The Leader In Sports Handicapping
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
W MICHIGAN Broncos21-13 |
|
|
All Games YTD for the 2010-2011 Season |
Last 20 Games |
All Games YTD
|
March 2011 |
3-19-11 |
vs BUFFALO |
PK |
144 |
48-49 |
L |
L |
Un |
40.8% |
25.0% |
50.0% |
35 |
38.5% |
16.7% |
30.4% |
36 |
3-16-11 |
vs TENNESSEE TECH |
-7.5 |
150 |
74-66 |
W |
W |
Un |
42.9% |
38.5% |
53.8% |
42 |
47.7% |
40.0% |
51.3% |
30 |
3-11-11 |
vs AKRON |
+2 |
138 |
68-79 |
L |
L |
Ov |
31.0% |
25.0% |
63.3% |
52 |
48.2% |
45.0% |
64.0% |
40 |
3-10-11 |
vs BOWLING GREEN |
-5 |
137 |
67-56 |
W |
W |
Un |
42.6% |
37.5% |
78.9% |
34 |
42.9% |
8.3% |
77.8% |
33 |
3-5-11 |
at C MICHIGAN |
-1.5 |
129 |
81-68 |
W |
W |
Ov |
51.9% |
50.0% |
66.7% |
41 |
36.8% |
20.8% |
81.3% |
34 |
3-2-11 |
vs BALL ST |
-4.5 |
136 |
87-70 |
W |
W |
Ov |
61.1% |
56.3% |
75.0% |
30 |
41.1% |
27.8% |
73.1% |
27 |
February 2011 |
2-27-11 |
at E MICHIGAN |
-1 |
130.5 |
87-60 |
W |
W |
Ov |
52.5% |
35.7% |
83.3% |
44 |
34.5% |
40.0% |
46.2% |
31 |
2-23-11 |
vs TOLEDO |
-15 |
134 |
68-56 |
W |
L |
Un |
48.8% |
47.6% |
66.7% |
34 |
39.1% |
25.0% |
66.7% |
25 |
2-21-11 |
vs KENT ST |
PK |
141 |
72-74 |
L |
L |
Ov |
43.3% |
35.3% |
73.7% |
39 |
44.3% |
23.1% |
75.0% |
37 |
2-19-11 |
vs ILLINOIS ST |
-4.5 |
132 |
68-65 |
W |
L |
Ov |
43.6% |
38.9% |
72.2% |
31 |
46.9% |
46.7% |
75.0% |
28 |
2-15-11 |
at N ILLINOIS |
+1 |
148.5 |
77-65 |
W |
W |
Un |
45.2% |
37.5% |
71.4% |
46 |
41.5% |
33.3% |
64.0% |
32 |
2-12-11 |
vs OHIO U |
-2.5 |
145.5 |
85-83 |
W |
L |
Ov |
47.6% |
57.1% |
76.5% |
35 |
47.0% |
35.7% |
69.6% |
39 |
2-9-11 |
at AKRON |
+7 |
134.5 |
71-83 |
L |
L |
Ov |
40.4% |
0.0% |
86.2% |
32 |
48.3% |
37.5% |
85.7% |
33 |
2-5-11 |
at BOWLING GREEN |
+4.5 |
131.5 |
75-61 |
W |
W |
Ov |
41.0% |
45.0% |
94.1% |
44 |
43.9% |
33.3% |
87.5% |
25 |
January 2011 |
1-29-11 |
at MIAMI OHIO |
+5.5 |
131 |
73-68 |
W |
W |
Ov |
49.2% |
33.3% |
80.0% |
35 |
42.1% |
32.0% |
66.7% |
32 |
1-25-11 |
vs BUFFALO |
+2.5 |
137 |
68-79 |
L |
L |
Ov |
44.0% |
33.3% |
55.9% |
29 |
56.3% |
46.7% |
72.0% |
31 |
1-22-11 |
vs N ILLINOIS |
-8 |
143.5 |
82-80 |
W |
L |
Ov |
54.5% |
50.0% |
72.2% |
32 |
52.5% |
55.6% |
57.1% |
27 |
1-19-11 |
at TOLEDO |
-9.5 |
124 |
60-73 |
L |
L |
Ov |
37.5% |
30.4% |
52.4% |
36 |
43.8% |
41.7% |
76.5% |
37 |
1-16-11 |
vs E MICHIGAN |
-8.5 |
129.5 |
65-48 |
W |
W |
Un |
35.0% |
35.7% |
81.8% |
46 |
36.7% |
37.5% |
37.5% |
30 |
1-12-11 |
at BALL ST |
+6 |
134 |
63-72 |
L |
L |
Ov |
39.3% |
25.0% |
78.6% |
36 |
50.0% |
55.6% |
71.4% |
30 |
1-9-11 |
vs C MICHIGAN |
-6.5 |
127.5 |
63-56 |
W |
W |
Un |
36.0% |
18.2% |
71.4% |
41 |
31.4% |
7.1% |
61.1% |
44 |
December 2010 |
12-31-10 |
vs E ILLINOIS |
-9 |
128.5 |
69-60 |
W |
P |
Ov |
44.6% |
26.3% |
87.5% |
36 |
44.8% |
29.4% |
50.0% |
32 |
12-23-10 |
vs IDAHO ST |
-7 |
134 |
63-60 |
W |
L |
Un |
35.6% |
25.0% |
72.7% |
45 |
33.9% |
16.7% |
59.3% |
42 |
12-22-10 |
at UTAH ST |
+16 |
130 |
57-78 |
L |
L |
Ov |
40.4% |
28.6% |
78.6% |
24 |
50.0% |
58.3% |
75.8% |
34 |
12-21-10 |
vs TROY |
-7.5 |
147 |
99-102 |
L |
L |
Ov |
51.4% |
52.0% |
51.9% |
45 |
46.3% |
56.7% |
55.0% |
45 |
12-18-10 |
vs S DAKOTA ST |
-1.5 |
141 |
77-74 |
W |
W |
Ov |
48.3% |
37.5% |
78.3% |
38 |
43.9% |
28.6% |
60.0% |
33 |
12-11-10 |
at GEORGIA ST |
+1 |
130.5 |
61-59 |
W |
W |
Un |
36.2% |
8.3% |
81.8% |
32 |
43.6% |
55.6% |
54.5% |
37 |
12-8-10 |
vs DETROIT |
-2 |
140 |
71-69 |
W |
P |
P |
49.1% |
44.4% |
50.0% |
33 |
43.5% |
41.2% |
61.5% |
35 |
12-4-10 |
vs ALMA |
NL |
NL |
109-50 |
W |
- |
- |
56.4% |
47.6% |
61.1% |
53 |
31.3% |
20.0% |
100.0% |
29 |
12-1-10 |
at TOWSON ST |
-1 |
145.5 |
73-75 |
L |
L |
Ov |
44.1% |
35.3% |
70.0% |
38 |
47.6% |
36.4% |
61.1% |
37 |
November 2010 |
11-27-10 |
vs ILLINOIS |
+12.5 |
134.5 |
63-78 |
L |
L |
Ov |
43.6% |
30.4% |
72.7% |
26 |
51.6% |
30.8% |
80.0% |
37 |
11-23-10 |
at WI-MILWAUKEE |
+8.5 |
140 |
67-55 |
W |
W |
Un |
43.6% |
23.1% |
59.3% |
43 |
29.0% |
20.7% |
56.5% |
45 |
11-20-10 |
vs LOYOLA-IL |
-1 |
133.5 |
64-82 |
L |
L |
Ov |
41.4% |
13.3% |
82.4% |
35 |
52.8% |
47.1% |
69.2% |
28 |
11-12-10 |
at XAVIER |
+15.5 |
NL |
65-68 |
L |
W |
- |
42.6% |
25.0% |
61.5% |
38 |
42.6% |
36.0% |
72.2% |
28 |
|
Game Situation Report for the 2010-2011 Season Season |
34 |
21-13 (61.8%) |
14-17-2 (45.2%) |
21-10-1 |
67.7% |
32.3% |
71.8 |
68.3 |
+3.5 |
17 |
12-5 (70.6%) |
5-9-2 (35.7%) |
10-5-1 |
66.7% |
33.3% |
72.5 |
67.0 |
+5.5 |
13 |
7-6 (53.8%) |
8-5-0 (61.5%) |
9-3-0 |
75.0% |
25.0% |
70.0 |
68.1 |
+1.9 |
4 |
2-2 (50.0%) |
1-3-0 (25.0%) |
2-2-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
74.3 |
74.3 |
0.0 |
5 |
2-3 (40.0%) |
1-4-0 (20.0%) |
3-2-0 |
60.0% |
40.0% |
70.8 |
75.0 |
-4.2 |
2 |
1-1 (50.0%) |
1-1-0 (50.0%) |
0-2-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
61.0 |
57.5 |
+3.5 |
19 |
12-7 (63.2%) |
9-10-0 (47.4%) |
13-6-0 |
68.4% |
31.6% |
71.6 |
67.4 |
+4.2 |
15 |
9-6 (60.0%) |
5-7-2 (41.7%) |
8-4-1 |
66.7% |
33.3% |
72.0 |
69.4 |
+2.6 |
19 |
15-4 (78.9%) |
8-9-2 (47.1%) |
12-6-1 |
66.7% |
33.3% |
73.8 |
68.6 |
+5.3 |
12 |
5-7 (41.7%) |
6-6-0 (50.0%) |
8-3-0 |
72.7% |
27.3% |
67.3 |
70.4 |
-3.1 |
12 |
11-1 (91.7%) |
5-5-2 (50.0%) |
7-4-1 |
63.6% |
36.4% |
72.8 |
67.4 |
+5.3 |
2 |
0-2 (0.0%) |
0-2-0 (0.0%) |
2-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
65.5 |
78.5 |
-13.0 |
4 |
2-2 (50.0%) |
2-2-0 (50.0%) |
4-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
75.3 |
69.0 |
+6.3 |
9 |
5-4 (55.6%) |
6-3-0 (66.7%) |
5-3-0 |
62.5% |
37.5% |
67.7 |
67.7 |
0.0 |
3 |
1-2 (33.3%) |
0-3-0 (0.0%) |
2-1-0 |
66.7% |
33.3% |
62.7 |
72.3 |
-9.7 |
2 |
1-1 (50.0%) |
0-2-0 (0.0%) |
1-1-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
70.0 |
65.0 |
+5.0 |
13 |
8-5 (61.5%) |
5-7-0 (41.7%) |
8-4-0 |
66.7% |
33.3% |
75.9 |
69.6 |
+6.3 |
16 |
11-5 (68.8%) |
9-5-2 (64.3%) |
10-4-1 |
71.4% |
28.6% |
70.3 |
66.8 |
+3.5 |
21 |
12-9 (57.1%) |
9-10-2 (47.4%) |
15-5-1 |
75.0% |
25.0% |
71.2 |
69.1 |
+2.0 |
12 |
9-3 (75.0%) |
4-7-0 (36.4%) |
6-5-0 |
54.5% |
45.5% |
73.3 |
66.8 |
+6.6 |
14 |
6-8 (42.9%) |
5-9-0 (35.7%) |
12-2-0 |
85.7% |
14.3% |
70.8 |
72.3 |
-1.5 |
16 |
12-4 (75.0%) |
6-8-1 (42.9%) |
9-6-0 |
60.0% |
40.0% |
74.3 |
66.1 |
+8.3 |
|
|
|
| |
|