The Leader In Sports Handicapping
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOLEDO - |
|
|
Last 20 Games for the 2001-2002 Season |
Last 20 Games |
All Games YTD
|
March 2002 |
3-8-02 |
vs KENT ST |
+11.5 |
129 |
61-86 |
L |
L |
Ov |
45.7% |
29.4% |
66.7% |
25 |
54.2% |
61.1% |
64.7% |
34 |
3-7-02 |
vs C MICHIGAN |
-2.5 |
130.5 |
62-54 |
W |
W |
Un |
37.7% |
33.3% |
65.4% |
30 |
38.2% |
9.1% |
79.4% |
31 |
3-4-02 |
vs E MICHIGAN |
-15 |
NL |
89-53 |
W |
W |
- |
50.8% |
50.0% |
66.7% |
38 |
31.8% |
12.5% |
77.4% |
31 |
3-2-02 |
vs E MICHIGAN |
-16 |
NL |
74-68 |
W |
L |
- |
46.7% |
53.3% |
68.6% |
26 |
54.8% |
66.7% |
75.0% |
25 |
February 2002 |
2-27-02 |
at OHIO U |
+8 |
NL |
69-68 |
W |
W |
- |
50.9% |
47.1% |
77.8% |
30 |
51.1% |
10.0% |
70.4% |
25 |
2-23-02 |
vs W MICHIGAN |
-4.5 |
NL |
72-68 |
W |
L |
- |
54.3% |
66.7% |
57.1% |
36 |
35.6% |
33.3% |
65.5% |
34 |
2-20-02 |
vs BUFFALO |
-6.5 |
NL |
54-42 |
W |
W |
- |
34.0% |
22.2% |
60.9% |
35 |
31.3% |
35.3% |
54.5% |
39 |
2-18-02 |
vs BOWLING GREEN |
+3 |
NL |
66-62 |
W |
W |
- |
44.7% |
30.0% |
65.6% |
36 |
41.5% |
25.0% |
72.2% |
28 |
2-16-02 |
at BALL ST |
+12 |
NL |
63-81 |
L |
L |
- |
46.9% |
50.0% |
50.0% |
31 |
47.1% |
45.5% |
88.5% |
27 |
2-13-02 |
vs AKRON |
-9 |
NL |
77-72 |
W |
L |
- |
55.1% |
53.3% |
75.0% |
32 |
43.1% |
26.7% |
81.8% |
27 |
2-9-02 |
at MIAMI OHIO |
+6.5 |
NL |
54-64 |
L |
L |
- |
40.0% |
42.1% |
85.7% |
27 |
46.9% |
23.1% |
71.4% |
32 |
2-6-02 |
vs C MICHIGAN |
-2.5 |
NL |
58-42 |
W |
W |
- |
39.1% |
40.0% |
66.7% |
36 |
31.9% |
12.5% |
64.7% |
34 |
2-2-02 |
at KENT ST |
+13.5 |
NL |
52-79 |
L |
L |
- |
38.3% |
10.0% |
65.2% |
25 |
47.5% |
25.0% |
82.6% |
42 |
January 2002 |
1-30-02 |
at N ILLINOIS |
PK |
NL |
91-95 |
L |
L |
- |
48.4% |
33.3% |
77.8% |
35 |
53.2% |
31.3% |
77.4% |
33 |
1-26-02 |
vs MARSHALL |
-2.5 |
NL |
77-67 |
W |
W |
- |
41.4% |
33.3% |
79.3% |
44 |
46.4% |
50.0% |
58.3% |
26 |
1-22-02 |
at C MICHIGAN |
+5.5 |
NL |
61-75 |
L |
L |
- |
45.7% |
41.2% |
60.0% |
25 |
50.0% |
42.9% |
73.3% |
39 |
1-19-02 |
at BOWLING GREEN |
+9 |
NL |
57-76 |
L |
L |
- |
38.6% |
40.0% |
73.9% |
30 |
44.8% |
40.0% |
78.3% |
36 |
1-16-02 |
vs N ILLINOIS |
-10 |
NL |
89-80 |
W |
L |
- |
47.4% |
29.4% |
71.4% |
28 |
46.9% |
26.7% |
64.0% |
48 |
1-12-02 |
vs BALL ST |
+3 |
NL |
59-68 |
L |
L |
- |
40.4% |
21.4% |
75.0% |
31 |
41.7% |
39.1% |
73.1% |
31 |
1-9-02 |
at E MICHIGAN |
-6.5 |
NL |
85-60 |
W |
W |
- |
58.2% |
54.5% |
78.9% |
28 |
46.7% |
22.2% |
61.5% |
25 |
|
Game Situation Report for the 2001-2002 Season Season |
30 |
16-14 (53.3%) |
12-16-0 (42.9%) |
1-1-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
66.9 |
68.4 |
-1.5 |
13 |
11-2 (84.6%) |
5-7-0 (41.7%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
72.2 |
63.8 |
+8.5 |
15 |
4-11 (26.7%) |
6-8-0 (42.9%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
63.1 |
72.2 |
-9.1 |
2 |
1-1 (50.0%) |
1-1-0 (50.0%) |
1-1-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
61.5 |
70.0 |
-8.5 |
3 |
2-1 (66.7%) |
2-1-0 (66.7%) |
1-1-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
70.7 |
64.3 |
+6.3 |
29 |
15-14 (51.7%) |
12-16-0 (42.9%) |
1-1-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
66.9 |
68.7 |
-1.8 |
11 |
11-0 (100.0%) |
6-5-0 (54.5%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
74.2 |
61.0 |
+13.2 |
15 |
3-12 (20.0%) |
5-10-0 (33.3%) |
1-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
60.0 |
71.5 |
-11.5 |
9 |
9-0 (100.0%) |
4-5-0 (44.4%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
74.3 |
61.9 |
+12.4 |
3 |
1-2 (33.3%) |
1-2-0 (33.3%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
67.0 |
70.7 |
-3.7 |
1 |
1-0 (100.0%) |
1-0-0 (100.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
85.0 |
60.0 |
+25.0 |
11 |
2-9 (18.2%) |
4-7-0 (36.4%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
58.0 |
70.4 |
-12.4 |
1 |
0-1 (0.0%) |
0-1-0 (0.0%) |
1-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
61.0 |
86.0 |
-25.0 |
4 |
3-1 (75.0%) |
4-0-0 (100.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
66.0 |
56.3 |
+9.8 |
12 |
5-7 (41.7%) |
3-8-0 (27.3%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
62.6 |
68.4 |
-5.8 |
13 |
8-5 (61.5%) |
5-7-0 (41.7%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
71.7 |
70.8 |
+0.9 |
16 |
8-8 (50.0%) |
7-9-0 (43.8%) |
1-1-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
68.0 |
67.7 |
+0.3 |
13 |
8-5 (61.5%) |
5-6-0 (45.5%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
66.9 |
69.2 |
-2.3 |
12 |
6-6 (50.0%) |
3-9-0 (25.0%) |
1-1-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
67.3 |
67.9 |
-0.7 |
15 |
9-6 (60.0%) |
7-6-0 (53.8%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
67.6 |
69.1 |
-1.5 |
|
|
|
| |
|