|
Welcome:
Login to StatFox |
Register |
Login to FoxSheets
|
The Leading Logic In Sports Handicapping |
|
               |
|
|
|
|

 |
TX-PAN AM Broncos6-27 |
 |
|
| All Games YTD for the 2009-2010 Season |
| Last 20 Games |
All Games YTD
|
|
March 2010 |
|
3-12-10 |
at S DAKOTA |
NL |
NL |
71-76 |
L |
- |
- |
45.2% |
33.3% |
72.7% |
25 |
44.6% |
39.1% |
68.0% |
45 |
|
3-10-10 |
at UTAH VALLEY ST |
NL |
NL |
56-53 |
W |
- |
- |
44.2% |
41.2% |
60.0% |
27 |
35.8% |
27.3% |
85.7% |
40 |
|
3-6-10 |
at N DAKOTA |
NL |
NL |
71-68 |
W |
- |
- |
43.1% |
47.4% |
69.2% |
27 |
43.8% |
47.4% |
77.3% |
36 |
|
3-4-10 |
at S DAKOTA |
NL |
NL |
79-85 |
L |
- |
- |
44.0% |
37.5% |
63.6% |
36 |
44.1% |
7.1% |
68.6% |
46 |
|
February 2010 |
|
2-27-10 |
at HOUSTN BAPTIST |
NL |
NL |
62-76 |
L |
- |
- |
37.7% |
5.6% |
60.0% |
35 |
43.6% |
28.6% |
83.9% |
44 |
|
2-20-10 |
at NEW JERSEY TECH |
NL |
NL |
59-66 |
L |
- |
- |
43.5% |
47.4% |
76.9% |
28 |
50.9% |
40.0% |
61.5% |
28 |
|
2-13-10 |
vs UTAH VALLEY ST |
NL |
NL |
74-61 |
W |
- |
- |
50.0% |
52.9% |
73.1% |
38 |
39.6% |
38.1% |
78.6% |
23 |
|
2-10-10 |
vs HOUSTN BAPTIST |
NL |
NL |
82-84 |
L |
- |
- |
43.9% |
33.3% |
62.1% |
39 |
52.8% |
20.0% |
74.3% |
37 |
|
2-6-10 |
at CHICAGO ST |
NL |
NL |
69-76 |
L |
- |
- |
44.9% |
35.0% |
51.4% |
43 |
36.5% |
31.6% |
58.5% |
43 |
|
2-4-10 |
at UTAH VALLEY ST |
NL |
NL |
53-67 |
L |
- |
- |
32.7% |
23.5% |
78.9% |
27 |
44.9% |
33.3% |
67.7% |
43 |
|
January 2010 |
|
1-30-10 |
vs S DAKOTA |
NL |
NL |
71-72 |
L |
- |
- |
41.0% |
57.1% |
86.7% |
29 |
54.9% |
44.4% |
61.5% |
35 |
|
1-28-10 |
vs N DAKOTA |
NL |
NL |
74-78 |
L |
- |
- |
36.9% |
13.3% |
73.3% |
35 |
48.0% |
42.9% |
61.5% |
43 |
|
1-25-10 |
vs TEXAS A&M CC |
NL |
NL |
51-64 |
L |
- |
- |
29.6% |
17.9% |
63.6% |
29 |
48.9% |
21.4% |
65.2% |
46 |
|
1-20-10 |
at TCU |
NL |
NL |
58-70 |
L |
- |
- |
37.0% |
43.5% |
50.0% |
26 |
57.4% |
21.4% |
65.0% |
37 |
|
1-16-10 |
vs CHICAGO ST |
NL |
NL |
63-42 |
W |
- |
- |
54.1% |
33.3% |
78.3% |
24 |
27.5% |
6.7% |
56.5% |
39 |
|
1-14-10 |
vs NEW JERSEY TECH |
NL |
NL |
66-53 |
W |
- |
- |
42.2% |
25.0% |
77.4% |
33 |
39.6% |
25.0% |
52.4% |
31 |
|
1-7-10 |
at NORTHWESTERN |
NL |
NL |
44-53 |
L |
- |
- |
28.1% |
25.0% |
43.8% |
36 |
32.0% |
22.7% |
64.0% |
48 |
|
1-5-10 |
at VIRGINIA |
NL |
NL |
53-72 |
L |
- |
- |
41.7% |
28.6% |
69.2% |
25 |
56.6% |
58.3% |
55.6% |
33 |
|
1-2-10 |
at AIR FORCE |
NL |
NL |
65-72 |
L |
- |
- |
42.9% |
50.0% |
62.5% |
27 |
60.0% |
27.3% |
70.0% |
24 |
|
December 2009 |
|
12-28-09 |
vs N ARIZONA |
NL |
NL |
59-64 |
L |
- |
- |
35.2% |
18.8% |
69.2% |
30 |
47.8% |
40.0% |
80.0% |
35 |
|
12-22-09 |
at LOUISIANA TECH |
NL |
NL |
60-81 |
L |
- |
- |
38.1% |
35.0% |
71.4% |
29 |
54.7% |
42.1% |
65.2% |
41 |
|
12-18-09 |
vs TX-SAN ANTONIO |
NL |
NL |
48-72 |
L |
- |
- |
36.5% |
18.5% |
45.5% |
35 |
46.6% |
37.5% |
63.2% |
37 |
|
12-15-09 |
at TEXAS |
NL |
NL |
42-104 |
L |
- |
- |
23.8% |
13.6% |
45.0% |
31 |
53.3% |
40.0% |
55.2% |
64 |
|
12-7-09 |
at TX-SAN ANTONIO |
NL |
NL |
58-84 |
L |
- |
- |
36.7% |
34.8% |
58.3% |
25 |
54.8% |
45.0% |
46.7% |
44 |
|
12-5-09 |
at TEXAS ST |
NL |
NL |
70-80 |
L |
- |
- |
38.6% |
38.1% |
56.3% |
25 |
56.9% |
41.7% |
65.4% |
40 |
|
12-2-09 |
at NEBRASKA |
NL |
NL |
53-81 |
L |
- |
- |
40.4% |
29.4% |
76.9% |
26 |
53.7% |
75.0% |
73.7% |
31 |
|
November 2009 |
|
11-28-09 |
at BETHUNE-COOKMAN |
NL |
NL |
64-67 |
L |
- |
- |
48.6% |
47.4% |
70.4% |
24 |
58.1% |
50.0% |
58.3% |
25 |
|
11-27-09 |
vs UT-CHATTANOOGA |
NL |
NL |
61-50 |
W |
- |
- |
34.0% |
23.1% |
61.8% |
45 |
32.7% |
28.6% |
40.0% |
38 |
|
11-24-09 |
at MISSISSIPPI ST |
NL |
NL |
50-75 |
L |
- |
- |
29.2% |
33.3% |
62.5% |
33 |
52.6% |
40.9% |
54.5% |
45 |
|
11-22-09 |
at MISSOURI |
NL |
NL |
44-100 |
L |
- |
- |
28.8% |
30.8% |
42.9% |
28 |
57.1% |
56.5% |
58.3% |
44 |
|
11-19-09 |
at TEXAS A&M CC |
NL |
NL |
55-77 |
L |
- |
- |
35.6% |
26.1% |
46.7% |
32 |
52.5% |
42.9% |
75.0% |
40 |
|
11-16-09 |
at LAMAR |
NL |
NL |
72-77 |
L |
- |
- |
47.3% |
40.0% |
66.7% |
27 |
47.4% |
23.1% |
80.0% |
39 |
|
11-14-09 |
vs LOUISIANA TECH |
NL |
NL |
62-80 |
L |
- |
- |
42.6% |
25.0% |
70.8% |
24 |
61.2% |
28.6% |
66.7% |
33 |
|
|
Game Situation Report for the 2009-2010 Season Season |
|
33 |
6-27 (18.2%) |
0-0-0 ( ) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
61.2 |
72.1 |
-10.9 |
|
10 |
3-7 (30.0%) |
0-0-0 ( ) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
65.0 |
67.0 |
-2.0 |
|
22 |
2-20 (9.1%) |
0-0-0 ( ) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
59.5 |
75.5 |
-16.0 |
|
1 |
1-0 (100.0%) |
0-0-0 ( ) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
61.0 |
50.0 |
+11.0 |
|
1 |
1-0 (100.0%) |
0-0-0 ( ) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
61.0 |
50.0 |
+11.0 |
|
14 |
5-9 (35.7%) |
0-0-0 ( ) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
67.9 |
68.4 |
-0.5 |
|
19 |
1-18 (5.3%) |
0-0-0 ( ) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
56.3 |
74.9 |
-18.6 |
|
1 |
0-1 (0.0%) |
0-0-0 ( ) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
64.0 |
67.0 |
-3.0 |
|
9 |
2-7 (22.2%) |
0-0-0 ( ) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
63.2 |
69.2 |
-6.0 |
|
8 |
2-6 (25.0%) |
0-0-0 ( ) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
59.9 |
73.8 |
-13.9 |
|
15 |
2-13 (13.3%) |
0-0-0 ( ) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
60.5 |
73.3 |
-12.9 |
|
6 |
2-4 (33.3%) |
0-0-0 ( ) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
61.8 |
62.3 |
-0.5 |
|
26 |
4-22 (15.4%) |
0-0-0 ( ) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
61.0 |
74.1 |
-13.1 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|