The Leader In Sports Handicapping
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Statistics for the 1994-95 Season Season |
|
Rushing |
Passing |
Turnovers |
Penalties |
|
19.0 |
47.2 - 200.9 |
4.3 |
147.9 |
17.2 - 9.5 |
55.6% |
8.6 |
15.5 |
0.6 |
0.6 |
5.1 |
44.7 |
29.83 |
20.2 |
38.3 - 162.2 |
4.2 |
234.5 |
32.3 - 18.4 |
56.9% |
7.3 |
12.8 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
6.1 |
58.7 |
30.17 |
|
Game Log for the 1994-95 Season Season |
Offensive Stats |
Defensive Stats |
|
Results |
Rushing |
Passing |
Rushing |
Passing |
9/3/1994 |
vs OKLAHOMA |
+8 |
44.5 |
29-30 |
L |
W |
Ov |
149 |
3.5 |
170 |
28.3 |
201 |
3.6 |
276 |
23.0 |
9/10/1994 |
at CINCINNATI |
-8.5 |
NL |
34-19 |
W |
W |
- |
257 |
4.3 |
104 |
14.9 |
124 |
4.0 |
206 |
10.3 |
9/17/1994 |
vs RUTGERS |
-11 |
NL |
37-36 |
W |
L |
- |
110 |
2.8 |
149 |
13.5 |
220 |
4.9 |
320 |
15.2 |
9/24/1994 |
at E CAROLINA |
-1.5 |
NL |
21-18 |
W |
W |
- |
236 |
4.6 |
130 |
10.8 |
54 |
1.9 |
280 |
13.3 |
10/1/1994 |
vs VIRGINIA TECH |
+5.5 |
42 |
28-20 |
W |
W |
Ov |
278 |
5.5 |
183 |
20.3 |
196 |
5.9 |
290 |
14.5 |
10/8/1994 |
vs PITTSBURGH |
-10 |
NL |
31-7 |
W |
W |
- |
414 |
6.2 |
204 |
17.0 |
88 |
3.4 |
145 |
12.1 |
10/22/1994 |
at TEMPLE |
-21 |
NL |
49-42 |
W |
L |
- |
202 |
5.1 |
334 |
19.6 |
119 |
3.5 |
392 |
12.3 |
11/5/1994 |
vs MIAMI |
+13.5 |
46.5 |
6-27 |
L |
L |
Un |
189 |
3.9 |
34 |
8.5 |
228 |
4.8 |
118 |
11.8 |
11/12/1994 |
at BOSTON COLLEGE |
+7 |
NL |
0-31 |
L |
L |
- |
29 |
0.8 |
128 |
11.6 |
243 |
5.4 |
162 |
13.5 |
11/19/1994 |
vs MARYLAND |
-9 |
NL |
21-16 |
W |
L |
- |
295 |
5.7 |
69 |
17.3 |
81 |
3.4 |
284 |
8.1 |
11/24/1994 |
at W VIRGINIA |
+2.5 |
44 |
0-13 |
L |
L |
Un |
51 |
1.6 |
122 |
10.2 |
230 |
4.5 |
107 |
15.3 |
|
Game Situation Report for the 1994-95 Season Season |
11 |
7-4 (63.6%) |
5-6-0 (45.5%) |
2-2-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
23.3 |
23.5 |
-0.3 |
6 |
4-2 (66.7%) |
3-3-0 (50.0%) |
2-1-0 |
66.7% |
33.3% |
25.3 |
22.7 |
+2.7 |
5 |
3-2 (60.0%) |
2-3-0 (40.0%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
20.8 |
24.6 |
-3.8 |
1 |
1-0 (100.0%) |
1-0-0 (100.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
21.0 |
18.0 |
+3.0 |
9 |
5-4 (55.6%) |
3-6-0 (33.3%) |
2-2-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
22.3 |
24.7 |
-2.3 |
6 |
4-2 (66.7%) |
3-3-0 (50.0%) |
2-1-0 |
66.7% |
33.3% |
25.3 |
22.7 |
+2.7 |
1 |
1-0 (100.0%) |
0-1-0 (0.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
21.0 |
16.0 |
+5.0 |
10 |
6-4 (60.0%) |
5-5-0 (50.0%) |
2-2-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
23.5 |
24.3 |
-0.8 |
6 |
6-0 (100.0%) |
3-3-0 (50.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
32.2 |
23.0 |
+9.2 |
5 |
1-4 (20.0%) |
2-3-0 (40.0%) |
2-2-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
12.6 |
24.2 |
-11.6 |
3 |
3-0 (100.0%) |
1-2-0 (33.3%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
29.7 |
19.7 |
+10.0 |
3 |
1-2 (33.3%) |
2-1-0 (66.7%) |
2-1-0 |
66.7% |
33.3% |
21.0 |
25.7 |
-4.7 |
3 |
3-0 (100.0%) |
2-1-0 (66.7%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
34.7 |
26.3 |
+8.3 |
2 |
0-2 (0.0%) |
0-2-0 (0.0%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
0.0 |
22.0 |
-22.0 |
|
|
|
| |
|