The Leader In Sports Handicapping
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S FLORIDA - |
|
|
All Games YTD for the 2001-2002 Season |
Last 20 Games |
All Games YTD
|
March 2002 |
3-12-02 |
at BALL ST |
+5 |
152.5 |
92-98 |
L |
L |
Ov |
55.9% |
45.8% |
38.5% |
32 |
47.2% |
46.4% |
83.3% |
36 |
3-7-02 |
at CINCINNATI |
+15.5 |
144 |
57-79 |
L |
L |
Un |
35.0% |
50.0% |
55.0% |
35 |
50.0% |
30.0% |
64.7% |
41 |
3-6-02 |
vs UAB |
-3.5 |
142.5 |
65-62 |
W |
L |
Un |
45.3% |
37.5% |
64.7% |
33 |
35.6% |
36.4% |
76.2% |
39 |
3-2-02 |
at SOUTHERN MISS |
-3 |
NL |
75-92 |
L |
L |
- |
40.0% |
25.0% |
62.1% |
34 |
63.2% |
50.0% |
57.9% |
39 |
February 2002 |
2-26-02 |
vs HOUSTON |
-18 |
NL |
88-57 |
W |
W |
- |
46.0% |
44.0% |
73.1% |
38 |
45.5% |
45.5% |
54.5% |
29 |
2-23-02 |
at UAB |
PK |
NL |
78-83 |
L |
L |
- |
41.0% |
28.6% |
71.0% |
38 |
37.9% |
26.1% |
84.6% |
42 |
2-20-02 |
vs MEMPHIS |
-2.5 |
153 |
59-71 |
L |
L |
Un |
39.6% |
23.1% |
56.0% |
43 |
51.7% |
25.0% |
52.9% |
28 |
2-16-02 |
at TCU |
PK |
NL |
88-74 |
W |
W |
- |
54.2% |
50.0% |
59.1% |
41 |
40.3% |
42.9% |
78.9% |
29 |
2-12-02 |
at HOUSTON |
-2 |
NL |
75-91 |
L |
L |
- |
42.0% |
29.2% |
52.6% |
38 |
57.6% |
53.8% |
51.6% |
39 |
2-9-02 |
vs TULANE |
-10 |
NL |
76-65 |
W |
W |
- |
50.0% |
46.2% |
64.7% |
37 |
44.1% |
26.7% |
75.0% |
30 |
2-5-02 |
vs UAB |
-8.5 |
NL |
81-65 |
W |
W |
- |
53.4% |
33.3% |
63.6% |
36 |
41.7% |
23.8% |
58.8% |
34 |
2-1-02 |
at LOUISVILLE |
+4 |
148 |
77-96 |
L |
L |
Ov |
50.8% |
31.3% |
52.2% |
36 |
53.3% |
59.4% |
61.9% |
34 |
January 2002 |
1-29-02 |
at C FLORIDA |
NL |
NL |
84-79 |
W |
- |
- |
47.5% |
43.5% |
60.0% |
52 |
44.1% |
35.0% |
85.7% |
28 |
1-26-02 |
vs CINCINNATI |
+6 |
NL |
68-78 |
L |
L |
- |
44.1% |
41.7% |
64.7% |
37 |
40.7% |
46.7% |
90.0% |
35 |
1-23-02 |
at TULANE |
-2 |
NL |
68-54 |
W |
W |
- |
47.4% |
28.6% |
52.6% |
37 |
38.9% |
15.8% |
39.1% |
40 |
1-18-02 |
vs CHARLOTTE |
-2.5 |
147.5 |
78-81 |
L |
L |
Ov |
51.6% |
40.0% |
75.0% |
35 |
47.6% |
44.0% |
58.8% |
33 |
1-15-02 |
at MEMPHIS |
+8.5 |
NL |
62-81 |
L |
L |
- |
29.7% |
19.0% |
58.8% |
42 |
45.8% |
37.5% |
77.8% |
45 |
1-12-02 |
at DEPAUL |
-2.5 |
NL |
70-63 |
W |
W |
- |
43.1% |
40.0% |
43.5% |
43 |
34.9% |
26.7% |
55.6% |
50 |
1-8-02 |
vs SOUTHERN MISS |
-13.5 |
NL |
74-54 |
W |
W |
- |
49.2% |
43.5% |
40.0% |
34 |
40.0% |
53.8% |
84.6% |
29 |
1-5-02 |
vs TCU |
-9 |
NL |
117-108 |
W |
P |
- |
55.1% |
29.2% |
60.0% |
47 |
47.9% |
53.8% |
85.7% |
40 |
1-2-02 |
vs FLORIDA ST |
-8.5 |
NL |
74-78 |
L |
L |
- |
45.6% |
45.0% |
59.1% |
28 |
48.2% |
42.1% |
64.0% |
43 |
December 2001 |
12-29-01 |
vs IL-CHICAGO |
-11.5 |
NL |
82-78 |
W |
L |
- |
46.9% |
25.0% |
60.0% |
48 |
45.3% |
44.0% |
56.3% |
33 |
12-28-01 |
vs BUCKNELL |
-30 |
NL |
59-56 |
W |
L |
- |
36.8% |
8.3% |
66.7% |
42 |
43.4% |
27.8% |
45.5% |
33 |
12-20-01 |
at SYRACUSE |
+6.5 |
NL |
68-80 |
L |
L |
- |
40.6% |
33.3% |
40.0% |
47 |
36.2% |
27.3% |
77.4% |
46 |
12-8-01 |
vs FLORIDA |
+3.5 |
145 |
73-92 |
L |
L |
Ov |
45.8% |
38.9% |
60.0% |
35 |
57.6% |
33.3% |
75.0% |
32 |
12-4-01 |
at N ILLINOIS |
-14.5 |
NL |
79-74 |
W |
L |
- |
46.0% |
18.8% |
64.3% |
42 |
41.3% |
36.0% |
59.1% |
38 |
12-1-01 |
vs CALIFORNIA |
-5.5 |
NL |
79-59 |
W |
W |
- |
45.8% |
30.8% |
63.6% |
50 |
34.4% |
26.9% |
52.6% |
35 |
November 2001 |
11-28-01 |
vs PRAIRIE VIEW A&M |
NL |
NL |
86-63 |
W |
- |
- |
43.5% |
36.4% |
72.0% |
36 |
41.0% |
35.3% |
70.0% |
42 |
11-25-01 |
vs PITTSBURGH |
-2.5 |
NL |
69-63 |
W |
W |
- |
47.8% |
57.9% |
63.6% |
37 |
33.8% |
25.8% |
64.3% |
41 |
11-24-01 |
vs HOFSTRA |
-13.5 |
NL |
79-60 |
W |
W |
- |
47.4% |
37.5% |
73.3% |
34 |
38.0% |
30.0% |
53.3% |
41 |
11-23-01 |
vs ROBERT MORRIS |
-18 |
NL |
82-55 |
W |
W |
- |
50.8% |
60.0% |
42.9% |
49 |
37.7% |
25.0% |
66.7% |
28 |
11-19-01 |
vs FORDHAM |
-13 |
NL |
104-84 |
W |
W |
- |
43.6% |
63.2% |
72.7% |
46 |
51.5% |
35.0% |
52.9% |
40 |
|
Game Situation Report for the 2001-2002 Season Season |
32 |
19-13 (59.4%) |
12-17-1 (41.4%) |
4-3-0 |
57.1% |
42.9% |
77.1 |
74.2 |
+2.9 |
15 |
10-5 (66.7%) |
6-7-1 (46.2%) |
2-1-0 |
66.7% |
33.3% |
79.9 |
72.6 |
+7.3 |
13 |
5-8 (38.5%) |
3-9-0 (25.0%) |
2-1-0 |
66.7% |
33.3% |
74.8 |
80.3 |
-5.5 |
4 |
4-0 (100.0%) |
3-1-0 (75.0%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
73.8 |
60.0 |
+13.8 |
7 |
6-1 (85.7%) |
3-4-0 (42.9%) |
0-2-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
70.4 |
64.7 |
+5.7 |
1 |
0-1 (0.0%) |
0-1-0 (0.0%) |
1-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
92.0 |
98.0 |
-6.0 |
32 |
19-13 (59.4%) |
12-17-1 (41.4%) |
4-3-0 |
57.1% |
42.9% |
77.1 |
74.2 |
+2.9 |
21 |
16-5 (76.2%) |
11-9-1 (55.0%) |
1-2-0 |
33.3% |
66.7% |
77.8 |
70.0 |
+7.8 |
7 |
0-7 (0.0%) |
0-7-0 (0.0%) |
3-1-0 |
75.0% |
25.0% |
71.0 |
86.3 |
-15.3 |
12 |
9-3 (75.0%) |
6-5-1 (54.5%) |
1-1-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
80.9 |
71.3 |
+9.6 |
2 |
0-2 (0.0%) |
0-2-0 (0.0%) |
1-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
70.5 |
85.0 |
-14.5 |
5 |
3-2 (60.0%) |
2-3-0 (40.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
73.4 |
74.8 |
-1.4 |
5 |
0-5 (0.0%) |
0-5-0 (0.0%) |
2-1-0 |
66.7% |
33.3% |
71.2 |
86.8 |
-15.6 |
4 |
3-1 (75.0%) |
2-2-0 (50.0%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
71.8 |
70.0 |
+1.8 |
13 |
7-6 (53.8%) |
3-7-1 (30.0%) |
2-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
80.4 |
77.2 |
+3.2 |
15 |
9-6 (60.0%) |
7-8-0 (46.7%) |
2-2-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
75.6 |
72.6 |
+3.0 |
1 |
1-0 (100.0%) |
0-1-0 (0.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
82.0 |
78.0 |
+4.0 |
19 |
10-9 (52.6%) |
7-11-0 (38.9%) |
2-2-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
73.5 |
73.3 |
+0.2 |
12 |
8-4 (66.7%) |
4-6-1 (40.0%) |
2-1-0 |
66.7% |
33.3% |
80.5 |
74.8 |
+5.8 |
12 |
7-5 (58.3%) |
5-6-0 (45.5%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
73.3 |
71.3 |
+2.0 |
16 |
9-7 (56.3%) |
4-10-1 (28.6%) |
3-2-0 |
60.0% |
40.0% |
78.3 |
76.5 |
+1.8 |
|
|
|
| |
|