The Leader In Sports Handicapping
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N CAROLINA Tar Heels20-17 |
|
|
All Games YTD for the 2009-2010 Season |
Last 20 Games |
All Games YTD
|
April 2010 |
4-1-10 |
vs DAYTON |
+2.5 |
139 |
68-79 |
L |
L |
Ov |
44.1% |
38.1% |
53.3% |
33 |
47.5% |
35.5% |
62.5% |
41 |
March 2010 |
3-30-10 |
vs RHODE ISLAND |
+1.5 |
152.5 |
68-67 |
W |
W |
Un |
34.9% |
11.8% |
50.0% |
60 |
36.8% |
25.0% |
66.7% |
45 |
3-23-10 |
at UAB |
+4.5 |
137 |
60-55 |
W |
W |
Un |
41.5% |
21.4% |
65.0% |
40 |
28.8% |
31.6% |
73.1% |
38 |
3-20-10 |
at MISSISSIPPI ST |
+7.5 |
144.5 |
76-74 |
W |
W |
Ov |
48.5% |
35.7% |
70.0% |
41 |
41.4% |
37.9% |
71.4% |
32 |
3-16-10 |
vs WM & MARY |
-9 |
134 |
80-72 |
W |
L |
Ov |
49.1% |
35.3% |
69.2% |
35 |
41.9% |
37.2% |
100.0% |
33 |
3-11-10 |
vs GEORGIA TECH |
+4 |
144 |
58-62 |
L |
P |
Un |
33.3% |
12.5% |
71.4% |
46 |
42.9% |
26.3% |
56.3% |
37 |
3-6-10 |
at DUKE |
+14.5 |
145.5 |
50-82 |
L |
L |
Un |
33.3% |
20.0% |
65.4% |
28 |
45.6% |
38.1% |
95.7% |
37 |
3-2-10 |
vs MIAMI |
-4.5 |
144.5 |
69-62 |
W |
W |
Un |
40.4% |
33.3% |
73.9% |
51 |
34.8% |
23.5% |
66.7% |
27 |
February 2010 |
2-27-10 |
at WAKE FOREST |
+7 |
150.5 |
77-68 |
W |
W |
Un |
40.0% |
37.5% |
57.6% |
52 |
29.7% |
36.0% |
62.5% |
50 |
2-24-10 |
vs FLORIDA ST |
+2 |
139 |
67-77 |
L |
L |
Ov |
42.0% |
35.3% |
67.9% |
31 |
47.4% |
45.8% |
66.7% |
36 |
2-20-10 |
at BOSTON COLLEGE |
+3 |
143 |
67-71 |
L |
L |
Un |
39.1% |
12.5% |
66.7% |
39 |
40.3% |
35.3% |
84.6% |
43 |
2-16-10 |
at GEORGIA TECH |
+6 |
146.5 |
51-68 |
L |
L |
Un |
32.2% |
20.0% |
41.7% |
39 |
44.6% |
40.0% |
50.0% |
44 |
2-13-10 |
vs NC STATE |
-7.5 |
145.5 |
74-61 |
W |
W |
Un |
41.7% |
33.3% |
65.5% |
44 |
41.1% |
27.8% |
58.8% |
32 |
2-10-10 |
vs DUKE |
+5.5 |
155.5 |
54-64 |
L |
L |
Un |
34.5% |
26.3% |
56.3% |
42 |
31.9% |
50.0% |
61.1% |
51 |
2-7-10 |
at MARYLAND |
+6 |
156 |
71-92 |
L |
L |
Ov |
37.7% |
31.3% |
66.7% |
40 |
51.5% |
52.2% |
83.3% |
39 |
2-4-10 |
at VIRGINIA TECH |
+3.5 |
145.5 |
70-74 |
L |
L |
Un |
43.4% |
26.7% |
66.7% |
40 |
38.8% |
21.1% |
81.8% |
36 |
January 2010 |
1-31-10 |
vs VIRGINIA |
-8 |
146 |
60-75 |
L |
L |
Un |
35.7% |
40.9% |
50.0% |
35 |
51.9% |
41.2% |
77.8% |
30 |
1-26-10 |
at NC STATE |
-1.5 |
152.5 |
77-63 |
W |
W |
Un |
50.9% |
46.2% |
59.1% |
39 |
39.0% |
31.8% |
90.9% |
30 |
1-20-10 |
vs WAKE FOREST |
-6 |
158.5 |
69-82 |
L |
L |
Un |
36.6% |
23.1% |
73.3% |
38 |
50.0% |
56.3% |
72.2% |
42 |
1-16-10 |
vs GEORGIA TECH |
-6.5 |
156 |
71-73 |
L |
L |
Un |
37.9% |
41.2% |
83.3% |
41 |
43.1% |
46.2% |
73.3% |
36 |
1-13-10 |
at CLEMSON |
+5 |
153 |
64-83 |
L |
L |
Un |
44.3% |
25.0% |
70.0% |
38 |
47.5% |
26.9% |
90.0% |
30 |
1-10-10 |
vs VIRGINIA TECH |
-8.5 |
148.5 |
78-64 |
W |
W |
Un |
53.8% |
31.3% |
77.3% |
38 |
35.8% |
22.2% |
66.7% |
35 |
1-4-10 |
at COLL OF CHARLESTON |
-13.5 |
159.5 |
79-82 |
L |
L |
Ov |
38.0% |
16.7% |
70.6% |
56 |
43.4% |
40.6% |
50.0% |
36 |
December 2009 |
12-30-09 |
vs ALBANY |
-25.5 |
145.5 |
87-70 |
W |
L |
Ov |
50.0% |
36.4% |
63.0% |
41 |
40.6% |
30.0% |
69.2% |
38 |
12-28-09 |
vs RUTGERS |
-20 |
150.5 |
81-67 |
W |
L |
Un |
45.8% |
42.9% |
68.6% |
45 |
42.9% |
13.0% |
44.4% |
34 |
12-22-09 |
vs MARSHALL |
-13 |
159.5 |
98-61 |
W |
W |
Un |
47.9% |
63.6% |
79.3% |
53 |
35.9% |
22.2% |
25.0% |
34 |
12-19-09 |
vs TEXAS |
+7 |
152 |
90-103 |
L |
L |
Ov |
48.0% |
53.8% |
57.9% |
41 |
41.4% |
31.8% |
70.6% |
60 |
12-12-09 |
vs PRESBYTERIAN |
NL |
NL |
103-64 |
W |
- |
- |
54.1% |
30.4% |
72.7% |
48 |
41.0% |
39.1% |
71.4% |
26 |
12-5-09 |
at KENTUCKY |
+4 |
152.5 |
66-68 |
L |
W |
Un |
38.8% |
35.0% |
53.8% |
37 |
44.4% |
37.5% |
63.6% |
39 |
12-1-09 |
vs MICHIGAN ST |
-1.5 |
153 |
89-82 |
W |
W |
Ov |
57.9% |
50.0% |
60.0% |
39 |
43.0% |
10.0% |
75.0% |
39 |
November 2009 |
11-29-09 |
vs NEVADA |
-15 |
163.5 |
80-73 |
W |
L |
Un |
47.1% |
40.0% |
50.0% |
45 |
41.3% |
23.8% |
100.0% |
42 |
11-23-09 |
vs GARDNER WEBB |
NL |
NL |
93-72 |
W |
- |
- |
56.1% |
25.0% |
54.5% |
50 |
37.7% |
41.7% |
71.4% |
32 |
11-20-09 |
vs SYRACUSE |
-1 |
159.5 |
71-87 |
L |
L |
Un |
38.1% |
25.0% |
73.1% |
42 |
54.4% |
42.9% |
40.0% |
37 |
11-19-09 |
vs OHIO ST |
-1.5 |
147 |
77-73 |
W |
W |
Ov |
49.1% |
46.7% |
72.0% |
33 |
42.6% |
28.6% |
68.2% |
37 |
11-15-09 |
vs VALPARAISO |
-23 |
NL |
88-77 |
W |
L |
- |
56.1% |
40.0% |
62.1% |
42 |
43.3% |
44.4% |
70.0% |
23 |
11-11-09 |
vs NC CENTRAL |
-43.5 |
NL |
89-42 |
W |
W |
- |
59.3% |
38.5% |
73.7% |
46 |
25.5% |
44.4% |
55.6% |
24 |
11-9-09 |
vs FLA INTERNATIONAL |
-32.5 |
153.5 |
88-72 |
W |
L |
Ov |
55.7% |
30.8% |
84.2% |
44 |
36.8% |
34.8% |
82.4% |
29 |
|
Game Situation Report for the 2009-2010 Season Season |
37 |
20-17 (54.1%) |
13-21-1 (38.2%) |
11-22-0 |
33.3% |
66.7% |
74.5 |
71.9 |
+2.6 |
19 |
14-5 (73.7%) |
6-11-0 (35.3%) |
5-10-0 |
33.3% |
66.7% |
79.9 |
68.9 |
+10.9 |
12 |
4-8 (33.3%) |
5-7-0 (41.7%) |
3-9-0 |
25.0% |
75.0% |
67.3 |
73.3 |
-6.0 |
6 |
2-4 (33.3%) |
2-3-1 (40.0%) |
3-3-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
72.0 |
78.5 |
-6.5 |
5 |
3-2 (60.0%) |
2-2-1 (50.0%) |
2-2-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
76.6 |
67.2 |
+9.4 |
5 |
4-1 (80.0%) |
3-2-0 (60.0%) |
3-2-0 |
60.0% |
40.0% |
70.4 |
69.4 |
+1.0 |
17 |
5-12 (29.4%) |
5-11-1 (31.3%) |
2-15-0 |
11.8% |
88.2% |
66.3 |
71.8 |
-5.5 |
20 |
15-5 (75.0%) |
8-10-0 (44.4%) |
9-7-0 |
56.3% |
43.8% |
81.6 |
72.0 |
+9.6 |
19 |
14-5 (73.7%) |
8-11-0 (42.1%) |
6-11-0 |
35.3% |
64.7% |
79.2 |
70.4 |
+8.8 |
16 |
4-12 (25.0%) |
5-10-1 (33.3%) |
5-11-0 |
31.3% |
68.8% |
66.1 |
74.2 |
-8.1 |
15 |
12-3 (80.0%) |
6-9-0 (40.0%) |
4-9-0 |
30.8% |
69.2% |
80.1 |
68.9 |
+11.2 |
2 |
0-2 (0.0%) |
0-2-0 (0.0%) |
1-1-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
60.5 |
70.5 |
-10.0 |
2 |
1-1 (50.0%) |
1-1-0 (50.0%) |
1-1-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
78.0 |
72.5 |
+5.5 |
10 |
3-7 (30.0%) |
4-6-0 (40.0%) |
2-8-0 |
20.0% |
80.0% |
65.2 |
73.5 |
-8.3 |
1 |
0-1 (0.0%) |
0-1-0 (0.0%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
71.0 |
87.0 |
-16.0 |
4 |
3-1 (75.0%) |
2-2-0 (50.0%) |
3-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
83.3 |
68.3 |
+15.0 |
11 |
6-5 (54.5%) |
5-5-0 (50.0%) |
1-9-0 |
10.0% |
90.0% |
71.1 |
69.0 |
+2.1 |
21 |
11-10 (52.4%) |
6-13-1 (31.6%) |
7-12-0 |
36.8% |
63.2% |
74.9 |
73.4 |
+1.4 |
20 |
11-9 (55.0%) |
8-12-0 (40.0%) |
7-11-0 |
38.9% |
61.1% |
73.2 |
73.5 |
-0.3 |
16 |
8-8 (50.0%) |
5-8-1 (38.5%) |
3-11-0 |
21.4% |
78.6% |
75.4 |
70.0 |
+5.4 |
13 |
6-7 (46.2%) |
4-8-0 (33.3%) |
1-10-0 |
9.1% |
90.9% |
69.2 |
71.8 |
-2.7 |
20 |
11-9 (55.0%) |
9-9-1 (50.0%) |
7-11-0 |
38.9% |
61.1% |
76.1 |
70.4 |
+5.7 |
|
|
|
| |
|