The Leader In Sports Handicapping
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WICHITA ST Shockers27-6 |
|
|
All Games YTD for the 2011-2012 Season |
Last 20 Games |
All Games YTD
|
March 2012 |
3-15-12 |
vs VA COMMONWEALTH |
-7.5 |
137.5 |
59-62 |
L |
L |
Un |
38.7% |
31.3% |
60.0% |
36 |
42.4% |
26.1% |
66.7% |
37 |
3-3-12 |
vs ILLINOIS ST |
-12 |
132 |
64-65 |
L |
L |
Un |
34.9% |
30.4% |
76.5% |
44 |
33.9% |
33.3% |
90.9% |
38 |
3-2-12 |
vs INDIANA ST |
-11.5 |
131.5 |
72-48 |
W |
W |
Un |
50.0% |
50.0% |
60.0% |
43 |
26.9% |
22.7% |
71.4% |
29 |
February 2012 |
2-25-12 |
vs DRAKE |
-16 |
136.5 |
81-58 |
W |
W |
Ov |
44.6% |
24.0% |
85.0% |
44 |
35.6% |
39.1% |
77.8% |
32 |
2-22-12 |
at ILLINOIS ST |
-5.5 |
138 |
68-55 |
W |
W |
Un |
47.3% |
43.5% |
75.0% |
33 |
37.7% |
40.0% |
64.3% |
32 |
2-18-12 |
at DAVIDSON |
-3 |
150.5 |
91-74 |
W |
W |
Ov |
63.6% |
55.6% |
76.2% |
34 |
43.5% |
33.3% |
68.8% |
24 |
2-15-12 |
vs MISSOURI ST |
-11 |
132.5 |
73-58 |
W |
W |
Un |
59.5% |
57.9% |
80.0% |
30 |
39.1% |
46.7% |
50.0% |
28 |
2-11-12 |
at CREIGHTON |
PK |
146.5 |
89-68 |
W |
W |
Ov |
58.2% |
50.0% |
100.0% |
37 |
40.4% |
21.7% |
77.3% |
23 |
2-8-12 |
vs N IOWA |
-9.5 |
131.5 |
82-57 |
W |
W |
Ov |
55.9% |
63.2% |
100.0% |
34 |
39.2% |
38.1% |
69.2% |
24 |
2-4-12 |
vs INDIANA ST |
-14 |
131.5 |
71-66 |
W |
L |
Ov |
41.1% |
12.5% |
80.0% |
37 |
39.3% |
36.4% |
62.5% |
40 |
2-1-12 |
at MISSOURI ST |
-5 |
133 |
74-67 |
W |
W |
Ov |
49.1% |
38.1% |
85.7% |
31 |
44.6% |
33.3% |
71.4% |
27 |
January 2012 |
1-28-12 |
at DRAKE |
-9 |
137.5 |
86-93 |
L |
L |
Ov |
40.8% |
28.0% |
89.5% |
46 |
43.8% |
29.4% |
66.7% |
48 |
1-25-12 |
vs EVANSVILLE |
-15.5 |
145 |
86-74 |
W |
L |
Ov |
63.0% |
44.4% |
75.0% |
30 |
43.3% |
35.7% |
77.3% |
28 |
1-21-12 |
vs S ILLINOIS |
-17.5 |
140 |
85-42 |
W |
W |
Un |
54.1% |
25.0% |
68.2% |
38 |
34.0% |
20.0% |
35.3% |
36 |
1-18-12 |
at N IOWA |
-3 |
130.5 |
71-68 |
W |
P |
Ov |
47.9% |
26.3% |
83.3% |
29 |
48.1% |
30.0% |
75.0% |
29 |
1-15-12 |
at INDIANA ST |
-6.5 |
132.5 |
75-65 |
W |
W |
Ov |
40.4% |
50.0% |
79.3% |
36 |
38.1% |
36.8% |
66.7% |
42 |
1-13-12 |
vs BRADLEY |
-21 |
143 |
78-41 |
W |
W |
Un |
55.8% |
44.4% |
80.0% |
44 |
28.8% |
15.4% |
41.7% |
26 |
1-10-12 |
vs ILLINOIS ST |
-14 |
135.5 |
65-62 |
W |
L |
Un |
41.5% |
22.2% |
77.3% |
36 |
39.6% |
28.0% |
86.7% |
34 |
1-7-12 |
at S ILLINOIS |
-11 |
134.5 |
83-73 |
W |
L |
Ov |
50.0% |
42.1% |
68.0% |
36 |
49.1% |
31.6% |
65.2% |
30 |
1-4-12 |
at EVANSVILLE |
-11.5 |
143.5 |
67-66 |
W |
L |
Un |
59.1% |
36.4% |
84.6% |
30 |
44.2% |
52.9% |
78.6% |
20 |
December 2011 |
12-31-11 |
vs CREIGHTON |
-7 |
150 |
61-68 |
L |
L |
Un |
33.3% |
19.2% |
72.0% |
38 |
42.6% |
53.3% |
77.8% |
36 |
12-28-11 |
at BRADLEY |
-12 |
139 |
90-51 |
W |
W |
Ov |
52.4% |
43.8% |
77.3% |
50 |
25.5% |
21.4% |
69.0% |
32 |
12-19-11 |
vs NEWMAN |
NL |
NL |
102-53 |
W |
- |
- |
62.9% |
44.4% |
69.6% |
50 |
28.1% |
19.0% |
81.3% |
40 |
12-14-11 |
vs CHICAGO ST |
NL |
NL |
94-44 |
W |
- |
- |
44.4% |
25.7% |
75.0% |
53 |
27.3% |
10.5% |
60.0% |
34 |
12-10-11 |
vs UTAH ST |
-15.5 |
129.5 |
83-76 |
W |
L |
Ov |
45.6% |
44.0% |
71.4% |
37 |
53.8% |
33.3% |
71.4% |
25 |
12-7-11 |
at TULSA |
-3.5 |
131.5 |
77-67 |
W |
W |
Ov |
52.2% |
46.2% |
82.1% |
34 |
44.0% |
52.6% |
56.5% |
24 |
12-4-11 |
vs UNLV |
-3 |
142.5 |
89-70 |
W |
W |
Ov |
59.3% |
52.2% |
68.4% |
28 |
47.1% |
25.0% |
73.9% |
26 |
12-1-11 |
vs CS-FULLERTON |
-19 |
144 |
75-60 |
W |
L |
Un |
48.2% |
29.4% |
69.6% |
37 |
47.1% |
22.2% |
53.3% |
27 |
November 2011 |
11-25-11 |
vs UAB |
-13 |
126 |
68-46 |
W |
W |
Un |
39.6% |
21.4% |
76.7% |
42 |
32.1% |
6.3% |
64.7% |
34 |
11-20-11 |
vs TEMPLE |
+1.5 |
134 |
74-78 |
L |
L |
Ov |
41.4% |
20.0% |
54.5% |
42 |
45.2% |
38.9% |
60.0% |
41 |
11-18-11 |
vs ALABAMA |
+2.5 |
124 |
60-70 |
L |
L |
Ov |
33.8% |
35.0% |
60.0% |
43 |
43.4% |
12.5% |
82.1% |
38 |
11-17-11 |
vs COLORADO |
-10.5 |
141 |
67-58 |
W |
L |
Un |
45.0% |
34.8% |
62.5% |
38 |
42.9% |
45.5% |
57.9% |
28 |
11-13-11 |
vs CHARLESTON SO |
NL |
NL |
85-57 |
W |
- |
- |
53.4% |
50.0% |
52.2% |
40 |
29.0% |
20.8% |
76.2% |
35 |
|
Game Situation Report for the 2011-2012 Season Season |
33 |
27-6 (81.8%) |
15-14-1 (51.7%) |
17-13-0 |
56.7% |
43.3% |
77.1 |
62.4 |
+14.7 |
16 |
15-1 (93.8%) |
7-6-0 (53.8%) |
6-7-0 |
46.2% |
53.8% |
79.9 |
58.3 |
+21.6 |
11 |
10-1 (90.9%) |
7-3-1 (70.0%) |
9-2-0 |
81.8% |
18.2% |
79.2 |
67.9 |
+11.3 |
6 |
2-4 (33.3%) |
1-5-0 (16.7%) |
2-4-0 |
33.3% |
66.7% |
66.0 |
63.5 |
+2.5 |
5 |
2-3 (40.0%) |
1-4-0 (20.0%) |
2-3-0 |
40.0% |
60.0% |
67.4 |
63.8 |
+3.6 |
1 |
0-1 (0.0%) |
0-1-0 (0.0%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
59.0 |
62.0 |
-3.0 |
20 |
17-3 (85.0%) |
11-8-1 (57.9%) |
11-9-0 |
55.0% |
45.0% |
76.1 |
62.3 |
+13.8 |
13 |
10-3 (76.9%) |
4-6-0 (40.0%) |
6-4-0 |
60.0% |
40.0% |
78.8 |
62.7 |
+16.1 |
27 |
23-4 (85.2%) |
14-12-1 (53.8%) |
14-13-0 |
51.9% |
48.1% |
75.6 |
62.6 |
+13.0 |
2 |
0-2 (0.0%) |
0-2-0 (0.0%) |
2-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
67.0 |
74.0 |
-7.0 |
13 |
12-1 (92.3%) |
7-6-0 (53.8%) |
6-7-0 |
46.2% |
53.8% |
76.7 |
59.8 |
+16.8 |
10 |
9-1 (90.0%) |
6-3-1 (66.7%) |
8-2-0 |
80.0% |
20.0% |
78.2 |
67.9 |
+10.3 |
2 |
0-2 (0.0%) |
0-2-0 (0.0%) |
1-1-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
62.0 |
67.5 |
-5.5 |
2 |
1-1 (50.0%) |
1-1-0 (50.0%) |
2-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
74.5 |
71.5 |
+3.0 |
14 |
12-2 (85.7%) |
7-6-1 (53.8%) |
10-4-0 |
71.4% |
28.6% |
79.3 |
66.1 |
+13.1 |
15 |
14-1 (93.3%) |
7-5-0 (58.3%) |
4-8-0 |
33.3% |
66.7% |
77.5 |
57.1 |
+20.4 |
27 |
23-4 (85.2%) |
13-11-1 (54.2%) |
15-10-0 |
60.0% |
40.0% |
78.4 |
62.4 |
+16.1 |
5 |
3-2 (60.0%) |
2-3-0 (40.0%) |
2-3-0 |
40.0% |
60.0% |
68.4 |
63.8 |
+4.6 |
15 |
13-2 (86.7%) |
8-6-1 (57.1%) |
9-6-0 |
60.0% |
40.0% |
75.8 |
64.7 |
+11.1 |
13 |
9-4 (69.2%) |
5-7-0 (41.7%) |
7-5-0 |
58.3% |
41.7% |
75.3 |
63.8 |
+11.5 |
|
|
|
| |
|