The Leader In Sports Handicapping
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ST BONAVENTURE - |
|
|
Last 20 Games for the 2001-2002 Season |
Last 20 Games |
All Games YTD
|
March 2002 |
3-13-02 |
at SYRACUSE |
+6 |
154.5 |
66-76 |
L |
L |
Un |
33.8% |
21.9% |
68.2% |
41 |
47.0% |
38.9% |
35.0% |
47 |
3-7-02 |
vs RICHMOND |
-1.5 |
137 |
69-78 |
L |
L |
Ov |
38.3% |
38.6% |
85.7% |
28 |
64.3% |
45.5% |
82.4% |
25 |
3-6-02 |
vs DUQUESNE |
-12 |
152.5 |
81-66 |
W |
W |
Un |
46.3% |
36.4% |
70.4% |
29 |
54.2% |
46.7% |
58.3% |
30 |
3-2-02 |
at RHODE ISLAND |
-6.5 |
NL |
72-80 |
L |
L |
- |
35.4% |
31.6% |
93.3% |
26 |
41.9% |
14.3% |
83.9% |
52 |
February 2002 |
2-28-02 |
vs ST JOSEPHS |
-3 |
NL |
84-91 |
L |
L |
- |
40.0% |
25.8% |
80.0% |
34 |
52.2% |
33.3% |
75.0% |
46 |
2-23-02 |
at TEMPLE |
+6.5 |
NL |
71-75 |
L |
W |
- |
34.7% |
28.6% |
69.2% |
42 |
47.3% |
41.7% |
61.9% |
41 |
2-16-02 |
vs FORDHAM |
-15 |
NL |
90-84 |
W |
L |
- |
44.1% |
28.6% |
75.9% |
28 |
61.8% |
57.1% |
60.0% |
39 |
2-13-02 |
at MASSACHUSETTS |
+1.5 |
NL |
60-56 |
W |
W |
- |
34.7% |
19.0% |
75.9% |
32 |
45.3% |
19.0% |
100.0% |
30 |
2-9-02 |
vs XAVIER |
-1 |
NL |
80-79 |
W |
P |
- |
48.3% |
36.8% |
70.8% |
28 |
49.0% |
45.0% |
71.4% |
36 |
2-6-02 |
vs RICHMOND |
-8 |
NL |
66-78 |
L |
L |
- |
35.4% |
22.9% |
92.3% |
34 |
54.0% |
40.9% |
68.2% |
37 |
2-3-02 |
at DAYTON |
+8.5 |
NL |
81-75 |
W |
W |
- |
46.4% |
39.3% |
81.8% |
22 |
48.0% |
34.8% |
67.9% |
40 |
January 2002 |
1-26-02 |
vs MASSACHUSETTS |
-8 |
NL |
65-67 |
L |
L |
- |
41.8% |
30.4% |
80.0% |
27 |
49.0% |
40.9% |
62.5% |
35 |
1-23-02 |
at FORDHAM |
-3 |
NL |
81-87 |
L |
L |
- |
39.7% |
35.0% |
83.3% |
34 |
61.1% |
62.5% |
47.8% |
40 |
1-19-02 |
vs DUQUESNE |
-17.5 |
NL |
96-89 |
W |
L |
- |
42.2% |
35.5% |
79.5% |
37 |
48.5% |
46.2% |
65.0% |
42 |
1-16-02 |
vs TEMPLE |
-2.5 |
NL |
93-74 |
W |
W |
- |
49.2% |
48.7% |
55.6% |
34 |
52.7% |
46.2% |
66.7% |
31 |
1-13-02 |
at ST JOSEPHS |
+7.5 |
NL |
87-93 |
L |
W |
- |
49.1% |
40.0% |
77.8% |
36 |
50.8% |
36.1% |
72.0% |
32 |
1-10-02 |
at LASALLE |
-3 |
NL |
68-62 |
W |
W |
- |
38.1% |
30.8% |
80.0% |
30 |
45.8% |
20.0% |
71.4% |
40 |
1-6-02 |
vs RHODE ISLAND |
-18.5 |
NL |
96-74 |
W |
W |
- |
53.2% |
45.5% |
78.9% |
35 |
51.7% |
30.0% |
53.3% |
28 |
1-3-02 |
at GEORGE WASHINGTON |
-3 |
NL |
86-92 |
L |
L |
- |
37.8% |
24.3% |
75.0% |
38 |
49.2% |
32.1% |
75.0% |
48 |
December 2001 |
12-31-01 |
at KENT ST |
+3 |
NL |
82-93 |
L |
L |
- |
48.1% |
42.3% |
77.8% |
25 |
52.2% |
23.5% |
82.6% |
40 |
|
Game Situation Report for the 2001-2002 Season Season |
30 |
17-13 (56.7%) |
14-15-1 (48.3%) |
1-2-0 |
33.3% |
66.7% |
80.5 |
78.1 |
+2.5 |
13 |
9-4 (69.2%) |
4-8-1 (33.3%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
85.5 |
80.4 |
+5.1 |
15 |
7-8 (46.7%) |
9-6-0 (60.0%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
77.0 |
76.9 |
+0.1 |
2 |
1-1 (50.0%) |
1-1-0 (50.0%) |
1-1-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
75.0 |
72.0 |
+3.0 |
2 |
1-1 (50.0%) |
1-1-0 (50.0%) |
1-1-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
75.0 |
72.0 |
+3.0 |
1 |
0-1 (0.0%) |
0-1-0 (0.0%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
66.0 |
76.0 |
-10.0 |
30 |
17-13 (56.7%) |
14-15-1 (48.3%) |
1-2-0 |
33.3% |
66.7% |
80.5 |
78.1 |
+2.5 |
20 |
13-7 (65.0%) |
7-12-1 (36.8%) |
1-1-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
82.3 |
78.2 |
+4.1 |
10 |
4-6 (40.0%) |
7-3-0 (70.0%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
77.0 |
77.8 |
-0.8 |
12 |
9-3 (75.0%) |
4-7-1 (36.4%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
85.8 |
79.1 |
+6.7 |
1 |
0-1 (0.0%) |
0-1-0 (0.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
82.0 |
96.0 |
-14.0 |
6 |
3-3 (50.0%) |
2-4-0 (33.3%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
77.8 |
78.5 |
-0.7 |
9 |
4-5 (44.4%) |
7-2-0 (77.8%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
76.4 |
75.8 |
+0.7 |
1 |
0-1 (0.0%) |
0-1-0 (0.0%) |
1-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
69.0 |
78.0 |
-9.0 |
1 |
0-1 (0.0%) |
0-1-0 (0.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
72.0 |
80.0 |
-8.0 |
13 |
8-5 (61.5%) |
4-8-1 (33.3%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
84.2 |
80.9 |
+3.3 |
15 |
9-6 (60.0%) |
10-5-0 (66.7%) |
0-2-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
78.7 |
75.5 |
+3.2 |
17 |
9-8 (52.9%) |
8-9-0 (47.1%) |
1-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
79.9 |
79.1 |
+0.8 |
12 |
7-5 (58.3%) |
5-6-1 (45.5%) |
0-2-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
81.6 |
77.8 |
+3.8 |
14 |
7-7 (50.0%) |
5-9-0 (35.7%) |
1-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
82.4 |
81.9 |
+0.5 |
14 |
8-6 (57.1%) |
7-6-1 (53.8%) |
0-2-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
80.3 |
76.9 |
+3.4 |
|
|
|
| |
|