |
22 |
54.0% |
60.0% |
82.8% |
29 |
February 2002 |
2-27-02 |
at WISCONSIN |
+11 |
NL |
54-74 |
L |
L |
- |
47.9% |
21.4% |
50.0% |
29 |
47.4% |
68.4% |
53.8% |
32 |
2-23-02 |
at IOWA |
+10.5 |
137 |
56-76 |
L |
L |
Un |
37.0% |
38.1% |
88.9% |
25 |
51.8% |
45.5% |
81.3% |
38 |
2-17-02 |
vs INDIANA |
+8 |
131 |
55-75 |
L |
L |
Un |
37.5% |
25.0% |
71.4% |
28 |
54.5% |
60.0% |
85.7% |
30 |
2-13-02 |
at PURDUE |
+7.5 |
NL |
43-79 |
L |
L |
- |
24.1% |
18.8% |
64.3% |
31 |
47.5% |
45.8% |
80.0% |
44 |
2-11-02 |
at COLORADO ST |
+4.5 |
NL |
66-70 |
L |
W |
- |
40.0% |
36.7% |
73.3% |
34 |
43.6% |
36.4% |
69.2% |
40 |
2-9-02 |
vs PENN ST |
-9.5 |
NL |
65-58 |
W |
L |
- |
52.1% |
28.6% |
68.4% |
33 |
42.0% |
50.0% |
50.0% |
23 |
2-7-02 |
vs ILLINOIS |
+8 |
143 |
60-68 |
L |
P |
Un |
40.7% |
29.2% |
64.3% |
31 |
41.1% |
33.3% |
93.3% |
38 |
2-2-02 |
vs WISCONSIN |
-2 |
NL |
64-53 |
W |
W |
- |
48.9% |
30.0% |
85.0% |
31 |
31.6% |
26.7% |
68.4% |
35 |
January 2002 |
1-30-02 |
at MICHIGAN ST |
+11 |
NL |
44-71 |
L |
L |
- |
29.6% |
19.0% |
57.1% |
25 |
52.1% |
43.8% |
93.3% |
41 |
1-26-02 |
vs VERMONT |
NL |
NL |
75-62 |
W |
- |
- |
55.2% |
40.0% |
75.0% |
31 |
36.0% |
27.8% |
60.0% |
44 |
1-24-02 |
at OHIO ST |
+13.5 |
140 |
47-69 |
L |
L |
Un |
30.4% |
20.0% |
69.2% |
36 |
42.6% |
36.4% |
52.9% |
43 |
1-19-02 |
vs MINNESOTA |
PK |
NL |
71-69 |
W |
W |
- |
44.6% |
31.6% |
83.3% |
29 |
43.6% |
35.3% |
75.0% |
35 |
1-16-02 |
vs NORTHWESTERN |
-6.5 |
NL |
54-58 |
L |
L |
- |
39.2% |
36.4% |
66.7% |
39 |
43.8% |
22.7% |
50.0% |
28 |
1-12-02 |
at ILLINOIS |
+16 |
NL |
70-94 |
L |
L |
- |
38.1% |
30.4% |
71.4% |
31 |
68.0% |
50.0% |
76.9% |
30 |
1-9-02 |
at MINNESOTA |
+7.5 |
NL |
82-90 |
L |
L |
- |
41.3% |
40.0% |
90.9% |
24 |
69.4% |
61.5% |
70.0% |
32 |
1-5-02 |
vs PURDUE |
-2 |
NL |
79-75 |
W |
W |
- |
56.9% |
42.9% |
88.2% |
25 |
48.5% |
41.2% |
50.0% |
33 |
1-2-02 |
at PENN ST |
-2.5 |
NL |
67-63 |
W |
W |
- |
42.1% |
47.1% |
73.3% |
31 |
45.6% |
31.8% |
50.0% |
33 |
December 2001 |
12-29-01 |
at SAN FRANCISCO |
-3 |
NL |
47-55 |
L |
L |
- |
24.6% |
26.3% |
71.4% |
42 |
38.3% |
30.8% |
62.5% |
42 |
12-22-01 |
vs E MICHIGAN |
-18.5 |
NL |
88-58 |
W |
W |
- |
58.3% |
43.5% |
66.7% |
33 |
40.0% |
35.0% |
30.0% |
34 |
12-8-01 |
vs DUKE |
+16.5 |
NL |
83-104 |
L |
L |
- |
44.4% |
40.9% |
90.0% |
29 |
60.3% |
47.8% |
77.3% |
35 |
12-4-01 |
vs IUPU-FORT WAYNE |
NL |
NL |
91-62 |
W |
- |
- |
47.1% |
35.7% |
73.3% |
48 |
40.0% |
26.1% |
60.0% |
35 |
12-1-01 |
vs BOSTON COLLEGE |
+2 |
149 |
74-83 |
L |
L |
Ov |
44.2% |
42.1% |
71.4% |
32 |
46.5% |
26.3% |
66.7% |
42 |
November 2001 |
11-28-01 |
at BOWLING GREEN |
+3 |
NL |
59-65 |
L |
L |
- |
46.5% |
33.3% |
69.6% |
27 |
51.1% |
27.3% |
70.0% |
28 |
11-23-01 |
at W MICHIGAN |
-6.5 |
NL |
73-79 |
L |
L |
- |
42.4% |
30.4% |
88.9% |
31 |
53.1% |
52.2% |
68.2% |
31 |
11-20-01 |
vs FAIRFIELD |
-14 |
NL |
88-59 |
W |
W |
- |
57.1% |
57.9% |
59.1% |
31 |
38.3% |
33.3% |
70.0% |
31 |
11-16-01 |
vs OAKLAND |
NL |
NL |
81-73 |
W |
- |
- |
57.4% |
28.6% |
74.2% |
32 |
44.4% |
30.8% |
75.0% |
24 |
|
Game Situation Report for the 2001-2002 Season Season |
29 |
11-18 (37.9%) |
9-16-1 (36.0%) |
3-4-0 |
42.9% |
57.1% |
67.3 |
70.8 |
-3.5 |
15 |
9-6 (60.0%) |
5-6-1 (45.5%) |
1-2-0 |
33.3% |
66.7% |
73.5 |
69.4 |
+4.1 |
12 |
1-11 (8.3%) |
2-10-0 (16.7%) |
0-2-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
59.0 |
73.8 |
-14.8 |
2 |
1-1 (50.0%) |
2-0-0 (100.0%) |
2-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
70.0 |
63.0 |
+7.0 |
2 |
1-1 (50.0%) |
2-0-0 (100.0%) |
2-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
70.0 |
63.0 |
+7.0 |
28 |
10-18 (35.7%) |
9-16-1 (36.0%) |
3-4-0 |
42.9% |
57.1% |
66.4 |
71.1 |
-4.6 |
9 |
6-3 (66.7%) |
5-4-0 (55.6%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
69.4 |
62.0 |
+7.4 |
16 |
1-15 (6.3%) |
3-12-1 (20.0%) |
3-4-0 |
42.9% |
57.1% |
63.0 |
76.8 |
-13.8 |
6 |
5-1 (83.3%) |
4-2-0 (66.7%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
73.0 |
60.2 |
+12.8 |
5 |
0-5 (0.0%) |
0-4-1 (0.0%) |
1-2-0 |
33.3% |
66.7% |
69.4 |
82.8 |
-13.4 |
3 |
1-2 (33.3%) |
1-2-0 (33.3%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
62.3 |
65.7 |
-3.3 |
9 |
0-9 (0.0%) |
1-8-0 (11.1%) |
0-2-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
57.9 |
76.4 |
-18.6 |
1 |
0-1 (0.0%) |
1-0-0 (100.0%) |
1-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
68.0 |
75.0 |
-7.0 |
4 |
2-2 (50.0%) |
1-2-0 (33.3%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
62.3 |
67.3 |
-5.0 |
8 |
4-4 (50.0%) |
3-4-0 (42.9%) |
1-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
74.6 |
74.9 |
-0.3 |
16 |
5-11 (31.3%) |
4-10-1 (28.6%) |
1-4-0 |
20.0% |
80.0% |
64.8 |
69.3 |
-4.5 |
11 |
2-9 (18.2%) |
4-6-1 (40.0%) |
1-2-0 |
33.3% |
66.7% |
67.0 |
74.1 |
-7.1 |
17 |
8-9 (47.1%) |
5-10-0 (33.3%) |
2-2-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
66.6 |
68.5 |
-1.8 |
8 |
1-7 (12.5%) |
2-5-1 (28.6%) |
1-2-0 |
33.3% |
66.7% |
62.4 |
73.8 |
-11.4 |
16 |
7-9 (43.8%) |
6-8-0 (42.9%) |
2-2-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
68.2 |
68.6 |
-0.4 |
|
|
|
| |
|