The Leader In Sports Handicapping
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WI-MILWAUKEE - |
|
|
Last 20 Games for the 2002-2003 Season |
Last 20 Games |
All Games YTD
|
March 2003 |
3-20-03 |
vs NOTRE DAME |
+5 |
157 |
69-70 |
L |
W |
Un |
34.8% |
34.8% |
75.0% |
37 |
42.6% |
23.1% |
84.0% |
44 |
3-11-03 |
vs BUTLER |
-2 |
135 |
69-52 |
W |
W |
Un |
48.1% |
62.5% |
63.6% |
40 |
40.8% |
23.8% |
43.8% |
30 |
3-8-03 |
vs IL-CHICAGO |
-4.5 |
NL |
75-73 |
W |
L |
- |
40.8% |
28.6% |
78.4% |
35 |
39.7% |
46.7% |
66.7% |
40 |
3-1-03 |
at BUTLER |
+4.5 |
NL |
74-76 |
L |
W |
- |
47.4% |
50.0% |
92.9% |
31 |
54.7% |
44.0% |
53.8% |
24 |
February 2003 |
2-27-03 |
at WRIGHT ST |
-4 |
NL |
98-65 |
W |
W |
- |
53.8% |
36.0% |
82.6% |
48 |
38.2% |
35.0% |
72.7% |
23 |
2-22-03 |
at S ILLINOIS |
+5.5 |
149.5 |
64-66 |
L |
W |
Un |
42.1% |
40.0% |
66.7% |
40 |
46.6% |
37.5% |
54.5% |
29 |
2-15-03 |
at YOUNGSTOWN ST |
-7.5 |
NL |
86-61 |
W |
W |
- |
45.8% |
33.3% |
68.4% |
42 |
37.0% |
30.8% |
51.5% |
40 |
2-13-03 |
vs IL-CHICAGO |
-5.5 |
NL |
81-78 |
W |
L |
- |
51.8% |
39.1% |
60.9% |
35 |
47.6% |
54.5% |
63.2% |
37 |
2-10-03 |
vs WI-GREEN BAY |
-12.5 |
NL |
78-54 |
W |
W |
- |
46.3% |
41.2% |
60.9% |
29 |
33.3% |
31.3% |
72.2% |
43 |
2-8-03 |
vs CLEVELAND ST |
-16 |
NL |
86-69 |
W |
W |
- |
53.7% |
60.0% |
76.0% |
32 |
55.3% |
28.6% |
61.9% |
20 |
2-6-03 |
vs DETROIT |
-4 |
NL |
61-50 |
W |
W |
- |
44.7% |
22.2% |
68.2% |
38 |
37.3% |
21.4% |
64.3% |
25 |
2-1-03 |
at LOYOLA-IL |
-1 |
NL |
92-91 |
W |
P |
- |
56.7% |
46.2% |
44.4% |
31 |
44.3% |
26.3% |
86.5% |
43 |
January 2003 |
1-25-03 |
vs WRIGHT ST |
-11.5 |
NL |
74-59 |
W |
W |
- |
49.2% |
26.7% |
62.5% |
37 |
38.8% |
33.3% |
65.4% |
34 |
1-23-03 |
vs BUTLER |
PK |
NL |
69-65 |
W |
W |
- |
50.0% |
31.6% |
48.1% |
28 |
51.1% |
50.0% |
50.0% |
29 |
1-18-03 |
at WI-GREEN BAY |
-5 |
NL |
68-79 |
L |
L |
- |
37.7% |
30.0% |
68.4% |
29 |
50.0% |
33.3% |
67.7% |
47 |
1-14-03 |
at CHICAGO ST |
NL |
NL |
81-73 |
W |
- |
- |
50.9% |
35.0% |
71.4% |
35 |
44.8% |
35.7% |
61.5% |
41 |
1-11-03 |
vs YOUNGSTOWN ST |
-18.5 |
NL |
74-56 |
W |
L |
- |
43.8% |
31.6% |
76.5% |
30 |
38.6% |
20.0% |
76.9% |
32 |
1-9-03 |
at IL-CHICAGO |
+3.5 |
NL |
92-102 |
L |
L |
- |
49.2% |
37.5% |
85.2% |
25 |
45.3% |
37.5% |
84.4% |
47 |
1-4-03 |
at CLEVELAND ST |
-5 |
NL |
70-58 |
W |
W |
- |
45.0% |
44.4% |
61.5% |
37 |
45.8% |
20.0% |
84.6% |
24 |
1-2-03 |
at DETROIT |
+1.5 |
NL |
73-72 |
W |
W |
- |
55.1% |
52.2% |
58.3% |
25 |
52.6% |
53.3% |
36.4% |
31 |
|
Game Situation Report for the 2002-2003 Season Season |
32 |
24-8 (75.0%) |
17-8-1 (68.0%) |
0-3-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
77.1 |
69.9 |
+7.1 |
13 |
13-0 (100.0%) |
7-3-0 (70.0%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
77.2 |
64.8 |
+12.4 |
15 |
9-6 (60.0%) |
7-4-1 (63.6%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
79.1 |
75.3 |
+3.8 |
4 |
2-2 (50.0%) |
3-1-0 (75.0%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
69.0 |
66.5 |
+2.5 |
6 |
5-1 (83.3%) |
4-2-0 (66.7%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
72.8 |
66.3 |
+6.5 |
1 |
0-1 (0.0%) |
1-0-0 (100.0%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
69.0 |
70.0 |
-1.0 |
32 |
24-8 (75.0%) |
17-8-1 (68.0%) |
0-3-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
77.1 |
69.9 |
+7.1 |
17 |
15-2 (88.2%) |
11-5-1 (68.8%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
77.6 |
65.9 |
+11.6 |
8 |
2-6 (25.0%) |
5-3-0 (62.5%) |
0-2-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
74.9 |
79.4 |
-4.5 |
9 |
9-0 (100.0%) |
6-3-0 (66.7%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
77.6 |
63.4 |
+14.1 |
5 |
4-1 (80.0%) |
3-1-1 (75.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
82.8 |
70.8 |
+12.0 |
7 |
2-5 (28.6%) |
4-3-0 (57.1%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
75.7 |
80.7 |
-5.0 |
2 |
2-0 (100.0%) |
1-0-0 (100.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
82.5 |
70.0 |
+12.5 |
9 |
7-2 (77.8%) |
7-2-0 (77.8%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
76.4 |
64.6 |
+11.9 |
6 |
6-0 (100.0%) |
1-1-0 (50.0%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
79.2 |
70.5 |
+8.7 |
15 |
9-6 (60.0%) |
8-5-1 (61.5%) |
0-2-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
75.9 |
72.9 |
+2.9 |
24 |
17-7 (70.8%) |
13-5-1 (72.2%) |
0-3-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
77.4 |
70.4 |
+7.0 |
7 |
7-0 (100.0%) |
4-2-0 (66.7%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
76.7 |
66.4 |
+10.3 |
16 |
11-5 (68.8%) |
9-4-1 (69.2%) |
0-2-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
78.9 |
71.9 |
+6.9 |
8 |
8-0 (100.0%) |
5-1-0 (83.3%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
75.0 |
64.1 |
+10.9 |
|
|
|
| |
|