|
The Leader In Sports Handicapping
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
UTAH ST Aggies30-5 |
|
|
Upcoming Games
for the 2008-2009 Season |
|
|
|
WAC Standings for the 2008-2009 Season |
|
|
All |
ATS |
Scoring |
Home/Away |
|
UTAH ST |
30 |
5 |
0.857 |
17 |
12 |
0 |
58.6% |
72.4 |
62.0 |
17-0 |
13-5 |
|
NEVADA |
21 |
13 |
0.618 |
11 |
20 |
1 |
35.5% |
70.6 |
66.1 |
13-8 |
8-5 |
|
BOISE ST |
19 |
13 |
0.594 |
13 |
15 |
0 |
46.4% |
72.8 |
72.3 |
13-3 |
6-10 |
|
NEW MEXICO ST |
17 |
15 |
0.531 |
13 |
17 |
1 |
43.3% |
76.3 |
74.4 |
12-4 |
5-11 |
|
IDAHO |
17 |
16 |
0.515 |
14 |
14 |
0 |
50.0% |
65.9 |
65.7 |
13-3 |
4-13 |
|
LOUISIANA TECH |
15 |
18 |
0.455 |
19 |
7 |
0 |
73.1% |
63.3 |
63.1 |
8-4 |
7-14 |
|
SAN JOSE ST |
13 |
17 |
0.433 |
11 |
12 |
1 |
47.8% |
67.5 |
68.0 |
8-7 |
5-10 |
|
HAWAII |
13 |
17 |
0.433 |
14 |
14 |
0 |
50.0% |
64.0 |
65.2 |
11-9 |
2-8 |
|
FRESNO ST |
13 |
21 |
0.382 |
13 |
15 |
2 |
46.4% |
67.6 |
69.8 |
9-8 |
4-13 |
|
|
Current Injuries |
|
No significant injuries. |
|
|
| Last 20 Games for the 2008-2009 Season |
| Last 20 Games |
All Games YTD
|
|
March 2009 |
|
3-20-09 |
vs MARQUETTE |
+6 |
140 |
57-58 |
L |
W |
Un |
41.5% |
30.4% |
75.0% |
26 |
36.2% |
26.3% |
82.6% |
32 |
|
3-14-09 |
at NEVADA |
+1.5 |
133 |
72-62 |
W |
W |
Ov |
50.0% |
36.4% |
69.2% |
44 |
30.6% |
42.1% |
100.0% |
34 |
|
3-13-09 |
vs NEW MEXICO ST |
-7 |
144.5 |
71-70 |
W |
L |
Un |
46.3% |
31.3% |
84.2% |
35 |
46.6% |
47.4% |
63.6% |
29 |
|
3-12-09 |
vs FRESNO ST |
-11.5 |
130.5 |
85-68 |
W |
W |
Ov |
53.1% |
61.9% |
80.0% |
35 |
46.3% |
36.4% |
58.8% |
22 |
|
3-7-09 |
vs SAN JOSE ST |
-14 |
133 |
89-77 |
W |
L |
Ov |
51.7% |
47.8% |
76.2% |
31 |
52.7% |
41.7% |
77.8% |
29 |
|
February 2009 |
|
2-28-09 |
at NEVADA |
-1 |
131.5 |
71-84 |
L |
L |
Ov |
45.1% |
38.1% |
77.3% |
30 |
51.0% |
40.0% |
78.8% |
31 |
|
2-26-09 |
vs HAWAII |
-15 |
127.5 |
82-62 |
W |
W |
Ov |
55.4% |
20.0% |
58.3% |
36 |
48.9% |
60.0% |
62.5% |
25 |
|
2-21-09 |
at ST MARYS-CA |
+4 |
131 |
64-75 |
L |
L |
Ov |
46.2% |
40.0% |
80.0% |
26 |
51.9% |
28.6% |
65.4% |
35 |
|
2-18-09 |
vs CS-BAKERSFIELD |
NL |
NL |
78-57 |
W |
- |
- |
51.9% |
55.0% |
78.6% |
40 |
37.5% |
50.0% |
72.2% |
21 |
|
2-14-09 |
at BOISE ST |
-4.5 |
136.5 |
56-66 |
L |
L |
Un |
36.5% |
33.3% |
61.9% |
38 |
41.8% |
27.8% |
75.0% |
32 |
|
2-12-09 |
at IDAHO |
-5 |
126 |
62-53 |
W |
W |
Un |
40.5% |
43.8% |
77.8% |
40 |
36.4% |
41.2% |
70.0% |
21 |
|
2-7-09 |
vs LOUISIANA TECH |
-17 |
123.5 |
60-52 |
W |
L |
Un |
47.5% |
46.7% |
88.2% |
27 |
38.2% |
20.0% |
100.0% |
29 |
|
2-5-09 |
vs NEW MEXICO ST |
-11.5 |
145 |
78-59 |
W |
W |
Un |
50.0% |
54.5% |
60.0% |
39 |
42.6% |
50.0% |
52.9% |
31 |
|
January 2009 |
|
1-31-09 |
at FRESNO ST |
-5.5 |
132.5 |
83-77 |
W |
W |
Ov |
60.0% |
28.6% |
73.1% |
29 |
44.4% |
37.5% |
83.3% |
26 |
|
1-29-09 |
vs NEVADA |
-8 |
134 |
72-61 |
W |
W |
Un |
42.0% |
42.9% |
80.0% |
33 |
39.7% |
50.0% |
57.1% |
35 |
|
1-24-09 |
at HAWAII |
-8.5 |
128 |
67-51 |
W |
W |
Un |
50.0% |
44.4% |
64.7% |
38 |
28.6% |
15.8% |
94.1% |
24 |
|
1-22-09 |
at SAN JOSE ST |
-4.5 |
131 |
62-58 |
W |
L |
Un |
37.9% |
38.5% |
65.0% |
28 |
47.1% |
18.2% |
72.7% |
36 |
|
1-17-09 |
vs BOISE ST |
-13.5 |
136 |
79-65 |
W |
W |
Ov |
50.0% |
37.5% |
77.8% |
31 |
44.0% |
35.7% |
80.0% |
29 |
|
1-15-09 |
vs FRESNO ST |
-16 |
135.5 |
65-61 |
W |
L |
Un |
46.2% |
46.7% |
100.0% |
27 |
47.1% |
33.3% |
88.9% |
28 |
|
1-10-09 |
at NEW MEXICO ST |
+1 |
144.5 |
77-67 |
W |
W |
Un |
53.8% |
37.5% |
75.0% |
34 |
43.1% |
43.8% |
76.2% |
26 |
|
|
Game Situation Report for the 2008-2009 Season Season |
|
35 |
30-5 (85.7%) |
17-12-0 (58.6%) |
10-19-0 |
34.5% |
65.5% |
72.4 |
62.0 |
+10.4 |
|
17 |
17-0 (100.0%) |
6-7-0 (46.2%) |
5-8-0 |
38.5% |
61.5% |
77.9 |
61.4 |
+16.5 |
|
14 |
11-3 (78.6%) |
8-4-0 (66.7%) |
4-8-0 |
33.3% |
66.7% |
66.6 |
61.5 |
+5.1 |
|
4 |
2-2 (50.0%) |
3-1-0 (75.0%) |
1-3-0 |
25.0% |
75.0% |
69.0 |
66.0 |
+3.0 |
|
2 |
2-0 (100.0%) |
1-1-0 (50.0%) |
1-1-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
71.5 |
66.0 |
+5.5 |
|
1 |
0-1 (0.0%) |
1-0-0 (100.0%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
57.0 |
58.0 |
-1.0 |
|
19 |
17-2 (89.5%) |
11-8-0 (57.9%) |
7-12-0 |
36.8% |
63.2% |
71.1 |
62.7 |
+8.4 |
|
16 |
13-3 (81.3%) |
6-4-0 (60.0%) |
3-7-0 |
30.0% |
70.0% |
73.9 |
61.1 |
+12.8 |
|
23 |
21-2 (91.3%) |
12-11-0 (52.2%) |
8-15-0 |
34.8% |
65.2% |
72.7 |
62.4 |
+10.2 |
|
6 |
3-3 (50.0%) |
5-1-0 (83.3%) |
2-4-0 |
33.3% |
66.7% |
65.7 |
64.8 |
+0.8 |
|
13 |
13-0 (100.0%) |
6-7-0 (46.2%) |
5-8-0 |
38.5% |
61.5% |
76.7 |
62.7 |
+14.0 |
|
8 |
6-2 (75.0%) |
5-3-0 (62.5%) |
2-6-0 |
25.0% |
75.0% |
64.8 |
60.4 |
+4.4 |
|
4 |
3-1 (75.0%) |
3-1-0 (75.0%) |
2-2-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
68.5 |
65.8 |
+2.8 |
|
4 |
4-0 (100.0%) |
1-2-0 (33.3%) |
2-1-0 |
66.7% |
33.3% |
81.8 |
73.5 |
+8.3 |
|
8 |
6-2 (75.0%) |
4-4-0 (50.0%) |
3-5-0 |
37.5% |
62.5% |
69.9 |
65.8 |
+4.1 |
|
5 |
4-1 (80.0%) |
3-2-0 (60.0%) |
1-4-0 |
20.0% |
80.0% |
63.2 |
58.0 |
+5.2 |
|
18 |
16-2 (88.9%) |
9-4-0 (69.2%) |
4-9-0 |
30.8% |
69.2% |
74.0 |
58.8 |
+15.2 |
|
2 |
2-0 (100.0%) |
0-1-0 (0.0%) |
1-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
92.0 |
81.0 |
+11.0 |
|
30 |
25-5 (83.3%) |
16-11-0 (59.3%) |
8-19-0 |
29.6% |
70.4% |
71.5 |
62.4 |
+9.1 |
|
4 |
4-0 (100.0%) |
1-1-0 (50.0%) |
2-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
79.5 |
61.5 |
+18.0 |
|
16 |
13-3 (81.3%) |
7-8-0 (46.7%) |
3-12-0 |
20.0% |
80.0% |
70.8 |
62.2 |
+8.6 |
|
12 |
11-1 (91.7%) |
8-2-0 (80.0%) |
5-5-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
73.5 |
58.8 |
+14.7 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
