The Leader In Sports Handicapping
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N ARIZONA - |
|
|
All Games YTD for the 2001-2002 Season |
Last 20 Games |
All Games YTD
|
March 2002 |
3-7-02 |
vs MONTANA |
-2.5 |
139 |
64-82 |
L |
L |
Ov |
39.3% |
30.4% |
45.0% |
30 |
60.0% |
55.6% |
63.9% |
38 |
3-2-02 |
vs E WASHINGTON |
-3.5 |
NL |
80-75 |
W |
W |
- |
50.9% |
25.0% |
77.8% |
35 |
46.4% |
42.9% |
81.0% |
26 |
3-1-02 |
vs PORTLAND ST |
-11.5 |
NL |
79-88 |
L |
L |
- |
48.4% |
30.0% |
61.9% |
38 |
60.4% |
52.6% |
56.0% |
26 |
February 2002 |
2-23-02 |
at MONTANA |
+3.5 |
NL |
63-70 |
L |
L |
- |
38.1% |
30.4% |
80.0% |
34 |
45.1% |
25.0% |
70.0% |
35 |
2-22-02 |
at MONTANA ST |
+6.5 |
NL |
59-62 |
L |
W |
- |
40.0% |
21.1% |
70.0% |
33 |
43.5% |
38.9% |
78.9% |
32 |
2-16-02 |
vs SACRAMENTO ST |
-13 |
NL |
90-70 |
W |
W |
- |
50.0% |
26.7% |
75.6% |
46 |
40.6% |
10.0% |
66.7% |
33 |
2-9-02 |
vs WEBER ST |
-2 |
NL |
85-79 |
W |
W |
- |
46.2% |
54.5% |
83.8% |
29 |
45.9% |
26.3% |
64.3% |
39 |
2-8-02 |
vs IDAHO ST |
-12 |
NL |
77-76 |
W |
L |
- |
42.2% |
36.4% |
83.3% |
45 |
41.2% |
33.3% |
73.7% |
38 |
2-2-02 |
at PORTLAND ST |
+3 |
NL |
77-60 |
W |
W |
- |
54.9% |
52.9% |
70.6% |
35 |
41.7% |
26.1% |
66.7% |
27 |
2-1-02 |
at E WASHINGTON |
+5 |
NL |
70-63 |
W |
W |
- |
53.2% |
50.0% |
61.9% |
35 |
46.3% |
26.7% |
45.0% |
29 |
January 2002 |
1-26-02 |
vs MONTANA ST |
-2.5 |
NL |
48-59 |
L |
L |
- |
34.5% |
23.1% |
50.0% |
38 |
43.5% |
29.4% |
82.4% |
26 |
1-25-02 |
vs MONTANA |
-5.5 |
NL |
77-64 |
W |
W |
- |
49.0% |
37.5% |
76.7% |
42 |
34.4% |
16.7% |
66.7% |
33 |
1-19-02 |
at SACRAMENTO ST |
-3 |
NL |
63-81 |
L |
L |
- |
38.1% |
16.7% |
54.5% |
38 |
47.1% |
28.6% |
72.5% |
39 |
1-12-02 |
at IDAHO ST |
PK |
NL |
64-77 |
L |
L |
- |
41.1% |
36.8% |
73.3% |
39 |
46.3% |
52.4% |
72.7% |
29 |
1-11-02 |
at WEBER ST |
+6.5 |
NL |
66-78 |
L |
L |
- |
41.7% |
29.4% |
63.6% |
36 |
50.0% |
46.7% |
72.2% |
32 |
1-5-02 |
at NEW MEXICO |
+13 |
NL |
57-70 |
L |
P |
- |
40.7% |
45.5% |
61.5% |
30 |
42.1% |
42.9% |
66.7% |
41 |
1-2-02 |
vs AIR FORCE |
-8.5 |
NL |
56-57 |
L |
L |
- |
48.6% |
20.0% |
64.3% |
25 |
40.5% |
45.0% |
75.0% |
25 |
December 2001 |
12-29-01 |
vs CS-FULLERTON |
-13.5 |
NL |
80-68 |
W |
L |
- |
51.1% |
50.0% |
73.0% |
40 |
45.5% |
47.4% |
75.0% |
22 |
12-21-01 |
vs MONTANA TECH |
NL |
NL |
64-46 |
W |
- |
- |
54.9% |
42.9% |
41.7% |
38 |
25.9% |
18.5% |
84.6% |
32 |
12-18-01 |
at BOISE ST |
+5.5 |
NL |
44-55 |
L |
L |
- |
32.6% |
0.0% |
61.5% |
31 |
35.4% |
41.2% |
87.5% |
33 |
12-16-01 |
at OREGON |
+19 |
NL |
51-86 |
L |
L |
- |
34.5% |
10.5% |
69.2% |
35 |
55.2% |
54.5% |
76.9% |
31 |
12-8-01 |
at TENN-MARTIN |
+2 |
NL |
51-54 |
L |
L |
- |
37.9% |
13.6% |
44.4% |
42 |
32.7% |
25.0% |
64.0% |
39 |
12-6-01 |
at LIPSCOMB |
NL |
NL |
67-52 |
W |
- |
- |
51.1% |
11.1% |
72.0% |
34 |
35.0% |
25.0% |
50.0% |
28 |
November 2001 |
11-30-01 |
vs NM HIGHLANDS |
NL |
NL |
91-64 |
W |
- |
- |
46.3% |
42.9% |
63.0% |
41 |
34.7% |
26.9% |
71.9% |
39 |
11-24-01 |
at NORTHEASTERN |
NL |
NL |
70-67 |
W |
- |
- |
52.2% |
21.4% |
79.2% |
34 |
41.3% |
30.4% |
72.7% |
27 |
11-21-01 |
at COLGATE |
NL |
NL |
78-77 |
W |
- |
- |
51.7% |
17.6% |
71.4% |
33 |
41.9% |
30.4% |
62.1% |
37 |
11-18-01 |
at PITTSBURGH |
+11 |
NL |
47-58 |
L |
P |
- |
43.2% |
23.1% |
66.7% |
28 |
38.2% |
14.3% |
59.1% |
37 |
11-16-01 |
vs CAL POLY-SLO |
-13 |
NL |
75-57 |
W |
W |
- |
60.4% |
40.0% |
75.0% |
36 |
36.1% |
21.9% |
50.0% |
30 |
|
Game Situation Report for the 2001-2002 Season Season |
28 |
14-14 (50.0%) |
8-13-2 (38.1%) |
1-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
67.6 |
67.7 |
-0.1 |
12 |
9-3 (75.0%) |
5-5-0 (50.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
75.2 |
66.9 |
+8.3 |
15 |
5-10 (33.3%) |
3-7-2 (30.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
61.8 |
67.3 |
-5.5 |
1 |
0-1 (0.0%) |
0-1-0 (0.0%) |
1-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
64.0 |
82.0 |
-18.0 |
1 |
0-1 (0.0%) |
0-1-0 (0.0%) |
1-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
64.0 |
82.0 |
-18.0 |
28 |
14-14 (50.0%) |
8-13-2 (38.1%) |
1-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
67.6 |
67.7 |
-0.1 |
12 |
7-5 (58.3%) |
5-7-0 (41.7%) |
1-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
72.8 |
71.3 |
+1.5 |
10 |
2-8 (20.0%) |
3-5-2 (37.5%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
58.5 |
65.6 |
-7.1 |
10 |
7-3 (70.0%) |
5-5-0 (50.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
74.7 |
69.3 |
+5.4 |
1 |
0-1 (0.0%) |
0-1-0 (0.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
63.0 |
81.0 |
-18.0 |
10 |
2-8 (20.0%) |
3-5-2 (37.5%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
58.5 |
65.6 |
-7.1 |
6 |
3-3 (50.0%) |
3-3-0 (50.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
69.5 |
70.0 |
-0.5 |
3 |
0-3 (0.0%) |
0-2-1 (0.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
47.3 |
55.7 |
-8.3 |
4 |
3-1 (75.0%) |
0-0-1 ( ) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
67.3 |
65.0 |
+2.3 |
15 |
8-7 (53.3%) |
5-8-0 (38.5%) |
1-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
71.0 |
69.9 |
+1.1 |
3 |
2-1 (66.7%) |
2-1-0 (66.7%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
71.0 |
71.0 |
0.0 |
3 |
1-2 (33.3%) |
1-2-0 (33.3%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
68.0 |
69.0 |
-1.0 |
14 |
8-6 (57.1%) |
4-6-1 (40.0%) |
1-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
68.7 |
64.9 |
+3.9 |
13 |
5-8 (38.5%) |
3-7-1 (30.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
65.8 |
71.5 |
-5.7 |
8 |
3-5 (37.5%) |
3-4-1 (42.9%) |
1-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
65.6 |
67.1 |
-1.5 |
12 |
5-7 (41.7%) |
4-6-1 (40.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
65.8 |
70.1 |
-4.3 |
|
|
|
| |
|