The Leader In Sports Handicapping
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OHIO U - |
|
|
All Games YTD for the 2000-2001 Season |
Last 20 Games |
All Games YTD
|
March 2001 |
3-9-01 |
vs MIAMI OHIO |
-2.5 |
122.5 |
61-62 |
L |
L |
Ov |
38.0% |
15.4% |
70.0% |
33 |
46.7% |
40.0% |
69.6% |
30 |
3-8-01 |
vs TOLEDO |
+2.5 |
139.5 |
64-63 |
W |
W |
Un |
45.3% |
35.7% |
55.0% |
40 |
35.3% |
23.1% |
77.4% |
32 |
3-5-01 |
vs BUFFALO |
-17.5 |
NL |
101-78 |
W |
W |
- |
57.9% |
50.0% |
82.4% |
44 |
39.7% |
50.0% |
65.5% |
25 |
February 2001 |
2-28-01 |
at MIAMI OHIO |
+3 |
NL |
72-76 |
L |
L |
- |
40.4% |
31.8% |
61.3% |
30 |
56.3% |
44.4% |
62.1% |
39 |
2-26-01 |
vs C MICHIGAN |
-6 |
NL |
77-64 |
W |
W |
- |
57.5% |
42.9% |
89.3% |
28 |
41.4% |
20.0% |
82.4% |
27 |
2-24-01 |
at KENT |
+9 |
NL |
69-63 |
W |
W |
- |
50.0% |
36.4% |
63.3% |
34 |
32.3% |
25.0% |
79.2% |
41 |
2-21-01 |
vs BUFFALO |
-17.5 |
NL |
86-76 |
W |
L |
- |
53.8% |
42.1% |
55.0% |
35 |
52.0% |
37.5% |
69.2% |
31 |
2-17-01 |
at MARSHALL |
+5 |
NL |
70-92 |
L |
L |
- |
38.3% |
35.3% |
54.5% |
38 |
46.2% |
38.9% |
78.1% |
46 |
2-14-01 |
at AKRON |
-2.5 |
NL |
70-61 |
W |
W |
- |
49.1% |
29.4% |
64.3% |
40 |
47.7% |
50.0% |
60.0% |
21 |
2-10-01 |
vs E MICHIGAN |
-16 |
NL |
94-68 |
W |
W |
- |
58.5% |
26.7% |
87.5% |
38 |
52.2% |
33.3% |
55.2% |
20 |
2-7-01 |
vs BOWLING GREEN |
-9 |
NL |
68-78 |
L |
L |
- |
37.1% |
13.6% |
65.5% |
39 |
41.7% |
46.7% |
84.0% |
43 |
2-3-01 |
vs MARSHALL |
-3 |
NL |
77-71 |
W |
W |
- |
40.9% |
23.8% |
72.0% |
42 |
48.3% |
20.0% |
63.2% |
34 |
January 2001 |
1-31-01 |
at TOLEDO |
+3.5 |
NL |
53-66 |
L |
L |
- |
29.2% |
4.8% |
63.6% |
30 |
50.0% |
23.1% |
60.0% |
45 |
1-27-01 |
at BUFFALO |
-9.5 |
NL |
83-66 |
W |
W |
- |
47.5% |
35.0% |
76.9% |
41 |
38.8% |
46.2% |
61.1% |
32 |
1-23-01 |
vs N ILLINOIS |
-14.5 |
NL |
91-63 |
W |
W |
- |
49.2% |
47.6% |
85.2% |
39 |
34.5% |
21.1% |
70.0% |
35 |
1-20-01 |
vs AKRON |
-10.5 |
NL |
85-67 |
W |
W |
- |
47.8% |
40.0% |
73.3% |
45 |
39.2% |
36.8% |
74.1% |
27 |
1-17-01 |
at C MICHIGAN |
+1.5 |
NL |
69-75 |
L |
L |
- |
42.6% |
40.0% |
65.0% |
29 |
46.2% |
28.6% |
69.4% |
40 |
1-13-01 |
vs MIAMI OHIO |
-4.5 |
NL |
62-60 |
W |
L |
- |
36.2% |
31.3% |
59.0% |
41 |
33.9% |
38.9% |
73.3% |
40 |
1-8-01 |
vs KENT |
-2 |
NL |
67-65 |
W |
P |
- |
51.4% |
38.5% |
57.1% |
30 |
43.9% |
38.5% |
66.7% |
34 |
1-3-01 |
at BALL ST |
+4.5 |
NL |
68-58 |
W |
W |
- |
47.5% |
25.0% |
87.5% |
40 |
36.7% |
38.1% |
46.2% |
32 |
December 2000 |
12-30-00 |
vs PEPPERDINE |
+5.5 |
NL |
76-78 |
L |
W |
- |
41.4% |
34.6% |
65.5% |
43 |
36.5% |
11.8% |
75.0% |
43 |
12-29-00 |
at ARIZONA ST |
+13 |
NL |
75-71 |
W |
W |
- |
51.8% |
33.3% |
47.6% |
46 |
37.8% |
36.4% |
45.8% |
44 |
12-22-00 |
at OAKLAND |
NL |
NL |
92-85 |
W |
- |
- |
46.3% |
55.6% |
62.5% |
38 |
47.8% |
53.6% |
81.3% |
32 |
12-19-00 |
vs W VIRGINIA |
-3 |
NL |
79-67 |
W |
W |
- |
42.9% |
40.0% |
62.5% |
49 |
33.3% |
31.3% |
71.4% |
40 |
12-16-00 |
at W MICHIGAN |
-7 |
NL |
65-76 |
L |
L |
- |
46.0% |
29.4% |
87.5% |
24 |
49.0% |
42.9% |
62.9% |
35 |
12-12-00 |
at DUQUESNE |
-2.5 |
NL |
89-94 |
L |
L |
- |
49.2% |
55.0% |
66.7% |
29 |
57.8% |
72.7% |
87.2% |
26 |
12-9-00 |
|
|
NL |
- |
T |
P |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12-6-00 |
|
|
NL |
- |
T |
P |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 2000 |
11-22-00 |
vs RIO GRANDE |
NL |
NL |
91-70 |
W |
- |
- |
46.8% |
40.0% |
64.3% |
42 |
54.8% |
66.7% |
78.3% |
33 |
|
Game Situation Report for the 2000-2001 Season Season |
29 |
18-9 (66.7%) |
14-10-1 (58.3%) |
1-1-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
70.8 |
66.0 |
+4.9 |
12 |
11-1 (91.7%) |
7-3-1 (70.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
81.5 |
68.9 |
+12.6 |
12 |
6-6 (50.0%) |
5-6-0 (45.5%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
72.9 |
73.6 |
-0.7 |
3 |
1-2 (33.3%) |
2-1-0 (66.7%) |
1-1-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
67.0 |
67.7 |
-0.7 |
3 |
2-1 (66.7%) |
2-1-0 (66.7%) |
1-1-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
75.3 |
67.7 |
+7.7 |
2 |
0-0 ( ) |
0-0-0 ( ) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
27 |
18-9 (66.7%) |
14-10-1 (58.3%) |
1-1-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
76.1 |
70.9 |
+5.2 |
16 |
12-4 (75.0%) |
9-6-1 (60.0%) |
1-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
78.4 |
69.8 |
+8.7 |
9 |
4-5 (44.4%) |
5-4-0 (55.6%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
68.4 |
71.3 |
-2.9 |
11 |
10-1 (90.9%) |
7-3-1 (70.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
80.6 |
68.8 |
+11.8 |
4 |
2-2 (50.0%) |
2-2-0 (50.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
76.8 |
74.3 |
+2.5 |
7 |
3-4 (42.9%) |
3-4-0 (42.9%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
68.0 |
71.6 |
-3.6 |
2 |
0-2 (0.0%) |
1-1-0 (50.0%) |
1-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
68.5 |
70.0 |
-1.5 |
2 |
1-1 (50.0%) |
1-1-0 (50.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
74.5 |
70.0 |
+4.5 |
11 |
8-2 (80.0%) |
7-2-0 (77.8%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
73.6 |
66.6 |
+7.0 |
14 |
9-4 (69.2%) |
5-6-1 (45.5%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
68.4 |
64.3 |
+4.1 |
18 |
10-7 (58.8%) |
8-7-1 (53.3%) |
1-1-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
67.7 |
66.0 |
+1.7 |
8 |
7-1 (87.5%) |
6-2-0 (75.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
81.9 |
70.1 |
+11.8 |
14 |
8-6 (57.1%) |
7-5-1 (58.3%) |
1-1-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
72.3 |
69.8 |
+2.5 |
9 |
7-2 (77.8%) |
6-3-0 (66.7%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
80.6 |
71.2 |
+9.3 |
|
|
|
| |
|