The Leader In Sports Handicapping
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MARYLAND Terrapins21-14 |
|
|
Upcoming Games for the 2008-2009 Season |
|
|
ACC Standings for the 2008-2009 Season |
|
All |
ATS |
Scoring |
Home/Away |
N CAROLINA |
34 |
4 |
0.895 |
18 |
19 |
0 |
48.6% |
89.8 |
72.0 |
14-1 |
20-3 |
DUKE |
30 |
7 |
0.811 |
16 |
18 |
2 |
47.1% |
77.5 |
65.9 |
16-1 |
14-6 |
WAKE FOREST |
24 |
7 |
0.774 |
15 |
12 |
0 |
55.6% |
81.0 |
70.7 |
14-1 |
10-6 |
CLEMSON |
23 |
9 |
0.719 |
12 |
14 |
1 |
46.2% |
78.3 |
68.0 |
13-3 |
10-6 |
FLORIDA ST |
25 |
10 |
0.714 |
18 |
10 |
1 |
64.3% |
68.3 |
64.9 |
13-3 |
12-7 |
BOSTON COLLEGE |
22 |
12 |
0.647 |
15 |
13 |
1 |
53.6% |
74.4 |
70.5 |
15-4 |
7-8 |
MARYLAND |
21 |
14 |
0.600 |
16 |
12 |
1 |
57.1% |
71.8 |
69.1 |
14-4 |
7-10 |
MIAMI |
19 |
13 |
0.594 |
13 |
13 |
1 |
50.0% |
72.7 |
66.3 |
12-4 |
7-9 |
VIRGINIA TECH |
19 |
15 |
0.559 |
13 |
16 |
0 |
44.8% |
72.6 |
70.7 |
10-6 |
9-9 |
NC STATE |
16 |
14 |
0.533 |
15 |
9 |
1 |
62.5% |
73.0 |
69.6 |
14-4 |
2-10 |
GEORGIA TECH |
12 |
19 |
0.387 |
11 |
16 |
0 |
40.7% |
71.2 |
71.5 |
9-8 |
3-11 |
VIRGINIA |
10 |
18 |
0.357 |
10 |
13 |
0 |
43.5% |
70.0 |
72.5 |
9-8 |
1-10 |
|
Current Injuries |
No significant injuries. |
|
|
Last 20 Games for the 2008-2009 Season |
Last 20 Games |
All Games YTD
|
March 2009 |
3-21-09 |
vs MEMPHIS |
+9.5 |
131.5 |
70-89 |
L |
L |
Ov |
43.5% |
35.7% |
57.9% |
27 |
58.5% |
52.6% |
77.3% |
35 |
3-19-09 |
vs CALIFORNIA |
+1 |
142 |
84-71 |
W |
W |
Ov |
49.2% |
37.5% |
66.7% |
36 |
42.4% |
29.2% |
73.7% |
35 |
3-14-09 |
vs DUKE |
+9 |
140 |
61-67 |
L |
W |
Un |
39.7% |
26.7% |
77.8% |
37 |
36.4% |
40.9% |
85.7% |
32 |
3-13-09 |
vs WAKE FOREST |
+6.5 |
147.5 |
75-64 |
W |
W |
Un |
43.6% |
37.5% |
80.8% |
44 |
29.7% |
12.0% |
70.8% |
40 |
3-12-09 |
vs NC STATE |
-2.5 |
140 |
74-69 |
W |
W |
Ov |
47.2% |
56.3% |
71.4% |
28 |
44.1% |
29.6% |
81.8% |
36 |
3-7-09 |
at VIRGINIA |
-2 |
140.5 |
63-68 |
L |
L |
Un |
40.9% |
22.7% |
66.7% |
27 |
45.7% |
42.9% |
83.3% |
36 |
3-3-09 |
vs WAKE FOREST |
+1.5 |
153 |
63-65 |
L |
L |
Un |
39.1% |
36.8% |
100.0% |
32 |
39.7% |
33.3% |
58.8% |
50 |
3-1-09 |
at NC STATE |
+4 |
144.5 |
71-60 |
W |
W |
Un |
48.2% |
47.6% |
87.5% |
24 |
50.0% |
26.3% |
64.3% |
32 |
February 2009 |
2-25-09 |
vs DUKE |
+6 |
146.5 |
67-78 |
L |
L |
Un |
48.0% |
37.5% |
64.0% |
28 |
43.9% |
42.1% |
71.4% |
39 |
2-21-09 |
vs N CAROLINA |
+12 |
163.5 |
88-85 |
W |
W |
Ov |
45.6% |
43.3% |
76.5% |
41 |
37.7% |
26.3% |
78.6% |
51 |
2-17-09 |
at CLEMSON |
+10.5 |
145.5 |
64-93 |
L |
L |
Ov |
38.3% |
40.0% |
66.7% |
33 |
57.8% |
46.2% |
77.8% |
37 |
2-14-09 |
vs VIRGINIA TECH |
-3.5 |
141.5 |
83-73 |
W |
W |
Ov |
48.1% |
38.9% |
92.3% |
29 |
47.3% |
38.1% |
61.9% |
31 |
2-8-09 |
at GEORGIA TECH |
+2.5 |
140.5 |
57-56 |
W |
W |
Un |
35.8% |
31.8% |
63.2% |
35 |
40.4% |
35.0% |
68.8% |
37 |
2-3-09 |
at N CAROLINA |
+21 |
159 |
91-108 |
L |
W |
Ov |
48.0% |
30.0% |
76.2% |
39 |
51.4% |
64.0% |
74.1% |
39 |
January 2009 |
1-31-09 |
vs MIAMI |
-1.5 |
140 |
73-68 |
W |
W |
Ov |
41.5% |
26.3% |
82.4% |
37 |
40.7% |
32.3% |
71.4% |
41 |
1-27-09 |
vs BOSTON COLLEGE |
-4.5 |
143 |
67-76 |
L |
L |
P |
40.8% |
17.6% |
60.0% |
37 |
48.1% |
50.0% |
75.0% |
34 |
1-24-09 |
at DUKE |
+15.5 |
142.5 |
44-85 |
L |
L |
Un |
28.1% |
16.7% |
50.0% |
38 |
42.5% |
48.0% |
57.9% |
56 |
1-20-09 |
vs VIRGINIA |
-9.5 |
141.5 |
84-78 |
W |
L |
Ov |
53.7% |
50.0% |
87.5% |
25 |
45.8% |
30.0% |
85.7% |
35 |
1-17-09 |
at FLORIDA ST |
+4 |
130.5 |
73-76 |
L |
W |
Ov |
38.6% |
27.3% |
68.4% |
44 |
42.6% |
26.1% |
72.0% |
37 |
1-14-09 |
at MIAMI |
+6 |
141.5 |
60-62 |
L |
W |
Un |
43.9% |
33.3% |
66.7% |
32 |
39.3% |
45.5% |
44.4% |
40 |
|
Game Situation Report for the 2008-2009 Season Season |
35 |
21-14 (60.0%) |
16-12-1 (57.1%) |
12-16-1 |
42.9% |
57.1% |
71.8 |
69.1 |
+2.7 |
18 |
14-4 (77.8%) |
5-6-1 (45.5%) |
6-5-1 |
54.5% |
45.5% |
75.7 |
65.6 |
+10.1 |
8 |
2-6 (25.0%) |
5-3-0 (62.5%) |
3-5-0 |
37.5% |
62.5% |
65.4 |
76.0 |
-10.6 |
9 |
5-4 (55.6%) |
6-3-0 (66.7%) |
3-6-0 |
33.3% |
66.7% |
69.7 |
70.1 |
-0.4 |
6 |
3-3 (50.0%) |
4-2-0 (66.7%) |
1-5-0 |
16.7% |
83.3% |
66.2 |
69.7 |
-3.5 |
2 |
1-1 (50.0%) |
1-1-0 (50.0%) |
2-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
77.0 |
80.0 |
-3.0 |
19 |
9-10 (47.4%) |
11-8-0 (57.9%) |
8-10-1 |
44.4% |
55.6% |
69.8 |
73.3 |
-3.5 |
16 |
12-4 (75.0%) |
5-4-1 (55.6%) |
4-6-0 |
40.0% |
60.0% |
74.1 |
64.2 |
+9.9 |
12 |
10-2 (83.3%) |
6-5-1 (54.5%) |
6-5-1 |
54.5% |
45.5% |
74.8 |
65.8 |
+8.9 |
17 |
6-11 (35.3%) |
10-7-0 (58.8%) |
6-11-0 |
35.3% |
64.7% |
67.9 |
75.1 |
-7.2 |
9 |
8-1 (88.9%) |
4-4-1 (50.0%) |
5-3-1 |
62.5% |
37.5% |
76.0 |
66.7 |
+9.3 |
3 |
1-2 (33.3%) |
1-2-0 (33.3%) |
1-2-0 |
33.3% |
66.7% |
72.7 |
76.0 |
-3.3 |
1 |
0-1 (0.0%) |
0-1-0 (0.0%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
63.0 |
68.0 |
-5.0 |
7 |
2-5 (28.6%) |
5-2-0 (71.4%) |
3-4-0 |
42.9% |
57.1% |
65.7 |
77.1 |
-11.4 |
3 |
1-2 (33.3%) |
2-1-0 (66.7%) |
0-3-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
65.0 |
70.7 |
-5.7 |
3 |
0-3 (0.0%) |
0-3-0 (0.0%) |
1-2-0 |
33.3% |
66.7% |
60.3 |
76.3 |
-16.0 |
9 |
5-4 (55.6%) |
3-5-0 (37.5%) |
5-2-1 |
71.4% |
28.6% |
76.3 |
76.2 |
+0.1 |
20 |
15-5 (75.0%) |
11-3-1 (78.6%) |
6-9-0 |
40.0% |
60.0% |
72.5 |
64.6 |
+7.9 |
21 |
11-10 (52.4%) |
9-6-1 (60.0%) |
5-11-0 |
31.3% |
68.8% |
71.7 |
69.2 |
+2.5 |
13 |
9-4 (69.2%) |
7-6-0 (53.8%) |
7-5-1 |
58.3% |
41.7% |
71.2 |
70.2 |
+0.9 |
16 |
8-8 (50.0%) |
7-6-1 (53.8%) |
8-6-0 |
57.1% |
42.9% |
74.4 |
75.4 |
-0.9 |
11 |
6-5 (54.5%) |
6-5-0 (54.5%) |
4-6-1 |
40.0% |
60.0% |
67.2 |
70.1 |
-2.9 |
|
|
|
| |
|