The Leader In Sports Handicapping
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UNC-WILMINGTON - |
|
|
All Games YTD for the 2002-2003 Season |
Last 20 Games |
All Games YTD
|
March 2003 |
3-21-03 |
vs MARYLAND |
+8.5 |
139.5 |
73-75 |
L |
W |
Ov |
36.4% |
44.8% |
76.9% |
29 |
50.0% |
52.6% |
73.3% |
35 |
3-10-03 |
vs DREXEL |
-6 |
128.5 |
70-62 |
W |
W |
Ov |
51.9% |
46.7% |
58.3% |
32 |
40.7% |
29.2% |
55.0% |
33 |
3-9-03 |
vs DELAWARE |
-9 |
NL |
63-50 |
W |
W |
- |
40.4% |
20.0% |
56.0% |
44 |
30.2% |
26.3% |
68.4% |
36 |
3-8-03 |
vs HOFSTRA |
-15 |
NL |
76-56 |
W |
W |
- |
48.3% |
26.7% |
72.7% |
41 |
37.7% |
20.0% |
54.5% |
34 |
3-3-03 |
vs WM & MARY |
-19.5 |
NL |
60-49 |
W |
L |
- |
33.3% |
28.1% |
69.2% |
40 |
37.5% |
23.8% |
80.0% |
37 |
3-1-03 |
vs VA COMMONWEALTH |
-10.5 |
NL |
80-63 |
W |
W |
- |
48.3% |
47.1% |
80.0% |
26 |
44.2% |
27.8% |
66.7% |
40 |
February 2003 |
2-24-03 |
at WM & MARY |
-9.5 |
NL |
72-48 |
W |
W |
- |
44.1% |
40.0% |
76.9% |
35 |
39.6% |
30.8% |
75.0% |
30 |
2-22-03 |
at TOWSON ST |
-20 |
NL |
75-51 |
W |
W |
- |
50.8% |
36.8% |
46.2% |
29 |
48.8% |
50.0% |
66.7% |
28 |
2-19-03 |
vs GEORGE MASON |
-8.5 |
NL |
75-55 |
W |
W |
- |
54.5% |
45.8% |
36.4% |
34 |
39.0% |
7.7% |
57.1% |
36 |
2-15-03 |
at HOFSTRA |
-10.5 |
NL |
74-70 |
W |
L |
- |
47.5% |
42.9% |
40.0% |
27 |
39.1% |
42.9% |
61.1% |
53 |
2-12-03 |
at OLD DOMINION |
-2 |
NL |
68-71 |
L |
L |
- |
40.0% |
35.0% |
65.0% |
31 |
54.2% |
38.5% |
58.3% |
37 |
2-8-03 |
vs DELAWARE |
-12 |
NL |
71-53 |
W |
W |
- |
51.9% |
33.3% |
61.9% |
32 |
31.5% |
17.4% |
75.0% |
38 |
2-5-03 |
vs JAMES MADISON |
-16 |
NL |
73-62 |
W |
L |
- |
38.3% |
23.5% |
80.5% |
30 |
40.7% |
39.3% |
70.0% |
36 |
2-1-03 |
vs DREXEL |
-9 |
NL |
77-56 |
W |
W |
- |
40.6% |
40.9% |
80.0% |
47 |
36.4% |
28.6% |
66.7% |
34 |
January 2003 |
1-27-03 |
at GEORGE MASON |
-3 |
NL |
58-70 |
L |
L |
- |
47.2% |
26.3% |
42.9% |
25 |
47.7% |
53.8% |
72.4% |
34 |
1-25-03 |
at VA COMMONWEALTH |
-1 |
NL |
81-50 |
W |
W |
- |
50.0% |
50.0% |
83.3% |
39 |
33.3% |
28.6% |
47.6% |
32 |
1-22-03 |
vs TOWSON ST |
-24.5 |
NL |
85-53 |
W |
W |
- |
56.9% |
46.2% |
59.1% |
29 |
55.6% |
66.7% |
75.0% |
18 |
1-18-03 |
at DELAWARE |
-1 |
NL |
68-62 |
W |
W |
- |
50.0% |
33.3% |
57.1% |
34 |
35.0% |
23.1% |
73.7% |
39 |
1-15-03 |
at JAMES MADISON |
-4.5 |
NL |
73-58 |
W |
W |
- |
48.2% |
30.8% |
88.2% |
38 |
32.7% |
21.7% |
61.3% |
29 |
1-11-03 |
at DREXEL |
+2 |
NL |
88-86 |
W |
W |
- |
41.5% |
48.0% |
68.8% |
29 |
48.3% |
44.4% |
73.3% |
43 |
1-8-03 |
vs OLD DOMINION |
-9.5 |
NL |
57-67 |
L |
L |
- |
36.1% |
26.9% |
54.5% |
26 |
45.5% |
40.9% |
81.8% |
41 |
1-4-03 |
vs HOFSTRA |
-20.5 |
NL |
71-47 |
W |
W |
- |
48.9% |
55.6% |
71.4% |
29 |
28.6% |
36.4% |
46.7% |
43 |
December 2002 |
12-30-02 |
at JACKSONVILLE |
NL |
NL |
81-62 |
W |
- |
- |
55.4% |
52.6% |
75.0% |
32 |
50.0% |
33.3% |
45.0% |
26 |
12-23-02 |
at COLL OF CHARLESTON |
+1.5 |
NL |
78-69 |
W |
W |
- |
52.1% |
41.2% |
72.4% |
33 |
41.7% |
29.2% |
75.0% |
34 |
12-21-02 |
vs TX-SAN ANTONIO |
NL |
NL |
71-60 |
W |
- |
- |
39.7% |
28.6% |
71.4% |
29 |
48.8% |
23.1% |
62.5% |
37 |
12-11-02 |
vs CAMPBELL |
NL |
NL |
68-36 |
W |
- |
- |
51.0% |
30.0% |
75.0% |
36 |
30.4% |
31.3% |
42.9% |
25 |
12-7-02 |
at DAYTON |
+7.5 |
NL |
48-59 |
L |
L |
- |
40.8% |
15.4% |
85.7% |
22 |
37.0% |
20.0% |
70.0% |
41 |
12-2-02 |
at FAIRFIELD |
-8.5 |
NL |
60-69 |
L |
L |
- |
36.5% |
26.9% |
77.8% |
28 |
40.0% |
26.7% |
78.1% |
45 |
November 2002 |
11-30-02 |
vs E TENN ST |
-7 |
NL |
78-57 |
W |
W |
- |
47.5% |
40.0% |
82.4% |
41 |
39.7% |
21.4% |
44.4% |
34 |
11-26-02 |
at TX-SAN ANTONIO |
NL |
NL |
66-52 |
W |
- |
- |
46.4% |
30.8% |
58.8% |
44 |
29.6% |
17.4% |
76.2% |
30 |
11-22-02 |
at TEXAS TECH |
+10 |
NL |
76-85 |
L |
W |
- |
55.1% |
47.1% |
77.8% |
31 |
50.0% |
29.4% |
74.1% |
31 |
|
Game Situation Report for the 2002-2003 Season Season |
31 |
24-7 (77.4%) |
19-8-0 (70.4%) |
2-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
71.4 |
60.1 |
+11.3 |
12 |
11-1 (91.7%) |
7-3-0 (70.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
72.2 |
54.8 |
+17.3 |
15 |
10-5 (66.7%) |
8-5-0 (61.5%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
71.1 |
64.1 |
+6.9 |
4 |
3-1 (75.0%) |
4-0-0 (100.0%) |
2-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
70.5 |
60.8 |
+9.8 |
3 |
3-0 (100.0%) |
3-0-0 (100.0%) |
1-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
69.7 |
56.0 |
+13.7 |
1 |
0-1 (0.0%) |
1-0-0 (100.0%) |
1-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
73.0 |
75.0 |
-2.0 |
31 |
24-7 (77.4%) |
19-8-0 (70.4%) |
2-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
71.4 |
60.1 |
+11.3 |
22 |
18-4 (81.8%) |
15-7-0 (68.2%) |
1-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
71.1 |
58.1 |
+13.0 |
5 |
2-3 (40.0%) |
4-1-0 (80.0%) |
1-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
72.6 |
74.8 |
-2.2 |
10 |
9-1 (90.0%) |
7-3-0 (70.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
72.7 |
56.2 |
+16.5 |
9 |
6-3 (66.7%) |
5-4-0 (55.6%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
69.9 |
61.0 |
+8.9 |
4 |
2-2 (50.0%) |
3-1-0 (75.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
72.5 |
74.8 |
-2.3 |
2 |
2-0 (100.0%) |
2-0-0 (100.0%) |
1-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
66.5 |
56.0 |
+10.5 |
5 |
3-2 (60.0%) |
2-3-0 (40.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
65.6 |
61.0 |
+4.6 |
6 |
6-0 (100.0%) |
5-1-0 (83.3%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
76.2 |
62.0 |
+14.2 |
18 |
13-5 (72.2%) |
10-4-0 (71.4%) |
1-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
72.0 |
59.7 |
+12.3 |
24 |
19-5 (79.2%) |
16-6-0 (72.7%) |
2-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
71.5 |
59.1 |
+12.4 |
6 |
5-1 (83.3%) |
2-2-0 (50.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
70.2 |
59.8 |
+10.3 |
18 |
13-5 (72.2%) |
10-6-0 (62.5%) |
2-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
70.2 |
59.7 |
+10.5 |
8 |
7-1 (87.5%) |
5-2-0 (71.4%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
72.1 |
58.9 |
+13.3 |
|
|
|
| |
|