|
Welcome:
Login to StatFox |
Register |
Login to FoxSheets
|
The Leading Logic In Sports Handicapping |
|
                 |
|
|
|
|

 |
WAKE FOREST Demon Deacons 13-0 |
 |
|
|
|
|
ACC Standings for the 2008-09 Season |
|
|
All |
ATS |
Scoring |
Home/Away |
|
CLEMSON |
15 |
0 |
1.000 |
5 |
5 |
0 |
50.0% |
81.6 |
63.2 |
8-0 |
7-0 |
|
WAKE FOREST |
13 |
0 |
1.000 |
5 |
4 |
0 |
55.6% |
85.2 |
64.1 |
7-0 |
6-0 |
|
N CAROLINA |
14 |
1 |
0.933 |
7 |
7 |
0 |
50.0% |
94.6 |
69.6 |
7-1 |
7-0 |
|
DUKE |
13 |
1 |
0.929 |
8 |
5 |
0 |
61.5% |
82.6 |
60.6 |
9-0 |
4-1 |
|
FLORIDA ST |
13 |
2 |
0.867 |
6 |
3 |
0 |
66.7% |
67.1 |
60.6 |
7-1 |
6-1 |
|
BOSTON COLLEGE |
13 |
3 |
0.813 |
7 |
3 |
1 |
70.0% |
77.9 |
67.5 |
10-1 |
3-2 |
|
MARYLAND |
11 |
3 |
0.786 |
4 |
3 |
1 |
57.1% |
73.7 |
61.9 |
9-1 |
2-2 |
|
MIAMI |
11 |
3 |
0.786 |
5 |
4 |
0 |
55.6% |
76.6 |
61.2 |
7-2 |
4-1 |
|
NC STATE |
9 |
3 |
0.750 |
5 |
3 |
0 |
62.5% |
72.8 |
60.9 |
8-1 |
1-2 |
|
GEORGIA TECH |
9 |
5 |
0.643 |
3 |
7 |
0 |
30.0% |
75.1 |
67.3 |
7-3 |
2-2 |
|
VIRGINIA TECH |
9 |
5 |
0.643 |
3 |
6 |
0 |
33.3% |
69.4 |
64.6 |
4-1 |
5-4 |
|
VIRGINIA |
7 |
5 |
0.583 |
3 |
4 |
0 |
42.9% |
76.0 |
70.7 |
6-3 |
1-2 |
|
|
Current Injuries |
[F] Jamie Skeen has elected to leave school. - Eligibility - 12/04/08
|
|
|
| Last 20 Games for the 2008-09 Season |
| Last 20 Games |
All Games YTD
|
|
January 2009 |
|
1-3-09 |
at BYU |
+3.5 |
155 |
94-87 |
W |
W |
Ov |
50.0% |
31.3% |
69.4% |
42 |
40.3% |
31.3% |
75.0% |
46 |
|
December 2008 |
|
12-30-08 |
vs RADFORD |
NL |
NL |
83-61 |
W |
- |
- |
44.1% |
27.3% |
74.1% |
39 |
40.6% |
33.3% |
55.6% |
45 |
|
12-22-08 |
at E CAROLINA |
-8.5 |
153 |
95-54 |
W |
W |
Un |
56.1% |
42.9% |
83.3% |
46 |
29.0% |
20.0% |
82.4% |
28 |
|
12-19-08 |
at RICHMOND |
-8 |
143.5 |
86-79 |
W |
L |
Ov |
50.9% |
25.0% |
81.8% |
43 |
47.7% |
22.7% |
63.2% |
26 |
|
12-14-08 |
vs WRIGHT ST |
-22 |
135.5 |
66-53 |
W |
L |
Un |
52.2% |
53.8% |
61.1% |
39 |
39.6% |
30.4% |
61.5% |
19 |
|
12-6-08 |
vs BUCKNELL |
NL |
NL |
81-52 |
W |
- |
- |
43.9% |
33.3% |
59.3% |
50 |
31.7% |
30.8% |
44.4% |
39 |
|
12-3-08 |
vs INDIANA |
-21 |
144 |
83-58 |
W |
W |
Un |
61.5% |
45.5% |
66.7% |
34 |
37.7% |
31.6% |
54.5% |
30 |
|
November 2008 |
|
11-30-08 |
vs BAYLOR |
+3.5 |
156.5 |
87-74 |
W |
W |
Ov |
40.6% |
16.7% |
70.8% |
62 |
32.4% |
25.8% |
66.7% |
38 |
|
11-28-08 |
vs UTEP |
-8.5 |
154 |
82-79 |
W |
L |
Ov |
53.8% |
30.0% |
76.7% |
33 |
34.2% |
19.0% |
77.8% |
50 |
|
11-27-08 |
vs CS-FULLERTON |
-13 |
157 |
75-69 |
W |
L |
Un |
45.8% |
40.0% |
51.7% |
43 |
35.2% |
29.6% |
78.6% |
43 |
|
11-24-08 |
vs WINSTON SALEM |
NL |
NL |
62-31 |
W |
- |
- |
52.4% |
16.7% |
73.9% |
41 |
28.3% |
15.4% |
37.5% |
20 |
|
11-19-08 |
vs UNC-WILMINGTON |
-25 |
169 |
120-88 |
W |
W |
Ov |
56.6% |
30.8% |
68.8% |
52 |
47.6% |
40.0% |
64.0% |
30 |
|
11-14-08 |
vs NC CENTRAL |
NL |
NL |
94-48 |
W |
- |
- |
59.7% |
18.2% |
75.0% |
45 |
26.7% |
27.3% |
52.6% |
34 |
|
|
Game Situation Report for the 2008-09 Season Season |
|
13 |
13-0 (100.0%) |
5-4-0 (55.6%) |
5-4-0 |
55.6% |
44.4% |
85.2 |
64.1 |
+21.2 |
|
7 |
7-0 (100.0%) |
2-1-0 (66.7%) |
1-2-0 |
33.3% |
66.7% |
84.1 |
55.9 |
+28.3 |
|
3 |
3-0 (100.0%) |
2-1-0 (66.7%) |
2-1-0 |
66.7% |
33.3% |
91.7 |
73.3 |
+18.3 |
|
3 |
3-0 (100.0%) |
1-2-0 (33.3%) |
2-1-0 |
66.7% |
33.3% |
81.3 |
74.0 |
+7.3 |
|
3 |
3-0 (100.0%) |
1-2-0 (33.3%) |
2-1-0 |
66.7% |
33.3% |
81.3 |
74.0 |
+7.3 |
|
13 |
13-0 (100.0%) |
5-4-0 (55.6%) |
5-4-0 |
55.6% |
44.4% |
85.2 |
64.1 |
+21.2 |
|
7 |
7-0 (100.0%) |
3-4-0 (42.9%) |
3-4-0 |
42.9% |
57.1% |
86.7 |
68.6 |
+18.1 |
|
2 |
2-0 (100.0%) |
2-0-0 (100.0%) |
2-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
90.5 |
80.5 |
+10.0 |
|
3 |
3-0 (100.0%) |
2-1-0 (66.7%) |
1-2-0 |
33.3% |
66.7% |
89.7 |
66.3 |
+23.3 |
|
2 |
2-0 (100.0%) |
1-1-0 (50.0%) |
1-1-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
90.5 |
66.5 |
+24.0 |
|
1 |
1-0 (100.0%) |
1-0-0 (100.0%) |
1-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
94.0 |
87.0 |
+7.0 |
|
1 |
1-0 (100.0%) |
0-1-0 (0.0%) |
1-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
82.0 |
79.0 |
+3.0 |
|
1 |
1-0 (100.0%) |
1-0-0 (100.0%) |
1-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
87.0 |
74.0 |
+13.0 |
|
4 |
4-0 (100.0%) |
2-1-0 (66.7%) |
0-3-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
83.5 |
58.3 |
+25.3 |
|
7 |
7-0 (100.0%) |
2-2-0 (50.0%) |
3-1-0 |
75.0% |
25.0% |
86.4 |
63.9 |
+22.6 |
|
12 |
12-0 (100.0%) |
5-4-0 (55.6%) |
5-4-0 |
55.6% |
44.4% |
84.5 |
65.4 |
+19.1 |
|
4 |
4-0 (100.0%) |
1-0-0 (100.0%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
77.3 |
50.5 |
+26.8 |
|
4 |
4-0 (100.0%) |
2-2-0 (50.0%) |
3-1-0 |
75.0% |
25.0% |
87.5 |
71.5 |
+16.0 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|