The Leader In Sports Handicapping
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AKRON Zips23-13 |
|
|
Upcoming Games for the 2008-2009 Season |
|
|
Mid-American Standings for the 2008-2009 Season |
EAST Division |
|
All |
ATS |
Scoring |
Home/Away |
AKRON |
23 |
13 |
0.639 |
17 |
13 |
1 |
56.7% |
66.8 |
60.3 |
11-3 |
12-10 |
BUFFALO |
21 |
12 |
0.636 |
15 |
16 |
1 |
48.4% |
65.3 |
63.0 |
9-4 |
12-8 |
BOWLING GREEN |
19 |
14 |
0.576 |
19 |
10 |
0 |
65.5% |
64.4 |
61.2 |
10-4 |
9-10 |
MIAMI OHIO |
17 |
13 |
0.567 |
14 |
13 |
1 |
51.9% |
61.6 |
58.9 |
9-2 |
8-11 |
KENT ST |
19 |
15 |
0.559 |
11 |
20 |
0 |
35.5% |
68.9 |
64.7 |
13-3 |
6-12 |
OHIO U |
15 |
17 |
0.469 |
13 |
15 |
1 |
46.4% |
64.8 |
65.0 |
11-2 |
4-15 |
|
Current Injuries |
No significant injuries. |
|
|
Last 20 Games for the 2008-2009 Season |
Last 20 Games |
All Games YTD
|
March 2009 |
3-19-09 |
vs GONZAGA |
+13.5 |
133 |
64-77 |
L |
W |
Ov |
36.8% |
40.0% |
66.7% |
30 |
52.3% |
33.3% |
83.9% |
38 |
3-14-09 |
vs BUFFALO |
-2 |
122.5 |
65-53 |
W |
W |
Un |
55.3% |
57.1% |
55.6% |
27 |
36.7% |
18.8% |
60.9% |
34 |
3-13-09 |
vs BOWLING GREEN |
-3.5 |
119.5 |
63-55 |
W |
W |
Un |
43.2% |
38.9% |
78.3% |
43 |
33.9% |
30.4% |
66.7% |
24 |
3-12-09 |
vs MIAMI OHIO |
+1 |
114 |
73-63 |
W |
W |
Ov |
38.3% |
50.0% |
68.2% |
40 |
39.0% |
36.4% |
82.1% |
28 |
3-10-09 |
vs TOLEDO |
-13 |
118 |
93-92 |
W |
L |
Ov |
37.3% |
32.4% |
62.5% |
48 |
47.3% |
23.5% |
75.0% |
46 |
3-8-09 |
at KENT ST |
+3 |
125.5 |
63-67 |
L |
L |
Ov |
38.0% |
33.3% |
77.3% |
31 |
41.1% |
22.2% |
63.0% |
43 |
3-5-09 |
vs OHIO U |
-9 |
126.5 |
60-51 |
W |
P |
Un |
37.3% |
25.0% |
76.2% |
33 |
46.5% |
0.0% |
78.6% |
25 |
3-1-09 |
vs BOWLING GREEN |
-10 |
123.5 |
46-50 |
L |
L |
Un |
30.0% |
23.8% |
84.6% |
31 |
42.9% |
27.8% |
27.3% |
34 |
February 2009 |
2-26-09 |
at BUFFALO |
+2 |
126 |
62-57 |
W |
W |
Un |
52.3% |
36.4% |
66.7% |
29 |
41.2% |
26.3% |
76.9% |
27 |
2-21-09 |
at VALPARAISO |
-5 |
123.5 |
66-74 |
L |
L |
Ov |
48.8% |
33.3% |
72.0% |
25 |
51.1% |
33.3% |
64.9% |
32 |
2-18-09 |
vs MIAMI OHIO |
-4 |
119 |
53-44 |
W |
W |
Un |
40.0% |
17.6% |
63.6% |
33 |
27.7% |
20.0% |
83.3% |
32 |
2-15-09 |
at N ILLINOIS |
-11.5 |
132.5 |
79-83 |
L |
L |
Ov |
42.0% |
31.8% |
87.5% |
35 |
47.9% |
40.0% |
66.0% |
37 |
2-11-09 |
vs BALL ST |
-15 |
118 |
63-55 |
W |
L |
P |
37.5% |
28.6% |
75.0% |
35 |
38.9% |
46.7% |
60.0% |
31 |
2-8-09 |
vs W MICHIGAN |
-11 |
122.5 |
87-63 |
W |
W |
Ov |
55.9% |
50.0% |
56.0% |
30 |
41.3% |
33.3% |
70.4% |
30 |
2-3-09 |
at E MICHIGAN |
-9.5 |
117.5 |
78-41 |
W |
W |
Ov |
45.8% |
40.0% |
73.7% |
35 |
32.7% |
23.1% |
40.0% |
37 |
January 2009 |
1-31-09 |
vs C MICHIGAN |
-13 |
128 |
64-43 |
W |
W |
Un |
51.2% |
37.5% |
65.4% |
32 |
32.6% |
28.6% |
46.4% |
31 |
1-28-09 |
at TOLEDO |
-6 |
123 |
70-61 |
W |
W |
Ov |
48.1% |
36.4% |
80.0% |
34 |
46.8% |
28.6% |
72.2% |
24 |
1-26-09 |
at YOUNGSTOWN ST |
-5 |
129 |
67-53 |
W |
W |
Un |
35.1% |
31.6% |
80.8% |
41 |
32.7% |
26.3% |
50.0% |
40 |
1-24-09 |
vs KENT ST |
-4 |
126 |
68-54 |
W |
W |
Un |
44.2% |
21.7% |
70.8% |
34 |
33.9% |
28.6% |
55.6% |
41 |
1-20-09 |
at OHIO U |
+3.5 |
128 |
65-70 |
L |
L |
Ov |
41.7% |
24.0% |
64.3% |
36 |
41.2% |
35.3% |
68.8% |
39 |
|
Game Situation Report for the 2008-2009 Season Season |
36 |
23-13 (63.9%) |
17-13-1 (56.7%) |
12-16-1 |
42.9% |
57.1% |
66.8 |
60.3 |
+6.4 |
14 |
11-3 (78.6%) |
4-5-1 (44.4%) |
1-8-1 |
11.1% |
88.9% |
65.4 |
53.5 |
+11.9 |
16 |
8-8 (50.0%) |
9-6-0 (60.0%) |
8-6-0 |
57.1% |
42.9% |
67.0 |
63.3 |
+3.7 |
6 |
4-2 (66.7%) |
4-2-0 (66.7%) |
3-2-0 |
60.0% |
40.0% |
69.2 |
68.2 |
+1.0 |
4 |
4-0 (100.0%) |
3-1-0 (75.0%) |
2-2-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
73.5 |
65.8 |
+7.8 |
1 |
0-1 (0.0%) |
1-0-0 (100.0%) |
1-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
64.0 |
77.0 |
-13.0 |
20 |
14-6 (70.0%) |
11-8-1 (57.9%) |
8-11-1 |
42.1% |
57.9% |
66.3 |
59.1 |
+7.3 |
16 |
9-7 (56.3%) |
6-5-0 (54.5%) |
4-5-0 |
44.4% |
55.6% |
67.3 |
61.9 |
+5.4 |
19 |
14-5 (73.7%) |
10-8-1 (55.6%) |
6-11-1 |
35.3% |
64.7% |
66.9 |
58.1 |
+8.8 |
12 |
4-8 (33.3%) |
7-5-0 (58.3%) |
6-5-0 |
54.5% |
45.5% |
61.6 |
66.8 |
-5.2 |
9 |
7-2 (77.8%) |
4-4-1 (50.0%) |
1-7-1 |
12.5% |
87.5% |
62.0 |
52.1 |
+9.9 |
1 |
0-1 (0.0%) |
0-1-0 (0.0%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
50.0 |
54.0 |
-4.0 |
6 |
4-2 (66.7%) |
4-2-0 (66.7%) |
4-2-0 |
66.7% |
33.3% |
72.5 |
60.8 |
+11.7 |
9 |
3-6 (33.3%) |
5-4-0 (55.6%) |
4-4-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
61.3 |
67.4 |
-6.1 |
3 |
3-0 (100.0%) |
2-0-0 (100.0%) |
0-2-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
71.0 |
49.7 |
+21.3 |
4 |
4-0 (100.0%) |
3-1-0 (75.0%) |
3-1-0 |
75.0% |
25.0% |
75.8 |
67.3 |
+8.5 |
15 |
7-8 (46.7%) |
6-8-0 (42.9%) |
5-7-1 |
41.7% |
58.3% |
62.4 |
59.7 |
+2.7 |
14 |
9-5 (64.3%) |
6-4-1 (60.0%) |
4-6-0 |
40.0% |
60.0% |
67.9 |
61.2 |
+6.7 |
23 |
12-11 (52.2%) |
13-9-0 (59.1%) |
11-8-1 |
57.9% |
42.1% |
65.9 |
62.6 |
+3.3 |
12 |
10-2 (83.3%) |
4-3-1 (57.1%) |
1-7-0 |
12.5% |
87.5% |
69.3 |
57.2 |
+12.1 |
16 |
10-6 (62.5%) |
8-6-0 (57.1%) |
6-7-1 |
46.2% |
53.8% |
66.0 |
58.4 |
+7.6 |
13 |
10-3 (76.9%) |
5-4-1 (55.6%) |
3-7-0 |
30.0% |
70.0% |
69.0 |
60.2 |
+8.8 |
|
|
|
| |
|