The Leader In Sports Handicapping
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ST BONAVENTURE - |
|
|
Last 20 Games for the 2000-2001 Season |
Last 20 Games |
All Games YTD
|
March 2001 |
3-14-01 |
at PITTSBURGH |
+5 |
133 |
75-84 |
L |
L |
Ov |
42.4% |
38.5% |
88.2% |
35 |
45.8% |
28.0% |
76.7% |
36 |
3-8-01 |
vs MASSACHUSETTS |
+2.5 |
132.5 |
58-79 |
L |
L |
Ov |
36.0% |
20.8% |
63.0% |
28 |
53.2% |
52.6% |
73.1% |
39 |
3-3-01 |
at MASSACHUSETTS |
+5.5 |
NL |
66-59 |
W |
W |
- |
42.2% |
42.1% |
71.4% |
30 |
37.7% |
25.0% |
50.0% |
35 |
February 2001 |
2-28-01 |
vs GEORGE WASHINGTON |
-5 |
NL |
78-73 |
W |
P |
- |
43.8% |
31.6% |
76.9% |
34 |
46.6% |
40.0% |
73.3% |
35 |
2-24-01 |
vs FORDHAM |
-8 |
NL |
84-74 |
W |
W |
- |
41.7% |
32.0% |
72.2% |
44 |
43.3% |
33.3% |
70.6% |
34 |
2-21-01 |
at XAVIER |
+9.5 |
NL |
60-77 |
L |
L |
- |
40.7% |
29.2% |
36.0% |
36 |
46.6% |
33.3% |
73.9% |
36 |
2-17-01 |
at DUQUESNE |
-6.5 |
NL |
60-72 |
L |
L |
- |
38.2% |
33.3% |
84.6% |
18 |
55.8% |
55.6% |
79.2% |
37 |
2-14-01 |
vs LASALLE |
-8 |
NL |
82-73 |
W |
W |
- |
43.9% |
42.3% |
86.7% |
37 |
37.5% |
28.6% |
78.6% |
48 |
2-10-01 |
vs ST JOSEPHS |
-2 |
NL |
76-78 |
L |
L |
- |
41.9% |
45.5% |
73.7% |
31 |
52.9% |
50.0% |
60.9% |
36 |
2-7-01 |
vs DUQUESNE |
-14.5 |
NL |
82-70 |
W |
L |
- |
49.0% |
47.8% |
67.7% |
25 |
48.1% |
18.2% |
90.0% |
36 |
2-3-01 |
at LASALLE |
+1.5 |
NL |
80-76 |
W |
W |
- |
38.4% |
27.3% |
78.3% |
50 |
40.6% |
40.0% |
58.8% |
40 |
2-1-01 |
at ST JOSEPHS |
+7.5 |
NL |
97-104 |
L |
W |
- |
44.6% |
40.9% |
78.6% |
32 |
52.9% |
33.3% |
69.7% |
50 |
January 2001 |
1-27-01 |
at GEORGE WASHINGTON |
+3 |
NL |
68-76 |
L |
L |
- |
34.9% |
33.3% |
76.0% |
33 |
46.0% |
30.0% |
90.0% |
41 |
1-25-01 |
vs DAYTON |
-3.5 |
NL |
66-51 |
W |
W |
- |
50.0% |
52.6% |
66.7% |
25 |
40.0% |
24.0% |
50.0% |
33 |
1-21-01 |
vs RHODE ISLAND |
-15 |
NL |
91-55 |
W |
W |
- |
45.9% |
46.2% |
57.9% |
52 |
40.0% |
18.8% |
57.1% |
29 |
1-16-01 |
at CLEVELAND ST |
-1.5 |
NL |
64-61 |
W |
W |
- |
38.2% |
30.0% |
61.5% |
42 |
46.7% |
52.9% |
43.5% |
28 |
1-13-01 |
vs MASSACHUSETTS |
-5 |
NL |
66-65 |
W |
L |
- |
40.4% |
18.8% |
68.0% |
34 |
44.4% |
41.7% |
76.9% |
33 |
1-9-01 |
at FORDHAM |
PK |
150 |
67-76 |
L |
L |
Un |
43.9% |
50.0% |
63.6% |
26 |
56.9% |
35.7% |
72.2% |
35 |
1-6-01 |
at TEMPLE |
+9.5 |
NL |
43-63 |
L |
L |
- |
26.5% |
24.1% |
76.9% |
31 |
45.7% |
30.0% |
88.2% |
32 |
1-3-01 |
at ST LOUIS |
+4 |
NL |
63-76 |
L |
L |
- |
30.6% |
40.0% |
73.1% |
32 |
57.1% |
50.0% |
82.9% |
35 |
|
Game Situation Report for the 2000-2001 Season Season |
30 |
18-12 (60.0%) |
14-11-1 (56.0%) |
2-1-0 |
66.7% |
33.3% |
74.4 |
71.2 |
+3.2 |
14 |
12-2 (85.7%) |
7-3-1 (70.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
82.5 |
70.4 |
+12.1 |
14 |
5-9 (35.7%) |
6-7-0 (46.2%) |
1-1-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
67.9 |
72.6 |
-4.8 |
2 |
1-1 (50.0%) |
1-1-0 (50.0%) |
1-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
63.0 |
66.0 |
-3.0 |
1 |
0-1 (0.0%) |
0-1-0 (0.0%) |
1-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
58.0 |
79.0 |
-21.0 |
1 |
0-1 (0.0%) |
0-1-0 (0.0%) |
1-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
75.0 |
84.0 |
-9.0 |
30 |
18-12 (60.0%) |
14-11-1 (56.0%) |
2-1-0 |
66.7% |
33.3% |
74.4 |
71.2 |
+3.2 |
12 |
10-2 (83.3%) |
7-4-1 (63.6%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
77.0 |
67.0 |
+10.0 |
13 |
5-8 (38.5%) |
7-6-0 (53.8%) |
2-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
69.0 |
73.5 |
-4.5 |
10 |
9-1 (90.0%) |
6-3-1 (66.7%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
80.0 |
67.1 |
+12.9 |
1 |
1-0 (100.0%) |
1-0-0 (100.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
79.0 |
78.0 |
+1.0 |
2 |
1-1 (50.0%) |
1-1-0 (50.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
62.0 |
66.5 |
-4.5 |
10 |
3-7 (30.0%) |
5-5-0 (50.0%) |
1-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
69.2 |
74.5 |
-5.3 |
5 |
4-1 (80.0%) |
2-1-0 (66.7%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
80.2 |
74.8 |
+5.4 |
9 |
5-4 (55.6%) |
4-4-0 (50.0%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
71.8 |
68.2 |
+3.6 |
16 |
9-7 (56.3%) |
8-6-1 (57.1%) |
2-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
74.0 |
71.7 |
+2.3 |
18 |
12-6 (66.7%) |
8-5-1 (61.5%) |
1-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
75.3 |
69.4 |
+5.9 |
11 |
5-6 (45.5%) |
5-6-0 (45.5%) |
1-1-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
73.5 |
75.7 |
-2.3 |
14 |
10-4 (71.4%) |
7-4-1 (63.6%) |
1-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
75.4 |
68.1 |
+7.2 |
10 |
4-6 (40.0%) |
4-6-0 (40.0%) |
1-1-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
71.4 |
75.5 |
-4.1 |
|
|
|
| |
|