The Leader In Sports Handicapping
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MISSISSIPPI ST - |
|
|
All Games YTD for the 2001-2002 Season |
Last 20 Games |
All Games YTD
|
March 2002 |
3-17-02 |
vs TEXAS |
+1.5 |
143.5 |
64-68 |
L |
L |
Un |
48.0% |
26.1% |
66.7% |
22 |
50.0% |
43.8% |
86.7% |
33 |
3-15-02 |
vs MCNEESE ST |
-10 |
128.5 |
70-58 |
W |
W |
Un |
46.3% |
36.4% |
72.7% |
40 |
37.9% |
25.0% |
50.0% |
38 |
3-10-02 |
vs ALABAMA |
+2.5 |
138 |
61-58 |
W |
W |
Un |
41.1% |
31.3% |
58.8% |
35 |
38.5% |
28.6% |
75.0% |
33 |
3-9-02 |
vs LSU |
-5 |
129.5 |
57-51 |
W |
W |
Un |
35.3% |
23.8% |
66.7% |
35 |
39.1% |
23.1% |
70.6% |
30 |
3-8-02 |
vs FLORIDA |
+8.5 |
144 |
62-52 |
W |
W |
Un |
37.0% |
37.5% |
72.7% |
39 |
31.3% |
25.0% |
63.6% |
40 |
3-2-02 |
at S CAROLINA |
+5 |
132 |
64-57 |
W |
W |
Un |
45.3% |
50.0% |
84.6% |
40 |
35.7% |
0.0% |
73.9% |
29 |
February 2002 |
2-27-02 |
vs ARKANSAS |
-6 |
NL |
89-83 |
W |
P |
- |
49.1% |
26.3% |
71.1% |
46 |
45.9% |
46.4% |
82.4% |
21 |
2-23-02 |
vs MISSISSIPPI |
-4.5 |
NL |
61-59 |
W |
L |
- |
47.1% |
20.0% |
62.5% |
26 |
46.2% |
45.0% |
33.3% |
34 |
2-20-02 |
at VANDERBILT |
-2 |
NL |
66-43 |
W |
W |
- |
57.1% |
27.3% |
63.6% |
41 |
31.4% |
10.0% |
69.2% |
19 |
2-16-02 |
vs AUBURN |
-8.5 |
NL |
89-53 |
W |
W |
- |
51.6% |
50.0% |
62.5% |
48 |
38.8% |
31.6% |
42.9% |
25 |
2-13-02 |
at LSU |
+1 |
NL |
65-68 |
L |
L |
- |
42.6% |
41.7% |
56.0% |
32 |
46.6% |
41.2% |
53.8% |
38 |
2-9-02 |
vs ALABAMA |
+1.5 |
NL |
76-62 |
W |
W |
- |
56.1% |
63.2% |
66.7% |
29 |
34.8% |
12.5% |
76.5% |
36 |
2-6-02 |
vs GEORGIA |
-3.5 |
NL |
68-86 |
L |
L |
- |
43.3% |
14.8% |
66.7% |
28 |
50.0% |
33.3% |
89.5% |
40 |
2-2-02 |
at FLORIDA |
+15 |
NL |
48-76 |
L |
L |
- |
37.5% |
25.0% |
33.3% |
39 |
45.6% |
40.0% |
54.5% |
42 |
January 2002 |
1-30-02 |
at AUBURN |
+1 |
NL |
72-64 |
W |
W |
- |
43.8% |
23.1% |
65.0% |
45 |
40.7% |
30.4% |
81.8% |
28 |
1-26-02 |
vs LSU |
-6 |
NL |
84-61 |
W |
W |
- |
62.7% |
60.0% |
45.8% |
38 |
39.3% |
33.3% |
70.0% |
24 |
1-19-02 |
at ALABAMA |
+9 |
NL |
73-85 |
L |
L |
- |
44.6% |
29.2% |
88.9% |
29 |
49.1% |
27.3% |
82.4% |
36 |
1-16-02 |
vs TENNESSEE |
-3.5 |
NL |
92-91 |
W |
L |
- |
56.7% |
45.0% |
62.5% |
34 |
54.4% |
36.8% |
58.8% |
33 |
1-12-02 |
at MISSISSIPPI |
+4.5 |
NL |
59-66 |
L |
L |
- |
43.2% |
27.3% |
62.1% |
39 |
36.7% |
27.3% |
70.6% |
33 |
1-8-02 |
at ARKANSAS |
+8 |
155 |
64-75 |
L |
L |
Un |
37.3% |
28.6% |
60.9% |
46 |
44.6% |
35.7% |
43.8% |
35 |
1-5-02 |
vs KENTUCKY |
+7 |
NL |
74-69 |
W |
W |
- |
38.5% |
36.8% |
60.7% |
43 |
44.8% |
25.0% |
70.6% |
35 |
December 2001 |
12-29-01 |
at TULANE |
PK |
NL |
77-66 |
W |
W |
- |
65.3% |
36.4% |
56.3% |
34 |
40.3% |
15.8% |
100.0% |
27 |
12-22-01 |
vs IL-CHICAGO |
-6 |
NL |
77-74 |
W |
L |
- |
54.4% |
30.8% |
64.7% |
48 |
44.4% |
26.3% |
68.4% |
20 |
12-21-01 |
vs CINCINNATI |
+9 |
NL |
56-90 |
L |
L |
- |
32.7% |
33.3% |
82.4% |
32 |
49.2% |
47.6% |
87.0% |
40 |
12-20-01 |
vs RICHMOND |
-8.5 |
NL |
74-72 |
W |
L |
- |
52.8% |
43.8% |
78.6% |
27 |
51.9% |
37.5% |
90.0% |
22 |
12-16-01 |
at GEORGIA ST |
NL |
NL |
72-63 |
W |
- |
- |
43.3% |
37.5% |
56.0% |
44 |
31.3% |
21.7% |
85.7% |
43 |
12-15-01 |
vs LA-MONROE |
NL |
NL |
104-67 |
W |
- |
- |
58.4% |
57.1% |
66.7% |
46 |
35.4% |
26.9% |
70.0% |
34 |
12-8-01 |
vs ARKANSAS ST |
-10 |
NL |
91-83 |
W |
L |
- |
41.5% |
30.8% |
75.0% |
48 |
49.3% |
35.3% |
64.3% |
36 |
12-5-01 |
at RICHMOND |
+2 |
NL |
71-57 |
W |
W |
- |
54.2% |
36.4% |
62.5% |
38 |
36.2% |
25.9% |
100.0% |
26 |
12-2-01 |
vs S ALABAMA |
-17.5 |
NL |
73-66 |
W |
L |
- |
41.9% |
25.0% |
66.7% |
43 |
46.3% |
50.0% |
42.1% |
31 |
November 2001 |
11-28-01 |
vs ALABAMA A&M |
NL |
NL |
70-45 |
W |
- |
- |
54.0% |
41.7% |
68.8% |
42 |
29.3% |
30.8% |
46.7% |
31 |
11-24-01 |
at LA-LAFAYETTE |
-5 |
NL |
79-71 |
W |
W |
- |
48.3% |
38.5% |
78.3% |
35 |
45.0% |
38.5% |
70.6% |
32 |
11-21-01 |
vs ARK-LITTLE ROCK |
-16 |
NL |
93-81 |
W |
L |
- |
56.0% |
43.8% |
62.5% |
37 |
41.4% |
23.1% |
68.0% |
43 |
11-19-01 |
vs FLORIDA A&M |
NL |
NL |
92-55 |
W |
- |
- |
56.7% |
50.0% |
58.1% |
54 |
24.7% |
25.0% |
52.6% |
43 |
11-17-01 |
vs NICHOLLS ST |
NL |
NL |
95-59 |
W |
- |
- |
57.0% |
15.8% |
28.6% |
49 |
39.2% |
33.3% |
59.1% |
28 |
|
Game Situation Report for the 2001-2002 Season Season |
35 |
27-8 (77.1%) |
14-15-1 (48.3%) |
0-7-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
73.8 |
66.7 |
+7.1 |
15 |
14-1 (93.3%) |
4-6-1 (40.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
83.4 |
68.0 |
+15.4 |
12 |
7-5 (58.3%) |
6-5-0 (54.5%) |
0-2-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
67.5 |
65.9 |
+1.6 |
8 |
6-2 (75.0%) |
4-4-0 (50.0%) |
0-5-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
65.1 |
65.4 |
-0.3 |
6 |
5-1 (83.3%) |
3-3-0 (50.0%) |
0-3-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
64.5 |
66.2 |
-1.7 |
2 |
1-1 (50.0%) |
1-1-0 (50.0%) |
0-2-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
67.0 |
63.0 |
+4.0 |
35 |
27-8 (77.1%) |
14-15-1 (48.3%) |
0-7-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
73.8 |
66.7 |
+7.1 |
15 |
14-1 (93.3%) |
6-8-1 (42.9%) |
0-2-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
77.5 |
68.8 |
+8.7 |
14 |
7-7 (50.0%) |
7-7-0 (50.0%) |
0-5-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
64.9 |
67.6 |
-2.7 |
9 |
8-1 (88.9%) |
2-6-1 (25.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
82.2 |
73.7 |
+8.6 |
2 |
2-0 (100.0%) |
2-0-0 (100.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
75.0 |
65.5 |
+9.5 |
2 |
2-0 (100.0%) |
2-0-0 (100.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
72.5 |
57.0 |
+15.5 |
8 |
3-5 (37.5%) |
3-5-0 (37.5%) |
0-2-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
64.5 |
68.5 |
-4.0 |
5 |
4-1 (80.0%) |
2-2-0 (50.0%) |
0-2-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
64.6 |
67.2 |
-2.6 |
3 |
2-1 (66.7%) |
0-2-0 (0.0%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
83.0 |
68.0 |
+15.0 |
10 |
7-3 (70.0%) |
5-5-0 (50.0%) |
0-2-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
71.6 |
67.8 |
+3.8 |
17 |
14-3 (82.4%) |
7-6-1 (53.8%) |
0-2-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
76.1 |
65.6 |
+10.5 |
1 |
1-0 (100.0%) |
0-0-0 ( ) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
72.0 |
63.0 |
+9.0 |
27 |
21-6 (77.8%) |
11-11-1 (50.0%) |
0-7-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
71.9 |
66.0 |
+5.9 |
7 |
5-2 (71.4%) |
3-4-0 (42.9%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
77.9 |
70.4 |
+7.4 |
14 |
10-4 (71.4%) |
7-6-0 (53.8%) |
0-6-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
66.1 |
62.1 |
+4.0 |
14 |
10-4 (71.4%) |
6-6-1 (50.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
78.1 |
72.3 |
+5.9 |
|
|
|
| |
|