|
|
1: PITTSBURGH 2: NY RANGERS | 5.5 +105 | 3.1 / 2.6 2.7 / 2.5 | 54-35 46-44 | +14.2 -13.2 | 38-47-4 39-45-6 | 2504 2818 | 11.0% 8.5% | 414 411 | 21.3% 15.8% | 2720 2343 | 0.0% 9.5% | 385 371 | 17.9% 16.7% |
|
|
|
| The power rating system is based on recent game results. The section should be used to compare the relative strength of the two teams involved. A power line is calculated using both teams ratings and home field advantage. Where the power line differs significantly from the current line, the team with the edge is indicated. |
|---|
|
|
|
| PITTSBURGH | FLEURY | 4.3 | 0, -157 | | | NY RANGERS | LUNDQVIST | 3.2 | 0, +157 | |
|
|
|
| All team trends listed below apply to the current game. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| in all games | 54-35 | +14.2 | 124-134 | +2.4 | 438-486 | -59.2 | 38-47 | 121-123 | 446-421 | | in a road game where where the total is 5.5 | 17-10 | +8.1 | 18-10 | +9.7 | 66-73 | -1.3 | 10-17 | 10-18 | 63-81 | | second half of the season | 34-17 | +16.2 | 78-68 | +24.8 | 254-280 | -23.8 | 21-26 | 69-67 | 265-231 | | vs. division opponents | 18-17 | -1.8 | 50-49 | +7.2 | 142-151 | -8.3 | 17-17 | 48-45 | 144-129 | | after a division game | 17-17 | -4 | 45-53 | -5.4 | 146-144 | +3.4 | 14-18 | 47-47 | 137-132 | | in the second round of the playoffs | 3-0 | +3.3 | 3-0 | +3.3 | 11-11 | +0.5 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 9-7 | | when leading in a playoff series | 5-0 | +5.3 | 5-0 | +5.3 | 11-10 | -0.7 | 2-3 | 2-3 | 10-7 | | after a win by 2 goals or more | 20-15 | +1.5 | 37-32 | +3.7 | 141-111 | +18.5 | 15-20 | 38-29 | 134-112 | | after scoring 4 goals or more in their previous game | 19-17 | -3.3 | 50-54 | -4.5 | 164-152 | -1.4 | 15-21 | 50-48 | 164-146 | | after a 3 game unbeaten streak | 10-8 | +0.7 | 22-15 | +5.6 | 75-57 | +6.6 | 7-11 | 19-18 | 63-60 | | when playing against a team with a winning record | 25-17 | +10 | 54-69 | +2.4 | 200-256 | -25.8 | 22-19 | 55-61 | 229-194 | | when playing against a team with a winning record in the second half of the season | 15-9 | +8.2 | 31-36 | +6.4 | 112-149 | -14.4 | 13-10 | 32-30 | 131-104 |
|
|
|
|
| in all games | 46-44 | -13.2 | 138-130 | -26 | 427-482 | -123.8 | 39-45 | 108-146 | 420-447 | | in a home game where where the total is 5.5 | 16-5 | +8.9 | 27-10 | +12.4 | 95-86 | -8.2 | 8-13 | 14-23 | 91-93 | | second half of the season | 26-25 | -8.2 | 77-73 | -17.6 | 226-268 | -76.1 | 22-26 | 59-84 | 218-248 | | vs. division opponents | 24-16 | +2.2 | 57-51 | -11.6 | 138-162 | -52 | 18-20 | 40-59 | 129-150 | | after a division game | 23-16 | +1.1 | 54-53 | -15.8 | 140-160 | -47.1 | 17-20 | 39-63 | 133-156 | | in the second round of the playoffs | 0-3 | -3.5 | 2-7 | -5.6 | 6-8 | -1.2 | 2-1 | 4-5 | 5-9 | | when trailing in a playoff series | 0-2 | -2.5 | 2-6 | -4.6 | 5-8 | -2.7 | 1-1 | 3-5 | 5-8 | | revenging a home loss versus opponent | 11-2 | +9.2 | 26-18 | +7 | 26-18 | +7 | 5-8 | 18-23 | 18-23 | | revenging a loss versus opponent | 19-15 | -1 | 55-53 | -10 | 55-53 | -10 | 14-19 | 40-62 | 40-62 | | after allowing 4 goals or more | 9-14 | -10.5 | 31-39 | -19.3 | 125-165 | -60.6 | 8-13 | 29-34 | 135-139 | | after a loss by 2 goals or more in their previous game | 11-10 | -1.6 | 31-23 | +3.9 | 126-131 | -15.3 | 8-11 | 23-27 | 122-125 | | after 3 or more consecutive losses | 4-3 | -0.1 | 16-18 | -5 | 55-51 | -1.6 | 3-4 | 12-20 | 54-48 | | when playing against a team with a winning record | 24-21 | +0.7 | 62-71 | -12.8 | 182-262 | -78.6 | 18-25 | 56-71 | 198-227 | | when playing against a team with a winning record in the second half of the season | 16-8 | +7.9 | 35-42 | -9.8 | 102-152 | -46.2 | 11-12 | 31-43 | 103-134 |
|
|
|
| Peformance statistics for each team in various situations are listed below. Categories where a team has performed poorly are denoted in red. Categories where a team has performed well are denoted in green. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 54-35-0 | +14.2 | 54-35 | +14.2 | 38-47 | 3.1 | 28.1 | 2.6 | 30.6 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 24-20-0 | +6.1 | 24-20 | +6.1 | 18-24 | 2.8 | 28.1 | 2.8 | 32.5 | | Last 5 Games | 5-0-0 | +5.3 | 5-0 | +5.3 | 2-3 | 3.8 | 29.4 | 1.8 | 29.0 | | Playoff Games | 7-0-0 | +7.3 | 7-0 | +7.3 | 3-4 | 4.0 | 33.7 | 1.7 | 28.7 | | vs. Division | 18-17-0 | -1.8 | 18-17 | -1.8 | 17-17 | 2.9 | 26.1 | 2.7 | 30.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 89 | 275 | 77 | 93 | 99 | 8 | 20 | 2504 | 11.0% | 414 | 88 | 21.3% | 478 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 44 | 123 | 34 | 43 | 42 | 5 | 13 | 1237 | 9.9% | 196 | 36 | 18.4% | 204 | | Team Stats (Last 5 Games) | 5 | 19 | 3 | 7 | 9 | 0 | 2 | 147 | 12.9% | 25 | 6 | 24.0% | 34 | | Team Stats (Playoffs) | 7 | 28 | 6 | 9 | 13 | 0 | 3 | 236 | 11.9% | 37 | 10 | 27.0% | 51 | | Team Stats (vs. Division) | 35 | 101 | 35 | 37 | 30 | 0 | 3 | 913 | 11.1% | 161 | 39 | 24.2% | 184 | | Stats Against (All Games) | | 228 | 67 | 84 | 69 | 8 | 9 | 2720 | 8.4% | 385 | 69 | 17.9% | 407 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | | 124 | 34 | 53 | 34 | 3 | 5 | 1432 | 8.7% | 194 | 41 | 21.1% | 223 | | Stats Against (Last 5 Games) | | 9 | 2 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 145 | 6.2% | 18 | 1 | 5.6% | 17 | | Stats Against (Playoffs) | | 12 | 2 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 201 | 6.0% | 26 | 2 | 7.7% | 23 | | Stats Against (vs. Division) | | 94 | 30 | 33 | 28 | 3 | 2 | 1052 | 8.9% | 173 | 32 | 18.5% | 173 |
|
|
|
|
|
| TY CONKLIN (All Games) | 33 | 31 | 1013 | 935 | 92.3% | 2 | 18-13 | +2.7 | 18-13-0 | +3 | 16-15 | | TY CONKLIN (Road Games) | 17 | 15 | 518 | 471 | 90.9% | 0 | 7-8 | -1.5 | 7-8-0 | -1 | 8-7 | | TY CONKLIN (vs. Division) | 10 | 9 | 322 | 291 | 90.4% | 0 | 5-4 | +0.5 | 5-4-0 | +1 | 7-2 | | TY CONKLIN (Last 4 Games) | 4 | 4 | 120 | 107 | 89.2% | 0 | 1-3 | -3.6 | 1-3-0 | -3 | 3-1 | | TY CONKLIN (Playoff Games) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0-0 | 0 | 0-0-0 | 0 | 0-0 | | PATRICK EHELECHNER (All Games) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0-0 | 0 | 0-0-0 | 0 | 0-0 | | PATRICK EHELECHNER (Road Games) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0-0 | 0 | 0-0-0 | 0 | 0-0 | | PATRICK EHELECHNER (vs. Division) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0-0 | 0 | 0-0-0 | 0 | 0-0 | | PATRICK EHELECHNER (Playoff Games) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0-0 | 0 | 0-0-0 | 0 | 0-0 | | MARC-ANDRE FLEURY (All Games) | 42 | 39 | 1110 | 1026 | 92.4% | 5 | 26-13 | +9.3 | 26-13-0 | +9 | 15-21 | | MARC-ANDRE FLEURY (Road Games) | 19 | 16 | 494 | 457 | 92.5% | 1 | 9-7 | +2.1 | 9-7-0 | +1 | 6-9 | | MARC-ANDRE FLEURY (vs. Division) | 19 | 19 | 562 | 522 | 92.9% | 3 | 11-8 | +2 | 11-8-0 | +1 | 8-10 | | MARC-ANDRE FLEURY (Last 4 Games) | 4 | 4 | 111 | 103 | 92.8% | 1 | 4-0 | +4.3 | 4-0-0 | +4 | 2-2 | | MARC-ANDRE FLEURY (Playoff Games) | 7 | 7 | 201 | 189 | 94.0% | 2 | 7-0 | +7.3 | 7-0-0 | +7 | 3-4 | | DANNY SABOURIN (All Games) | 24 | 19 | 596 | 539 | 90.4% | 1 | 10-9 | +2.1 | 10-9-0 | +3 | 7-11 | | DANNY SABOURIN (Road Games) | 16 | 13 | 420 | 385 | 91.7% | 1 | 8-5 | +5.6 | 8-5-0 | +6 | 4-8 | | DANNY SABOURIN (vs. Division) | 7 | 7 | 170 | 149 | 87.6% | 1 | 2-5 | -4.2 | 2-5-0 | -4 | 2-5 | | DANNY SABOURIN (Last 4 Games) | 4 | 3 | 102 | 92 | 90.2% | 0 | 2-1 | +1.6 | 2-1-0 | +2 | 2-0 | | DANNY SABOURIN (Playoff Games) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0-0 | 0 | 0-0-0 | 0 | 0-0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 46-44-0 | -13.2 | 46-44 | -13.2 | 39-45 | 2.7 | 31.3 | 2.5 | 26.0 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 26-18-0 | -5.2 | 26-18 | -5.2 | 19-23 | 2.7 | 33.5 | 2.3 | 24.7 | | Last 5 Games | 2-3-0 | -1.5 | 2-3 | -1.5 | 4-1 | 3.4 | 30.2 | 3.6 | 26.4 | | Playoff Games | 4-4-0 | -0.8 | 4-4 | -0.8 | 6-2 | 3.2 | 29.9 | 3.0 | 27.4 | | vs. Division | 24-16-0 | +2.2 | 24-16 | +2.2 | 18-20 | 2.7 | 30.9 | 2.2 | 25.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 90 | 239 | 82 | 71 | 74 | 12 | 15 | 2818 | 8.5% | 411 | 65 | 15.8% | 413 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 44 | 117 | 42 | 34 | 34 | 7 | 6 | 1472 | 7.9% | 203 | 32 | 15.8% | 206 | | Team Stats (Last 5 Games) | 5 | 17 | 6 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 151 | 11.3% | 20 | 3 | 15.0% | 29 | | Team Stats (Playoffs) | 8 | 26 | 7 | 9 | 10 | 0 | 3 | 239 | 10.9% | 31 | 5 | 16.1% | 47 | | Team Stats (vs. Division) | 40 | 110 | 33 | 36 | 34 | 7 | 9 | 1235 | 8.9% | 183 | 30 | 16.4% | 192 | | Stats Against (All Games) | | 223 | 57 | 88 | 66 | 14 | 15 | 2343 | 9.5% | 371 | 62 | 16.7% | 361 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | | 102 | 27 | 48 | 23 | 4 | 4 | 1088 | 9.4% | 161 | 27 | 16.8% | 166 | | Stats Against (Last 5 Games) | | 18 | 4 | 8 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 132 | 13.6% | 20 | 6 | 30.0% | 33 | | Stats Against (Playoffs) | | 24 | 5 | 11 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 219 | 11.0% | 37 | 9 | 24.3% | 41 | | Stats Against (vs. Division) | | 87 | 26 | 32 | 25 | 6 | 6 | 1026 | 8.5% | 163 | 24 | 14.7% | 138 |
|
|
|
|
|
| CHRIS HOLT (All Games) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0-0 | 0 | 0-0-0 | 0 | 0-0 | | CHRIS HOLT (Home Games) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0-0 | 0 | 0-0-0 | 0 | 0-0 | | CHRIS HOLT (vs. Division) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0-0 | 0 | 0-0-0 | 0 | 0-0 | | CHRIS HOLT (Playoff Games) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0-0 | 0 | 0-0-0 | 0 | 0-0 | | HENRIK LUNDQVIST (All Games) | 80 | 79 | 2041 | 1858 | 91.0% | 13 | 41-38 | -10.6 | 41-38-0 | -10 | 34-40 | | HENRIK LUNDQVIST (Home Games) | 43 | 42 | 1036 | 946 | 91.3% | 8 | 25-17 | -3.7 | 25-17-0 | -4 | 17-23 | | HENRIK LUNDQVIST (vs. Division) | 37 | 36 | 925 | 848 | 91.7% | 6 | 21-15 | -0.1 | 21-15-0 | 0 | 16-18 | | HENRIK LUNDQVIST (Last 4 Games) | 4 | 4 | 100 | 86 | 86.0% | 1 | 1-3 | -2.5 | 1-3-0 | -2 | 3-1 | | HENRIK LUNDQVIST (Playoff Games) | 8 | 8 | 218 | 195 | 89.4% | 1 | 4-4 | -0.8 | 4-4-0 | 0 | 6-2 | | AL MONTOYA (All Games) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0-0 | 0 | 0-0-0 | 0 | 0-0 | | AL MONTOYA (Home Games) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0-0 | 0 | 0-0-0 | 0 | 0-0 | | AL MONTOYA (vs. Division) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0-0 | 0 | 0-0-0 | 0 | 0-0 | | AL MONTOYA (Playoff Games) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0-0 | 0 | 0-0-0 | 0 | 0-0 | | STEPHEN VALIQUETTE (All Games) | 13 | 11 | 296 | 271 | 91.6% | 1 | 5-6 | -2.6 | 5-6-0 | -2 | 5-5 | | STEPHEN VALIQUETTE (Home Games) | 3 | 2 | 50 | 42 | 84.0% | 0 | 1-1 | -1.5 | 1-1-0 | -1 | 2-0 | | STEPHEN VALIQUETTE (vs. Division) | 4 | 4 | 99 | 95 | 96.0% | 0 | 3-1 | +2.4 | 3-1-0 | +2 | 2-2 | | STEPHEN VALIQUETTE (Last 4 Games) | 4 | 4 | 103 | 96 | 93.2% | 0 | 2-2 | +0.1 | 2-2-0 | 0 | 2-2 | | STEPHEN VALIQUETTE (Playoff Games) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0-0 | 0 | 0-0-0 | 0 | 0-0 |
|
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: PITTSBURGH 2.91, NY RANGERS 3.05 |
|
|
| Here are the most recent results and upcoming schedules for the two teams involved. Lines, total, game scores, results versus the spread, straight up and against the total are all displayed. |
|---|
|
|
|
| 4/6/2008 | at PHILADELPHIA | 0-2 | L | 0, -150 | L | 6 un | U | | 4/9/2008 | OTTAWA | 4-0 | W | 0, -200 | W | 5.5 un | U | | 4/11/2008 | OTTAWA | 5-3 | W | 0, -240 | W | 5 ov | O | | 4/14/2008 | at OTTAWA | 4-1 | W | 0, -125 | W | 5.5 un | U | | 4/16/2008 | at OTTAWA | 3-1 | W | 0, -165 | W | 5.5 un | U | | 4/25/2008 | NY RANGERS | 5-4 | W | 0, -145 | W | 5 ov | O | | 4/27/2008 | NY RANGERS | 2-0 | W | 0, -150 | W | 5.5 un | U | | 4/29/2008 | at NY RANGERS | 5-3 | W | 0, +130 | W | 5 ov | O | | 5/1/2008 | at NY RANGERS | |
|
|
|
|
|
| 4/4/2008 | NY ISLANDERS | 3-4 | L | 0, -300 | L | 5 un | O | | 4/6/2008 | at NEW JERSEY | 2-3 | L | 0, -105 | L | 5 un | P | | 4/9/2008 | at NEW JERSEY | 4-1 | W | 0, +100 | W | 4.5 ov | O | | 4/11/2008 | at NEW JERSEY | 2-1 | W | 0, +110 | W | 4.5 ov | U | | 4/13/2008 | NEW JERSEY | 3-4 | L | 0, -145 | L | 4.5 ev | O | | 4/16/2008 | NEW JERSEY | 5-3 | W | 0, -160 | W | 4.5 ov | O | | 4/18/2008 | at NEW JERSEY | 5-3 | W | 0, -120 | W | 5 un | O | | 4/25/2008 | at PITTSBURGH | 4-5 | L | 0, +125 | L | 5 ov | O | | 4/27/2008 | at PITTSBURGH | 0-2 | L | 0, +130 | L | 5.5 un | U | | 4/29/2008 | PITTSBURGH | 3-5 | L | 0, -150 | L | 5 ov | O | | 5/1/2008 | PITTSBURGH | |
|
|
|
| Listed below is a summary of the games results in recent Head-to-Head matchups. |
|---|
|
|
| PITTSBURGH is 33-29 (+5.9 Units) against the spread versus NY RANGERS since 1996 | | PITTSBURGH is 33-28-5 straight up against NY RANGERS since 1996 | | 34 of 63 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL since 1996. (Under=+2.6 Units) |
| |
| PITTSBURGH is 14-13 (+3.7 Units) against the spread versus NY RANGERS over the last 3 seasons | | PITTSBURGH is 14-13-0 straight up against NY RANGERS over the last 3 seasons | | 16 of 26 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons . (Under=+4.9 Units) |
|
|
|
|
|
| NY RANGERS is 18-13-2 straight up against PITTSBURGH since 1996 | | 16 of 33 games in this series have gone OVER THE TOTAL since 1996. (Over=-2.9 Units, Under=-0.0 Units) |
| |
| NY RANGERS is 9-4 (+2.3 Units) against the spread versus PITTSBURGH over the last 3 seasons | | NY RANGERS is 9-4-0 straight up against PITTSBURGH over the last 3 seasons | | 7 of 13 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons . (Under=+0.4 Units) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 4/29/2008 | PITTSBURGH | 5 | 0, +130 | | SU ATS | 17 | 10 | 3-2 | FLEURY | 39 | 36 | | | NY RANGERS | 3 | 0, -150 | 5 ov | Over | 39 | 6 | 5-0 | LUNDQVIST | 17 | 12 | | 4/27/2008 | NY RANGERS | 0 | 0, +130 | | Under | 26 | 0 | 6-0 | LUNDQVIST | 31 | 30 | | | PITTSBURGH | 2 | 0, -150 | 5.5 un | SU ATS | 32 | 4 | 5-1 | FLEURY | 26 | 26 | | 4/25/2008 | NY RANGERS | 4 | 0, +125 | | Over | 24 | 8 | 3-1 | LUNDQVIST | 26 | 21 | | | PITTSBURGH | 5 | 0, -145 | 5 ov | SU ATS | 26 | 9 | 5-1 | FLEURY | 24 | 20 | | 3/31/2008 | PITTSBURGH | 1 | 0, +135 | | Under | 22 | 2 | 4-0 | FLEURY | 27 | 25 | | | NY RANGERS | 2 | 0, -155 | 5.5 un | SU ATS | 27 | 4 | 5-2 | LUNDQVIST | 22 | 21 | | 3/30/2008 | NY RANGERS | 1 | 0, +110 | | Under | 27 | 2 | 8-1 | LUNDQVIST | 20 | 17 | | | PITTSBURGH | 3 | 0, -130 | 5.5 un | SU ATS | 20 | 6 | 4-1 | FLEURY | 27 | 26 | | 3/18/2008 | PITTSBURGH | 2 | 0, +125 | | Over | 24 | 4 | 1-0 | CONKLIN | 30 | 25 | | | NY RANGERS | 5 | 0, -145 | 5.5 un | SU ATS | 30 | 7 | 2-1 | LUNDQVIST | 24 | 22 | | 1/14/2008 | NY RANGERS | 1 | 0, +120 | | Under | 44 | 2 | 6-1 | LUNDQVIST | 22 | 19 | | | PITTSBURGH | 4 | 0, -140 | 5.5 un | SU ATS | 23 | 7 | 5-2 | CONKLIN | 44 | 43 | | 12/18/2007 | PITTSBURGH | 0 | 0, +125 | | Under | 18 | 0 | 5-0 | SABOURIN | 31 | 27 | | | NY RANGERS | 4 | 0, -145 | 5.5 un | SU ATS | 31 | 8 | 7-2 | LUNDQVIST | 18 | 18 | | 11/17/2007 | NY RANGERS | 4 | 0, +100 | | SU ATS | 26 | 8 | 6-1 | LUNDQVIST | 23 | 20 | | | PITTSBURGH | 3 | 0, -120 | 5.5 un | Over | 23 | 5 | 2-0 | FLEURY | 26 | 22 | | 11/8/2007 | PITTSBURGH | 2 | 0, +155 | | Over | 28 | 4 | 6-1 | FLEURY | 39 | 35 | | | NY RANGERS | 4 | 0, -175 | 5.5 ov | SU ATS | 39 | 7 | 7-2 | LUNDQVIST | 28 | 26 | | 10/23/2007 | NY RANGERS | 0 | 0, +120 | | Under | 36 | 0 | 4-0 | LUNDQVIST | 22 | 21 | | | PITTSBURGH | 1 | 0, -140 | 6 ev | SU ATS | 22 | 2 | 5-1 | FLEURY | 36 | 36 | | 4/7/2007 | NY RANGERS | 1 | 0, +145 | | Under | 29 | 2 | 4-0 | LUNDQVIST | 30 | 28 | | | PITTSBURGH | 2 | 0, -165 | 6 ov | SU ATS | 30 | 4 | 6-2 | FLEURY | 29 | 28 | | 3/19/2007 | PITTSBURGH | 1 | 0, +125 | | Under | 22 | 2 | 4-0 | THIBAULT | 42 | 40 | | | NY RANGERS | 2 | 0, -145 | 6 ev | SU ATS | 42 | 4 | 5-0 | LUNDQVIST | 22 | 21 | | 3/10/2007 | NY RANGERS | 2 | 0, +125 | | Under | 28 | 3 | 5-0 | LUNDQVIST | 23 | 20 | | | PITTSBURGH | 3 | 0, -145 | 6 ev | SU ATS | 23 | 5 | 9-2 | FLEURY | 28 | 26 | | 3/1/2007 | PITTSBURGH | 4 | 0, +105 | | SU ATS | 33 | 4 | 4-1 | FLEURY | 35 | 32 | | | NY RANGERS | 3 | 0, -125 | 6 ov | Over | 35 | 6 | 4-1 | LUNDQVIST | 33 | 30 |
|
|
|
| Oddsmakers move a line in part because of one-sided public betting action on a side or total. They also move the line in reaction to wise guys selections. Either way, this section attempts to uncover whether the wise guys and public have a read on a given team. It summarizes both line and total movements. As a general rule, follow the line or total movement when percentages exceed 57% and go against it when they are below 43%. |
|---|
|
|
|
| [LW] Gary Roberts is "?" Tuesday vs NY Rangers. - Groin - 04/27/08 | |
| No significant injuries. |
|
|