The Leader In Sports Handicapping
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S DAKOTA Coyotes22-10 |
|
|
All Games YTD for the 2009-2010 Season |
Last 20 Games |
All Games YTD
|
March 2010 |
3-16-10 |
at CREIGHTON |
+13 |
149.5 |
78-89 |
L |
W |
Ov |
42.4% |
48.0% |
66.7% |
33 |
46.9% |
52.2% |
89.5% |
41 |
3-13-10 |
vs HOUSTN BAPTIST |
NL |
NL |
91-86 |
W |
- |
- |
47.5% |
52.6% |
83.3% |
32 |
48.6% |
30.0% |
78.9% |
39 |
3-12-10 |
vs TX-PAN AM |
NL |
NL |
76-71 |
W |
- |
- |
44.6% |
39.1% |
68.0% |
45 |
45.2% |
33.3% |
72.7% |
25 |
3-7-10 |
vs NEW JERSEY TECH |
NL |
NL |
83-49 |
W |
- |
- |
50.9% |
40.9% |
80.0% |
46 |
28.2% |
22.7% |
44.4% |
38 |
3-6-10 |
vs HOUSTN BAPTIST |
NL |
NL |
97-84 |
W |
- |
- |
51.6% |
59.3% |
62.5% |
30 |
47.4% |
30.0% |
52.9% |
49 |
3-4-10 |
vs TX-PAN AM |
NL |
NL |
85-79 |
W |
- |
- |
44.1% |
7.1% |
68.6% |
46 |
44.0% |
37.5% |
63.6% |
36 |
February 2010 |
2-27-10 |
at CHICAGO ST |
NL |
NL |
77-73 |
W |
- |
- |
49.2% |
23.8% |
51.9% |
42 |
40.9% |
25.0% |
66.7% |
41 |
2-25-10 |
at NEW JERSEY TECH |
NL |
NL |
68-58 |
W |
- |
- |
38.6% |
13.3% |
59.5% |
45 |
29.6% |
26.3% |
55.0% |
49 |
2-18-10 |
vs UTAH VALLEY ST |
NL |
NL |
59-55 |
W |
- |
- |
37.0% |
41.7% |
58.3% |
39 |
35.0% |
36.4% |
83.3% |
40 |
2-11-10 |
vs CHICAGO ST |
NL |
NL |
79-74 |
W |
- |
- |
51.1% |
36.4% |
74.2% |
32 |
36.1% |
41.7% |
63.2% |
43 |
2-5-10 |
at SIU EDWARDSVL |
NL |
NL |
91-69 |
W |
- |
- |
64.9% |
50.0% |
52.4% |
39 |
39.1% |
21.7% |
76.9% |
32 |
January 2010 |
1-30-10 |
at TX-PAN AM |
NL |
NL |
72-71 |
W |
- |
- |
54.9% |
44.4% |
61.5% |
35 |
41.0% |
57.1% |
86.7% |
29 |
1-28-10 |
at HOUSTN BAPTIST |
NL |
NL |
92-70 |
W |
- |
- |
51.6% |
52.9% |
65.5% |
43 |
35.0% |
20.0% |
64.7% |
48 |
1-23-10 |
at N DAKOTA |
NL |
NL |
82-64 |
W |
- |
- |
54.0% |
37.5% |
82.6% |
35 |
38.3% |
41.7% |
50.0% |
34 |
1-21-10 |
at UTAH VALLEY ST |
NL |
NL |
68-86 |
L |
- |
- |
50.0% |
42.1% |
46.7% |
32 |
45.8% |
52.9% |
92.0% |
32 |
1-16-10 |
vs N DAKOTA |
NL |
NL |
74-64 |
W |
- |
- |
29.1% |
26.1% |
69.2% |
42 |
45.5% |
40.9% |
38.5% |
39 |
1-12-10 |
vs LONGWOOD |
NL |
NL |
75-63 |
W |
- |
- |
50.0% |
20.0% |
61.3% |
41 |
37.5% |
38.5% |
62.5% |
34 |
1-9-10 |
vs SIU EDWARDSVL |
NL |
NL |
100-76 |
W |
- |
- |
59.6% |
50.0% |
68.8% |
44 |
37.7% |
36.4% |
76.9% |
36 |
1-8-10 |
vs CORNELL |
NL |
NL |
65-71 |
L |
- |
- |
40.0% |
28.6% |
68.8% |
35 |
41.0% |
39.1% |
100.0% |
41 |
1-3-10 |
at KANSAS ST |
NL |
NL |
69-91 |
L |
- |
- |
48.3% |
22.2% |
53.8% |
33 |
43.2% |
30.4% |
61.5% |
52 |
December 2009 |
12-28-09 |
vs MOREHEAD ST |
NL |
NL |
64-66 |
L |
- |
- |
44.2% |
16.7% |
60.0% |
32 |
40.3% |
42.9% |
62.5% |
44 |
12-20-09 |
at WYOMING |
NL |
NL |
74-86 |
L |
- |
- |
38.2% |
41.7% |
66.7% |
40 |
47.1% |
28.0% |
76.5% |
43 |
12-13-09 |
vs BINGHAMTON |
NL |
NL |
89-77 |
W |
- |
- |
49.2% |
32.0% |
75.0% |
37 |
41.7% |
38.1% |
60.0% |
43 |
12-11-09 |
at DRAKE |
NL |
NL |
81-96 |
L |
- |
- |
42.3% |
32.4% |
66.7% |
38 |
50.0% |
53.8% |
84.2% |
39 |
12-2-09 |
vs DAKOTA STATE |
NL |
NL |
111-59 |
W |
- |
- |
56.5% |
43.5% |
76.7% |
43 |
33.3% |
19.0% |
68.8% |
35 |
November 2009 |
11-29-09 |
vs MIDLAND LTHRN |
NL |
NL |
104-71 |
W |
- |
- |
54.1% |
50.0% |
76.9% |
37 |
40.8% |
6.7% |
70.6% |
23 |
11-28-09 |
vs DANA |
NL |
NL |
100-65 |
W |
- |
- |
58.5% |
47.4% |
65.2% |
43 |
39.4% |
32.0% |
50.0% |
31 |
11-24-09 |
at MARQUETTE |
NL |
NL |
68-93 |
L |
- |
- |
50.0% |
50.0% |
76.2% |
23 |
50.0% |
60.0% |
81.3% |
35 |
11-20-09 |
vs MAYVILLE ST |
NL |
NL |
99-67 |
W |
- |
- |
55.7% |
42.1% |
65.7% |
42 |
36.8% |
29.0% |
100.0% |
37 |
11-15-09 |
vs TEXAS A&M CC |
NL |
NL |
76-73 |
W |
- |
- |
47.2% |
50.0% |
68.2% |
28 |
44.8% |
40.0% |
64.7% |
39 |
11-14-09 |
vs OREGON ST |
NL |
NL |
47-62 |
L |
- |
- |
30.9% |
18.5% |
66.7% |
25 |
52.0% |
41.7% |
45.5% |
42 |
11-13-09 |
at TEXAS TECH |
NL |
NL |
49-88 |
L |
- |
- |
31.5% |
13.3% |
54.2% |
41 |
45.3% |
18.2% |
72.0% |
46 |
|
Game Situation Report for the 2009-2010 Season Season |
32 |
22-10 (68.8%) |
1-0-0 (100.0%) |
1-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
79.5 |
73.3 |
+6.2 |
16 |
14-2 (87.5%) |
0-0-0 ( ) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
85.1 |
68.8 |
+16.4 |
13 |
6-7 (46.2%) |
1-0-0 (100.0%) |
1-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
74.5 |
79.5 |
-5.0 |
3 |
2-1 (66.7%) |
0-0-0 ( ) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
70.7 |
70.7 |
0.0 |
1 |
0-1 (0.0%) |
1-0-0 (100.0%) |
1-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
78.0 |
89.0 |
-11.0 |
14 |
13-1 (92.9%) |
0-0-0 ( ) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
78.8 |
70.3 |
+8.5 |
18 |
9-9 (50.0%) |
1-0-0 (100.0%) |
1-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
80.0 |
75.7 |
+4.3 |
1 |
0-1 (0.0%) |
1-0-0 (100.0%) |
1-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
78.0 |
89.0 |
-11.0 |
1 |
0-1 (0.0%) |
1-0-0 (100.0%) |
1-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
78.0 |
89.0 |
-11.0 |
6 |
5-1 (83.3%) |
0-0-0 ( ) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
83.5 |
69.5 |
+14.0 |
5 |
5-0 (100.0%) |
0-0-0 ( ) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
83.4 |
73.8 |
+9.6 |
3 |
2-1 (66.7%) |
1-0-0 (100.0%) |
1-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
88.0 |
70.3 |
+17.7 |
18 |
10-8 (55.6%) |
0-0-0 ( ) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
75.6 |
74.9 |
+0.7 |
4 |
4-0 (100.0%) |
0-0-0 ( ) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
94.5 |
70.5 |
+24.0 |
22 |
17-5 (77.3%) |
1-0-0 (100.0%) |
1-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
81.9 |
73.3 |
+8.6 |
9 |
5-4 (55.6%) |
0-0-0 ( ) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
76.9 |
71.7 |
+5.2 |
|
|
|
| |
|