The Leader In Sports Handicapping
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VILLANOVA Wildcats30-8 |
|
|
|
Big East Standings for the 2008-2009 Season |
|
All |
ATS |
Scoring |
Home/Away |
CONNECTICUT |
31 |
5 |
0.861 |
17 |
15 |
0 |
53.1% |
78.3 |
64.3 |
14-2 |
17-3 |
PITTSBURGH |
31 |
5 |
0.861 |
17 |
13 |
0 |
56.7% |
77.4 |
64.4 |
19-0 |
12-5 |
LOUISVILLE |
31 |
6 |
0.838 |
22 |
15 |
0 |
59.5% |
74.3 |
61.8 |
16-2 |
15-4 |
VILLANOVA |
30 |
8 |
0.789 |
19 |
15 |
0 |
55.9% |
76.8 |
67.4 |
15-2 |
15-6 |
SYRACUSE |
28 |
10 |
0.737 |
19 |
15 |
0 |
55.9% |
80.2 |
71.7 |
17-3 |
11-7 |
MARQUETTE |
25 |
10 |
0.714 |
14 |
15 |
1 |
48.3% |
78.3 |
69.5 |
16-2 |
9-8 |
W VIRGINIA |
23 |
12 |
0.657 |
15 |
17 |
0 |
46.9% |
72.0 |
61.8 |
12-3 |
11-9 |
NOTRE DAME |
21 |
15 |
0.583 |
12 |
19 |
0 |
38.7% |
75.8 |
70.7 |
15-3 |
6-12 |
PROVIDENCE |
19 |
14 |
0.576 |
11 |
18 |
0 |
37.9% |
78.1 |
76.7 |
13-5 |
6-9 |
CINCINNATI |
18 |
14 |
0.563 |
11 |
15 |
0 |
42.3% |
68.3 |
66.3 |
14-5 |
4-9 |
SETON HALL |
17 |
15 |
0.531 |
17 |
10 |
0 |
63.0% |
74.3 |
72.8 |
10-6 |
7-9 |
GEORGETOWN |
16 |
15 |
0.516 |
9 |
17 |
1 |
34.6% |
69.3 |
63.9 |
11-6 |
5-9 |
ST JOHNS |
16 |
18 |
0.471 |
13 |
15 |
1 |
46.4% |
65.9 |
67.6 |
13-7 |
3-11 |
RUTGERS |
11 |
21 |
0.344 |
13 |
13 |
0 |
50.0% |
63.2 |
66.6 |
8-10 |
3-11 |
S FLORIDA |
9 |
22 |
0.290 |
16 |
14 |
0 |
53.3% |
59.0 |
64.6 |
7-7 |
2-15 |
DEPAUL |
9 |
24 |
0.273 |
10 |
18 |
0 |
35.7% |
64.3 |
72.4 |
6-10 |
3-14 |
|
Current Injuries |
No significant injuries. |
|
|
Last 20 Games for the 2008-2009 Season |
Last 20 Games |
All Games YTD
|
April 2009 |
4-4-09 |
vs N CAROLINA |
+7 |
161.5 |
69-83 |
L |
L |
Un |
32.9% |
18.5% |
75.0% |
53 |
40.3% |
50.0% |
59.5% |
48 |
March 2009 |
3-28-09 |
vs PITTSBURGH |
+2 |
140.5 |
78-76 |
W |
W |
Ov |
44.6% |
30.0% |
95.7% |
33 |
48.1% |
27.8% |
72.4% |
28 |
3-26-09 |
vs DUKE |
+2.5 |
147.5 |
77-54 |
W |
W |
Un |
42.2% |
22.2% |
82.6% |
49 |
26.7% |
18.5% |
70.8% |
34 |
3-21-09 |
vs UCLA |
-2 |
145.5 |
89-69 |
W |
W |
Ov |
46.3% |
32.0% |
70.4% |
41 |
42.6% |
37.5% |
66.7% |
28 |
3-19-09 |
vs AMERICAN |
-15 |
128 |
80-67 |
W |
L |
Ov |
48.0% |
33.3% |
89.7% |
38 |
43.5% |
32.3% |
60.0% |
24 |
3-13-09 |
vs LOUISVILLE |
+4 |
139.5 |
55-69 |
L |
L |
Un |
34.6% |
35.3% |
76.5% |
42 |
42.4% |
46.4% |
50.0% |
33 |
3-12-09 |
vs MARQUETTE |
-2 |
149 |
76-75 |
W |
L |
Ov |
42.1% |
33.3% |
81.5% |
39 |
33.3% |
40.0% |
84.6% |
34 |
3-5-09 |
vs PROVIDENCE |
-10 |
160 |
97-80 |
W |
W |
Ov |
48.6% |
52.0% |
66.7% |
38 |
47.3% |
34.8% |
66.7% |
40 |
3-2-09 |
at NOTRE DAME |
+2.5 |
157 |
77-60 |
W |
W |
Un |
45.3% |
52.9% |
76.9% |
36 |
38.9% |
36.4% |
50.0% |
39 |
February 2009 |
2-28-09 |
vs GEORGETOWN |
-6.5 |
143 |
54-56 |
L |
L |
Un |
33.3% |
18.8% |
77.8% |
29 |
48.9% |
25.0% |
80.0% |
29 |
2-25-09 |
at DEPAUL |
-13 |
146 |
74-72 |
W |
L |
P |
47.3% |
28.6% |
76.2% |
36 |
38.8% |
27.3% |
84.6% |
38 |
2-22-09 |
at SYRACUSE |
+2 |
158.5 |
89-86 |
W |
W |
Ov |
52.5% |
46.7% |
69.2% |
40 |
45.7% |
30.8% |
71.4% |
36 |
2-19-09 |
vs RUTGERS |
-16.5 |
138 |
82-72 |
W |
L |
Ov |
44.3% |
42.1% |
83.3% |
32 |
52.1% |
45.5% |
85.7% |
28 |
2-13-09 |
at W VIRGINIA |
+4.5 |
139.5 |
72-93 |
L |
L |
Ov |
42.3% |
27.8% |
71.9% |
31 |
50.0% |
36.0% |
78.6% |
37 |
2-10-09 |
vs MARQUETTE |
-5 |
146 |
102-84 |
W |
W |
Ov |
58.7% |
54.2% |
57.7% |
37 |
50.9% |
47.8% |
55.6% |
29 |
2-7-09 |
vs SYRACUSE |
-6 |
147.5 |
102-85 |
W |
W |
Ov |
54.5% |
33.3% |
71.9% |
46 |
38.1% |
34.5% |
64.3% |
37 |
2-4-09 |
at PROVIDENCE |
-2.5 |
148 |
94-91 |
W |
W |
Ov |
44.1% |
32.1% |
75.8% |
50 |
39.1% |
42.5% |
66.7% |
38 |
2-1-09 |
vs CINCINNATI |
-11.5 |
130 |
71-50 |
W |
W |
Un |
51.0% |
16.7% |
79.2% |
36 |
28.8% |
25.8% |
72.7% |
33 |
January 2009 |
1-28-09 |
vs PITTSBURGH |
+3.5 |
137 |
67-57 |
W |
W |
Un |
44.7% |
40.0% |
67.9% |
32 |
40.7% |
18.8% |
58.8% |
38 |
1-24-09 |
at S FLORIDA |
-6 |
128 |
70-61 |
W |
W |
Ov |
44.0% |
31.3% |
61.8% |
44 |
35.2% |
31.8% |
55.2% |
34 |
|
Game Situation Report for the 2008-2009 Season Season |
38 |
30-8 (78.9%) |
19-15-0 (55.9%) |
17-16-1 |
51.5% |
48.5% |
76.8 |
67.4 |
+9.4 |
17 |
15-2 (88.2%) |
8-5-0 (61.5%) |
6-7-0 |
46.2% |
53.8% |
78.6 |
62.7 |
+15.9 |
11 |
8-3 (72.7%) |
7-4-0 (63.6%) |
7-3-1 |
70.0% |
30.0% |
78.1 |
74.7 |
+3.4 |
10 |
7-3 (70.0%) |
4-6-0 (40.0%) |
4-6-0 |
40.0% |
60.0% |
72.4 |
67.2 |
+5.2 |
4 |
3-1 (75.0%) |
1-3-0 (25.0%) |
1-3-0 |
25.0% |
75.0% |
68.3 |
64.0 |
+4.3 |
5 |
4-1 (80.0%) |
3-2-0 (60.0%) |
3-2-0 |
60.0% |
40.0% |
78.6 |
69.8 |
+8.8 |
21 |
15-6 (71.4%) |
12-9-0 (57.1%) |
14-6-1 |
70.0% |
30.0% |
78.1 |
73.2 |
+4.9 |
17 |
15-2 (88.2%) |
7-6-0 (53.8%) |
3-10-0 |
23.1% |
76.9% |
75.2 |
60.1 |
+15.1 |
23 |
21-2 (91.3%) |
13-10-0 (56.5%) |
12-10-1 |
54.5% |
45.5% |
78.3 |
65.8 |
+12.5 |
11 |
5-6 (45.5%) |
6-5-0 (54.5%) |
5-6-0 |
45.5% |
54.5% |
72.5 |
73.9 |
-1.5 |
12 |
10-2 (83.3%) |
7-5-0 (58.3%) |
6-6-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
79.1 |
64.7 |
+14.4 |
1 |
1-0 (100.0%) |
1-0-0 (100.0%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
67.0 |
57.0 |
+10.0 |
6 |
6-0 (100.0%) |
4-2-0 (66.7%) |
3-2-1 |
60.0% |
40.0% |
77.7 |
69.2 |
+8.5 |
5 |
2-3 (40.0%) |
3-2-0 (60.0%) |
4-1-0 |
80.0% |
20.0% |
78.6 |
81.4 |
-2.8 |
2 |
1-1 (50.0%) |
1-1-0 (50.0%) |
0-2-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
66.5 |
67.0 |
-0.5 |
6 |
6-0 (100.0%) |
3-2-0 (60.0%) |
2-3-0 |
40.0% |
60.0% |
78.8 |
63.3 |
+15.5 |
15 |
11-4 (73.3%) |
10-5-0 (66.7%) |
10-4-1 |
71.4% |
28.6% |
81.3 |
73.1 |
+8.1 |
15 |
12-3 (80.0%) |
5-7-0 (41.7%) |
5-7-0 |
41.7% |
58.3% |
72.9 |
63.3 |
+9.7 |
30 |
22-8 (73.3%) |
16-11-0 (59.3%) |
12-14-1 |
46.2% |
53.8% |
76.9 |
68.1 |
+8.9 |
7 |
7-0 (100.0%) |
3-4-0 (42.9%) |
5-2-0 |
71.4% |
28.6% |
76.1 |
65.4 |
+10.7 |
19 |
15-4 (78.9%) |
11-6-0 (64.7%) |
10-6-1 |
62.5% |
37.5% |
80.1 |
71.7 |
+8.3 |
14 |
11-3 (78.6%) |
6-7-0 (46.2%) |
6-7-0 |
46.2% |
53.8% |
73.5 |
65.0 |
+8.5 |
|
|
|
| |
|