The Leader In Sports Handicapping
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PRINCETON Tigers25-7 |
|
|
All Games YTD for the 2010-2011 Season |
Last 20 Games |
All Games YTD
|
March 2011 |
3-17-11 |
vs KENTUCKY |
+13 |
132 |
57-59 |
L |
W |
Un |
46.2% |
21.4% |
85.7% |
28 |
51.1% |
45.5% |
54.5% |
26 |
3-12-11 |
vs HARVARD |
+3 |
130 |
63-62 |
W |
W |
Un |
41.8% |
27.3% |
93.3% |
36 |
51.1% |
44.4% |
62.5% |
24 |
3-8-11 |
at PENNSYLVANIA |
-3.5 |
126.5 |
70-58 |
W |
W |
Ov |
48.8% |
50.0% |
74.1% |
33 |
40.8% |
21.4% |
83.3% |
25 |
3-5-11 |
at HARVARD |
+5 |
130.5 |
67-79 |
L |
L |
Ov |
44.1% |
35.3% |
75.0% |
30 |
60.0% |
50.0% |
90.0% |
23 |
3-4-11 |
at DARTMOUTH |
-12.5 |
125.5 |
77-55 |
W |
W |
Ov |
50.8% |
40.0% |
70.0% |
38 |
41.4% |
25.0% |
75.0% |
29 |
February 2011 |
2-26-11 |
vs COLUMBIA |
-11.5 |
131 |
66-61 |
W |
L |
Un |
40.0% |
30.0% |
79.3% |
33 |
40.4% |
33.3% |
70.8% |
35 |
2-25-11 |
vs CORNELL |
-9.5 |
131 |
84-66 |
W |
W |
Ov |
62.3% |
55.6% |
66.7% |
34 |
37.0% |
32.0% |
72.0% |
27 |
2-19-11 |
at BROWN |
-8 |
134 |
65-75 |
L |
L |
Ov |
38.2% |
19.0% |
79.2% |
29 |
48.9% |
44.4% |
92.6% |
33 |
2-18-11 |
at YALE |
-3.5 |
127 |
58-51 |
W |
W |
Un |
31.6% |
16.7% |
76.0% |
39 |
37.8% |
22.2% |
71.4% |
35 |
2-12-11 |
at CORNELL |
-3.5 |
132.5 |
57-55 |
W |
L |
Un |
47.6% |
12.5% |
84.2% |
31 |
39.2% |
17.6% |
85.7% |
24 |
2-11-11 |
at COLUMBIA |
-3 |
136 |
76-46 |
W |
W |
Un |
56.9% |
37.5% |
75.0% |
42 |
27.6% |
18.2% |
63.2% |
32 |
2-8-11 |
vs PENNSYLVANIA |
-8 |
130 |
62-59 |
W |
L |
Un |
39.3% |
47.4% |
64.3% |
39 |
40.7% |
47.4% |
46.2% |
32 |
2-5-11 |
vs DARTMOUTH |
-16.5 |
124 |
68-53 |
W |
L |
Un |
45.6% |
42.9% |
58.3% |
42 |
41.2% |
36.4% |
46.7% |
29 |
2-4-11 |
vs HARVARD |
-2.5 |
131 |
65-61 |
W |
W |
Un |
39.6% |
35.7% |
85.7% |
29 |
43.8% |
18.8% |
80.0% |
36 |
January 2011 |
1-29-11 |
vs YALE |
-10.5 |
129 |
67-63 |
W |
L |
Ov |
53.2% |
62.5% |
66.7% |
33 |
44.4% |
40.0% |
56.3% |
24 |
1-28-11 |
vs BROWN |
-13.5 |
136.5 |
78-60 |
W |
W |
Ov |
47.4% |
35.0% |
65.4% |
42 |
40.0% |
18.8% |
60.7% |
28 |
1-23-11 |
vs NEW JERSEY |
NL |
NL |
73-40 |
W |
- |
- |
51.7% |
25.0% |
55.6% |
42 |
34.7% |
0.0% |
46.2% |
26 |
1-5-11 |
vs MARIST |
-18.5 |
132 |
68-57 |
W |
L |
Un |
43.1% |
16.7% |
87.5% |
38 |
33.9% |
12.5% |
86.7% |
34 |
December 2010 |
12-30-10 |
at UCF |
+11 |
NL |
62-68 |
L |
W |
- |
42.9% |
37.5% |
93.3% |
22 |
43.1% |
50.0% |
75.0% |
39 |
12-29-10 |
vs NORTHEASTERN |
-4.5 |
129 |
65-63 |
W |
L |
Un |
49.0% |
40.0% |
47.4% |
34 |
42.4% |
28.6% |
75.0% |
33 |
12-22-10 |
at TOWSON ST |
-6.5 |
138 |
75-65 |
W |
W |
Ov |
47.5% |
31.3% |
70.6% |
40 |
43.9% |
40.0% |
80.6% |
23 |
12-17-10 |
at WAGNER |
NL |
NL |
69-57 |
W |
- |
- |
54.3% |
60.0% |
76.2% |
32 |
38.6% |
28.6% |
84.0% |
23 |
12-12-10 |
at TULSA |
+7 |
133.5 |
82-78 |
W |
W |
Ov |
42.9% |
25.0% |
80.0% |
36 |
38.8% |
46.7% |
63.3% |
46 |
12-8-10 |
at MONMOUTH |
NL |
NL |
64-61 |
W |
- |
- |
43.4% |
40.0% |
50.0% |
32 |
44.2% |
40.0% |
60.0% |
35 |
12-5-10 |
vs ST JOSEPHS |
-7.5 |
128.5 |
74-65 |
W |
W |
Ov |
50.0% |
45.5% |
77.8% |
27 |
46.4% |
33.3% |
66.7% |
32 |
November 2010 |
11-30-10 |
at LAFAYETTE |
NL |
NL |
82-64 |
W |
- |
- |
61.2% |
52.9% |
76.5% |
29 |
40.0% |
27.3% |
73.7% |
30 |
11-28-10 |
vs SIENA |
+1.5 |
132.5 |
86-77 |
W |
W |
Ov |
46.6% |
41.2% |
80.6% |
37 |
38.6% |
25.0% |
62.1% |
48 |
11-24-10 |
vs PRESBYTERIAN |
-11 |
121.5 |
67-69 |
L |
L |
Ov |
42.4% |
26.9% |
66.7% |
35 |
49.1% |
53.3% |
64.3% |
30 |
11-23-10 |
vs BUCKNELL |
-4 |
119.5 |
66-55 |
W |
W |
Ov |
42.9% |
44.4% |
76.2% |
40 |
38.6% |
14.3% |
81.8% |
28 |
11-22-10 |
at JAMES MADISON |
+6 |
128 |
64-65 |
L |
W |
Ov |
43.8% |
41.2% |
65.2% |
36 |
41.1% |
37.5% |
81.3% |
29 |
11-14-10 |
at DUKE |
+23.5 |
133 |
60-97 |
L |
L |
Ov |
46.0% |
37.5% |
42.1% |
31 |
55.4% |
53.8% |
91.7% |
29 |
11-12-10 |
vs RUTGERS |
-7.5 |
NL |
78-73 |
W |
L |
- |
49.1% |
40.9% |
73.9% |
36 |
49.2% |
33.3% |
55.6% |
28 |
|
Game Situation Report for the 2010-2011 Season Season |
32 |
25-7 (78.1%) |
16-12-0 (57.1%) |
15-11-0 |
57.7% |
42.3% |
69.2 |
63.0 |
+6.2 |
12 |
12-0 (100.0%) |
5-6-0 (45.5%) |
5-5-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
72.4 |
61.3 |
+11.2 |
15 |
10-5 (66.7%) |
8-4-0 (66.7%) |
8-3-0 |
72.7% |
27.3% |
68.5 |
64.9 |
+3.6 |
5 |
3-2 (60.0%) |
3-2-0 (60.0%) |
2-3-0 |
40.0% |
60.0% |
63.6 |
61.6 |
+2.0 |
5 |
2-3 (40.0%) |
3-2-0 (60.0%) |
3-1-0 |
75.0% |
25.0% |
64.8 |
64.0 |
+0.8 |
1 |
0-1 (0.0%) |
1-0-0 (100.0%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
57.0 |
59.0 |
-2.0 |
15 |
13-2 (86.7%) |
8-7-0 (53.3%) |
7-8-0 |
46.7% |
53.3% |
68.2 |
60.3 |
+7.9 |
17 |
12-5 (70.6%) |
8-5-0 (61.5%) |
8-3-0 |
72.7% |
27.3% |
70.1 |
65.5 |
+4.6 |
20 |
18-2 (90.0%) |
10-10-0 (50.0%) |
10-9-0 |
52.6% |
47.4% |
69.3 |
60.5 |
+8.8 |
8 |
3-5 (37.5%) |
6-2-0 (75.0%) |
5-2-0 |
71.4% |
28.6% |
67.6 |
73.1 |
-5.5 |
10 |
10-0 (100.0%) |
4-6-0 (40.0%) |
4-5-0 |
44.4% |
55.6% |
71.0 |
61.8 |
+9.2 |
1 |
1-0 (100.0%) |
1-0-0 (100.0%) |
1-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
86.0 |
77.0 |
+9.0 |
7 |
6-1 (85.7%) |
5-2-0 (71.4%) |
4-3-0 |
57.1% |
42.9% |
68.3 |
57.9 |
+10.4 |
5 |
1-4 (20.0%) |
3-2-0 (60.0%) |
4-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
67.0 |
77.4 |
-10.4 |
9 |
5-4 (55.6%) |
2-7-0 (22.2%) |
5-3-0 |
62.5% |
37.5% |
65.0 |
64.2 |
+0.8 |
2 |
1-1 (50.0%) |
0-1-0 (0.0%) |
1-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
71.0 |
80.5 |
-9.5 |
4 |
4-0 (100.0%) |
2-1-0 (66.7%) |
1-2-0 |
33.3% |
66.7% |
68.0 |
56.0 |
+12.0 |
17 |
15-2 (88.2%) |
12-3-0 (80.0%) |
8-6-0 |
57.1% |
42.9% |
71.5 |
62.0 |
+9.5 |
3 |
3-0 (100.0%) |
0-3-0 (0.0%) |
1-2-0 |
33.3% |
66.7% |
67.0 |
59.0 |
+8.0 |
3 |
1-2 (33.3%) |
0-3-0 (0.0%) |
2-1-0 |
66.7% |
33.3% |
63.0 |
69.7 |
-6.7 |
25 |
19-6 (76.0%) |
11-10-0 (52.4%) |
10-10-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
68.0 |
62.6 |
+5.3 |
6 |
5-1 (83.3%) |
5-1-0 (83.3%) |
5-1-0 |
83.3% |
16.7% |
73.0 |
63.0 |
+10.0 |
15 |
11-4 (73.3%) |
3-9-0 (25.0%) |
5-7-0 |
41.7% |
58.3% |
66.1 |
62.2 |
+3.9 |
12 |
9-3 (75.0%) |
9-2-0 (81.8%) |
6-4-0 |
60.0% |
40.0% |
69.8 |
61.9 |
+7.8 |
|
|
|
| |
|