|
Welcome:
Login to StatFox |
Register |
Login to FoxSheets
|
The Leading Logic In Sports Handicapping |
|
                 |
|
|
|
|

 |
WASHINGTON ST Cougars 8-5 |
 |
|
|
|
|
PAC 10 Standings for the 2008-09 Season |
|
|
All |
ATS |
Scoring |
Home/Away |
|
STANFORD |
11 |
1 |
0.917 |
8 |
3 |
0 |
72.7% |
77.3 |
65.8 |
8-1 |
3-0 |
|
CALIFORNIA |
13 |
2 |
0.867 |
9 |
2 |
1 |
81.8% |
78.3 |
64.1 |
11-0 |
2-2 |
|
ARIZONA ST |
12 |
2 |
0.857 |
6 |
4 |
0 |
60.0% |
76.1 |
59.8 |
6-0 |
6-2 |
|
UCLA |
12 |
2 |
0.857 |
6 |
7 |
0 |
46.2% |
77.1 |
58.2 |
9-0 |
3-2 |
|
WASHINGTON |
10 |
3 |
0.769 |
8 |
3 |
0 |
72.7% |
76.8 |
63.5 |
9-0 |
1-3 |
|
USC |
10 |
4 |
0.714 |
6 |
6 |
0 |
50.0% |
72.0 |
61.6 |
8-0 |
2-4 |
|
ARIZONA |
9 |
5 |
0.643 |
5 |
8 |
1 |
38.5% |
71.2 |
64.9 |
6-1 |
3-4 |
|
WASHINGTON ST |
8 |
5 |
0.615 |
4 |
7 |
0 |
36.4% |
59.2 |
50.8 |
5-3 |
3-2 |
|
OREGON ST |
6 |
6 |
0.500 |
4 |
4 |
0 |
50.0% |
62.6 |
61.6 |
5-3 |
1-3 |
|
OREGON |
6 |
8 |
0.429 |
5 |
8 |
0 |
38.5% |
73.9 |
77.4 |
4-4 |
2-4 |
|
|
Current Injuries |
|
No significant injuries. |
|
|
| Last 20 Games for the 2008-09 Season |
| Last 20 Games |
All Games YTD
|
|
January 2009 |
|
1-3-09 |
vs WASHINGTON |
-2.5 |
120 |
48-68 |
L |
L |
Un |
41.3% |
20.0% |
88.9% |
20 |
48.1% |
54.5% |
85.7% |
36 |
|
December 2008 |
|
12-27-08 |
at LSU |
+4.5 |
116 |
52-64 |
L |
L |
P |
43.8% |
37.5% |
87.5% |
33 |
38.9% |
45.0% |
86.7% |
28 |
|
12-21-08 |
at IDAHO |
-11 |
116 |
55-41 |
W |
W |
Un |
46.3% |
25.0% |
50.0% |
37 |
31.4% |
27.8% |
100.0% |
28 |
|
12-13-08 |
vs MONTANA ST |
-15.5 |
117 |
70-51 |
W |
W |
Ov |
58.3% |
50.0% |
66.7% |
36 |
32.7% |
26.7% |
88.2% |
20 |
|
12-10-08 |
vs GONZAGA |
+5.5 |
118 |
52-74 |
L |
L |
Ov |
32.7% |
10.5% |
84.2% |
33 |
47.5% |
43.5% |
85.7% |
35 |
|
12-6-08 |
vs BAYLOR |
-3 |
128.5 |
52-58 |
L |
L |
Un |
37.8% |
42.9% |
63.2% |
26 |
40.0% |
35.7% |
84.0% |
30 |
|
12-2-08 |
vs IDAHO ST |
-20.5 |
114.5 |
60-41 |
W |
L |
Un |
46.7% |
27.8% |
76.5% |
36 |
34.1% |
23.5% |
53.8% |
24 |
|
November 2008 |
|
11-29-08 |
vs PITTSBURGH |
+6 |
125.5 |
43-57 |
L |
L |
Un |
35.4% |
33.3% |
75.0% |
29 |
35.4% |
23.1% |
74.1% |
34 |
|
11-28-08 |
vs MISSISSIPPI ST |
-3.5 |
119.5 |
63-52 |
W |
W |
Un |
43.1% |
15.4% |
73.3% |
35 |
32.6% |
42.9% |
69.6% |
31 |
|
11-25-08 |
vs CANISIUS |
-20 |
117.5 |
67-41 |
W |
W |
Un |
42.4% |
26.1% |
68.8% |
44 |
30.8% |
33.3% |
50.0% |
27 |
|
11-21-08 |
vs SACRAMENTO ST |
-28 |
116 |
76-55 |
W |
L |
Ov |
47.5% |
51.7% |
62.5% |
29 |
46.8% |
44.4% |
75.0% |
28 |
|
11-18-08 |
vs FARLEIGH DICKINSON |
NL |
NL |
55-33 |
W |
- |
- |
41.5% |
22.2% |
77.8% |
39 |
21.6% |
9.1% |
50.0% |
37 |
|
11-15-08 |
vs MISS VALLEY ST |
NL |
NL |
76-25 |
W |
- |
- |
55.3% |
46.2% |
75.0% |
53 |
16.7% |
12.5% |
55.6% |
19 |
|
|
Game Situation Report for the 2008-09 Season Season |
|
13 |
8-5 (61.5%) |
4-7-0 (36.4%) |
3-7-1 |
30.0% |
70.0% |
59.2 |
50.8 |
+8.4 |
|
8 |
5-3 (62.5%) |
1-5-0 (16.7%) |
2-4-0 |
33.3% |
66.7% |
60.8 |
49.4 |
+11.4 |
|
2 |
1-1 (50.0%) |
1-1-0 (50.0%) |
0-1-1 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
53.5 |
52.5 |
+1.0 |
|
3 |
2-1 (66.7%) |
2-1-0 (66.7%) |
1-2-0 |
33.3% |
66.7% |
58.7 |
53.3 |
+5.3 |
|
2 |
1-1 (50.0%) |
1-1-0 (50.0%) |
0-2-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
53.0 |
54.5 |
-1.5 |
|
1 |
0-1 (0.0%) |
0-1-0 (0.0%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
48.0 |
68.0 |
-20.0 |
|
12 |
8-4 (66.7%) |
4-6-0 (40.0%) |
3-6-1 |
33.3% |
66.7% |
60.1 |
49.3 |
+10.8 |
|
8 |
6-2 (75.0%) |
4-4-0 (50.0%) |
2-6-0 |
25.0% |
75.0% |
61.4 |
50.9 |
+10.5 |
|
3 |
0-3 (0.0%) |
0-3-0 (0.0%) |
1-1-1 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
49.0 |
65.0 |
-16.0 |
|
5 |
3-2 (60.0%) |
1-4-0 (20.0%) |
1-4-0 |
20.0% |
80.0% |
60.6 |
52.6 |
+8.0 |
|
1 |
0-1 (0.0%) |
0-1-0 (0.0%) |
1-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
52.0 |
74.0 |
-22.0 |
|
1 |
1-0 (100.0%) |
1-0-0 (100.0%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
55.0 |
41.0 |
+14.0 |
|
1 |
0-1 (0.0%) |
0-1-0 (0.0%) |
0-0-1 |
|
|
52.0 |
64.0 |
-12.0 |
|
1 |
0-1 (0.0%) |
0-1-0 (0.0%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
43.0 |
57.0 |
-14.0 |
|
5 |
5-0 (100.0%) |
2-2-0 (50.0%) |
2-2-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
64.8 |
46.4 |
+18.4 |
|
7 |
3-4 (42.9%) |
2-4-0 (33.3%) |
1-4-1 |
20.0% |
80.0% |
57.4 |
53.0 |
+4.4 |
|
8 |
5-3 (62.5%) |
3-4-0 (42.9%) |
1-5-1 |
16.7% |
83.3% |
57.9 |
50.1 |
+7.8 |
|
4 |
2-2 (50.0%) |
1-3-0 (25.0%) |
2-2-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
57.5 |
58.5 |
-1.0 |
|
4 |
2-2 (50.0%) |
2-2-0 (50.0%) |
0-3-1 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
53.3 |
53.5 |
-0.3 |
|
6 |
3-3 (50.0%) |
2-4-0 (33.3%) |
2-4-0 |
33.3% |
66.7% |
58.2 |
55.5 |
+2.7 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|