The Leader In Sports Handicapping
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Statistics for the 2002-03 Season Season |
|
Rushing |
Passing |
Turnovers |
Penalties |
|
20.5 |
37.8 - 159.1 |
4.2 |
231.6 |
31.8 - 18.7 |
58.7% |
7.3 |
12.4 |
1.3 |
0.5 |
6.2 |
54.5 |
29.63 |
18.3 |
42.2 - 166.6 |
3.9 |
172.1 |
28.7 - 15.5 |
53.9% |
6.0 |
11.1 |
1.2 |
1.3 |
7.8 |
62.6 |
30.37 |
|
Game Log for the 2002-03 Season Season |
Offensive Stats |
Defensive Stats |
|
Results |
Rushing |
Passing |
Rushing |
Passing |
8/31/2002 |
vs CONNECTICUT |
-31 |
NL |
24-16 |
W |
L |
- |
114 |
3.4 |
239 |
12.6 |
40 |
1.2 |
203 |
8.5 |
9/7/2002 |
vs STANFORD |
-9 |
51.5 |
34-27 |
W |
L |
Ov |
139 |
3.6 |
260 |
11.8 |
55 |
1.5 |
244 |
14.4 |
9/21/2002 |
at MIAMI |
+26 |
53.5 |
6-38 |
L |
L |
Un |
147 |
3.1 |
138 |
9.9 |
182 |
5.9 |
211 |
15.1 |
9/28/2002 |
vs C MICHIGAN |
-19.5 |
NL |
43-0 |
W |
W |
- |
195 |
5.7 |
330 |
11.4 |
154 |
3.7 |
88 |
7.3 |
10/10/2002 |
vs VIRGINIA TECH |
+8.5 |
46 |
23-28 |
L |
W |
Ov |
83 |
3.2 |
232 |
14.5 |
334 |
5.5 |
86 |
21.5 |
10/19/2002 |
vs NAVY |
-30 |
NL |
46-21 |
W |
L |
- |
189 |
4.6 |
280 |
15.6 |
380 |
5.8 |
66 |
13.2 |
10/26/2002 |
at PITTSBURGH |
+6 |
46 |
16-19 |
L |
W |
Un |
177 |
4.4 |
179 |
9.9 |
143 |
4.5 |
201 |
10.1 |
11/2/2002 |
at NOTRE DAME |
+10 |
43.5 |
14-7 |
W |
W |
Un |
107 |
3.2 |
77 |
8.6 |
122 |
2.8 |
235 |
11.8 |
11/9/2002 |
at W VIRGINIA |
+3.5 |
50.5 |
14-24 |
L |
L |
Un |
80 |
2.7 |
284 |
10.1 |
273 |
5.2 |
124 |
10.3 |
11/16/2002 |
vs SYRACUSE |
-7 |
49 |
41-20 |
W |
W |
Ov |
227 |
6.9 |
284 |
12.9 |
245 |
5.1 |
131 |
9.4 |
11/23/2002 |
at TEMPLE |
-7.5 |
NL |
36-14 |
W |
W |
- |
148 |
3.3 |
203 |
15.6 |
56 |
1.8 |
166 |
11.1 |
11/30/2002 |
vs RUTGERS |
-28 |
NL |
44-14 |
W |
W |
- |
313 |
6.4 |
163 |
16.3 |
80 |
1.8 |
151 |
8.9 |
12/26/2002 |
vs TOLEDO |
-4 |
58.5 |
51-25 |
W |
W |
Ov |
149 |
3.7 |
342 |
13.7 |
102 |
3.6 |
331 |
12.3 |
|
Game Situation Report for the 2002-03 Season Season |
13 |
9-4 (69.2%) |
8-5-0 (61.5%) |
4-4-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
30.2 |
19.5 |
+10.7 |
7 |
6-1 (85.7%) |
4-3-0 (57.1%) |
3-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
36.4 |
18.0 |
+18.4 |
5 |
2-3 (40.0%) |
3-2-0 (60.0%) |
0-4-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
17.2 |
20.4 |
-3.2 |
1 |
1-0 (100.0%) |
1-0-0 (100.0%) |
1-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
51.0 |
25.0 |
+26.0 |
1 |
1-0 (100.0%) |
1-0-0 (100.0%) |
1-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
51.0 |
25.0 |
+26.0 |
3 |
1-2 (33.3%) |
2-1-0 (66.7%) |
0-3-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
12.0 |
21.3 |
-9.3 |
10 |
8-2 (80.0%) |
6-4-0 (60.0%) |
4-1-0 |
80.0% |
20.0% |
35.6 |
18.9 |
+16.7 |
1 |
1-0 (100.0%) |
1-0-0 (100.0%) |
1-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
51.0 |
25.0 |
+26.0 |
13 |
9-4 (69.2%) |
8-5-0 (61.5%) |
4-4-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
30.2 |
19.5 |
+10.7 |
8 |
8-0 (100.0%) |
5-3-0 (62.5%) |
3-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
39.9 |
17.1 |
+22.8 |
5 |
1-4 (20.0%) |
3-2-0 (60.0%) |
1-4-0 |
20.0% |
80.0% |
14.6 |
23.2 |
-8.6 |
6 |
6-0 (100.0%) |
3-3-0 (50.0%) |
2-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
38.7 |
16.3 |
+22.3 |
1 |
0-1 (0.0%) |
1-0-0 (100.0%) |
1-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
23.0 |
28.0 |
-5.0 |
1 |
1-0 (100.0%) |
1-0-0 (100.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
36.0 |
14.0 |
+22.0 |
4 |
1-3 (25.0%) |
2-2-0 (50.0%) |
0-4-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
12.5 |
22.0 |
-9.5 |
|
|
|
| |
|