|
The Leader In Sports Handicapping
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
PITTSBURGH Panthers31-5 |
|
|
Upcoming Games
for the 2008-2009 Season |
|
|
|
Big East Standings for the 2008-2009 Season |
|
|
All |
ATS |
Scoring |
Home/Away |
|
CONNECTICUT |
31 |
5 |
0.861 |
17 |
15 |
0 |
53.1% |
78.3 |
64.3 |
14-2 |
17-3 |
|
PITTSBURGH |
31 |
5 |
0.861 |
17 |
13 |
0 |
56.7% |
77.4 |
64.4 |
19-0 |
12-5 |
|
LOUISVILLE |
31 |
6 |
0.838 |
22 |
15 |
0 |
59.5% |
74.3 |
61.8 |
16-2 |
15-4 |
|
VILLANOVA |
30 |
8 |
0.789 |
19 |
15 |
0 |
55.9% |
76.8 |
67.4 |
15-2 |
15-6 |
|
SYRACUSE |
28 |
10 |
0.737 |
19 |
15 |
0 |
55.9% |
80.2 |
71.7 |
17-3 |
11-7 |
|
MARQUETTE |
25 |
10 |
0.714 |
14 |
15 |
1 |
48.3% |
78.3 |
69.5 |
16-2 |
9-8 |
|
W VIRGINIA |
23 |
12 |
0.657 |
15 |
17 |
0 |
46.9% |
72.0 |
61.8 |
12-3 |
11-9 |
|
NOTRE DAME |
21 |
15 |
0.583 |
12 |
19 |
0 |
38.7% |
75.8 |
70.7 |
15-3 |
6-12 |
|
PROVIDENCE |
19 |
14 |
0.576 |
11 |
18 |
0 |
37.9% |
78.1 |
76.7 |
13-5 |
6-9 |
|
CINCINNATI |
18 |
14 |
0.563 |
11 |
15 |
0 |
42.3% |
68.3 |
66.3 |
14-5 |
4-9 |
|
SETON HALL |
17 |
15 |
0.531 |
17 |
10 |
0 |
63.0% |
74.3 |
72.8 |
10-6 |
7-9 |
|
GEORGETOWN |
16 |
15 |
0.516 |
9 |
17 |
1 |
34.6% |
69.3 |
63.9 |
11-6 |
5-9 |
|
ST JOHNS |
16 |
18 |
0.471 |
13 |
15 |
1 |
46.4% |
65.9 |
67.6 |
13-7 |
3-11 |
|
RUTGERS |
11 |
21 |
0.344 |
13 |
13 |
0 |
50.0% |
63.2 |
66.6 |
8-10 |
3-11 |
|
S FLORIDA |
9 |
22 |
0.290 |
16 |
14 |
0 |
53.3% |
59.0 |
64.6 |
7-7 |
2-15 |
|
DEPAUL |
9 |
24 |
0.273 |
10 |
18 |
0 |
35.7% |
64.3 |
72.4 |
6-10 |
3-14 |
|
|
Current Injuries |
|
No significant injuries. |
|
|
| Last 20 Games for the 2008-2009 Season |
| Last 20 Games |
All Games YTD
|
|
March 2009 |
|
3-28-09 |
vs VILLANOVA |
-2 |
140.5 |
76-78 |
L |
L |
Ov |
48.1% |
27.8% |
72.4% |
28 |
44.6% |
30.0% |
95.7% |
33 |
|
3-26-09 |
vs XAVIER |
-6.5 |
137.5 |
60-55 |
W |
L |
Un |
33.8% |
26.7% |
63.2% |
44 |
32.8% |
21.7% |
80.0% |
44 |
|
3-22-09 |
vs OKLAHOMA ST |
-9 |
150 |
84-76 |
W |
L |
Ov |
49.1% |
39.3% |
65.4% |
41 |
48.1% |
42.9% |
100.0% |
21 |
|
3-20-09 |
vs E TENN ST |
-20.5 |
150 |
72-62 |
W |
L |
Un |
43.6% |
36.8% |
73.9% |
47 |
30.7% |
18.2% |
50.0% |
44 |
|
3-12-09 |
vs W VIRGINIA |
-4.5 |
136.5 |
60-74 |
L |
L |
Un |
45.1% |
0.0% |
73.7% |
25 |
44.2% |
28.6% |
88.9% |
26 |
|
3-7-09 |
vs CONNECTICUT |
-4 |
140.5 |
70-60 |
W |
W |
Un |
44.1% |
20.0% |
66.7% |
41 |
37.7% |
28.6% |
52.6% |
40 |
|
3-4-09 |
vs MARQUETTE |
-9.5 |
147 |
90-75 |
W |
W |
Ov |
63.0% |
41.2% |
65.2% |
33 |
42.6% |
38.5% |
72.2% |
28 |
|
February 2009 |
|
2-28-09 |
at SETON HALL |
-10 |
145.5 |
89-78 |
W |
W |
Ov |
51.7% |
31.3% |
77.4% |
44 |
47.6% |
24.0% |
75.0% |
21 |
|
2-24-09 |
at PROVIDENCE |
-9 |
158 |
73-81 |
L |
L |
Un |
46.6% |
36.8% |
80.0% |
33 |
49.1% |
41.7% |
75.9% |
27 |
|
2-21-09 |
vs DEPAUL |
-25.5 |
141.5 |
80-61 |
W |
L |
Un |
46.4% |
34.8% |
88.9% |
49 |
42.1% |
44.0% |
33.3% |
25 |
|
2-16-09 |
at CONNECTICUT |
+2.5 |
135 |
76-68 |
W |
W |
Ov |
40.0% |
42.1% |
80.0% |
48 |
43.3% |
29.4% |
64.7% |
31 |
|
2-14-09 |
vs CINCINNATI |
-15.5 |
136 |
85-69 |
W |
W |
Ov |
67.4% |
41.7% |
62.1% |
27 |
51.9% |
46.2% |
52.9% |
24 |
|
2-9-09 |
vs W VIRGINIA |
-8.5 |
136 |
70-59 |
W |
W |
Un |
48.1% |
30.8% |
73.7% |
39 |
40.4% |
31.3% |
75.0% |
23 |
|
2-7-09 |
at DEPAUL |
-16.5 |
136 |
92-69 |
W |
W |
Ov |
55.9% |
50.0% |
71.4% |
42 |
47.5% |
16.7% |
66.7% |
25 |
|
2-2-09 |
vs ROBERT MORRIS |
NL |
NL |
92-72 |
W |
- |
- |
55.4% |
44.4% |
66.7% |
31 |
57.4% |
58.8% |
53.3% |
23 |
|
January 2009 |
|
1-31-09 |
vs NOTRE DAME |
-11.5 |
147 |
93-80 |
W |
W |
Ov |
45.8% |
45.0% |
66.7% |
49 |
44.3% |
44.4% |
77.8% |
30 |
|
1-28-09 |
at VILLANOVA |
-3.5 |
137 |
57-67 |
L |
L |
Un |
40.7% |
18.8% |
58.8% |
38 |
44.7% |
40.0% |
67.9% |
32 |
|
1-25-09 |
at W VIRGINIA |
PK |
133 |
79-67 |
W |
W |
Ov |
54.5% |
33.3% |
75.0% |
31 |
41.1% |
26.3% |
80.0% |
34 |
|
1-19-09 |
vs SYRACUSE |
-9 |
147 |
78-60 |
W |
W |
Un |
53.3% |
33.3% |
52.9% |
40 |
41.8% |
35.0% |
43.8% |
28 |
|
1-17-09 |
at LOUISVILLE |
+2 |
134 |
63-69 |
L |
L |
Un |
34.9% |
38.5% |
56.3% |
38 |
39.3% |
37.5% |
65.5% |
42 |
|
|
Game Situation Report for the 2008-2009 Season Season |
|
36 |
31-5 (86.1%) |
17-13-0 (56.7%) |
15-15-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
77.4 |
64.4 |
+13.0 |
|
19 |
19-0 (100.0%) |
9-4-0 (69.2%) |
8-5-0 |
61.5% |
38.5% |
82.4 |
62.7 |
+19.6 |
|
10 |
7-3 (70.0%) |
6-4-0 (60.0%) |
5-5-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
73.3 |
67.3 |
+6.0 |
|
7 |
5-2 (71.4%) |
2-5-0 (28.6%) |
2-5-0 |
28.6% |
71.4% |
69.9 |
65.0 |
+4.9 |
|
3 |
2-1 (66.7%) |
2-1-0 (66.7%) |
0-3-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
65.7 |
61.3 |
+4.3 |
|
4 |
3-1 (75.0%) |
0-4-0 (0.0%) |
2-2-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
73.0 |
67.8 |
+5.3 |
|
20 |
15-5 (75.0%) |
12-8-0 (60.0%) |
11-9-0 |
55.0% |
45.0% |
77.2 |
68.5 |
+8.7 |
|
16 |
16-0 (100.0%) |
5-5-0 (50.0%) |
4-6-0 |
40.0% |
60.0% |
77.7 |
59.4 |
+18.3 |
|
26 |
22-4 (84.6%) |
14-12-0 (53.8%) |
13-13-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
76.5 |
65.4 |
+11.2 |
|
3 |
2-1 (66.7%) |
2-1-0 (66.7%) |
1-2-0 |
33.3% |
66.7% |
69.7 |
63.7 |
+6.0 |
|
13 |
13-0 (100.0%) |
9-4-0 (69.2%) |
8-5-0 |
61.5% |
38.5% |
81.2 |
63.8 |
+17.4 |
|
6 |
4-2 (66.7%) |
3-3-0 (50.0%) |
3-3-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
74.2 |
69.2 |
+5.0 |
|
3 |
2-1 (66.7%) |
2-1-0 (66.7%) |
1-2-0 |
33.3% |
66.7% |
69.7 |
63.7 |
+6.0 |
|
2 |
2-0 (100.0%) |
1-0-0 (100.0%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
71.5 |
51.5 |
+20.0 |
|
6 |
5-1 (83.3%) |
3-2-0 (60.0%) |
3-2-0 |
60.0% |
40.0% |
79.3 |
68.8 |
+10.5 |
|
11 |
8-3 (72.7%) |
5-4-0 (55.6%) |
3-6-0 |
33.3% |
66.7% |
74.3 |
64.0 |
+10.3 |
|
17 |
16-1 (94.1%) |
8-7-0 (53.3%) |
9-6-0 |
60.0% |
40.0% |
79.5 |
64.7 |
+14.8 |
|
1 |
1-0 (100.0%) |
0-0-0 ( ) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
86.0 |
60.0 |
+26.0 |
|
31 |
26-5 (83.9%) |
14-12-0 (53.8%) |
13-13-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
76.4 |
63.8 |
+12.6 |
|
4 |
4-0 (100.0%) |
3-1-0 (75.0%) |
2-2-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
83.0 |
70.0 |
+13.0 |
|
17 |
15-2 (88.2%) |
9-6-0 (60.0%) |
8-7-0 |
53.3% |
46.7% |
76.6 |
63.8 |
+12.8 |
|
12 |
9-3 (75.0%) |
5-6-0 (45.5%) |
4-7-0 |
36.4% |
63.6% |
75.0 |
66.8 |
+8.3 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
