The Leader In Sports Handicapping
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VERMONT - |
|
|
All Games YTD for the 2001-2002 Season |
Last 20 Games |
All Games YTD
|
March 2002 |
3-3-02 |
vs MAINE |
NL |
NL |
59-61 |
L |
- |
- |
36.2% |
21.1% |
62.5% |
43 |
35.9% |
31.8% |
61.5% |
46 |
3-2-02 |
vs STONY BROOK |
NL |
NL |
74-59 |
W |
- |
- |
47.2% |
53.3% |
66.7% |
38 |
43.4% |
30.8% |
75.0% |
26 |
February 2002 |
2-24-02 |
vs HARTFORD |
NL |
NL |
75-66 |
W |
- |
- |
45.3% |
28.6% |
88.5% |
30 |
42.6% |
42.1% |
75.0% |
36 |
2-22-02 |
at NEW HAMPSHIRE |
NL |
NL |
93-77 |
W |
- |
- |
46.2% |
37.5% |
92.3% |
41 |
42.1% |
42.1% |
72.4% |
35 |
2-17-02 |
at MAINE |
NL |
NL |
49-52 |
L |
- |
- |
31.9% |
6.3% |
33.3% |
45 |
36.7% |
22.2% |
85.7% |
40 |
2-13-02 |
vs BINGHAMTON |
NL |
NL |
86-71 |
W |
- |
- |
56.9% |
52.2% |
80.0% |
30 |
47.3% |
45.5% |
81.8% |
27 |
2-10-02 |
at ALBANY |
NL |
NL |
45-61 |
L |
- |
- |
30.5% |
14.3% |
31.3% |
33 |
57.4% |
25.0% |
55.6% |
38 |
2-8-02 |
at BINGHAMTON |
NL |
NL |
83-80 |
W |
- |
- |
47.9% |
25.9% |
61.5% |
42 |
46.7% |
42.9% |
75.0% |
34 |
2-2-02 |
vs BOSTON U |
NL |
NL |
89-85 |
W |
- |
- |
48.3% |
40.0% |
75.8% |
34 |
45.1% |
39.1% |
80.0% |
43 |
January 2002 |
1-26-02 |
at MICHIGAN |
NL |
NL |
62-75 |
L |
- |
- |
36.0% |
27.8% |
60.0% |
44 |
55.2% |
40.0% |
75.0% |
31 |
1-24-02 |
at STONY BROOK |
NL |
NL |
72-67 |
W |
- |
- |
39.7% |
30.0% |
50.0% |
49 |
46.4% |
50.0% |
68.8% |
32 |
1-20-02 |
at HARTFORD |
NL |
NL |
65-78 |
L |
- |
- |
40.6% |
22.7% |
66.7% |
37 |
54.0% |
63.6% |
77.3% |
30 |
1-17-02 |
vs NORTHEASTERN |
NL |
NL |
102-87 |
W |
- |
- |
54.5% |
60.0% |
87.1% |
37 |
43.8% |
45.5% |
81.3% |
34 |
1-14-02 |
vs NEW HAMPSHIRE |
NL |
NL |
81-68 |
W |
- |
- |
47.4% |
42.1% |
82.6% |
36 |
43.6% |
20.0% |
73.9% |
28 |
1-11-02 |
vs MAINE |
NL |
NL |
79-65 |
W |
- |
- |
45.8% |
56.3% |
64.0% |
35 |
48.9% |
50.0% |
100.0% |
26 |
1-7-02 |
at NORTHEASTERN |
NL |
NL |
80-77 |
W |
- |
- |
51.7% |
18.8% |
65.4% |
38 |
52.7% |
36.8% |
66.7% |
27 |
1-5-02 |
at BOSTON U |
NL |
NL |
74-65 |
W |
- |
- |
39.7% |
31.3% |
82.1% |
28 |
47.3% |
25.0% |
64.3% |
43 |
1-2-02 |
vs STONY BROOK |
NL |
NL |
91-60 |
W |
- |
- |
55.6% |
37.5% |
75.0% |
38 |
44.4% |
50.0% |
66.7% |
24 |
December 2001 |
12-31-01 |
vs ALBANY |
NL |
NL |
71-43 |
W |
- |
- |
49.1% |
35.0% |
66.7% |
44 |
33.9% |
14.3% |
50.0% |
27 |
12-28-01 |
at OHIO U |
NL |
NL |
91-79 |
W |
- |
- |
54.4% |
36.0% |
83.3% |
31 |
48.3% |
31.6% |
68.2% |
32 |
12-27-01 |
at FLA INTERNATIONAL |
NL |
NL |
69-64 |
W |
- |
- |
48.2% |
30.0% |
85.7% |
33 |
43.1% |
40.0% |
62.5% |
34 |
12-18-01 |
vs HARVARD |
NL |
NL |
74-54 |
W |
- |
- |
44.3% |
46.7% |
86.7% |
48 |
36.1% |
21.1% |
40.0% |
33 |
12-5-01 |
at SACRED HEART |
NL |
NL |
85-62 |
W |
- |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12-2-01 |
vs LEHIGH |
NL |
NL |
83-75 |
W |
- |
- |
47.9% |
31.3% |
58.8% |
44 |
52.5% |
46.2% |
63.6% |
31 |
November 2001 |
11-26-01 |
at DUQUESNE |
NL |
NL |
77-82 |
L |
- |
- |
43.1% |
38.9% |
80.0% |
32 |
54.9% |
45.5% |
70.0% |
31 |
11-24-01 |
vs CLEVELAND ST |
NL |
NL |
69-72 |
L |
- |
- |
41.0% |
30.0% |
72.2% |
40 |
46.3% |
47.4% |
76.5% |
33 |
11-20-01 |
at DARTMOUTH |
NL |
NL |
73-54 |
W |
- |
- |
42.6% |
56.3% |
66.7% |
48 |
40.0% |
44.4% |
46.2% |
24 |
11-17-01 |
at BUCKNELL |
NL |
NL |
77-60 |
W |
- |
- |
43.1% |
45.5% |
87.5% |
35 |
42.3% |
33.3% |
52.9% |
33 |
11-16-01 |
at BROWN |
NL |
NL |
58-82 |
L |
- |
- |
37.0% |
31.3% |
59.1% |
34 |
47.8% |
25.0% |
77.8% |
42 |
|
Game Situation Report for the 2001-2002 Season Season |
29 |
21-8 (72.4%) |
0-0-0 ( ) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
75.4 |
68.3 |
+7.1 |
11 |
10-1 (90.9%) |
0-0-0 ( ) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
81.8 |
67.8 |
+14.0 |
16 |
10-6 (62.5%) |
0-0-0 ( ) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
72.1 |
69.7 |
+2.4 |
2 |
1-1 (50.0%) |
0-0-0 ( ) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
66.5 |
60.0 |
+6.5 |
2 |
1-1 (50.0%) |
0-0-0 ( ) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
66.5 |
60.0 |
+6.5 |
29 |
21-8 (72.4%) |
0-0-0 ( ) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
75.4 |
68.3 |
+7.1 |
3 |
2-1 (66.7%) |
0-0-0 ( ) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
75.7 |
66.7 |
+9.0 |
6 |
3-3 (50.0%) |
0-0-0 ( ) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
71.7 |
70.2 |
+1.5 |
8 |
7-1 (87.5%) |
0-0-0 ( ) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
79.6 |
66.0 |
+13.6 |
12 |
9-3 (75.0%) |
0-0-0 ( ) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
74.3 |
69.3 |
+5.0 |
2 |
2-0 (100.0%) |
0-0-0 ( ) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
84.0 |
69.5 |
+14.5 |
21 |
15-6 (71.4%) |
0-0-0 ( ) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
73.9 |
65.8 |
+8.0 |
7 |
6-1 (85.7%) |
0-0-0 ( ) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
82.4 |
73.9 |
+8.6 |
|
|
|
| |
|