|
The Leader In Sports Handicapping
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Statistics for the 2000-01 Season Season |
|
|
Rushing |
Passing |
Turnovers |
Penalties |
|
| 16.8 |
37.8 - 130.5 |
3.4 |
179.6 |
29.4 - 16.3 |
55.4% |
6.1 |
11.0 |
1.5 |
0.7 |
7.7 |
58.7 |
30.27 |
| 18.1 |
39.7 - 136.8 |
3.4 |
204.9 |
28.0 - 15.4 |
54.9% |
7.3 |
13.3 |
0.9 |
1.4 |
6.4 |
63.6 |
29.73 |
|
|
Game Log for the 2000-01 Season Season |
Offensive Stats |
Defensive Stats |
|
|
Results |
Rushing |
Passing |
Rushing |
Passing |
|
9/2/2000 |
at NAVY |
+10.5 |
NL |
17-6 |
W |
W |
- |
231 |
4.0 |
188 |
11.1 |
73 |
2.4 |
75 |
12.5 |
|
9/9/2000 |
at MARYLAND |
+11 |
NL |
10-17 |
L |
W |
- |
104 |
2.9 |
339 |
13.6 |
100 |
2.8 |
154 |
14.0 |
|
9/16/2000 |
vs BOWLING GREEN |
-11 |
NL |
31-14 |
W |
W |
- |
127 |
3.3 |
272 |
11.3 |
26 |
0.9 |
256 |
18.3 |
|
9/23/2000 |
vs E MICHIGAN |
-16.5 |
NL |
49-40 |
W |
L |
- |
298 |
7.6 |
163 |
16.3 |
132 |
3.7 |
364 |
10.7 |
|
9/28/2000 |
vs W VIRGINIA |
+6 |
46 |
24-29 |
L |
W |
Ov |
143 |
5.7 |
154 |
8.6 |
152 |
3.8 |
242 |
13.4 |
|
10/7/2000 |
at VIRGINIA TECH |
+30 |
NL |
13-35 |
L |
W |
- |
-15 |
-0.5 |
131 |
10.1 |
214 |
3.8 |
162 |
11.6 |
|
10/14/2000 |
at RUTGERS |
-6 |
NL |
48-14 |
W |
W |
- |
202 |
3.5 |
254 |
12.1 |
108 |
4.0 |
243 |
12.8 |
|
10/21/2000 |
vs MIAMI |
+22 |
NL |
17-45 |
L |
L |
- |
122 |
2.8 |
135 |
7.9 |
152 |
4.2 |
205 |
17.1 |
|
11/4/2000 |
at BOSTON COLLEGE |
+9 |
NL |
3-31 |
L |
L |
- |
92 |
2.9 |
126 |
12.6 |
154 |
3.4 |
273 |
14.4 |
|
11/11/2000 |
vs SYRACUSE |
+10 |
43.5 |
12-31 |
L |
L |
Un |
119 |
3.7 |
44 |
7.3 |
224 |
3.9 |
62 |
15.5 |
|
11/18/2000 |
vs PITTSBURGH |
+8 |
46 |
0-7 |
L |
W |
Un |
12 |
0.4 |
170 |
9.4 |
170 |
3.8 |
218 |
12.1 |
|
|
Game Situation Report for the 2000-01 Season Season |
|
11 |
4-7 (36.4%) |
7-4-0 (63.6%) |
1-2-0 |
33.3% |
66.7% |
20.4 |
24.5 |
-4.1 |
|
6 |
2-4 (33.3%) |
3-3-0 (50.0%) |
1-2-0 |
33.3% |
66.7% |
22.2 |
27.7 |
-5.5 |
|
5 |
2-3 (40.0%) |
4-1-0 (80.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
18.2 |
20.6 |
-2.4 |
|
4 |
2-2 (50.0%) |
4-0-0 (100.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
22.0 |
18.0 |
+4.0 |
|
7 |
2-5 (28.6%) |
3-4-0 (42.9%) |
1-2-0 |
33.3% |
66.7% |
19.4 |
28.1 |
-8.7 |
|
11 |
4-7 (36.4%) |
7-4-0 (63.6%) |
1-2-0 |
33.3% |
66.7% |
20.4 |
24.5 |
-4.1 |
|
3 |
3-0 (100.0%) |
2-1-0 (66.7%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
42.7 |
22.7 |
+20.0 |
|
8 |
1-7 (12.5%) |
5-3-0 (62.5%) |
1-2-0 |
33.3% |
66.7% |
12.0 |
25.1 |
-13.1 |
|
2 |
2-0 (100.0%) |
1-1-0 (50.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
40.0 |
27.0 |
+13.0 |
|
4 |
0-4 (0.0%) |
2-2-0 (50.0%) |
1-2-0 |
33.3% |
66.7% |
13.3 |
28.0 |
-14.8 |
|
1 |
1-0 (100.0%) |
1-0-0 (100.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
48.0 |
14.0 |
+34.0 |
|
4 |
1-3 (25.0%) |
3-1-0 (75.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
10.8 |
22.3 |
-11.5 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
