The Leader In Sports Handicapping
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTRE DAME - |
|
|
All Games YTD for the 2002-2003 Season |
Last 20 Games |
All Games YTD
|
March 2003 |
3-27-03 |
vs ARIZONA |
+8 |
159 |
71-88 |
L |
L |
P |
42.4% |
43.5% |
61.1% |
36 |
47.4% |
50.0% |
81.8% |
44 |
3-22-03 |
vs ILLINOIS |
+5 |
146.5 |
68-60 |
W |
W |
Un |
42.6% |
54.2% |
100.0% |
37 |
34.9% |
29.4% |
68.8% |
41 |
3-20-03 |
vs WI-MILWAUKEE |
-5 |
157 |
70-69 |
W |
L |
Un |
42.6% |
23.1% |
84.0% |
44 |
34.8% |
34.8% |
75.0% |
37 |
3-12-03 |
vs ST JOHNS |
-3 |
146 |
80-83 |
L |
L |
Ov |
50.0% |
50.0% |
76.2% |
31 |
46.4% |
50.0% |
69.2% |
38 |
3-8-03 |
at GEORGETOWN |
+2.5 |
155 |
86-80 |
W |
W |
Ov |
51.0% |
45.8% |
79.3% |
38 |
38.5% |
37.5% |
70.0% |
39 |
3-4-03 |
vs SYRACUSE |
-5 |
154 |
88-92 |
L |
L |
Ov |
43.7% |
35.3% |
73.7% |
37 |
56.2% |
45.5% |
62.5% |
40 |
3-1-03 |
at RUTGERS |
-4 |
141 |
82-95 |
L |
L |
Ov |
37.7% |
29.6% |
77.8% |
35 |
53.8% |
61.1% |
77.8% |
36 |
February 2003 |
2-24-03 |
vs CONNECTICUT |
-6 |
153 |
79-87 |
L |
L |
Ov |
36.8% |
40.9% |
70.0% |
42 |
43.1% |
47.4% |
69.6% |
51 |
2-22-03 |
vs VIRGINIA TECH |
-16.5 |
NL |
98-76 |
W |
W |
- |
55.4% |
42.3% |
78.9% |
43 |
42.9% |
47.1% |
70.0% |
28 |
2-18-03 |
at W VIRGINIA |
-6.5 |
148.5 |
56-55 |
W |
L |
Un |
38.3% |
33.3% |
57.1% |
42 |
40.4% |
43.8% |
75.0% |
29 |
2-15-03 |
at SYRACUSE |
+3 |
151 |
80-82 |
L |
W |
Ov |
46.3% |
46.2% |
69.2% |
37 |
44.4% |
17.6% |
71.4% |
38 |
2-9-03 |
vs PITTSBURGH |
-2 |
142 |
66-64 |
W |
P |
Un |
51.9% |
43.8% |
50.0% |
26 |
46.2% |
40.9% |
70.0% |
33 |
2-5-03 |
at SETON HALL |
-2.5 |
142.5 |
72-78 |
L |
L |
Ov |
43.5% |
35.0% |
84.6% |
38 |
52.6% |
71.4% |
65.0% |
27 |
2-1-03 |
vs GEORGETOWN |
-7.5 |
158 |
93-92 |
W |
L |
Ov |
37.3% |
29.6% |
79.5% |
45 |
42.9% |
54.5% |
76.5% |
47 |
January 2003 |
1-29-03 |
vs W VIRGINIA |
-14.5 |
145.5 |
88-69 |
W |
W |
Ov |
40.6% |
32.0% |
88.9% |
51 |
45.5% |
33.3% |
57.9% |
27 |
1-25-03 |
at BOSTON COLLEGE |
-2.5 |
156 |
101-96 |
W |
W |
Ov |
41.7% |
52.6% |
73.8% |
44 |
48.7% |
41.2% |
68.4% |
48 |
1-21-03 |
at PROVIDENCE |
-2 |
NL |
71-65 |
W |
W |
- |
42.6% |
21.1% |
84.0% |
31 |
38.6% |
33.3% |
84.2% |
37 |
1-18-03 |
at KENTUCKY |
+6.5 |
148 |
73-88 |
L |
L |
Ov |
34.4% |
31.6% |
82.1% |
34 |
52.3% |
22.2% |
78.3% |
41 |
1-14-03 |
vs RUTGERS |
-12 |
NL |
68-57 |
W |
L |
- |
44.2% |
42.1% |
95.7% |
30 |
38.7% |
36.4% |
55.6% |
34 |
1-12-03 |
vs SETON HALL |
-14.5 |
NL |
74-64 |
W |
L |
- |
41.8% |
30.0% |
75.9% |
40 |
35.2% |
26.1% |
88.9% |
43 |
1-6-03 |
at PITTSBURGH |
+6 |
143 |
55-72 |
L |
L |
Un |
31.7% |
26.9% |
53.3% |
30 |
52.7% |
25.0% |
44.0% |
51 |
1-4-03 |
vs VALPARAISO |
NL |
NL |
55-53 |
W |
- |
- |
43.5% |
41.2% |
80.0% |
35 |
33.9% |
33.3% |
66.7% |
32 |
December 2002 |
12-30-02 |
vs VANDERBILT |
-14.5 |
NL |
76-63 |
W |
L |
- |
42.4% |
29.4% |
72.4% |
41 |
33.9% |
23.8% |
76.2% |
41 |
12-22-02 |
vs CANISIUS |
-25 |
NL |
93-75 |
W |
L |
- |
56.7% |
46.2% |
81.3% |
37 |
36.1% |
26.9% |
72.7% |
45 |
12-14-02 |
vs DEPAUL |
-13.5 |
145.5 |
102-71 |
W |
W |
Ov |
60.0% |
21.4% |
90.7% |
33 |
36.2% |
29.4% |
72.7% |
35 |
12-8-02 |
vs TEXAS |
+1.5 |
151.5 |
98-92 |
W |
W |
Ov |
45.8% |
48.1% |
82.6% |
45 |
41.5% |
56.0% |
76.9% |
46 |
12-7-02 |
vs MARYLAND |
+6.5 |
152.5 |
79-67 |
W |
W |
Un |
44.4% |
30.4% |
76.2% |
37 |
37.1% |
23.5% |
73.3% |
47 |
12-2-02 |
vs MARQUETTE |
-3.5 |
138.5 |
92-71 |
W |
W |
Ov |
50.0% |
40.0% |
60.9% |
44 |
42.9% |
29.4% |
80.0% |
30 |
November 2002 |
11-30-02 |
vs ALBANY |
NL |
NL |
90-55 |
W |
- |
- |
50.7% |
44.8% |
63.6% |
43 |
30.6% |
38.1% |
69.2% |
37 |
11-26-02 |
vs CREIGHTON |
-2.5 |
NL |
75-80 |
L |
L |
- |
45.3% |
25.0% |
55.0% |
29 |
62.0% |
58.8% |
38.1% |
36 |
11-25-02 |
vs FURMAN |
-17 |
NL |
75-50 |
W |
W |
- |
43.3% |
66.7% |
78.9% |
33 |
40.0% |
11.1% |
75.0% |
31 |
11-22-02 |
vs BUCKNELL |
NL |
NL |
73-42 |
W |
- |
- |
47.5% |
35.7% |
75.0% |
47 |
21.1% |
16.7% |
62.5% |
37 |
11-18-02 |
vs IUPUI |
NL |
NL |
89-45 |
W |
- |
- |
54.8% |
50.0% |
61.9% |
46 |
24.3% |
26.7% |
45.5% |
49 |
11-17-02 |
vs BELMONT |
NL |
NL |
76-48 |
W |
- |
- |
44.6% |
43.5% |
69.6% |
47 |
28.1% |
33.3% |
50.0% |
40 |
|
Game Situation Report for the 2002-2003 Season Season |
34 |
24-10 (70.6%) |
12-16-1 (42.9%) |
14-6-1 |
70.0% |
30.0% |
79.2 |
71.3 |
+7.9 |
14 |
12-2 (85.7%) |
4-7-1 (36.4%) |
6-1-0 |
85.7% |
14.3% |
85.4 |
70.1 |
+15.4 |
9 |
4-5 (44.4%) |
4-5-0 (44.4%) |
6-2-0 |
75.0% |
25.0% |
75.1 |
79.0 |
-3.9 |
11 |
8-3 (72.7%) |
4-4-0 (50.0%) |
2-3-1 |
40.0% |
60.0% |
74.5 |
66.5 |
+8.0 |
5 |
3-2 (60.0%) |
3-2-0 (60.0%) |
2-1-0 |
66.7% |
33.3% |
81.4 |
74.4 |
+7.0 |
3 |
2-1 (66.7%) |
1-2-0 (33.3%) |
0-2-1 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
69.7 |
72.3 |
-2.7 |
34 |
24-10 (70.6%) |
12-16-1 (42.9%) |
14-6-1 |
70.0% |
30.0% |
79.2 |
71.3 |
+7.9 |
21 |
15-6 (71.4%) |
7-13-1 (35.0%) |
10-3-0 |
76.9% |
23.1% |
80.9 |
73.9 |
+7.0 |
8 |
4-4 (50.0%) |
5-3-0 (62.5%) |
4-3-1 |
57.1% |
42.9% |
76.3 |
78.6 |
-2.4 |
12 |
10-2 (83.3%) |
4-7-1 (36.4%) |
6-1-0 |
85.7% |
14.3% |
84.8 |
73.4 |
+11.3 |
5 |
3-2 (60.0%) |
2-3-0 (40.0%) |
3-1-0 |
75.0% |
25.0% |
76.4 |
77.8 |
-1.4 |
4 |
1-3 (25.0%) |
2-2-0 (50.0%) |
3-1-0 |
75.0% |
25.0% |
73.5 |
80.5 |
-7.0 |
3 |
2-1 (66.7%) |
1-1-0 (50.0%) |
1-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
87.3 |
72.3 |
+15.0 |
5 |
3-2 (60.0%) |
2-3-0 (40.0%) |
2-2-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
72.4 |
69.4 |
+3.0 |
5 |
4-1 (80.0%) |
2-3-0 (40.0%) |
2-1-0 |
66.7% |
33.3% |
76.6 |
70.8 |
+5.8 |
21 |
15-6 (71.4%) |
7-9-1 (43.8%) |
9-3-1 |
75.0% |
25.0% |
80.2 |
71.7 |
+8.5 |
24 |
16-8 (66.7%) |
10-11-0 (47.6%) |
11-3-1 |
78.6% |
21.4% |
80.5 |
72.4 |
+8.2 |
9 |
7-2 (77.8%) |
2-5-1 (28.6%) |
3-3-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
75.9 |
71.0 |
+4.9 |
12 |
8-4 (66.7%) |
5-7-0 (41.7%) |
7-2-1 |
77.8% |
22.2% |
84.6 |
79.6 |
+5.0 |
15 |
11-4 (73.3%) |
4-8-1 (33.3%) |
5-3-0 |
62.5% |
37.5% |
75.8 |
70.6 |
+5.2 |
|
|
|
| |
|