The Leader In Sports Handicapping
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MICHIGAN Wolverines21-14 |
|
|
All Games YTD for the 2010-2011 Season |
Last 20 Games |
All Games YTD
|
March 2011 |
3-20-11 |
vs DUKE |
+12.5 |
135.5 |
71-73 |
L |
W |
Ov |
50.9% |
33.3% |
90.9% |
22 |
51.0% |
25.0% |
72.0% |
33 |
3-18-11 |
vs TENNESSEE |
PK |
127.5 |
75-45 |
W |
W |
Un |
51.6% |
34.6% |
0.0% |
36 |
34.9% |
16.7% |
75.0% |
26 |
3-12-11 |
vs OHIO ST |
+10 |
129.5 |
61-68 |
L |
W |
Un |
37.3% |
31.0% |
80.0% |
33 |
46.3% |
35.7% |
56.5% |
39 |
3-11-11 |
vs ILLINOIS |
+3 |
125.5 |
60-55 |
W |
W |
Un |
41.7% |
45.8% |
81.8% |
30 |
42.3% |
34.6% |
66.7% |
31 |
3-5-11 |
vs MICHIGAN ST |
-1 |
126.5 |
70-63 |
W |
W |
Ov |
42.0% |
26.3% |
74.2% |
30 |
32.8% |
36.4% |
75.0% |
46 |
February 2011 |
2-26-11 |
at MINNESOTA |
+6 |
126.5 |
70-63 |
W |
W |
Ov |
45.5% |
42.9% |
88.9% |
28 |
43.1% |
37.5% |
87.5% |
36 |
2-23-11 |
vs WISCONSIN |
+4.5 |
121.5 |
52-53 |
L |
W |
Un |
48.8% |
53.8% |
45.5% |
30 |
36.2% |
27.6% |
100.0% |
32 |
2-19-11 |
at IOWA |
PK |
127.5 |
75-72 |
W |
W |
Ov |
48.1% |
30.0% |
79.2% |
27 |
44.8% |
11.8% |
81.8% |
36 |
2-16-11 |
at ILLINOIS |
+9.5 |
131.5 |
52-54 |
L |
W |
Un |
37.3% |
11.1% |
60.0% |
32 |
44.2% |
22.2% |
44.4% |
38 |
2-12-11 |
vs INDIANA |
-7 |
131.5 |
73-69 |
W |
L |
Ov |
53.5% |
53.3% |
51.4% |
28 |
47.3% |
25.0% |
59.1% |
34 |
2-9-11 |
vs NORTHWESTERN |
-2 |
135.5 |
75-66 |
W |
W |
Ov |
51.9% |
40.0% |
71.4% |
38 |
46.4% |
44.0% |
42.9% |
25 |
2-6-11 |
at PENN ST |
+5 |
121 |
65-62 |
W |
W |
Ov |
49.0% |
47.4% |
66.7% |
27 |
40.4% |
35.7% |
82.4% |
31 |
2-3-11 |
at OHIO ST |
+16 |
130 |
53-62 |
L |
W |
Un |
41.8% |
31.6% |
25.0% |
28 |
44.7% |
33.3% |
60.0% |
36 |
January 2011 |
1-30-11 |
vs IOWA |
-7.5 |
126.5 |
87-73 |
W |
W |
Ov |
58.9% |
50.0% |
87.5% |
29 |
49.1% |
38.5% |
70.6% |
26 |
1-27-11 |
at MICHIGAN ST |
+11 |
127 |
61-57 |
W |
W |
Un |
50.0% |
47.6% |
41.7% |
29 |
43.8% |
26.3% |
62.5% |
29 |
1-22-11 |
vs MINNESOTA |
-1.5 |
129 |
64-69 |
L |
L |
Ov |
43.4% |
34.3% |
66.7% |
13 |
63.4% |
50.0% |
56.5% |
38 |
1-18-11 |
at NORTHWESTERN |
+7 |
132.5 |
60-74 |
L |
L |
Ov |
39.7% |
28.6% |
53.3% |
38 |
48.2% |
41.7% |
71.4% |
35 |
1-15-11 |
at INDIANA |
+2.5 |
127 |
61-80 |
L |
L |
Ov |
36.4% |
29.2% |
70.0% |
18 |
67.4% |
42.9% |
80.0% |
37 |
1-12-11 |
vs OHIO ST |
+11 |
126.5 |
64-68 |
L |
W |
Ov |
52.2% |
45.8% |
71.4% |
23 |
52.4% |
50.0% |
68.0% |
26 |
1-9-11 |
vs KANSAS |
+10 |
136 |
60-67 |
L |
W |
Un |
33.3% |
14.3% |
82.4% |
42 |
35.7% |
16.7% |
74.2% |
43 |
1-5-11 |
at WISCONSIN |
+12 |
118.5 |
50-66 |
L |
L |
Un |
39.5% |
38.1% |
100.0% |
21 |
47.7% |
47.4% |
83.3% |
29 |
1-2-11 |
vs PENN ST |
-5.5 |
124 |
76-69 |
W |
W |
Ov |
57.4% |
40.0% |
100.0% |
24 |
46.3% |
33.3% |
66.7% |
26 |
December 2010 |
12-28-10 |
vs PURDUE |
+4 |
122.5 |
57-80 |
L |
L |
Ov |
38.2% |
39.1% |
75.0% |
30 |
49.2% |
55.6% |
80.0% |
38 |
12-23-10 |
vs BRYANT |
NL |
NL |
87-71 |
W |
- |
- |
48.3% |
50.0% |
68.2% |
32 |
46.4% |
52.0% |
54.5% |
33 |
12-18-10 |
vs OAKLAND |
-5 |
NL |
69-51 |
W |
W |
- |
44.6% |
31.6% |
81.3% |
40 |
30.0% |
19.4% |
52.9% |
39 |
12-14-10 |
vs NC CENTRAL |
NL |
NL |
64-44 |
W |
- |
- |
41.1% |
27.6% |
71.4% |
37 |
30.4% |
25.0% |
80.0% |
33 |
12-10-10 |
vs UTAH |
-8.5 |
128 |
75-64 |
W |
W |
Ov |
45.8% |
36.4% |
81.3% |
32 |
45.5% |
43.8% |
53.8% |
37 |
12-6-10 |
vs CONCORDIA MI |
NL |
NL |
86-65 |
W |
- |
- |
48.6% |
30.4% |
56.3% |
46 |
42.9% |
28.0% |
50.0% |
34 |
12-4-10 |
vs HARVARD |
-8.5 |
127 |
65-62 |
W |
L |
P |
47.2% |
38.5% |
50.0% |
36 |
40.7% |
34.6% |
81.8% |
30 |
November 2010 |
11-30-10 |
at CLEMSON |
+9.5 |
121.5 |
69-61 |
W |
W |
Ov |
44.9% |
30.0% |
67.9% |
35 |
36.5% |
24.1% |
61.5% |
38 |
11-27-10 |
vs UTEP |
-2 |
127 |
56-65 |
L |
L |
Un |
30.2% |
17.2% |
73.1% |
31 |
50.9% |
21.4% |
66.7% |
40 |
11-26-10 |
vs SYRACUSE |
+6.5 |
132.5 |
50-53 |
L |
W |
Un |
32.3% |
25.0% |
50.0% |
37 |
41.7% |
35.7% |
53.3% |
39 |
11-21-10 |
vs GARDNER WEBB |
NL |
NL |
80-58 |
W |
- |
- |
52.4% |
36.4% |
75.0% |
45 |
39.3% |
33.3% |
60.0% |
23 |
11-18-10 |
vs BOWLING GREEN |
-14 |
124.5 |
69-50 |
W |
W |
Un |
48.1% |
47.1% |
64.3% |
43 |
29.6% |
14.3% |
69.6% |
30 |
11-13-10 |
vs USC UPSTATE |
NL |
NL |
66-35 |
W |
- |
- |
44.0% |
31.8% |
71.4% |
45 |
22.2% |
16.7% |
63.6% |
32 |
|
Game Situation Report for the 2010-2011 Season Season |
35 |
21-14 (60.0%) |
22-8-0 (73.3%) |
16-12-1 |
57.1% |
42.9% |
66.5 |
62.5 |
+4.0 |
19 |
14-5 (73.7%) |
10-4-0 (71.4%) |
9-3-1 |
75.0% |
25.0% |
70.5 |
61.9 |
+8.5 |
10 |
5-5 (50.0%) |
7-3-0 (70.0%) |
6-4-0 |
60.0% |
40.0% |
61.6 |
65.1 |
-3.5 |
6 |
2-4 (33.3%) |
5-1-0 (83.3%) |
1-5-0 |
16.7% |
83.3% |
62.2 |
59.8 |
+2.3 |
4 |
1-3 (25.0%) |
3-1-0 (75.0%) |
0-4-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
56.8 |
60.3 |
-3.5 |
2 |
1-1 (50.0%) |
2-0-0 (100.0%) |
1-1-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
73.0 |
59.0 |
+14.0 |
20 |
10-10 (50.0%) |
14-6-0 (70.0%) |
13-7-0 |
65.0% |
35.0% |
64.3 |
66.2 |
-1.9 |
15 |
11-4 (73.3%) |
8-2-0 (80.0%) |
3-5-1 |
37.5% |
62.5% |
69.5 |
57.6 |
+11.9 |
11 |
9-2 (81.8%) |
7-4-0 (63.6%) |
7-2-1 |
77.8% |
22.2% |
70.8 |
63.7 |
+7.1 |
17 |
5-12 (29.4%) |
13-4-0 (76.5%) |
8-9-0 |
47.1% |
52.9% |
59.8 |
64.5 |
-4.7 |
10 |
9-1 (90.0%) |
7-3-0 (70.0%) |
7-1-1 |
87.5% |
12.5% |
72.3 |
63.6 |
+8.7 |
4 |
0-4 (0.0%) |
3-1-0 (75.0%) |
2-2-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
58.3 |
67.0 |
-8.8 |
9 |
4-5 (44.4%) |
6-3-0 (66.7%) |
5-4-0 |
55.6% |
44.4% |
60.1 |
64.3 |
-4.2 |
2 |
0-2 (0.0%) |
1-1-0 (50.0%) |
0-2-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
58.5 |
66.5 |
-8.0 |
2 |
1-1 (50.0%) |
1-0-0 (100.0%) |
1-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
78.5 |
69.0 |
+9.5 |
12 |
8-4 (66.7%) |
7-4-0 (63.6%) |
10-1-0 |
90.9% |
9.1% |
69.1 |
67.7 |
+1.4 |
19 |
12-7 (63.2%) |
13-3-0 (81.3%) |
5-9-1 |
35.7% |
64.3% |
64.5 |
58.1 |
+6.4 |
21 |
13-8 (61.9%) |
13-4-0 (76.5%) |
7-8-1 |
46.7% |
53.3% |
67.0 |
61.9 |
+5.0 |
13 |
7-6 (53.8%) |
9-4-0 (69.2%) |
9-4-0 |
69.2% |
30.8% |
65.8 |
65.5 |
+0.3 |
21 |
13-8 (61.9%) |
13-5-0 (72.2%) |
10-7-1 |
58.8% |
41.2% |
67.3 |
63.7 |
+3.6 |
8 |
4-4 (50.0%) |
5-2-0 (71.4%) |
4-3-0 |
57.1% |
42.9% |
66.0 |
64.5 |
+1.5 |
|
|
|
| |
|